10225 Exhibit D-scored_non-cost.docx

EXHIBIT D – SCORED NON-COST FACTORS (SERVICES)

Type/print full legal name of bidder company

Instructions:

1. Insert bidder’s legal business name in the box above.

2. Provide a written response to all Required IDs (REQ ID) that addresses how the bidder meets or exceeds each requirement in the Written Response column.

a. Supporting Information. Please make sure to include references in Exhibit A – Bidder’s Certifications that align with the information provided in this exhibit. Enterprise Services may request additional information or references to help verify the information provided by the bidder in this exhibit. A bidder’s failure to provide such requested information to Enterprise Services within five (5) business days may result in disqualification.

b. Bidder’s Commitments. The bidder’s responses to the performance requirements below will be incorporated into such awarded bidder’s contract, if awarded. Therefore, the bidder is cautioned to propose only commitments that bidder can fully meet throughout the term of the contract. If an awarded bidder is unable to meet the terms of the contract, bidder will be in breach and subject to termination and/or damages as described by the contract. See Exhibit D- Contract Template.

c. Page/Word Limit. Bidder’s responses must fully demonstrate knowledge of the subject matter. Limited responses may receive lower scores than those that more fully demonstrate knowledge of the subject matter. However, conciseness is also preferred, and the following limits are provided:

· When specified, the total page limit for written responses must not exceed three (3) pages in length. Any text exceeding this limit will be deleted prior to forwarding the submittals to the evaluation team.

· When specified, screenshot examples must be submitted in Word or PDF format.

· Each written response must be complete and will be evaluated as written. Additional materials such as links to external content or embedded documents are not allowed and will not be evaluated.

3. Submit the exhibit as a Microsoft Word document without modifying the formatting. If you need to print out this document for any reason, please note this document is sized Legal 8.5” x 14”.

Important Note: Bidders must follow the instructions above as they complete this exhibit, or the bid will be deemed nonresponsive and rejected. Enterprise Services may, at its discretion, waive informalities and/or request clarification of a bid response, as described in the solicitation Section 4 – Bid Evaluation of the Competitive Solicitation.

· An informality is an immaterial variation from the exact requirements, which has no effect, or a negligible effect, on the good or services being solicited. Enterprise Services, at its discretion, may waive informalities.

· If clarification is requested, Enterprise Services will do so in writing. The request will include a response deadline (5 business days), and the bidder’s response to clarification requests must be received by that deadline, or the bid will be deemed nonresponsive.

Evaluation: Bidder’s written response to this Exhibit will be evaluated as follows:

Bidder’s Response Required:

Stated Business Need

To meet the minimum acceptable standard [0%]: Bidder must have completed at least three projects that are similar in scope in the last three years, and list customer organization type (private, local government, etc.), scope of services, and cost of project.

For the scope of the service, provide a description of [tasks completed, end products/deliverables, results, any metrics used]. The scope statement for each project should not exceed one (1) page in length. Bidder must demonstrate that the scope of services is similar to the services being procured. Bidders who do not meet this minimum acceptable standard will be disqualified from further consideration.

Added value: In the written response, demonstrate added value to the state that exceeds the minimum acceptable standard above by:

Listing project examples that more closely align with the scope/value of this contract, and/or type of customers served.

100 Points Written Response Required. Provide as much information as needed to address the Performance Requirement and Stated Business Need. Each scope statement must be no more than one (1) page in length.

How many projects similar in scope completed in the last 3 years:

Project 1 Title:

(a) Customer Organization Type and/or Name:

(b) Scope of Services:

(c) Cost:

Project 2 Title:

(d) Customer Organization Type and/or Name:

(e) Scope of Services:

(f) Cost:

Project 3 Title:

(g) Customer Organization Type and/or Name:

(h) Scope of Services:

(i) Cost:

To meet the minimum acceptable standard [0%]: Bidder’s who will be performing services under the contract, if awarded, each must

(a) Provide two examples of final reports, visual representations, or dashboards (screenshots) that demonstrate the use of telematics data for traffic data analysis.

(b) Examples must include trends, risk indicators, and actionable insights.

Bidders who do not meet this minimum acceptable standard will be disqualified from further consideration.

Added value: In the written response, demonstrate added value to the state by providing additional analysis trends, experience, or ability to collect, organize, interpret, and create visual representations of large amounts of telematics data.

100 Points Written Response Required. Attach examples of final reports, visual representations, or dashboards (screenshots) that demonstrate the use of telematics data for traffic data analysis. Examples must be in Word or PDF format, and each example must be no more than three (3) pages in length.

Additionally, provide a short description of the attached examples below.

(a) Example 1:

(b) Example 2:

To meet the minimum acceptable standard [0%] bidder must:

(a) Have access to and maintain dataset coverage in King, Pierce, Snohomish, Spokane, Clark, and Thurston Counties.

(b) Be able to describe how the telematics data is collected/accessed and when the data collection/access began.

(c) Be able to describe analytical approaches used to derive insights from the telematics data to meet customer needs.

(d) Provide telematics source coverage in Washington State for at least the previous 12 months, such as number of unique drivers, number of trips, total hours of driving, etc.

(e) Describe clearly any known or potential telematics data limitations, such as coverage in rural areas or data collection biases.

Bidders who do not meet this minimum acceptable standard will be disqualified from further consideration.

Added value: In the written response, demonstrate added value to the state that exceeds the minimum acceptable standard above by:

(a) Including additional dataset coverage beyond the minimum requirement above.

(b) Including screenshots of articles/publications describing the bidders’ telematics data collection, validation, or biases/limitations. Screenshots must be in Word or PDF format, and added value example(s) must be no more than three (3) pages in length.

(a) Do you meet the minimum dataset coverage requirement?

(b) Describe how the telematics data is collected/accessed. If data is collected from cell phones, provide specific examples/details of applications used to collect the data. If data is accessed through a third-party data provider, provide specific examples/details of how that provider collects the telematics data.

(c) Describe analytical approaches employed by the bidder, such as statistical methods, machine learning algorithms, and artificial intelligence.

(d) Describe your telematics data coverage in Washington State.

(e) Describe your data limitations and biases.

Return this exhibit to the Procurement Coordinator at:

DESContractsTeamApple@des.wa.gov

EXHIBIT D – SCORED NON-COST FACTORS (SERVICES) (REV 4/10/25) PAGE 2

image1.jpeg