020-DW-1025_Network_Equipment_Evaluation_Grid.pdf

PDF 218 KB Posted

Attached to
Network Equipment E-Rate
Solicitation number
020-DW-0125
Issued by
Polk County, Florida

About this file

The document is a Service Provider Bid Response Evaluation Grid for the School Board of Polk County, Florida's Network Equipment E-Rate procurement for Fiscal Year 2025. The evaluation grid compares multiple bidders for network equipment, with a single selection factor of pricing for E-rate eligible services and products, weighted at 100%. Ten potential bidders submitted proposals, including CDW Government (with multiple solutions using Aruba and Extreme equipment), Mobile Helpdesk, OMS, United Data, Zones, Princeton IT, and Netsync. Several bidders were rejected due to incomplete submissions, missing signatures, or improper pricing documentation.

The lowest-priced bid was CDW Government's solution using Extreme networking equipment at $43,514.80, while the highest-priced bid was Princeton IT at $136,678.52. The evaluation uses a scoring method where 10 represents the best score (lowest price), and the grid allows for weighted scoring across bidders. The procurement is contingent on E-Rate funding approval and district fund availability. The evaluation was conducted on December 16, 2024, with the intent to purchase network equipment, and the district's personnel will handle installation. The document was signed by Michael Chiavuzzi, indicating final review and selection of the bid.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Service Provider Bid Response Evaluation Grid Billed Entity Name:

Billed Entity Number:

Funding Year:

Service Description:

Date/Time of Evaluation:

Evaluation performed by:

Selection Factors 1

Evaluation Score 3

Weighted Score 4

Evaluation Score 3

Weighted Score 4

Evaluation Score 3

Weighted Score 4

Evaluation Score 3

Weighted Score 4

Evaluation Score 3

Weighted Score 4

Evaluation Score 3

Weighted Score 4

Evaluation Score 3

Weighted Score 4

Evaluation Score 3

Weighted Score 4

Evaluation Score 3

Weighted Score 4

Evaluation Score 3

Weighted Score 4

Price of E-rate Eligible Services and/ or Products 100% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 9 9 0 0 8 8 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 100% 0 0 0 0 0 10 9 0 8 0

1 Selection Factors: Price must be the top factor; all other factors are determined by the evaluator.

2 Weighting must add up to 100%. Price must have the highest Weight of all factors.

4 Weighted Score = Weighting x Score

Evaluator Selection Remarks:

Bidder Selected by Highest Weighted Score:

12/17/2024 Signature Name Date

OMS- (Option 1)

Michael Chiavuzzi

CDW Government, see pg 37-43 additional terms and conditions, pricing not in bid form attachment, rejected

Mobile Helpdesk, no references, no SPIN, rejected

Bidder #5:

CDWG-solution 2 (Aruba, Option 1)- $75,020.19

Bidder #4:

CDWG-solution 3 (Aruba, Option 2)- $74,254.18

Mobile Helpdesk- $124,460.00

The School Board of Polk County, Florida

020-DW-0125 Network Equipment E-Rate

127814

FY2025

Netsync, pricing not in bid form attachment, rejected

3 Evaluation Score on a scale of 1 to _10_: 1=worst (eg. highest price), _10_=best (eg. lowest price)

CDW Government, see pg 37-43 additional terms and conditions, pricing not in bid form attachment, rejected

CDW Government, see pg 37-43 additional terms and conditions, pricing not in bid form attachment, rejected

CDWG-solution 1 (Extereme)- $43,514.80 Netsync- $ 127,907.15

Bidder #1: Bidder #2:

12/16/24 12:00 AM

Weighting 2

Bidder #3: Bidder #9: Bidder #10:Bidder #6: Bidder #7: Bidder #8:

United Data- $75,712.00 Zones- $ 57,870.06

Zones LLC, no bidder acknowledgement signature, rejected

Equivalent Model for power cord only

Princeton, pricing not in bid form attachment, did not sign e-rate terms and conditions, rejected

OMS- (Option 1)- $69,531.00

OMS- (Option 2)- $70,245.00

Princeton IT- $136,678.52

Sheet1

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .