Top 59 Contractors in PSC AC22: National Defense R&D Services; Atomic Energy Defense Activities; Applied Research, FY2025
Parent companies by net contract obligations Oct 1, 2024 – Sep 30, 2025 Code page on GovTribe
The top 10 won 92% of FY2025 PSC AC22 contract dollars
Ranking facts
- Contract obligations
- $1,852,169,978 Net of deobligations, by contracts coded PSC AC22
- Contractors
- 59 Parent companies with an obligation
- Largest contractor
- Lockheed Martin Corporation $1.29 billion, 68.6% of obligations
- Data as of
Contract actions from FPDS (SAM.gov). How the rankings work · Download all 59 rows as CSV · Free to reuse with credit to GovTribe (CC BY 4.0)
Full ranking
| Rank | Contractor | Net obligations | Share | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Top agencies
|
$1,291,524,990 | ||
| 2 | $129,494,248 | |||
| 3 |
The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory LLC
|
$93,107,025 | ||
| 4 |
Firefly Aerospace Inc.
Top agencies
|
$65,621,396 | ||
| 5 |
Analytic Services Inc.
Top agencies
|
$43,237,453 | ||
| 6 |
Sparc Research LLC
Top agencies
|
$30,444,178 | ||
| 7 | $28,317,393 | |||
| 8 |
Rocket Lab USA Inc.
Top agencies
|
$20,641,317 | ||
| 9 |
RTX Corporation
Top agencies
|
$16,532,260 | ||
| 10 |
Aerovironment, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$16,300,172 | ||
| 11 |
Ursa Major Technologies Inc.
Top agencies
|
$15,144,366 | ||
| 12 | $11,745,171 | |||
| 13 |
Raytheon Company
Top agencies
|
$10,000,000 | ||
| 14 |
Canyon Consulting, LLC
Top agencies
|
$9,725,271 | ||
| 15 |
Istari Federal LLC
Top agencies
|
$8,999,051 | ||
| 16 | $7,391,896 | |||
| 17 | $7,006,511 | |||
| 18 |
Sierra Lobo Inc.
Top agencies
|
$6,647,654 | ||
| 19 | $5,730,561 | |||
| 20 | $5,159,556 | |||
| 21 |
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$3,086,400 | ||
| 22 |
KBR Wyle Services LLC
Top agencies
|
$2,664,464 | ||
| 23 |
Technology Service Corp
Top agencies
|
$2,370,900 | ||
| 24 |
Astrobotic Technology Inc
Top agencies
|
$2,215,483 | ||
| 25 | $2,060,960 | |||
| 26 | $1,899,532 | |||
| 27 |
Benchmark Space Systems Inc.
Top agencies
|
$1,800,000 | ||
| 28 | $1,629,626 | |||
| 29 |
Verisk Analytics, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$1,504,651 | ||
| 30 |
Flight Works, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$1,468,748 | ||
| 31 |
BAE Systems PLC
Top agencies
|
$1,466,665 | ||
| 32 | $1,122,235 | |||
| 33 | $1,000,000 | |||
| 34 | $943,348 | |||
| 35 | $882,126 | |||
| 36 | $715,769 | |||
| 37 |
Trusted Space LLC
Top agencies
|
$673,913 | ||
| 38 | $580,670 | |||
| 39 | $518,000 | |||
| 40 | $467,116 | |||
| 41 |
Busek Co., Inc.
Top agencies
|
$464,485 | ||
| 42 |
Utah State University
Top agencies
|
$444,500 | ||
| 43 |
Novawurks, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$399,281 | ||
| 44 |
DCS Corporation
Top agencies
|
$398,877 | ||
| 45 | $208,000 | |||
| 46 | $190,400 | |||
| 47 | $179,999 | |||
| 48 |
Spectral Energies LLC
Top agencies
|
$179,769 | ||
| 49 | $167,580 | |||
| 50 |
TDA Research, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$139,999 | ||
| 51 |
Intellisense Systems Inc
Top agencies
|
$139,964 | ||
| 52 |
Physical Sciences Inc.
Top agencies
|
$139,859 | ||
| 53 | $139,812 | |||
| 54 | $102,305 | |||
| 55 |
EXO-Atmospheric Technologies LLC
Top agencies
|
$78,335 | ||
| 56 | $73,098 | |||
| 57 |
Boecore, LLC
Top agencies
|
$62,583 | ||
| 58 |
Etegent Technologies Ltd.
Top agencies
|
$32,621 | ||
| 59 |
Autonodyne LLC
Top agencies
|
$4,082 |
Show all 59
How this ranking works
- Source: every contract action FPDS records (as published on SAM.gov) in the period, as GovTribe received it.
- Amounts are net obligations: what was obligated, less what was deobligated. Shares are of $1.88 billion obligated before deobligations, so they never pass 100%.
- Parent companies: each action counts under the ultimate parent its award record names, or under the awardee when it names none, so no dollar counts twice. An awardee whose own actions mostly name no parent, and that no other company's actions name as their parent, rolls up its SAM.gov registration's chain of parent companies: it counts under the first company there that other companies' actions name as their parent, or under the parent most of a company's own actions name, whichever comes first; with neither, under the highest company in the chain with federal contracts of its own. Joint ventures stay companies of their own. Parents of the same name (Inc., LLC and the like aside) count as one company, since FPDS records a company's parent under more than one UEI over time. GovTribe corrects a few parents and names by hand; see the corrections.
- Fiscal year 2025 ran Oct 1, 2024 – Sep 30, 2025. The Department of Defense reports its contract actions to FPDS about 90 days late, so a fiscal year is ranked once they're in, in February, and the list doesn't change after.
- Rank changes compare with FY2024. "New" marks a company outside that period's top 500, and "Returned" one of those that was on an earlier fiscal year's list.
- Rank lines show each company's rank on every fiscal year's list since FY2021, #1 at the top, on a scale that gives the top of the list more room. A dashed stretch spans years it wasn't on the list. The step from FY2024 takes the color of the rank change beside it.
- Placeholder recipients FPDS uses when it names no company ("Miscellaneous Foreign Contractors" and the like) aren't ranked.
Quick answers
Who were the top 10 PSC AC22 contractors in FY2025?
1. Lockheed Martin Corporation ($1.29B), 2. X-Bow Launch Systems Inc. ($129M), 3. The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory LLC ($93.1M), 4. Firefly Aerospace Inc. ($65.6M), 5. Analytic Services Inc. ($43.2M), 6. Sparc Research LLC ($30.4M), 7. Honeywell International Inc. ($28.3M), 8. Rocket Lab USA Inc. ($20.6M), 9. RTX Corporation ($16.5M), 10. Aerovironment, Inc. ($16.3M).
On GovTribe
Research every contractor on this list
- Every contract, task order and IDV they hold
- Their subsidiaries, teammates and competitors
- Open opportunities they're positioned for
- Alerts when they win new work