00010942 Matrix for release.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 57 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- S-73000-00010942
- Issued by
- Marion County, Oregon
About this file
This is a proposal evaluation scoring matrix from the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) for RFP S-73000-00010942 "Migration and Integration Services for Migration from TransInfo." The matrix shows detailed evaluation scores from five evaluators across six bidding firms: BuzzClan LLC, GeoDecisions, Resource Data, Rizing Geospatial LLC, Sanborn Map Company Inc., and Timmons Group. Each proposal was evaluated on five criteria plus price, with maximum possible scores of: Project Approach (450 points), Specific Experience of Key Staff (350 points), Availability (250 points), Organizational Change Management Philosophy and Approach (100 points), Project Samples (100 points), and Price Evaluation (200 points), for a total possible score of 1,450 points.
The final average scores for each bidder were: Rizing Geospatial LLC (1,160), Timmons Group (1,142), GeoDecisions (1,120), Resource Data (1,112), Sanborn Map Company Inc. (1,008), and BuzzClan LLC (667). Price evaluation points varied among bidders, with BuzzClan receiving 200 points, GeoDecisions 110 points, Resource Data 136 points, Rizing Geospatial 105 points, Sanborn 92 points, and Timmons Group 114 points. No scoring deductions were applied to any of the proposals. The evaluation matrix also includes a section for interview scores, though this section was not completed.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 00010942 Att B.doc | DOC document | |
| 00010942 Att G.docx | DOCX document | |
| 245052 RFP.pdf | ||
| 00010942 Att A Sample Contract Final.doc | DOC document | |
| 00010942 A1.docx | DOCX document | |
| 00010942 Notice of Competetive Range.docx | DOCX document | |
| 00010942 Att C.doc | DOC document | |
| 00010942 Att E.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 00010942 Q&A.docx | DOCX document | |
| 00010942 Matrix for release final~1.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 00010942 Att F.doc | DOC document | |
| 00010942 RFP Final.doc | DOC document | |
| 00010942 Q&A~1.docx | DOCX document | |
| 00010942 Intent to Award~1.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Proposal Detail Scores
RFP TITLE: MIGRATION AND INTEGRATION SERVICES FOR MIGRATION FROM TRANSINFO
RFP/Bid Solicitation Number: S-73000-00010942
| SOP SCORE DETAILS | ||||||||
| Proposal Evaluation Detail Scores | Enter actual number of evaluators: | 5 | ||||||
| Evaluation Team | ||||||||
| Maximum | ||||||||
| Score | evaluator 1 | evaluator 2 | evaluator 3 | evaluator 4 | evaluator 5 | |||
| 1 | BuzzClan LLC | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 1 -Project Approach | 450 | 100 | 150 | 100 | 140 | 200 | ||
| Evaluation Item 2 - Specific Experience of Key Staff | 350 | 50 | 150 | 50 | 120 | 150 | ||
| Evaluation Item 3 - Availability | 250 | 120 | 220 | 50 | 100 | 100 | ||
| Evaluation Item 4 - Organizational Change Management Philosophy and Approach | 100 | 75 | 70 | 75 | 50 | 50 | ||
| Evaluation Item 5 – Project Samples | 100 | 30 | 50 | 10 | 60 | 65 | ||
| Price Evaluation | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | 200 | ||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| Total | 1450 | 575 | 840 | 485 | 670 | 765 | 0.00 | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 575 | 840 | 485 | 670 | 765 | 667.00 |
| 2 | GeoDecisions | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 1 -Project Approach | 450 | 400 | 410 | 375 | 380 | 400 | ||
| Evaluation Item 2 - Specific Experience of Key Staff | 350 | 250 | 310 | 275 | 290 | 325 | ||
| Evaluation Item 3 - Availability | 250 | 175 | 200 | 200 | 150 | 200 | ||
| Evaluation Item 4 - Organizational Change Management Philosophy and Approach | 100 | 90 | 90 | 10 | 70 | 70 | ||
| Evaluation Item 5 – Project Samples | 100 | 85 | 90 | 50 | 75 | 80 | ||
| Price Evaluation | 200 | 110 | 110 | 110 | 110 | 110 | ||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 1450 | 1110 | 1210 | 1020 | 1075 | 1185 | 0.00 | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 1110 | 1210 | 1020 | 1075 | 1185 | 1120.00 |
| 3 | Resource Data | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 1 -Project Approach | 450 | 300 | 380 | 375 | 350 | 400 | ||
| Evaluation Item 2 - Specific Experience of Key Staff | 350 | 200 | 290 | 325 | 250 | 300 | ||
| Evaluation Item 3 - Availability | 250 | 100 | 225 | 225 | 175 | 200 | ||
| Evaluation Item 4 - Organizational Change Management Philosophy and Approach | 100 | 90 | 80 | 75 | 100 | 90 | ||
| Evaluation Item 5 – Project Samples | 100 | 60 | 70 | 70 | 70 | 80 | ||
| Price Evaluation | 200 | 136 | 136 | 136 | 136 | 136 | ||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 1450 | 886 | 1181 | 1206 | 1081 | 1206 | 0.00 | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 886 | 1181 | 1206 | 1081 | 1206 | 1112.00 |
| 4 | Rizing Geospatial, LLC | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 1 -Project Approach | 450 | 375 | 420 | 375 | 410 | 425 | ||
| Evaluation Item 2 - Specific Experience of Key Staff | 350 | 250 | 300 | 300 | 330 | 325 | ||
| Evaluation Item 3 - Availability | 250 | 125 | 200 | 200 | 150 | 200 | ||
| Evaluation Item 4 - Organizational Change Management Philosophy and Approach | 100 | 100 | 90 | 90 | 100 | 90 | ||
| Evaluation Item 5 – Project Samples | 100 | 75 | 95 | 80 | 90 | 80 | ||
| Price Evaluation | 200 | 105 | 105 | 105 | 105 | 105 | ||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 1450 | 1030 | 1210 | 1150 | 1185 | 1225 | 0.00 | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 1030 | 1210 | 1150 | 1185 | 1225 | 1160.00 |
| 5 | Sanborn Map Company, Inc. | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 1 -Project Approach | 450 | 375 | 430 | 350 | 345 | 325 | ||
| Evaluation Item 2 - Specific Experience of Key Staff | 350 | 200 | 300 | 150 | 265 | 250 | ||
| Evaluation Item 3 - Availability | 250 | 175 | 210 | 175 | 150 | 200 | ||
| Evaluation Item 4 - Organizational Change Management Philosophy and Approach | 100 | 75 | 75 | 50 | 100 | 60 | ||
| Evaluation Item 5 – Project Samples | 100 | 70 | 80 | 40 | 65 | 65 | ||
| Price Evaluation | 200 | 92 | 92 | 92 | 92 | 92 | ||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 1450 | 987 | 1187 | 857 | 1017 | 992 | 0.00 | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 987 | 1187 | 857 | 1017 | 992 | 1008.00 |
| 6 | Timmons Group | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 1 -Project Approach | 450 | 375 | 420 | 375 | 430 | 400 | ||
| Evaluation Item 2 - Specific Experience of Key Staff | 350 | 250 | 325 | 275 | 270 | 300 | ||
| Evaluation Item 3 - Availability | 250 | 175 | 150 | 200 | 150 | 175 | ||
| Evaluation Item 4 - Organizational Change Management Philosophy and Approach | 100 | 100 | 75 | 90 | 100 | 80 | ||
| Evaluation Item 5 – Project Samples | 100 | 95 | 90 | 70 | 85 | 85 | ||
| Price Evaluation | 200 | 114 | 114 | 114 | 114 | 114 | ||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 1450 | 1109 | 1174 | 1124 | 1149 | 1154 | 0.00 | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 1109 | 1174 | 1124 | 1149 | 1154 | 1142.00 |
| 7 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 1 -Project Approach | 450 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 2 - Specific Experience of Key Staff | 350 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 3 - Availability | 250 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 4 - Organizational Change Management Philosophy and Approach | 100 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 5 – Project Samples | 100 | |||||||
| Price Evaluation | 200 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 1450 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 1 -Project Approach | 450 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 2 - Specific Experience of Key Staff | 350 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 3 - Availability | 250 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 4 - Organizational Change Management Philosophy and Approach | 100 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 5 – Project Samples | 100 | |||||||
| Price Evaluation | 200 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 1450 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 1 -Project Approach | 450 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 2 - Specific Experience of Key Staff | 350 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 3 - Availability | 250 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 4 - Organizational Change Management Philosophy and Approach | 100 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 5 – Project Samples | 100 | |||||||
| Price Evaluation | 200 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 1450 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 1 -Project Approach | 450 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 2 - Specific Experience of Key Staff | 350 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 3 - Availability | 250 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 4 - Organizational Change Management Philosophy and Approach | 100 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 5 – Project Samples | 100 | |||||||
| Price Evaluation | 200 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 1450 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 11 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 1 -Project Approach | 450 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 2 - Specific Experience of Key Staff | 350 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 3 - Availability | 250 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 4 - Organizational Change Management Philosophy and Approach | 100 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 5 – Project Samples | 100 | |||||||
| Price Evaluation | 200 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 1450 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 12 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 1 -Project Approach | 450 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 2 - Specific Experience of Key Staff | 350 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 3 - Availability | 250 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 4 - Organizational Change Management Philosophy and Approach | 100 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 5 – Project Samples | 100 | |||||||
| Price Evaluation | 200 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 1450 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 1 -Project Approach | 450 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 2 - Specific Experience of Key Staff | 350 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 3 - Availability | 250 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 4 - Organizational Change Management Philosophy and Approach | 100 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 5 – Project Samples | 100 | |||||||
| Price Evaluation | 200 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 1450 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 1 -Project Approach | 450 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 2 - Specific Experience of Key Staff | 350 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 3 - Availability | 250 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 4 - Organizational Change Management Philosophy and Approach | 100 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 5 – Project Samples | 100 | |||||||
| Price Evaluation | 200 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 1450 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 1 -Project Approach | 450 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 2 - Specific Experience of Key Staff | 350 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 3 - Availability | 250 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 4 - Organizational Change Management Philosophy and Approach | 100 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 5 – Project Samples | 100 | |||||||
| Price Evaluation | 200 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 1450 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 1 -Project Approach | 450 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 2 - Specific Experience of Key Staff | 350 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 3 - Availability | 250 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 4 - Organizational Change Management Philosophy and Approach | 100 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 5 – Project Samples | 100 | |||||||
| Price Evaluation | 200 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 1450 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 1 -Project Approach | 450 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 2 - Specific Experience of Key Staff | 350 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 3 - Availability | 250 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 4 - Organizational Change Management Philosophy and Approach | 100 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 5 – Project Samples | 100 | |||||||
| Price Evaluation | 200 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 1450 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | Firm Name | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 1 -Project Approach | 450 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 2 - Specific Experience of Key Staff | 350 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 3 - Availability | 250 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 4 - Organizational Change Management Philosophy and Approach | 100 | |||||||
| Evaluation Item 5 – Project Samples | 100 | |||||||
| Price Evaluation | 200 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 7 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 8 | 0 | |||||||
| Enter Eval Criterion 9 | 0 | Scoring Deductions | ||||||
| TOTAL | 1450 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| Scoring Deduction Points | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| TOTAL (incl. Scoring Deductions) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
_x000D_&1#&"Calibri"&10&K000000 Level 3 - Restricted
Interview Detail Scores
| ERROR:#REF! | |||||||
| INTERVIEW SCORE DETAILS | |||||||
| Enter actual number of interview evaluators: | 1 | ||||||
| Evaluation Team | |||||||
| Maximum | |||||||
| Score | evaluator 1 | evaluator 2 | evaluator 3 | evaluator 4 | evaluator 5 | ||
| Firm Name | |||||||
| Eval criterion/question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Firm Name | |||||||
| Eval criterion/question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Firm Name | |||||||
| Eval criterion/question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Firm Name | |||||||
| Eval criterion/question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Firm Name | |||||||
| Eval criterion/question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Firm Name | |||||||
| Eval criterion/question 1 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 5 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 6 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 7 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 8 | 0 | ||||||
| Eval criterion/question 9 | 0 | ||||||
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
_x000D_&1#&"Calibri"&10&K000000 Level 3 - Restricted
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .