Addendum 2 BDC09-24-25.pdf
PDF 224 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- ITB-09966
- Issued by
- Walton County, Florida
About this file
This document is an Addendum No. 2 issued by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection regarding Bid No. BDC09-24/25 for the Grayton Beach State Park Boardwalk Replacement project. The addendum provides clarification on the required handrail lengths, as well as the reasons for discrepancies between the geotechnical report and the site plans. Specifically, the handrails are only required on the "Slope" portions of the boardwalk and not the "Landing" areas. Additionally, the geotechnical investigation was performed for two different potential alternatives, which resulted in the shape change of the proposed boardwalk to accommodate elevation and ADA accessibility requirements.
The document also states that all other contract documents and attachments remain in full force and effect, and that the addendum must be signed and included with the bid submission, or it may be grounds for bid rejection.
View the file
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BDC Bid No. BDC09-24/25, Addendum #2, Page 1 of 2
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
Environmental Protection
Marjory Stoneman Douglas Building
3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399
Ron DeSantis Governor
Jeanette Nuñez
Lt. Governor
Shawn Hamilton Secretary
August 13, 2024
NOTICE TO APPLICANTS
ADDENDUM NO. TWO (2)
Grayton Beach State Park - Boardwalk Replacement
DEP BID NO. BDC09-24/25
TO BIDDERS AND PLAN HOLDERS ON THE ABOVE REFERENCED
PROJECT: PLEASE NOTE CONTENTS HEREIN AND INCLUDE, SIGNED, WITH
YOUR BID SUBMISSION.
NOTICE
It will be required that this addendum be signed in acknowledgment of receipt and that it be included with your Bid when same is submitted to Laurinda Micheels, Contracts Specialist, Bureau of Design and Construction, 3800 Commonwealth Blvd., MS #520, Tallahassee, Florida, 32399-3000. Failure to do so may be grounds for rejection of the Bid.
Signature of Contractor and Date
The following statements supersede & supplement the corresponding items in the specifications & drawings:
1. Question: The plans do not list a linear foot for the aluminum/magnesium grab rail. On sheet C200 it shows them on both sides of the boardwalk. Will they continually run on both sides the entire length ?
Answer: Handrails are only required on the portions of the boardwalk labeled “Slope” and are not required on the portions labeled “Landing”.
2. Question: The geotechnical report is showing 2 proposed boardwalks rather than one. The proposed boardwalk is also a different shape than the proposed boardwalk in the site plans C103. Is there a reason for the discrepancy?
Answer: The geotechnical investigation was performed for two different potential alternatives. HA-3 and HA-4 were performed generally in the vicinity of the
BDC Bid No. BDC09-24/25, Addendum #2, Page 2 of 2 current proposed boardwalk. The shape changed due to elevation requirements for crossing the dune line in combination with ADA accessibility requirements.
In all other respects, the contract documents of which this is an Addendum, and attachments relative thereto, shall remain in full force and effect.
NOTICE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .