Attachment_13_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 254 KB Posted
- Attached to
- GAOA Statewide Radio Infrastructure Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140L3624R0011
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) related to a federal contract opportunity for the GAOA Maier Dam Reconstruction project. The PPQ requests information from an evaluator on the past performance of a contractor, including their relationship with the client, overall management, quality control, ability to meet the performance schedule, and whether any negative actions were taken. The evaluator is asked to provide an overall rating for the contractor's performance as well as comments.
The related federal contract opportunity is for the GAOA Statewide Radio Infrastructure project, which is a construction project being solicited by the Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Montana State Office. The solicitation is for the remediation of seven existing communications facilities across Montana, with an estimated contract value between $250,000 and $500,000. The procurement is set aside for small business concerns, and proposals are due by a specific date. The contract will be a firm fixed price, single award contract.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 27
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation No: 140L3624R0002 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: GAOA Maier Dam Reconstruction
Department of Interior Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)
U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management is considering [ ].
Your comments would be appreciated regarding this company’s past performance.
Firm Information Project Title:
Location:
Description:
Company Name: Contract Number:
Start Date: Completion Date:
Initial Amount: Final Amount:
Evaluator Evaluator Name: Company/Agency Name:
Address: POC Email:
Position Held or Function in Relation to Project:
Ratings Overview Rating: If the rating is Marginal or Unacceptable, please provide additional information in the appropriate block or in the remarks section of this form.
“O” Outstanding Performance greatly exceeded the contract requirements.
“A” Above Average Performance exceeded the contract requirements.
“S” Satisfactory Performance met the contract requirements.
“M” Marginal Performance met the minimum contract requirements but
Some material aspects of the contractor’s performance were less than satisfactory.
“U” Unacceptable Performance was poor and/or did not satisfy contract requirements.
Solicitation No: 140L3624R0002 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: GAOA Maier Dam Reconstruction
Questionnaire Please select the appropriate rating and provide supporting information for the following questions.
1. The relationship between the company and client’s/customer’s contract team:
O A S M U
2. Overall corporate management, integrity, reasonableness, and cooperative conduct:
O A S M U
3. Quality control: O A S M U
4. Ability to meet the performance schedule: O A S M U
5. Have any cure notices, show cause letters, letter of reprimand, suspension of payment, or termination been issued? If yes, please explain:
Yes No
6. Would you award another contract to the company being evaluated? If no, please explain: Yes No
7. Was the customer satisfied with the final product and services? If no, please explain: Yes No
8. Has the firm being evaluated been provided an opportunity to discuss or respond to any negative comments or performance ratings? If so, what were the results?
Yes No
9. Overall Rating O A S M U
10. Comments
Signatures Name Date:
| Project Title: |
| Location: |
| Description: |
| Company Name: |
| Contract Number: |
| Start Date: |
| Completion Date: |
| Initial Amount: |
| Final Amount: |
| Evaluator Name: |
| CompanyAgency Name: |
| Address: |
| POC Email: |
| Position Held or Function in Relation to Project: |
| undefined: |
| undefined_2: |
| undefined_3: |
| undefined_4: |
| undefined_5: |
| undefined_6: |
| undefined_7: |
| undefined_8: |
| undefined_9: |
| undefined_10: |
| undefined_11: |
| undefined_12: |
| undefined_13: |
| undefined_14: |
| undefined_15: |
| undefined_16: |
| undefined_17: |
| undefined_18: |
| undefined_19: |
| undefined_20: |
| Yes: |
| No: |
| Yes_2: |
| No_2: |
| Yes_3: |
| No_3: |
| Yes_4: |
| No_4: |
| undefined_21: |
| undefined_22: |
| undefined_23: |
| undefined_24: |
| undefined_25: |
| 10 Comments: |
| Date: |
| Text1: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .