Top 88 Contractors in NAICS 813312: Environment, Conservation and Wildlife Organizations, FY2022
Parent companies by net contract obligations Oct 1, 2021 – Sep 30, 2022 Code page on GovTribe
The top 10 won 88% of FY2022 NAICS 813312 contract dollars
Ranking facts
- Contract obligations
- $28,653,172 Net of deobligations, by contracts coded NAICS 813312
- Contractors
- 90 Parent companies with an obligation
- Largest contractor
- Tetra Tech, Inc. $14.9 million, 51.4% of obligations
- Data as of
Contract actions from FPDS (SAM.gov). How the rankings work · Download all 88 rows as CSV
Full ranking
| Rank | Contractor | Net obligations | Share | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $14,862,009 | |||
| 2 | $3,681,100 | |||
| 3 | $3,045,750 | |||
| 4 | $2,650,000 | |||
| 5 |
Walker's Lawncare LLC
Top agencies
|
$339,973 | ||
| 6 | $218,460 | |||
| 7 |
Deto Inc.
Top agencies
|
$198,135 | ||
| 8 | $189,000 | |||
| 9 | $155,800 | |||
| 10 |
Government of Canada
Top agencies
|
$155,000 | ||
| 11 | $149,996 | |||
| 12 | $148,306 | |||
| 13 | $128,120 | |||
| 14 |
Eyes On Earth Inc.
Top agencies
|
$117,000 | ||
| 15 |
Friends of Trees
Top agencies
|
$115,650 | ||
| 16 | $110,000 | |||
| 17 | $109,784 | |||
| 18 | $107,625 | |||
| 20 | $103,585 | |||
| 21 |
State of Arizona
Top agencies
|
$100,039 | ||
| 22 | $99,000 | |||
| 23 |
Sacramento River Ranch LLC
Top agencies
|
$97,000 | ||
| 24 | $86,590 | |||
| 25 |
Singh Group, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$85,000 | ||
| 26 | $82,000 | |||
| 27 | $80,000 | |||
| 28 | $71,180 | |||
| 29 | $70,760 | |||
| 30 | $68,700 | |||
| 31 |
Hawaii Wildlife Center
Top agencies
|
$68,268 | ||
| 32 | $65,796 | |||
| 33 | $56,479 | |||
| 34 | $54,678 | |||
| 35 | $51,241 | |||
| 36 |
Tilley, Alden
Top agencies
|
$42,956 | ||
| 37 |
Courtenay J Duzet
Top agencies
|
$42,697 | ||
| 38 |
Alfieri, Samuel
Top agencies
|
$40,192 | ||
| 39 | $37,926 | |||
| 40 |
Crow Creek Sioux Tribe
Top agencies
|
$33,869 | ||
| 41 |
Yeager, Nicholas
Top agencies
|
$33,394 | ||
| 42 | $30,500 | |||
| 43 |
Island ECO Services LLC
Top agencies
|
$30,000 | ||
| 44 | $30,000 | |||
| 45 | $30,000 | |||
| 46 | $29,545 | |||
| 47 |
Idea Consultants,Inc.
Top agencies
|
$29,232 | ||
| 48 |
Coastline Ltd.
Top agencies
|
$28,620 | ||
| 49 |
Kincer G Crovetti
Top agencies
|
$28,229 | ||
| 50 |
Jens H. Fleer
Top agencies
|
$27,908 | ||
| 51 | $27,682 | |||
| 52 | $25,600 | |||
| 53 |
The Peregrine Fund, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$25,588 | ||
| 54 | $25,363 | |||
| 55 |
Lynn C. Peterson
Top agencies
|
$25,000 | ||
| 56 | $24,964 | |||
| 57 |
Katie Bush
Top agencies
|
$24,492 | ||
| 58 | $20,000 | |||
| 59 | $20,000 | |||
| 60 |
Board of Governers State University System of Florida
Top agencies
|
$19,750 | ||
| 61 | $18,680 | |||
| 62 |
Ohio Civil Rights Commission
Top agencies
|
$18,214 | ||
| 63 | $17,285 | |||
| 64 | $16,575 | |||
| 65 |
Habitat Research LLC
Top agencies
|
$15,000 | ||
| 66 |
Birdlife International
Top agencies
|
$15,000 | ||
| 67 | $14,782 | |||
| 68 |
Elayna Bump
Top agencies
|
$14,235 | ||
| 69 | $14,000 | |||
| 70 |
Durkin, Brian
Top agencies
|
$12,041 | ||
| 71 |
Tenhundfeld, Daniel
Top agencies
|
$10,871 | ||
| 72 |
Lindsay Wourms
Top agencies
|
$10,618 | ||
| 73 | $10,000 | |||
| 74 | $10,000 | |||
| 75 | $10,000 | |||
| 76 | $9,999 | |||
| 77 |
Smith-Root Inc.
Top agencies
|
$9,056 | ||
| 78 |
Xceptional Inc.
Top agencies
|
$9,000 | ||
| 79 | $8,894 | |||
| 80 |
Windchazer Inc.
Top agencies
|
$8,820 | ||
| 81 | $8,741 | |||
| 82 |
Devin Pereira
Top agencies
|
$8,492 | ||
| 83 | $8,400 | |||
| 84 |
Ashley Loehn
Top agencies
|
$6,993 | ||
| 85 |
Ramirez, Alina
Top agencies
|
$6,000 | ||
| 86 | $5,000 | |||
| 87 |
Betty Grizzle
Top agencies
|
$2,715 | ||
| 88 |
A1 Datashred LLC
Top agencies
|
$2,500 |
Show 63 more
88 of 90 contractors listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
How this ranking works
- Source: every contract action FPDS records (as published on SAM.gov) in the period, as GovTribe received it.
- Amounts are net obligations: what was obligated, less what was deobligated. Shares are of $28.9 million obligated before deobligations, so they never pass 100%.
- Parent companies: each action counts under the ultimate parent its award record names, or under the awardee when it names none, so no dollar counts twice. Parents of the same name (Inc., LLC and the like aside) count as one company, since FPDS records a company's parent under more than one UEI over time. GovTribe corrects a few parents and names by hand; see the corrections.
- Fiscal year 2022 ran Oct 1, 2021 – Sep 30, 2022. The Department of Defense reports its contract actions to FPDS about 90 days late, so a fiscal year is ranked once they're in, in February, and the list doesn't change after.
- Rank changes compare with FY2021. "New" marks a company outside that period's top 500, and "Returned" one of those that was on an earlier fiscal year's list.
- Rank lines show each company's rank on every fiscal year's list since FY2021, #1 at the top, on a scale that gives the top of the list more room. A dashed stretch spans years it wasn't on the list. The step from FY2021 takes the color of the rank change beside it.
- Placeholder recipients FPDS uses when it names no company ("Miscellaneous Foreign Contractors" and the like) aren't ranked.
Quick answers
Who were the top 10 NAICS 813312 contractors in FY2022?
1. Tetra Tech, Inc. ($14.9M), 2. The Westervelt Company ($3.68M), 3. National Fish and Wildlife Foundation ($3.05M), 4. Pact, Inc. ($2.65M), 5. Walker's Lawncare LLC ($340K), 6. Ochoco Irrigation District ($218K), 7. Deto Inc. ($198K), 8. Gulf of Maine Lobster Foundation, Inc. ($189K), 9. Marshall University Research Corporation ($156K), 10. Government of Canada ($155K).
On GovTribe
Research every contractor on this list
- Every contract, task order and IDV they hold
- Their subsidiaries, teammates and competitors
- Open opportunities they're positioned for
- Alerts when they win new work