Top 34 Contractors in PSC AZ11: R&D – Other Research and Development (Basic Research), FY2024
Parent companies by net contract obligations Oct 1, 2023 – Sep 30, 2024 Code page on GovTribe
The top 10 won 99% of FY2024 PSC AZ11 contract dollars
Ranking facts
- Contract obligations
- $3,270,279,872 Net of deobligations, by contracts coded PSC AZ11
- Contractors
- 35 Parent companies with an obligation
- Largest contractor
- Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC $3.17 billion, 96.5% of obligations
- Data as of
Contract actions from FPDS (SAM.gov). How the rankings work · Download all 34 rows as CSV
Full ranking
| Rank | Contractor | Net obligations | Share | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $3,166,514,285 | |||
| 2 |
Torch Technologies Inc.
Top agencies
|
$13,499,883 | ||
| 3 | $10,649,311 | |||
| 4 | $10,343,081 | |||
| 5 | $10,174,207 | |||
| 6 | $8,315,177 | |||
| 7 | $8,077,971 | |||
| 8 | $5,929,807 | |||
| 9 |
Peraton Labs Inc.
Top agencies
|
$4,634,042 | ||
| 10 | $4,515,612 | |||
| 11 | $4,338,019 | |||
| 12 | $4,220,913 | |||
| 13 |
MRIGLOBAL
Top agencies
|
$3,480,336 | ||
| 14 | $2,818,448 | |||
| 15 |
Charles River Laboratories International Inc.
Top agencies
|
$2,781,552 | ||
| 16 | $2,651,530 | |||
| 17 | $2,517,887 | |||
| 18 | $2,295,605 | |||
| 19 | $1,973,714 | |||
| 20 |
Simventions Inc.
Top agencies
|
$1,266,011 | ||
| 21 | $1,111,418 | |||
| 22 |
Space Systems/Loral LLC
Top agencies
|
$1,092,456 | ||
| 23 |
Carnegie-Mellon University
Top agencies
|
$499,000 | ||
| 24 | $498,113 | |||
| 25 | $399,999 | |||
| 26 | $319,271 | |||
| 27 |
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Top agencies
|
$117,658 | ||
| 28 | $100,551 | |||
| 29 |
Taconic Biosciences Inc.
Top agencies
|
$66,117 | ||
| 30 |
Infrared Telemetrics Inc.
Top agencies
|
$50,000 | ||
| 31 |
Precision Combustion, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$32,676 | ||
| 32 |
Epir Technologies, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$32,033 | ||
| 33 | $8,040 | |||
| 34 |
Praxair Distribution Inc.
Top agencies
|
$2,838 |
Show 9 more
34 of 35 contractors listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
How this ranking works
- Source: every contract action FPDS records (as published on SAM.gov) in the period, as GovTribe received it.
- Amounts are net obligations: what was obligated, less what was deobligated. Shares are of $3.28 billion obligated before deobligations, so they never pass 100%.
- Parent companies: each action counts under the ultimate parent its award record names, or under the awardee when it names none, so no dollar counts twice. Parents of the same name (Inc., LLC and the like aside) count as one company, since FPDS records a company's parent under more than one UEI over time. GovTribe corrects a few parents and names by hand; see the corrections.
- Fiscal year 2024 ran Oct 1, 2023 – Sep 30, 2024. The Department of Defense reports its contract actions to FPDS about 90 days late, so a fiscal year is ranked once they're in, in February, and the list doesn't change after.
- Rank changes compare with FY2023. "New" marks a company outside that period's top 500, and "Returned" one of those that was on an earlier fiscal year's list.
- Rank lines show each company's rank on every fiscal year's list since FY2021, #1 at the top, on a scale that gives the top of the list more room. A dashed stretch spans years it wasn't on the list. The step from FY2023 takes the color of the rank change beside it.
- Placeholder recipients FPDS uses when it names no company ("Miscellaneous Foreign Contractors" and the like) aren't ranked.
Quick answers
Who were the top 10 PSC AZ11 contractors in FY2024?
1. Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC ($3.17B), 2. Torch Technologies Inc. ($13.5M), 3. Battelle Memorial Institute ($10.6M), 4. University of Southern California ($10.3M), 5. Teamstaff Inc. ($10.2M), 6. Michigan Technological University ($8.32M), 7. Integrated Laboratory Systems, LLC ($8.08M), 8. Zin Technologies, Inc. ($5.93M), 9. Peraton Labs Inc. ($4.63M), 10. Research Triangle Institute ($4.52M).
On GovTribe
Research every contractor on this list
- Every contract, task order and IDV they hold
- Their subsidiaries, teammates and competitors
- Open opportunities they're positioned for
- Alerts when they win new work