04 PP Ref List FA520920Q0028.pdf
PDF 9 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Cleaning and Inspection of Kitchen Hoods and Exhaust System at Yokota Air Base and Tama Service Annex, Japan
- Solicitation number
- FA520920Q0028
About this file
This document is a past performance reference list for solicitation number FA520920Q0028 for cleaning and inspection of kitchen hoods and exhaust systems at Yokota Air Base and Tama Service Annex in Japan. Offerors are required to provide details on their three most relevant contracts within the last five years, including the company and product or service provided, contract number, dollar value, period of performance, contracting officer contact information, compliance with contract terms and conditions, and known unacceptable performance. For each contract, offerors must explain how the scope, magnitude, and complexity relate to the current solicitation requirements for cleaning and inspecting kitchen hoods and exhaust systems at two military bases in Japan.
View the file
Other files
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 4
Solicitation No. FA520920Q0028
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE LIST
Name of Offeror:
The following Three (3) contracts are the most relevant contracts (similar in scope, size and complexity) performed for US Government agencies, Government of Japan, and Commercial customers performed within the last 5 years of the solicitation release date, or is currently in progress (see Solicitation Provision
52.212-1):
Contract No. 1
(1) Company/Division name
(2) Product/Service
(3) Contracting Agency/Customer
(4) Contract Number
(5) Contract Dollar Value
(6) Period of Performance
(7) Verified, up-to-date name, mailing and e-mail addresses, and telephone number of the contracting officer (Point-of-Contact)
(8) Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions
(9) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.
(10) Include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and identify aspects (scope, magnitude of effort, and complexity) of the contracts deemed relevant and how they relate to the proposed effort.
Contract No. 2
(2) Product/Service
(3) Contracting Agency/Customer
(4) Contract Number
(5) Contract Dollar Value
(6) Period of Performance
(7) Verified, up-to-date name, mailing and e-mail addresses, and telephone number of the contracting officer (Point-of-Contact)
(8) Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions
(9) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.
(10) Include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and identify aspects (scope, magnitude of
Contract No. 3
(2) Product/Service
(3) Contracting Agency/Customer
(4) Contract Number
(5) Contract Dollar Value
(6) Period of Performance
(7) Verified, up-to-date name, mailing and e-mail addresses, and telephone number of the contracting officer (Point-of-Contact)
(8) Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions
(9) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.
(10) Include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and identify aspects (scope, magnitude of
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .