Addendum 2 BDC09-24/25 Grayton Beach State Park - Boardwalk Replacement
Closed State & local contract opportunity Posted
- Solicitation number
- ITB-09966
- State
- Florida
- Responses due
Opportunity facts
- Jurisdiction
- NIGP codes
- 90930 Building Construction (Not Otherwise Classified)
- 91313 Construction, Bridge And Drawbridge (Includes Reconstruction/Rehabilitation)
- 90924 Building Construction, Commercial And Institutional
- 98863 Park Area Construction/Renovation
- 91223 Construction, General (Backfill Services, Digging, Ditching, Road Grading, Rock Stabilization, Etc.)
- 91240 Demolition Services
- 91347 Construction, Sidewalk And Driveway (Includes Pedestrian And Handicap Ramps)
- 91430 Concrete
- UNSPSC codes
- 72121400 Specialized public building construction services
- 72141107 Bridge construction and repair service
- 72141128 Public square construction and or remodelling service
- 72141129 Park and garden construction and or remodelling service
- 72141507 Pile driving service
- 72141510 Demolition services
- 72152705 Sidewalk or ramp construction service
- 72152710 Foundation and footing construction service
Opportunity details come from vendor.myfloridamarketplace.com. Updated .
About this opportunity
This state and local contract opportunity is for the replacement of the boardwalk at Grayton Beach State Park in Walton County, Florida. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection is issuing Addendum No. 2 to Bid No. BDC09-24/25 for this project. The addendum provides clarification on the required lengths of the aluminum/magnesium grab rails, which are only necessary on the "Slope" portions of the boardwalk and not the "Landing" areas. It also addresses discrepancies between the geotechnical report and the site plans, explaining that the geotechnical investigation was performed for two different potential alternatives, which resulted in the shape change of the proposed boardwalk to accommodate elevation and ADA accessibility requirements. The addendum must be signed and included with the bid submission, or it may be grounds for bid rejection. The bid is due on August 21, 2024.
The contract documents and attachments, other than the addendum, remain in full force and effect. The procurement does not appear to have any set-aside designations or restrictions on the types of organizations that can respond. There is no information provided about incumbent vendors or current contractors, nor any details on existing infrastructure or technology that requires integration. The budget range or possible award value is also not specified in the available information.
Opportunity text
August 13, 2024
NOTICE TO APPLICANTS
ADDENDUM NO. TWO (2)
Grayton Beach State Park - Boardwalk Replacement
DEP BID NO. BDC09-24/25
TO BIDDERS AND PLAN HOLDERS ON THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT: PLEASE NOTE CONTENTS HEREIN AND INCLUDE, SIGNED, WITH YOUR BID SUBMISSION.
NOTICE
It will be required that this addendum be signed in acknowledgment of receipt and that it be included with your Bid when same is submitted to Laurinda Micheels, Contracts Specialist, Bureau of Design and Construction, 3800 Commonwealth Blvd., MS #520, Tallahassee, Florida, 32399-3000. Failure to do so may be grounds for rejection of the Bid.
____________________________________
Signature of Contractor and Date
The following statements supersede & supplement the corresponding items in the specifications & drawings:
1. Question: The plans do not list a linear foot for the aluminum/magnesium grab rail. On sheet C200 it shows them on both sides of the boardwalk. Will they continually run on both sides the entire length ?
Answer: Handrails are only required on the portions of the boardwalk labeled "Slope" and are not required on the portions labeled "Landing".
2. Question: The geotechnical report is showing 2 proposed boardwalks rather than one. The proposed boardwalk is also a different shape than the proposed boardwalk in the site plans C103. Is there a reason for the discrepancy?
Answer: The geotechnical investigation was performed for two different potential alternatives. HA-3 and HA-4 were performed generally in the vicinity of the current proposed boardwalk. The shape changed due to elevation requirements for crossing the dune line in combination with ADA accessibility requirements.
In all other respects, the contract documents of which this is an Addendum, and attachments relative thereto, shall remain in full force and effect.
Files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Addendum 2 BDC09-24-25.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work this opportunity
- Track it in your pipeline
- Similar opportunities
- Ask GovTribe AI about this opportunity