Top 100 Contractors in PSC F999: Other Environmental Services, Studies, and Analytical Support, FY2024
Parent companies by net contract obligations Oct 1, 2023 – Sep 30, 2024 Code page on GovTribe
The top 10 won 57% of FY2024 PSC F999 contract dollars
Ranking facts
- Contract obligations
- $3,055,571,033 Net of deobligations, by contracts coded PSC F999
- Contractors
- 747 Parent companies with an obligation
- Largest contractor
- United Cleanup Oak Ridge LLC $592 million, 18.3% of obligations
- Data as of
Contract actions from FPDS (SAM.gov). How the rankings work · Download all 100 rows as CSV
Full ranking
| Rank | Contractor | Net obligations | Share | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
United Cleanup Oak Ridge LLC
Top agencies
|
$592,276,416 | ||
| 2 |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Top agencies
|
$397,228,588 | ||
| 3 | $216,505,988 | |||
| 4 | $121,256,923 | |||
| 5 | $120,000,839 | |||
| 6 | $99,813,459 | |||
| 7 |
Guidehouse Inc.
|
$80,834,727 | ||
| 8 |
BWX Technologies, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$74,041,448 | ||
| 9 | $69,829,399 | |||
| 10 | $69,244,816 | |||
| 11 | $58,730,468 | |||
| 12 |
ECC Constructors LLC
Top agencies
|
$47,726,648 | ||
| 13 | $39,809,399 | |||
| 14 | $38,322,959 | |||
| 15 | $35,141,251 | |||
| 16 | $28,642,723 | |||
| 17 | $25,207,414 | |||
| 18 |
Hgl-Er JV LLC
Top agencies
|
$24,051,422 | ||
| 19 | $23,596,167 | |||
| 20 | $20,356,439 | |||
| 21 |
Pika International Inc.
Top agencies
|
$18,963,499 | ||
| 22 | $17,336,148 | |||
| 23 | $16,244,600 | |||
| 24 | $16,096,275 | |||
| 25 | $14,231,711 | |||
| 26 | $14,077,411 | |||
| 27 | $14,074,259 | |||
| 28 | $13,688,923 | |||
| 29 | $13,445,719 | |||
| 30 |
Seres-Arcadis SB JV, LLC
Top agencies
|
$13,382,853 | ||
| 31 |
JFL-WCS Partners LLC
|
$13,095,027 | ||
| 32 | $12,509,620 | |||
| 33 | $12,018,585 | |||
| 34 |
SOL Solutions LLC
|
$11,887,697 | ||
| 35 | $11,594,969 | |||
| 36 | $11,538,131 | |||
| 37 |
Talces JV, LLC
Top agencies
|
$9,883,360 | ||
| 38 | $9,648,242 | |||
| 39 | $9,576,010 | |||
| 40 | $9,312,446 | |||
| 41 | $9,295,223 | |||
| 42 | $9,103,016 | |||
| 43 |
Semanticbits LLC
|
$8,414,554 | ||
| 44 |
Fpm-Aecom JV2
Top agencies
|
$7,790,503 | ||
| 45 | $7,657,486 | |||
| 46 |
US Ecology, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$7,390,983 | ||
| 47 | $7,300,245 | |||
| 48 | $7,260,140 | |||
| 49 | $7,254,610 | |||
| 50 | $7,180,000 | |||
| 51 | $7,174,175 | |||
| 52 |
Link Technologies Inc.
Top agencies
|
$7,168,026 | ||
| 53 | $6,629,928 | |||
| 54 | $6,619,568 | |||
| 55 | $6,615,822 | |||
| 56 | $6,260,500 | |||
| 57 | $6,253,153 | |||
| 58 | $6,216,755 | |||
| 59 |
LDS Kemron JV LLC
Top agencies
|
$6,193,517 | ||
| 60 | $5,970,635 | |||
| 61 | $5,859,744 | |||
| 62 | $5,670,632 | |||
| 63 |
Asgn Incorporated
Top agencies
|
$5,650,053 | ||
| 64 | $5,641,559 | |||
| 65 | $5,484,317 | |||
| 66 |
Aptim Federal Services LLC
|
$5,463,227 | ||
| 67 | $5,399,568 | |||
| 68 |
S&K Mission Support, LLC
Top agencies
|
$5,339,695 | ||
| 69 |
Seres-Arcadis 8(A) JV2 LLC
Top agencies
|
$5,258,614 | ||
| 70 | $5,162,820 | |||
| 71 |
Potomac-Hudson Engineering Inc
|
$4,927,563 | ||
| 72 | $4,864,678 | |||
| 73 |
Srs-Cape JV, LLC
Top agencies
|
$4,810,810 | ||
| 74 | $4,678,091 | |||
| 75 | $4,676,378 | |||
| 76 | $4,666,852 | |||
| 77 |
Azura Consulting LLC
Top agencies
|
$4,613,433 | ||
| 78 | $4,527,941 | |||
| 79 | $4,402,944 | |||
| 80 | $4,371,915 | |||
| 81 | $4,355,984 | |||
| 82 | $4,354,652 | |||
| 83 | $4,348,568 | |||
| 84 | $4,302,879 | |||
| 85 |
CDM A Joint Venture
Top agencies
|
$4,256,233 | ||
| 86 |
Bluestone Interspec JV, LLC
Top agencies
|
$4,215,817 | ||
| 87 | $4,177,263 | |||
| 88 |
Tierra Data Inc.
Top agencies
|
$4,101,284 | ||
| 89 | $4,084,252 | |||
| 90 |
Tetra TECH EC, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$4,000,000 | ||
| 91 | $3,895,278 | |||
| 92 | $3,865,228 | |||
| 93 | $3,842,571 | |||
| 94 | $3,813,332 | |||
| 95 | $3,757,028 | |||
| 96 | $3,687,288 | |||
| 97 |
Environmental Research Group LLC
|
$3,682,088 | ||
| 98 | $3,622,870 | |||
| 99 | $3,529,997 | |||
| 100 | $3,529,508 |
Show 75 more
100 of 747 contractors listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
How this ranking works
- Source: every contract action FPDS records (as published on SAM.gov) in the period, as GovTribe received it.
- Amounts are net obligations: what was obligated, less what was deobligated. Shares are of $3.23 billion obligated before deobligations, so they never pass 100%.
- Parent companies: each action counts under the ultimate parent its award record names, or under the awardee when it names none, so no dollar counts twice. Parents of the same name (Inc., LLC and the like aside) count as one company, since FPDS records a company's parent under more than one UEI over time. GovTribe corrects a few parents and names by hand; see the corrections.
- Fiscal year 2024 ran Oct 1, 2023 – Sep 30, 2024. The Department of Defense reports its contract actions to FPDS about 90 days late, so a fiscal year is ranked once they're in, in February, and the list doesn't change after.
- Rank changes compare with FY2023. "New" marks a company outside that period's top 500, and "Returned" one of those that was on an earlier fiscal year's list.
- Rank lines show each company's rank on every fiscal year's list since FY2021, #1 at the top, on a scale that gives the top of the list more room. A dashed stretch spans years it wasn't on the list. The step from FY2023 takes the color of the rank change beside it.
- Placeholder recipients FPDS uses when it names no company ("Miscellaneous Foreign Contractors" and the like) aren't ranked.
Quick answers
Who were the top 10 PSC F999 contractors in FY2024?
1. United Cleanup Oak Ridge LLC ($592M), 2. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. ($397M), 3. HUI Huliau Technology Services LLC ($217M), 4. Sevenson Environmental Services, Inc. ($121M), 5. Hanford Laboratory Management and Integration LLC ($120M), 6. Idaho Environmental Coalition LLC ($99.8M), 7. Guidehouse Inc. ($80.8M), 8. BWX Technologies, Inc. ($74M), 9. Dawson Solutions LLC ($69.8M), 10. Hydrogeologic, Inc. ($69.2M).
On GovTribe
Research every contractor on this list
- Every contract, task order and IDV they hold
- Their subsidiaries, teammates and competitors
- Open opportunities they're positioned for
- Alerts when they win new work