04 Attachment Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 527 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W912L2-23-Q-0001
- Issued by
-
Department of the Army National Guard
About this file
This document contains a past performance evaluation questionnaire and details of a related federal contract opportunity for full food services at the Western Army Aviation Training Site dining facility. The opportunity is a solicitation issued by the Department of the Army National Guard seeking a contractor to perform tasks such as cooking hot meals, cleaning facilities and equipment, cashier services, food handling, quality control, and contingency food services. The place of performance is the Western Army Aviation Training Site, with acceptance and delivery at that location. The questionnaire is to be completed by references for the vendor's past performance and involves ratings for regulatory compliance, quality, timeliness, issue resolution, flexibility, relationship management, and likelihood of future award. Comments may also be provided. Completed questionnaires must be sent directly to the US Property and Fiscal Officer for Arizona.
View the file
Other files
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION A: Contractor Information
A. Contractor’s name and address: __ _________________________________________
B. Point of Contact: _____________________________
C. Phone Number (with area code): _________ __________
D. Contract number: ________________________________________
E. Project Title or Description of Work performed under this project: ___ _______________________________
| F. Contract | Type: | |||||
| Firm‐Fixed‐Price | Indefinite‐Delivery/Indefinite | Quantity | Task | Order | Cost‐Reimbursement |
G. Contract Award Date: Scheduled Completion Date: _____________________________
H. Contract Award Amount: Current/Final Project Amount: ____________________
| I. Contractor | being | evaluated | performed | as | the: | |||||
| Prime | Contractor | Subcontractor | Supplier | on | this | contract/order. |
SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION
EVALUATED BY:
(Signature) (Date)
| _________________________________ Organization: | ____________________________________ | ||
| (Typed | or | Printed | Name) |
______________________ Address: _______________________________ (Title)
| Address) | ||
| Phone | Number: | _______________________________ |
NOTE: The identity of individual(s) providing the reference information shall not be disclosed.
Source Selection Sensitive
| PERFORMANCE | RATING | QUESTIONNAIRE | |||||
| (Contractor | to | forward | to | their | references | for | completion) |
| (This | Questionnaire, | when | completed, | shall | be | treated | as | Source | Selection | Sensitive | in | accordance |
| with | FAR | 3.104‐3 | and | shall | not | be | disclosed | to | anyone | outside | the | Government) |
| The | RATING | definitions | are | as | follows: | ||||||||||
| E | EXCEPTIONAL | – | Performance | met/meets | contractual | requirements | and | exceeded/exceed | many | ||||||
| requirements | to | the | organization’s | benefit. | No | contractual | performance | problems | for | the | element | being | |||
| assessed | have | occurred | or | if | any | minor | problems | occurred | the | corrective | actions | taken | by | the | contractor |
| were | highly | effective. |
| V | VERY | GOOD | – | Performance | met/meets | contractual | requirements | and | exceeded/exceeds | some | ||||
| requirements | to | the | organization’s | benefit. | The | contractual | performance | of | the | element | being | assessed | was | |
| accomplished | with | some | minor | problems | for | which | corrective | actions | taken | by | the | contractor | were | effective. |
| S | SATISFACTORY | – | Performance | met/meets | contractual | requirements. | The | contractual | performance | of | ||||
| the | element | being | assessed | was | accomplished | with | some | minor | problems | for | which | corrective | actions | taken |
| by | the | contractor | were | satisfactory. |
| M | MARGINAL | – | Performance | did | not/does | not | meet | some | contractual | requirements. | The | contractual | ||||
| performance | of | the | element | being | assessed | reflects | a | serious | problem | for | which | the | contractor | has | not | yet |
| identified | corrective | actions, | or | the | contractor’s | proposed | actions | appear | only | marginally | effective, | or | were | |||
| not | fully | implemented. |
| U | UNSATISFACTORY | – | Performance | did | not/does | not | meet | most | contractual | requirements | and | recovery | |||||
| is | not | likely | in | a | timely | manner. | The | contractual | performance | of | the | element | being | assessed | contains | serious | |
| problem(s) | for | which | the | contractor’s | corrective | actions | were | ineffective | or | were | not | implemented | timely. |
N NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable.
| PERFORMANCE | RATING | QUESTIONNAIRE | |||||
| (Contractor | to | forward | to | their | references | for | completion) |
| (This | Questionnaire, | when | completed, | shall | be | treated | as | Source | Selection | Sensitive | in | accordance |
| with | FAR | 3.104‐3 | and | shall | not | be | disclosed | to | anyone | outside | the | Government) |
The contractor:
1 How efficient was the contractor in abiding by all Rules, Regulations, Laws, and Safety Standards?
2 Were you satisfied with the quality of service performed or items supplied?
3 How effective were the contractor’s quality control and/or inspection procedures?
4 How well did the contractor perform in a respect to timeliness and schedule?
5 How well did the contractor resolve Issues/
Problems/Customer Complaints?
6 How flexible, cooperative, reasonable was the contractor, particularly when faced with short‐notice mission changes or requirements changes?
| 7 How well was the contractor | able | to | maintain | a |
| good relationship with | agency | contracting | and | |
| technical/project | management | personnel? |
8 How likely are you to award another contract to this contractor?
| 9 Was | the | contractor | ever | issued | a | cure or show cause | |
| notice | under | the | referenced | contract? | If | yes | explain |
| outcome | in | ‘remarks’ section | below. |
ADDITIONAL REMARKS:
**Please forward this questionnaire directly to the USPFO of Arizona **
E‐MAIL: sabreana.m.williams.civ@army.mil Subject: W912L223Q0001 PPQ and ng.az.azarng.list.az-purchasing-and-contracting@army.mil
1250948111N Highlight
| Text8: Vendor being evaluated |
| Text9: |
| Text10: |
| Text11: |
| Text12: |
| Text13: |
| Text14: |
| Text15: |
| Text16: |
| Text17: |
| Text18: |
| Text19: |
| Text20: |
| Check Box25: Off |
| Text26: |
| Text27: |
| Text28: |
| Text29: |
| Text30: |
| Text31: |
| Text32: |
| Text33: |
| Check Box1: Off |
| Check Box2: Off |
| Check Box3: Off |
| Check Box4: Off |
| Check Box5: Off |
| Text7: |
| Dropdown1: [Satisfactory] |
| Dropdown3: [Satisfactory] |
| Dropdown4: [Satisfactory] |
| Dropdown5: [Satisfactory] |
| Dropdown6: [Satisfactory] |
| Dropdown7: [Satisfactory] |
| Dropdown8: [Satisfactory] |
| Dropdown9: [Somewhat Likely] |
| Dropdown10: [No] |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .