Past_Performance_Questionnaire_1305M326Q0332.docx
DOCX document 4 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Expansion of the PIFSC Glider Lab, JBPHH
- Solicitation number
- 1305M326Q0332
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template used to assess contractor performance on previous contracts relevant to solicitation 1305M326Q0332 for the Expansion of the PIFSC Glider Lab.
The questionnaire is designed to be completed collaboratively between the offeror/major subcontractor and a government assessor who had direct experience with the contractor on a prior relevant contract. Offerors must submit completed copies of Sections I and II with their proposals by the solicitation closing date. The assessor completes the full questionnaire and returns it to the Contracting Office at jenna.taulman@noaa.gov. Section II requires the assessor to validate contractor-provided contract information including contractor name and address, contract number, contract type, contract value, period of performance, project description, and contracting role (prime or subcontractor). The assessor also documents their role and period of involvement in contract administration, selecting from options such as Procuring Contracting Officer, Administrative Contracting Officer, Contract Specialist, Contracting Officer's Representative, or other relevant positions. Section IV requires an overall performance rating on a five-point scale—Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, or Not Applicable—based on contract requirement fulfillment, quality and timeliness of delivery, cost management, communications, proactive management, and customer satisfaction. The questionnaire serves as a source selection evaluation tool for NOAA's assessment of contractor past performance capabilities.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
1305M326Q0332 Past Performance Questionnaire
Instructions:
· Sections I and II to be completed by the Offeror/Major Subcontractor and provided to the assessor (Government personnel that had experience with the Offeror/Major Subcontractor on a previous relevant contract). The assessor, in turn, to verify Sections I through III, complete the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office. The Offeror should also submit with its proposal (by the closing date of the Solicitation) copies of Sections I and II of all questionnaires as provided to assessors.
· Section II to be validated by the assessor. If any information is incorrect herein, please annotate and provide the correct information accordingly.
· Sections III through IV to be completed in their entirety by the assessor.
Message to the assessor: Your feedback is requested by NOAA to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to: jenna.taulman@noaa.gov
I. Solicitation Data (for the proposed effort)
| Solicitation Number |
| 1305M326Q0332 |
| Project/Requirement |
| Expansion of the PIFSC Glider Lab |
| Customer/Agency |
| NOAA Acquisitions and Grants Office |
II. Current or Historical Contract Information
Assessor: The performance data submitted by the Offeror is ☐ correct or ☐ incorrect.
CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS:
Contract No
Type of Contract
| Initial |
| Final |
Contract Value
Period of Performance/Delivery Schedule
Project/Requirement Description
Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:
| Contracting Role |
| ☐ PRIME |
| ☐ SUBCONTRACTOR |
| Termination History |
| ☐ Convenience |
| ☐ Default |
| ☐ N/A |
III. Assessor Information
Assessor Name
Title
Phone Number/Email Address
Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.
| ✔ |
| Role |
| Period of Involvement |
Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)
Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)
Contract Specialist
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)
Technical Project Lead/Project Officer
Quality Assurance Specialist
Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Auditor
Other:
IV. Overall Performance Rating
Please provide the overall performance rating based on performance of contract requirements, quality and timeliness of delivery of goods, services and/or construction, cost management, communications between contracting parties, proactive management and/or customer satisfaction.
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns. |
| VERY GOOD |
| Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective. |
| SATISFACTORY |
| Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective. |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment. |
Additional comments/notes:
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104 For Official Use Only
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .