04 Attachment Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 527 KB Posted

Attached to
Western Army Aviation Training Site (WAATS) DFAC Full Food Services
Solicitation number
W912L2-23-Q-0001
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance evaluation questionnaire and details of a related federal contract opportunity for full food services at the Western Army Aviation Training Site dining facility. The opportunity is a solicitation issued by the Department of the Army National Guard seeking a contractor to perform tasks such as cooking hot meals, cleaning facilities and equipment, cashier services, food handling, quality control, and contingency food services. The place of performance is the Western Army Aviation Training Site, with acceptance and delivery at that location. The questionnaire is to be completed by references for the vendor's past performance and involves ratings for regulatory compliance, quality, timeliness, issue resolution, flexibility, relationship management, and likelihood of future award. Comments may also be provided. Completed questionnaires must be sent directly to the US Property and Fiscal Officer for Arizona.

View the file

Other files

Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE

SECTION A: Contractor Information

A. Contractor’s name and address: __ _________________________________________

B. Point of Contact: _____________________________

C. Phone Number (with area code): _________ __________

D. Contract number: ________________________________________

E. Project Title or Description of Work performed under this project: ___ _______________________________

F. ContractType:
Firm‐Fixed‐PriceIndefinite‐Delivery/IndefiniteQuantityTaskOrderCost‐Reimbursement

G. Contract Award Date: Scheduled Completion Date: _____________________________

H. Contract Award Amount: Current/Final Project Amount: ____________________

I. Contractorbeingevaluatedperformedasthe:
PrimeContractorSubcontractorSupplieronthiscontract/order.

SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION

EVALUATED BY:

(Signature) (Date)

_________________________________ Organization:____________________________________
(TypedorPrintedName)

______________________ Address: _______________________________ (Title)

(EmailAddress)
PhoneNumber:_______________________________

NOTE: The identity of individual(s) providing the reference information shall not be disclosed.

Source Selection Sensitive

PERFORMANCERATINGQUESTIONNAIRE
(Contractortoforwardtotheirreferencesforcompletion)
(ThisQuestionnaire,whencompleted,shallbetreatedasSourceSelectionSensitiveinaccordance
withFAR3.104‐3andshallnotbedisclosedtoanyoneoutsidetheGovernment)
TheRATINGdefinitionsareasfollows:
EEXCEPTIONAL–Performancemet/meetscontractualrequirementsandexceeded/exceedmany
requirementstotheorganization’sbenefit.Nocontractualperformanceproblemsfortheelementbeing
assessedhaveoccurredorifanyminorproblemsoccurredthecorrectiveactionstakenbythecontractor
werehighlyeffective.
VVERYGOOD–Performancemet/meetscontractualrequirementsandexceeded/exceedssome
requirementstotheorganization’sbenefit.Thecontractualperformanceoftheelementbeingassessedwas
accomplishedwithsomeminorproblemsforwhichcorrectiveactionstakenbythecontractorwereeffective.
SSATISFACTORY–Performancemet/meetscontractualrequirements.Thecontractualperformanceof
theelementbeingassessedwasaccomplishedwithsomeminorproblemsforwhichcorrectiveactionstaken
bythecontractorweresatisfactory.
MMARGINAL–Performancedidnot/doesnotmeetsomecontractualrequirements.Thecontractual
performanceoftheelementbeingassessedreflectsaseriousproblemforwhichthecontractorhasnotyet
identifiedcorrectiveactions,orthecontractor’sproposedactionsappearonlymarginallyeffective,orwere
notfullyimplemented.
UUNSATISFACTORY–Performancedidnot/doesnotmeetmostcontractualrequirementsandrecovery
isnotlikelyinatimelymanner.Thecontractualperformanceoftheelementbeingassessedcontainsserious
problem(s)forwhichthecontractor’scorrectiveactionswereineffectiveorwerenotimplementedtimely.

N NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable.

PERFORMANCERATINGQUESTIONNAIRE
(Contractortoforwardtotheirreferencesforcompletion)
(ThisQuestionnaire,whencompleted,shallbetreatedasSourceSelectionSensitiveinaccordance
withFAR3.104‐3andshallnotbedisclosedtoanyoneoutsidetheGovernment)

The contractor:

1 How efficient was the contractor in abiding by all Rules, Regulations, Laws, and Safety Standards?

2 Were you satisfied with the quality of service performed or items supplied?

3 How effective were the contractor’s quality control and/or inspection procedures?

4 How well did the contractor perform in a respect to timeliness and schedule?

5 How well did the contractor resolve Issues/

Problems/Customer Complaints?

6 How flexible, cooperative, reasonable was the contractor, particularly when faced with short‐notice mission changes or requirements changes?

7 How well was the contractorabletomaintaina
good relationship withagencycontractingand
technical/projectmanagementpersonnel?

8 How likely are you to award another contract to this contractor?

9 Wasthecontractoreverissuedacure or show cause
noticeunderthereferencedcontract?Ifyesexplain
outcomein‘remarks’ sectionbelow.

ADDITIONAL REMARKS:

**Please forward this questionnaire directly to the USPFO of Arizona **

E‐MAIL: sabreana.m.williams.civ@army.mil Subject: W912L223Q0001 PPQ and ng.az.azarng.list.az-purchasing-and-contracting@army.mil

1250948111N Highlight

Text8: Vendor being evaluated
Text9:
Text10:
Text11:
Text12:
Text13:
Text14:
Text15:
Text16:
Text17:
Text18:
Text19:
Text20:
Check Box25: Off
Text26:
Text27:
Text28:
Text29:
Text30:
Text31:
Text32:
Text33:
Check Box1: Off
Check Box2: Off
Check Box3: Off
Check Box4: Off
Check Box5: Off
Text7:
Dropdown1: [Satisfactory]
Dropdown3: [Satisfactory]
Dropdown4: [Satisfactory]
Dropdown5: [Satisfactory]
Dropdown6: [Satisfactory]
Dropdown7: [Satisfactory]
Dropdown8: [Satisfactory]
Dropdown9: [Somewhat Likely]
Dropdown10: [No]

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .