Attachment 4-Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 66 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 1240LS25R0002
- Issued by
-
Department of Agriculture Forest Service
About this file
The document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for Solicitation Number 1240LS25R0002, issued by the Department of Agriculture Forest Service for the Guinavah-Malibu Campground and Amphitheatre Reconstruction project in Logan Canyon, Utah. The questionnaire is designed to assess a contractor's performance across five key evaluation areas: quality of work, schedule adherence, management, customer satisfaction, and regulatory compliance, with performance levels ranging from Exceptional (E) to Unsatisfactory (U).
The associated federal contract opportunity involves comprehensive campground reconstruction, including base bid and multiple optional elements. Base bid tasks include constructing a new entrance road, central intersection, trailhead parking, right turn lane, and site sign, along with removing existing infrastructure. Optional bid items cover additional campground loops, road realignment, parking areas, pavilions, amphitheater restoration, and an interpretive trail. The project emphasizes special care to protect existing Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) historical features throughout the site, with a focus on reconstructing and enhancing the campground, trailhead, day-use area, and historical amphitheater.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
1. Information Provided in Response to RFP No.: 1240LS25R0002
2. Offeror:
PART I: Contract Information
3. Customer Organization:
4. Reference Name and Title: (individual completing this questionnaire)
5. Contract Number:
6. Contract Type:
7. Contract Value:
8. Description of Work/Services Performed:
9. Problems: (if problems encountered on this contract, explain corrective action taken)
| 10. Would you recommend this contractor and would you have them work for you again? | |||
| Highly Likely | Likely | Unlikely | Highly Unlikely Comment: |
1. Quality of work or service: (please double click on check box to check and uncheck box) E V S M U N Comment:
2. Schedule: Did the Contractor maintain scheduling?(please double click on check box to check and uncheck box)
E V S M U N
Comment:
3. Management: (please double click on check box to check and uncheck box) E V S M U N Comment:
4. Customer Satisfaction: Rate the working relationship between the customer and your company.
E V S M U N
5. Regulatory Compliance: (please double click on check box to check and uncheck box) E V S M U N
| Part II: Performance Assessment (to be completed by reviewer) CODE | PERFORMANCE LEVEL |
| E | EXCEPTIONAL - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to |
the reviewer’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
V VERY GOOD - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the reviewer’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
S SATISFACTORY - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
M MARGINAL - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
U UNSATISFACTORY-
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N NOT
APPLICABLE -
Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to effort assessed.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .