0005 and 0006 Past Performance Questionnaire and Cover Letter.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- EOS Fieldcraft Support Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4484-21-R-0003
About this file
This solicitation is seeking proposals for Fieldcraft instruction services to be provided at Joint Base MDL, New Jersey. The U.S. Air Force 87 Contracting Squadron is requesting these services on behalf of the USAF Expeditionary Center to train personnel in contingency skills, serve as opposing forces during exercises, and provide role players. The government intends to award a single firm-fixed-price indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract to a service-disabled veteran-owned small business. The period of performance is one month for phase-in followed by a one-year base period and four one-year options. Pricing must be provided in accordance with the instructions and evaluation factors laid out in the solicitation. Contractor manpower reporting is also required for the life of the contract. Proposals are due by November 23, 2020 and the government anticipates work will begin on October 12, 2021 if all options are exercised.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past and Present Performance Questionnaire
1. The 87 Contracting Squadron is in the process of selecting a contractor for a Fieldcraft Support Services program. The Fieldcraft requirement consists of providing professional, technically qualified personnel to perform as contingency skills instructors, opposing forces (OPFOR) and role player support personnel.
2. One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past and present performance on contracts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from agencies, such as yours, which have had firsthand experience with an offeror.
3. Our areas of interest for the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. Request that you provide your completed questionnaire no later than 23 Nov 20. You may email your questionnaire to maggie.falkner.1@us.af.mil. Please email Maggie Falkner if you have any questions. Do not send the completed questionnaire back to the offeror. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official Source Selection records.
4. Your help is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.
Dennis Sughrue Contracting Officer
FA4484-21-R-0003 Attachments 0005 and 0006
A. General Information: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: ___________________ Telephone Number: ______________________
Address: __________________________ Point of Contact: _________________________
Project Title and Brief Description of Work: ________________________________________*
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ___________*
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: _________________________*
Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel
* Note: If an offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 5 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
B. Respondent Information:
Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: ________________________________
Address: _____________________ Telephone Number: ____________________
_____________________________ Email Address: _______________________
C. Email completed survey form to: maggie.falkner.1@us.af.mil mailto:michael.petty.5@us.af.mil
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (O, S, M, U and N/A) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation.
Please Provide a Narrative Explanation for any Rating Of M or U.
O S M U N/A
Outstanding Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Not Applicable
Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
Contractor Name: _______________________ Contract Number.____________________
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
Contractor Performance O S M U N/A
1.
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2.
Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
5.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
6. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
7. Identified problems as they occurred.
8. Displayed initiative to solve problems.
9. Was responsive to contract changes.
10. Provided adequate project supervision.
11. Cooperated with government personnel after award.
12. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance
Yes No
13.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
14.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
15. Is the contractor rated in CPARS / CORT?
Contract Requirements
16.
17.
18.
19.
Performed surge operations on short notice (24 hrs) (i.e. opened an additional facility, or increase in headcount/operations tempo
Remarks:
Demonstrated the ability to manage and execute an academic schedule and graduate students on time.
Proactive with suggestions on overall course improvement.
Developed/met realistic progress schedules.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .