Top 100 Contractors in NAICS 54194: Veterinary Services, FY2025
Parent companies by net contract obligations Oct 1, 2024 – Sep 30, 2025 Code page on GovTribe
The top 10 won 68% of FY2025 NAICS 54194 contract dollars
Ranking facts
- Contract obligations
- $137,210,592 Net of deobligations, by contracts coded NAICS 54194 or a code under it
- Contractors
- 164 Parent companies with an obligation
- Largest contractor
- JS Technology, Inc. $22.9 million, 15.8% of obligations
- Data as of
Contract actions from FPDS (SAM.gov). How the rankings work · Download all 100 rows as CSV
Full ranking
| Rank | Contractor | Net obligations | Share | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $22,900,502 | |||
| 2 | $20,746,896 | |||
| 3 |
Charles River Laboratories International Inc.
Top agencies
|
$20,314,557 | ||
| 4 | $9,144,977 | |||
| 5 | $6,621,126 | |||
| 6 | $5,950,680 | |||
| 7 |
Fefa, LLC
Top agencies
|
$3,372,032 | ||
| 8 | $3,119,306 | |||
| 9 |
Cornell University
Top agencies
|
$3,084,667 | ||
| 10 | $2,801,949 | |||
| 11 | $2,338,575 | |||
| 12 | $2,181,969 | |||
| 13 | $2,106,961 | |||
| 14 | $2,034,581 | |||
| 15 | $1,965,563 | |||
| 16 | $1,942,568 | |||
| 17 | $1,447,288 | |||
| 18 | $1,368,250 | |||
| 19 | $1,301,461 | |||
| 20 | $1,174,628 | |||
| 21 |
MPF Federal, LLC
Top agencies
|
$1,172,066 | ||
| 22 | $1,089,700 | |||
| 23 |
Purdue University
Top agencies
|
$972,242 | ||
| 24 | $883,297 | |||
| 25 |
Idexx Laboratories Inc.
Top agencies
|
$873,342 | ||
| 26 | $782,840 | |||
| 27 |
Sarah Hummel DVM LLC
Top agencies
|
$768,844 | ||
| 28 | $673,589 | |||
| 29 | $653,920 | |||
| 30 |
V.i. Pet, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$545,238 | ||
| 31 | $429,500 | |||
| 32 | $425,025 | |||
| 33 | $373,495 | |||
| 34 | $372,000 | |||
| 35 |
L & G Investment Co
Top agencies
|
$365,502 | ||
| 36 | $341,093 | |||
| 37 | $325,000 | |||
| 38 | $311,460 | |||
| 39 | $299,205 | |||
| 40 | $287,980 | |||
| 41 |
University of South Carolina
Top agencies
|
$287,025 | ||
| 42 | $274,005 | |||
| 43 | $240,400 | |||
| 44 |
Modoc Veterinary Center
Top agencies
|
$239,942 | ||
| 45 | $235,583 | |||
| 46 |
University of Georgia
Top agencies
|
$230,802 | ||
| 47 |
Sanford Dvm, Richard
Top agencies
|
$224,480 | ||
| 48 | $220,783 | |||
| 49 |
Utah State University
Top agencies
|
$206,770 | ||
| 50 |
Mojave Equine LLC
Top agencies
|
$200,000 | ||
| 51 | $200,000 | |||
| 52 | $199,935 | |||
| 53 | $199,377 | |||
| 54 | $191,405 | |||
| 55 | $184,965 | |||
| 56 | $175,955 | |||
| 57 | $174,536 | |||
| 58 | $170,612 | |||
| 59 |
The Geneva Foundation
Top agencies
|
$158,208 | ||
| 60 | $149,141 | |||
| 61 | $146,488 | |||
| 62 | $145,620 | |||
| 63 |
Trustees of Dartmouth College
Top agencies
|
$144,479 | ||
| 64 |
University of Utah
Top agencies
|
$140,980 | ||
| 65 | $140,160 | |||
| 66 | $138,217 | |||
| 67 | $136,540 | |||
| 68 | $135,593 | |||
| 69 | $132,830 | |||
| 70 | $132,627 | |||
| 71 | $130,540 | |||
| 72 | $130,295 | |||
| 73 |
Virginia Commonwealth University
Top agencies
|
$130,250 | ||
| 74 | $129,912 | |||
| 75 | $127,496 | |||
| 76 | $126,270 | |||
| 77 |
Yale Univ
Top agencies
|
$125,000 | ||
| 78 |
CCC Canine, LLC
Top agencies
|
$124,513 | ||
| 79 | $121,140 | |||
| 80 |
Kansas State University
Top agencies
|
$119,509 | ||
| 81 | $116,033 | |||
| 82 | $115,180 | |||
| 83 | $113,240 | |||
| 84 | $111,990 | |||
| 85 | $104,637 | |||
| 86 | $101,400 | |||
| 87 | $100,040 | |||
| 88 | $100,000 | |||
| 89 | $99,339 | |||
| 90 | $90,251 | |||
| 91 | $90,221 | |||
| 92 |
HMH Hospitals Corporation
Top agencies
|
$82,518 | ||
| 93 |
Clemson University
Top agencies
|
$80,000 | ||
| 94 | $75,000 | |||
| 95 | $71,092 | |||
| 96 | $69,700 | |||
| 97 |
Krista Gibbs
Top agencies
|
$67,530 | ||
| 98 | $67,100 | |||
| 99 | $62,565 | |||
| 100 |
Goin To Grandmas
Top agencies
|
$61,912 |
Show 75 more
100 of 164 contractors listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
Rankings for the codes under NAICS 54194
| Code | Net obligations | Largest contractor |
|---|---|---|
| 541940 Veterinary Services | $137,210,592 | JS Technology, Inc. |
How this ranking works
- Source: every contract action FPDS records (as published on SAM.gov) in the period, as GovTribe received it.
- Amounts are net obligations: what was obligated, less what was deobligated. Shares are of $145 million obligated before deobligations, so they never pass 100%.
- Parent companies: each action counts under the ultimate parent its award record names, or under the awardee when it names none, so no dollar counts twice. Parents of the same name (Inc., LLC and the like aside) count as one company, since FPDS records a company's parent under more than one UEI over time. GovTribe corrects a few parents and names by hand; see the corrections.
- Fiscal year 2025 ran Oct 1, 2024 – Sep 30, 2025. The Department of Defense reports its contract actions to FPDS about 90 days late, so a fiscal year is ranked once they're in, in February, and the list doesn't change after.
- Rank changes compare with FY2024. "New" marks a company outside that period's top 500, and "Returned" one of those that was on an earlier fiscal year's list.
- Rank lines show each company's rank on every fiscal year's list since FY2021, #1 at the top, on a scale that gives the top of the list more room. A dashed stretch spans years it wasn't on the list. The step from FY2024 takes the color of the rank change beside it.
- Placeholder recipients FPDS uses when it names no company ("Miscellaneous Foreign Contractors" and the like) aren't ranked.
Quick answers
Who were the top 10 NAICS 54194 contractors in FY2025?
1. JS Technology, Inc. ($22.9M), 2. Priority One Services, Inc. ($20.7M), 3. Charles River Laboratories International Inc. ($20.3M), 4. National Marine Mammal Foundation, Inc. ($9.14M), 5. Alpha Omega Biotechnology Services LLC ($6.62M), 6. Chimp Haven, Inc. ($5.95M), 7. Fefa, LLC ($3.37M), 8. University of Wisconsin System ($3.12M), 9. Cornell University ($3.08M), 10. Iowa State University of Science and Technology ($2.8M).
On GovTribe
Research every contractor on this list
- Every contract, task order and IDV they hold
- Their subsidiaries, teammates and competitors
- Open opportunities they're positioned for
- Alerts when they win new work