Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 28 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Amendment 1333ND222QNB190089-0001 - General Construction Multiple Award Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contract. Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 1333ND22QNB190089
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFQ 1333ND22QNB190089
General Construction IDIQ Past Performance Questionnaire
Thank you in advance for filling out this questionnaire for the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). We understand that your time is valuable, and we appreciate your input. Your rating is essential in successfully evaluating your contractors past performance. The following information, once submitted, will be treated as confidential and will not be released.
Project Information Contractor
Project Title
Project Description
Project Location
| Project Cost |
| Awarded: |
Final:
Project Start Date
Project Completion Date
General Instructions Please complete the questionnaire utilizing the following guidance:
1. This form should be completed by the Government Contracting Officer or the Corporate Official who oversaw the contractor’s performance.
2. Handwriting responses are sufficient.
3. Please provide an adjectival rating for each question (adjectival ratings are defined below).
4. Please provide comments to substantiate the assigned rating.
5. Please sign, date, and email completed questionnaires to Amos.Jackson@nist.gov with a curtesy copy to the requesting firm using the email subject line:
“PPQ – 1333ND22QNB190089”
NOTE: The requesting firm (Offeror) must submit completed questionnaires to the Government for review in accordance with the proposal instructions outlined in the RFQ/RFP.
Adjectival Ratings The following adjectival ratings and definitions shall be used to evaluate the contractor’s performance:
| RATING |
| DEFINITION |
| Exceptional (E) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective action taken by the Contractor was highly effective. |
| Very Good (VG) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assess was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective action taken by the Contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory (S) |
| Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective action taken by the Contractor were satisfactory. |
| Marginal (M) |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Unsatisfactory (U) |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problems for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear, or were, ineffective. |
| Not Applicable (NA) |
| No information or does not apply to your contract. |
1. Quality
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Rate the quality of the Contractor’s workmanship.
Rate the effectiveness of the Contractor’s quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements.
Please provide comments to substantiate the assigned rating. At a minimum, provide comments to substantiate any rating that is checked Exceptional (E), Very Good (VG), Marginal (M), or Unsatisfactory (U).
2. Schedule
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Rate the Contractor’s compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant milestones.
Note: If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below.
Rate Contractor’s ability to complete required punch list items and warranty work in a timely manner.
Rate how efficient and timely services were performed.
Please provide comments to substantiate the assigned rating. At a minimum, provide comments to substantiate any rating that is checked Exceptional (E), Very Good (VG), Marginal (M), or Unsatisfactory (U).
3. Cost Control
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Rate Contractor’s ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s).
Rate the Contractor’s system for managing and tracking costs including invoices and change orders.
Please provide comments to substantiate the assigned rating. At a minimum, provide comments to substantiate any rating that is checked Exceptional (E), Very Good (VG), Marginal (M), or Unsatisfactory (U).
4. Management
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
Rate the Contractor’s ability to effectively lead, manage and control the project.
Rate the Contractor’s on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and labor force.
Rate Contractor’s ability to hire, apply and retain a qualified workforce for this effort.
Rate Contractor’s ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in the requirements.
Please provide comments to substantiate the assigned rating. At a minimum, provide comments to substantiate any rating that is checked Exceptional (E), Very Good (VG), Marginal (M), or Unsatisfactory (U).
5. Overall Rating
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| NA |
How would you rate the Contractor’s overall performance?
Please provide comments to substantiate the assigned rating. At a minimum, provide comments to substantiate any rating that is checked Exceptional (E), Very Good (VG), Marginal (M), or Unsatisfactory (U).
6. Was any corrective action taken against the Contractor?
Cure Notice:
Yes / No
Show Cause Notice:
Yes / No
Termination for Default:
Yes / No
Other:
Yes / No
If yes, please describe:
7. Any additional information, comments, etc. that you would like to add:
Reviewer
Name
Title
Agency
Address
Phone Number
Signature of Reviewer
Date
Page 2 of 2 Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .