Attachment - Past Performance Questionaire.docx
DOCX document 37 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Large-Tier Electrical Construction IDIQ
- Solicitation number
- 1333ND26RNB190031
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template document for the Large-Tier Electrical Construction IDIQ solicitation (1333ND26RNB190031) issued by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) under the Department of Commerce. The questionnaire is designed to collect information from offerors regarding their relevant experience and past performance on similar electrical construction projects.
The template does not specify detailed response requirements, evaluation criteria, or scoring methodology within the provided excerpt. As a questionnaire appendix, it serves as an evaluation tool to assess contractor qualifications for work on the NIST Gaithersburg, Maryland campus electrical construction IDIQ contract, which has a combined ceiling of $73,788,828 across all awardees over a 5-year ordering period. Contractors responding to this solicitation should anticipate providing detailed information about their experience with electrical systems ranging from low-voltage branch circuits (120-277V) through medium-voltage distribution (13.8kV), as well as experience with specialized equipment including transformers, switchgear, UPS systems, generators, DDC systems, and life safety/fire alarm systems to demonstrate capability for the representative task orders contemplated under the IDIQ contract.
View the file
Other files
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Questionnaire
PART I: FOR COMPLETION BY OFFEROR.
Instructions:
Offerors are required to complete all items set forth in this Part I for each reference and return the completed forms with the proposal.
Offerors are also required to coordinate with their identified references, supplying them with the completed Part I and blank Part II for completion, sufficiently in advance of the due date identified in Part II.
Name and address of individual/firm being evaluated:
Name of firm/agency for which the referenced work was performed:
| Description of firm/agency (check one): |
| Commercial |_| |
| Federal Government |_| |
| Local/state Government |_| |
Address of firm/agency:
Name, title, employer, and contact information for individual providing reference:
Contract number:
Period of performance:
Contract award date:
Contract amount:
| Contracting method: |
| Sealed bid |_| |
| Negotiated |_| |
| Contract type: |
| Firm Fixed Price (FP) |_| |
| FP Incentive |_| |
| FP Economic Price Adjustment |_| |
| Cost Plus Award Fee |_| |
| Cost Plus Fixed Fee-Completion |_| |
| Cost Plus Fixed Fee-Term |_| |
| Cost Plus Incentive Fee |_| |
| Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity |_| |
| Basic Ordering Agreement |_| |
| Requirements |_| |
| Labor Hour |_| |
| Time and Material |_| |
| Competition: |
| Competitive |_| |
| Non-competitive |_| |
| Prime Contractor? |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
Description of the contract work:
Relevance of the referenced contract to the current requirement:
PART II: FOR COMPLETION BY REFERENCE.
Instructions:
References are asked to complete all items set forth in this Part II and return the completed form no later than
Responses can be sent by any one of the following methods:
Fax:
E-mail:
Mail:
Background Information
Name of respondent:
Position and title:
Employer name:
Employer’s address:
| Contact information: |
| Telephone: |
| Fax: |
| e-mail: |
Basis of qualification to evaluate contractor’s performance:
Contract number:
Contract award date:
Contract completion date:
Contract amount:
| Was a subcontracting plan required? |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
Names of key contractor personnel:
Description of the contract work:
Evaluation
For each performance element identified below, references should evaluate performance of the firm or individual identified in Part 1 of this form. Where the reference lacks sufficient information to provide an evaluation for a particular performance element, this should be noted. Where any deficiency or unfavorable information is identified, the reference should identify any mitigating factors that may weigh in favor of the person/firm on whose behalf the reference is provided (i.e., problems due to causes outside the contractor’s control). An individual within your organization who is knowledgeable of the contractor’s day-to-day operations and overall performance should complete this questionnaire. However, that individual is encouraged to supplement their own knowledge of the contractor’s performance with the judgment of others within their organization, as applicable.
Date this questionnaire completed:
Please provide answers to the questions listed below. When responding to the questions listed, circle the letter that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation (see the “ratings” chart below for a description of each letter). For any neutral, marginal, or unsatisfactory rating, please provide explanatory narratives in the remarks block. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. If a question is not applicable, circle N/A. If you circle a Yes/No answer that is marked with an asterisk (*), please provide a corresponding explanation in the remarks block. If more space is required, use the back of the questionnaire or attach additional pages. Handwritten responses to this questionnaire are acceptable. However, if responses are handwritten, please print legibly.
Ratings
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Neutral |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many. Problems, if any, were negligible, and were resolved in a timely and highly effective manner. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some. There were few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner. |
| Performance met contract requirements. There were some minor problems, for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Contractor has no record of past performance, or the record is inconclusive. |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective. |
| Performance did not meet contractual requirements. There were serious problems, and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
PERFORMANCE ELEMENTS:
A. QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE
Rating
| 1. |
| Contractor’s ability to meet minimum quality standards specified for performance. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 2. |
| Contractor’s ability to effectively control the quality of services or products provided. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 3. |
| Contractor’s compliance with contractual terms and conditions. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 4. |
| Quality of products or services furnished. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 5. |
| Overall rating of contractor’s standard of workmanship. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 6. |
| Overall rating of contractor’s quality of service. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
B. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE (SCHEDULE)
Rating
| 1. |
| Contractor’s ability to meet specific response times and scheduled timeframes for completion of specific tasks. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 2. |
| Contractor’s responsiveness/timeliness for providing administrative reports/documents required by the contract. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 3. |
| Contractor’s adherence to delivery schedules. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 4. |
| Contractor’s timeliness in responding to emergency service requirements. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 5. |
| Overall rating of contractor’s responsiveness/timeliness. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
C. BUSINESS RELATIONS/CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
Rating
| 1. |
| Contractor’s ability to identify problems and potential problems, and promptly notify the Contracting Officer. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 2. |
| Contractor’s ability to correct problems and prevent or mitigate potential problems in a timely manner. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 3. |
| Contractor’s willingness to improve and correct noncompliance issues or concerns. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 4. |
| Contractor’s ability to use effective approaches and provide technical expertise and resources to solve contract problems. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 5. |
| Extent to which the contractor has demonstrated reasonable and cooperative behavior. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 6. |
| Contractor’s effectiveness in interfacing with the Contracting Officer, quality assurance personnel, and customers. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 7. |
| Contractor’s flexibility in satisfying the requirements of its customers. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 8. |
| Extent to which the contractor provided prompt and courteous service when responding to customer complaints. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 9. |
| Contractor’s ability to coordinate, integrate, and provide for effective subcontractor management. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 10. |
| Overall rating of customer satisfaction. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 11. |
| Overall rating of business relations. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
D. COST MANAGEMENT
(NOT APPLICABLE TO FIXED-PRICE CONTRACTS)
Rating
| 1. |
| Extent to which the contractor provided reliable, supportable cost estimates or proposals. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 2. |
| Extent to which the contractor met the proposed cost estimates. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
E. MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL
Rating
| 1. |
| Contractor’s ability to select and retain cooperative and effective key personnel, such as the project manager and quality control personnel. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 2. |
| Extent to which key personnel were knowledgeable about contractual requirements. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 3. |
| Contractor’s ability to meet appropriate staffing levels with qualified personnel. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 4. |
| Contractor’s ability to provide continuity of key personnel on the contract. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 5. |
| Contractor’s ability to replace key personnel in a timely fashion. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 6. |
| Contractor’s ability to effectively manage subcontractors. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 7. |
| Level of functional expertise of the contractor’s staff. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 8. |
| Overall rating of contractor’s management of key personnel. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
F. CONTRACTUAL CONSIDERATIONS
Answer/Rating
| 1. |
| If a subcontracting plan was required, extent to which contractor met applicable goals for small business participation. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 2. |
| Has an election ever been made not to exercise an option or continue relations due to contractor’s poor performance? |
| YES* |
| NO |
| 3. |
| Has a Contract Discrepancy Report ever been issued? |
| YES* |
| NO |
| 4. |
| Has a cure notice or show cause notice ever been issued? |
| YES* |
| NO |
| 5. |
| Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience? |
| YES* |
| NO |
Partially ________ Completely _________
| 6. |
| Are there any pending terminations? |
| YES* |
| NO |
| 7. |
| Overall rating of contractor’s performance under this contract. |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 8. |
| Would you hire this contractor again? |
| YES |
| NO* |
*REMARKS
Please use this remarks block to provide explanatory narratives for any neutral, marginal, or unsatisfactory rating as well as for any Yes/No answer that is marked with an asterisk (*). These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed.
PART 3: FOR COMPLETION BY PROPOSAL EVALUATOR:
If taken by phone, name and title of the person conducting the interview:______ _______________________________________________________Date:______
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .