Root Cause Analysis and Human Factor Analysis Classification System Training

COMBINED SYNOPSIS/SOLICITATION NOTICE:

Requirement Title:                Root Cause Analysis and Human Factors Analysis Classification Training

Solicitation Number:            N42158-24-Q-S041

Solicitation Issue Date:         Wednesday, 8 August 2024

Response Deadline:               Tuesday,  27 August 2024 no later than 1200 noon (EST)

POC: Roshanda Sansom

          roshanda.l.sansom.civ@us.navy.mil

ALT. POC:  Jeremy Weible

                   Jeremy.r.weible.civ@us.navy.mil

                                                                                  GENERAL INFORMATION

1. This is a combined synopsis/solicitation notice for commercial product/services prepared in accordance with the format in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 12.603, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; quotes are being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued.

       2. This solicitation is being issued as a Request for Quotation (RFQ).

       3. This solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through, Federal Acquisition Circular

           (FAC) Number/Effective Date: 2024-05 effective 22 Apr 2024 and DFARS Change Notice 20240729.

       4. This acquisition is for Total Small Business Set-Aside.

       5. North American Industry Classification System Code (NAICS) 611430 Professional and Management Development Training             and Product or Service Code (PSC) U005 Education/training-Tuition/registration/membership Fees.

       6. The size standard is $15M. All qualified small businesses under this industry are encouraged to submit quotes.

       7. This requirement is rated under Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) with an assigned rating of DO-C9.

                                                                                     REQUIREMENT INFORMATION

Line Item       0001

Description   Root Cause Analysis and Human Factors Analysis Classification training for NNSY (Norfolk Naval Shipyard

                       personnel).

Quantity        6

Unit of Measure  Job

Extended Description:

The contractor shall submit quotes based on the below documents provided explaining work to be performed and work location as well as in accordance with required clauses and provisions contained in this solicitation. 

• Attachment 1 - Statement of Work
• Attachment 2 – Contractor Technical Certification

Place of Delivery/Performance/Acceptance/FOB Point:

F.O.B. Destination; Norfolk Naval Shipyard, Portsmouth, VA 23709 (exact customer address will be provided in the resulting contract).

                                                                                 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

FAR provision 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors -- Commercial, applies to this acquisition. As prescribed in FAR 12.301(b)(1), the following addendum is provided for this solicitation and hereby amends any language there in:

1. Questions may be submitted to the POC and Alternate POC listed above no later than 12:00 pm 14 August 2024.   Questions submitted after this date may not be answered.
2. Quotes in response to this solicitation must be submitted via email to the POC listed above no later than the established deadline.
3. Quotes must be valid through 22 September 2024.

                                                                                  EVALUATION CRITERIA

IAW FAR 12.602 the evaluation criteria found in 52.212-2, Evaluation-Commercial Items, is applicable and has been tailored to this solicitation as listed below.

(a) The Government intends to award one Firm Fixed Price, (FFP) contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible contractor whose quote conforms to the solicitation and will be most advantageous to the Government based on price and other factors considered. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and to award without discussions with Offerors; therefore, each Offeror's initial proposal should contain its best terms. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if later determined to be necessary. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements; failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the Offeror being ineligible for award.

Award shall be made to the responsible Offeror whose proposal, in conforming to this solicitation, is determined to be the best value to the Government based on a tradeoff among the priced and non-priced factors considered. Offerors are urged to ensure that their proposals are submitted on the most favorable terms.

The evaluation of proposals submitted in response to this solicitation will be conducted employing an adjectival level or confidence ratings. Proposals will be evaluated under three (3) factors: (1) Technical, (2) Past Performance, and (3) Price. Proposals are evaluated using adjectival ratings and are ranked in order of importance using the non-price factors as follows. Technical is more important than Past Performance, Past Performance and all non-price factors together are significantly more important than price.     

Quotes will be evaluated as Best Value Trade-Off where technical, past performance, and Period of Performance, when combined, are roughly equal to price. The Government only intends to evaluate Past Performance on the three (3) lowest priced quotes that receive a “technically acceptable” rating. The   following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

1. Technical Acceptability – The technical evaluation team will evaluate by assigning a rating of “acceptable” or “unacceptable”. Only those quotes considered technically acceptable may receive further consideration for award.
2. Past Performance,

      A.  The Government will conduct a performance risk assessment based upon the past

           performance          of the contractors and their proposed subcontractors as it relates to the

           probability of successful accomplishment of the work required by the solicitation.

      B. In conducting the performance risk assessment, the Government may use data provided by

           the contractor and data obtained from other sources including CPARS.

      C. While the Government may elect to consider data obtained from other sources, the burden of providing thorough and

           complete past performance source data rests with the contractor.

      D. The contractor shall submit a description of its past performance (all prime and major

           subcontracts received, or in performance, during the past five (5) years) which are in any way

           relevant to the effort required by this solicitation. Commercial and state/local contracts may be

           included, if necessary. The description shall include the following information in the following

           format, (i.e. PDF or Word document, Times New Roman, 12pt font, solid white background,  

           with no additional contractor identifiable information other than requested below):

1. Identify in specific detail for each contract listed, why or how you consider that effort relevant

           or similar to the effort required by this solicitation:

       2. Your (and/or your subcontractor's) CAGE and DUNS numbers:

       3. Government or commercial contracting activity, address, and telephone number:

       4. Procuring Contracting Officer's (PCO's) name and telephone number:

       5. Government or commercial contracting activity technical representative, or COR; and telephone

           numbers:

       6. Government or commercial contract administration activity, and the name and telephone number

           of the Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO):

       7. Contract number:

       8. Contract award date:

       9. Contract type:

      10. Awarded price/cost:

      11. Final, or projected final, price/cost:

      12. Original delivery schedule:

      13. Final or projected final, delivery schedule:

     E. Past Performance Evaluation – Past Performance will be rated utilizing the below table. Offerors

          who do not submit past performance for evaluation cannot be rated above “SATISFACTORY”.

Rating  

EXCEPTIONAL

Definition   

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Rating  

VERY GOOD

Definition   

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Rating  

SATISFACTORY

Definition   

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Rating  

MARGINAL

Definition   

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Rating  

UNSATISFACTORY

Definition   

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

iii. Price – Price will be evaluated on a comparative basis amongst all received quotations and the Government’s   estimate.

                                                                                      PROVISIONS

FAR provision 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications -- Commercial Items with alternate I applies to this acquisition; the offeror verifies by submission of their quote that the representation and certifications currently posted electronically at FAR 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications -- Commercial Items, have been entered or updated in the last 12 months, are current, accurate, complete, and  applicable to this solicitation.

The provisions and clauses listed below have been determined by the contracting officer to be necessary for this acquisition and consistent with customary commercial practices.

The following provisions are hereby included by reference:

52.212-1             Instructions to Offerors—Commercial Items

52.212-3             Offeror Representations and Certifications—Commercial Items--Alternate I

52.212-4             Contract Terms and Conditions—Commercial Items

52.212-5             Contract Terms and Conditions Required To Implement Statutes or Executive Orders—Commercial Items

The following provisions and clauses are hereby included by full text:

52.252-1       Solicitation Provisions Incorporated by Reference

SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)

This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at this address:

https://www.acquisition.gov/browse/index/far

https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfarspgi/current/index.html

https://www.secnav.navy.mil/rda/DASN-P/Pages/NMCARS.aspx

(End of provision)

52.252-2       Clauses Incorporated by Reference

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)

This contract incorporates one or more clauses by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. Also, the full text of a clause may be accessed electronically at this address:

https://www.acquisition.gov/browse/index/far

https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfarspgi/current/index.html

https://www.secnav.navy.mil/rda/DASN-P/Pages/NMCARS.aspx

(End of clause)

Solicitation

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment 1 - Statement of Work (Updated)

Attachment 2 – Contractor Technical Certification (Amended)

Response Deadline: Tuesday,  27 August 2024 no later than 1200 noon (EST)

POC: Roshanda Sansom

            roshanda.l.sansom.civ@us.navy.mil

ALT POC: Jeremy Weible

                 Jeremy.r.weible.civ@us.navy.mil

COMBINED SYNOPSIS/SOLICITATION NOTICE:

Requirement Title:                Root Cause Analysis and Human Factors Analysis Classification Training

Solicitation Number:            N42158-24-Q-S041

Solicitation Issue Date:         Wednesday, 8 August 2024

Response Deadline:               Thursday,  22 August 2024 no later than 1200 noon (EST)

POC: Roshanda Sansom

          roshanda.l.sansom.civ@us.navy.mil

ALT. POC:  Jeremy Weible

                   Jeremy.r.weible.civ@us.navy.mil

                                                                                  GENERAL INFORMATION

1. This is a combined synopsis/solicitation notice for commercial product/services prepared in accordance with the format in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 12.603, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; quotes are being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued.

       2. This solicitation is being issued as a Request for Quotation (RFQ).

       3. This solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through, Federal Acquisition Circular

           (FAC) Number/Effective Date: 2024-05 effective 22 Apr 2024 and DFARS Change Notice 20240729.

       4. This acquisition is for Total Small Business Set-Aside.

       5. North American Industry Classification System Code (NAICS) 611430 Professional and Management Development Training             and Product or Service Code (PSC) U005 Education/training-Tuition/registration/membership Fees.

       6. The size standard is $15M. All qualified small businesses under this industry are encouraged to submit quotes.

       7. This requirement is rated under Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) with an assigned rating of DO-C9.

                                                                                     REQUIREMENT INFORMATION

Line Item       0001

Description   Root Cause Analysis and Human Factors Analysis Classification training for NNSY (Norfolk Naval Shipyard

                       personnel).

Quantity        6

Unit of Measure  Job

Extended Description:

The contractor shall submit quotes based on the below documents provided explaining work to be performed and work location as well as in accordance with required clauses and provisions contained in this solicitation. 

• Attachment 1 - Statement of Work
• Attachment 2 – Contractor Technical Certification

Place of Delivery/Performance/Acceptance/FOB Point:

F.O.B. Destination; Norfolk Naval Shipyard, Portsmouth, VA 23709 (exact customer address will be provided in the resulting contract).

                                                                                 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

FAR provision 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors -- Commercial, applies to this acquisition. As prescribed in FAR 12.301(b)(1), the following addendum is provided for this solicitation and hereby amends any language there in:

1. Questions may be submitted to the POC and Alternate POC listed above no later than 12:00 pm 14 August 2024.   Questions submitted after this date may not be answered.
2. Quotes in response to this solicitation must be submitted via email to the POC listed above no later than the established deadline.
3. Quotes must be valid through 22 September 2024.

                                                                                  EVALUATION CRITERIA

IAW FAR 12.602 the evaluation criteria found in 52.212-2, Evaluation-Commercial Items, is applicable and has been tailored to this solicitation as listed below.

(a) The Government intends to award one Firm Fixed Price, (FFP) contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible contractor whose quote conforms to the solicitation and will be most advantageous to the Government based on price and other factors considered. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and to award without discussions with Offerors; therefore, each Offeror's initial proposal should contain its best terms. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if later determined to be necessary. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements; failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the Offeror being ineligible for award.

Award shall be made to the responsible Offeror whose proposal, in conforming to this solicitation, is determined to be the best value to the Government based on a tradeoff among the priced and non-priced factors considered. Offerors are urged to ensure that their proposals are submitted on the most favorable terms.

The evaluation of proposals submitted in response to this solicitation will be conducted employing an adjectival level or confidence ratings. Proposals will be evaluated under three (3) factors: (1) Technical, (2) Past Performance, and (3) Price. Proposals are evaluated using adjectival ratings and are ranked in order of importance using the non-price factors as follows. Technical is more important than Past Performance, Past Performance and all non-price factors together are significantly more important than price.     

Quotes will be evaluated as Best Value Trade-Off where technical, past performance, and Period of Performance, when combined, are roughly equal to price. The Government only intends to evaluate Past Performance on the three (3) lowest priced quotes that receive a “technically acceptable” rating. The   following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

1. Technical Acceptability – The technical evaluation team will evaluate by assigning a rating of “acceptable” or “unacceptable”. Only those quotes considered technically acceptable may receive further consideration for award.
2. Past Performance,

      A.  The Government will conduct a performance risk assessment based upon the past

           performance          of the contractors and their proposed subcontractors as it relates to the

           probability of successful accomplishment of the work required by the solicitation.

      B. In conducting the performance risk assessment, the Government may use data provided by

           the contractor and data obtained from other sources including CPARS.

      C. While the Government may elect to consider data obtained from other sources, the burden of providing thorough and

           complete past performance source data rests with the contractor.

      D. The contractor shall submit a description of its past performance (all prime and major

           subcontracts received, or in performance, during the past five (5) years) which are in any way

           relevant to the effort required by this solicitation. Commercial and state/local contracts may be

           included, if necessary. The description shall include the following information in the following

           format, (i.e. PDF or Word document, Times New Roman, 12pt font, solid white background,  

           with no additional contractor identifiable information other than requested below):

1. Identify in specific detail for each contract listed, why or how you consider that effort relevant

           or similar to the effort required by this solicitation:

       2. Your (and/or your subcontractor's) CAGE and DUNS numbers:

       3. Government or commercial contracting activity, address, and telephone number:

       4. Procuring Contracting Officer's (PCO's) name and telephone number:

       5. Government or commercial contracting activity technical representative, or COR; and telephone

           numbers:

       6. Government or commercial contract administration activity, and the name and telephone number

           of the Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO):

       7. Contract number:

       8. Contract award date:

       9. Contract type:

      10. Awarded price/cost:

      11. Final, or projected final, price/cost:

      12. Original delivery schedule:

      13. Final or projected final, delivery schedule:

     E. Past Performance Evaluation – Past Performance will be rated utilizing the below table. Offerors

          who do not submit past performance for evaluation cannot be rated above “SATISFACTORY”.

Rating  

EXCEPTIONAL

Definition   

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Rating  

VERY GOOD

Definition   

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Rating  

SATISFACTORY

Definition   

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Rating  

MARGINAL

Definition   

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Rating  

UNSATISFACTORY

Definition   

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

iii. Price – Price will be evaluated on a comparative basis amongst all received quotations and the Government’s   estimate.

                                                                                      PROVISIONS

FAR provision 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications -- Commercial Items with alternate I applies to this acquisition; the offeror verifies by submission of their quote that the representation and certifications currently posted electronically at FAR 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications -- Commercial Items, have been entered or updated in the last 12 months, are current, accurate, complete, and  applicable to this solicitation.

The provisions and clauses listed below have been determined by the contracting officer to be necessary for this acquisition and consistent with customary commercial practices.

The following provisions are hereby included by reference:

52.212-1             Instructions to Offerors—Commercial Items

52.212-3             Offeror Representations and Certifications—Commercial Items--Alternate I

52.212-4             Contract Terms and Conditions—Commercial Items

52.212-5             Contract Terms and Conditions Required To Implement Statutes or Executive Orders—Commercial Items

The following provisions and clauses are hereby included by full text:

52.252-1       Solicitation Provisions Incorporated by Reference

SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)

This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at this address:

https://www.acquisition.gov/browse/index/far

https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfarspgi/current/index.html

https://www.secnav.navy.mil/rda/DASN-P/Pages/NMCARS.aspx

(End of provision)

52.252-2       Clauses Incorporated by Reference

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)

This contract incorporates one or more clauses by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. Also, the full text of a clause may be accessed electronically at this address:

https://www.acquisition.gov/browse/index/far

https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfarspgi/current/index.html

https://www.secnav.navy.mil/rda/DASN-P/Pages/NMCARS.aspx

(End of clause)

Solicitation

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment 1 - Statement of Work (Updated)

Attachment 2 – Contractor Technical Certification

Response Deadline: Thursday,  22 August 2024 no later than 1200 noon (EST)

POC: Roshanda Sansom

            roshanda.l.sansom.civ@us.navy.mil

ALT POC: Jeremy Weible

                 Jeremy.r.weible.civ@us.navy.mil

This is a COMBINED SYNOPSIS/SOLICITATION for commercial items prepared in accordance with the information in FAR Subpart 12.6, in conjunction with Part 13 as supplemented with the additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; a written solicitation will not be issued. PAPER COPIES OF THIS SOLICITATION WILL NOT BE AVAILABLE.

The RFQ number is N42158-24-Q-S041. This solicitation documents and incorporates provisions and clauses in effect through FAC 2024-05 effective 22 Apr 2024, and DFARS Change Notice 20240729. It is the responsibility of the contractor to be familiar with the applicable clauses and provisions. The clauses may be accessed in full text at these addresses: https://www.acquisition.gov/browse/index/far and https://www.acquisition.gov/dfars. The NAICS Code is 611430 and the Small Business Standard is $15M. The Product Service Code is U005.

Norfolk Naval Shipyard (NNSY), Portsmouth, VA requests responses from qualified sources capable of providing (6) 3.5-day curriculum training covering the subject and application of Root Cause Analysis and Human Factors Analysis Classification System combined and tailored to NNSY as identified in the attached Statement of Work (SOW).

Table 1 – CLIN Structure and Pricing

ITEM NO. -  CLIN 0001

DESCRIPTION -  Root Cause Analysis and Human Factors Analysis Classification training for NNSY (Norfolk Naval Shipyard) personnel.

QTY - 6

UNIT - JOB

This announcement will close on 13 August 2024 at Noon Eastern Standard Time.

Shipping term shall be FOB Destination; therefore, quote SHALL include shipping cost.

System for Award Management (SAM). Quoting vendors must be registered in the SAM database to be considered for award. Registration is free and can be completed on-line at http://sam.gov/.

To be considered for this opportunity, all quotes shall be submitted in either Microsoft Word, Excel spreadsheet, or Adobe PDF. Quote must include price(s), FOB Destination, a point of contact, name and phone number, business size, and payment terms. Quote must include signed vendor certification (See section 3 of attached Addendum to FAR 52.212-1. The Government will award a contract resulting from this RFQ to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government. Each quote must clearly indicate the capability of the vendor to meet all specifications and requirements in the SOW. Responses to this solicitation are due by Noon Eastern Standard Time on 13 August 2024. Email quotes to Roshanda.L.Sansom.civ@us.navy.mil.

Quotes shall be valid for sixty (60) days (at minimum).

In addition to FAR 52.212-1, “Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Items”, the following information shall be received by NAVSEA Service Contracts Division, Norfolk Naval Shipyard no later than the closing date of the Solicitation.

This requirement will be awarded using procedures under Federal Acquisition Regulations FAR

Part 12 – Acquisition of Commercial Items and FAR Subpart 13, Simplified Acquisition Procedures.

1. Interested vendors may send the quotation to the Navy by replying via email to Roshanda.L.Sansom.civ@us.navy.mil.
2. Proposal content and instructions when submitting a quote shall consist of:
   1. Technical Capability
   2. Price Submission - INCLUDE DAILY, WEEKLY, AND MONTHLY RATES
   3. Acknowledgement of any amendment.
3. Technical Capability:

Each Vendor shall provide proof/certification that they are in compliance with the required

certifications and qualifications outlined within Attachments of the solicitation.  The information

provided should be presented in such a manner as to enable the government to make a     

thorough and complete evaluation and arrive at a sound determination as to whether or not the    

products proposed and described will satisfy the requirements of the Government as stated in

this request for quote.

Quotes submitted shall be IAW the Schedule contained in the Solicitation.  Quotes shall be held

firm for sixty (60) days.

EVALUATION

FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation — Commercial Items is applicable to this procurement. The

Government will award a contract resulting from this Request for Quotation (RFQ) to the

responsible quoter whose quotation conforms to the RFQ and will be the most advantageous to

the Government, price and other factors considered.

The following factors shall be used to evaluate quotations:

1. Technical Capability.

2. Price

Technical acceptability will be determined by reviewing the technical certifications submitted for

each item to ensure that all of the technical requirements identified are met. Technical  

acceptability will be defined as follows:

Technical Evaluation Ratings

Rating - Acceptable

Description - Quote meets all of the requirements identified.

Rating - Unacceptable

Description - Quote does not meet all of the requirements identified.

Note: Contractors who fail to possess acceptable technical capability will not be considered for award

and the other elements of their quotation will not be evaluated.

The following FAR provisions and clauses are applicable to this procurement

    (supplementary provisions and clauses may be added prior to award):

 52.212-1  Instructions to Offerors-Commercial Products and Commercial Services

                  SEP 2023

 52.212-2  Evaluation – Commercial Products and Commercial Services

                  NOV 2021

 52.212-3  Offeror Representations and Certifications – Commercial Products and Commercial

                 Services

                 MAY 2024

 52.212-4  Contract Terms and Conditions – Commercial Products and Commercial Services

                 NOV 2023

 52.212-5  Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statutes or Executive Orders -

                 Commercial Products and Commercial Services

                 MAY 2024

Attachment 1: RCA-HFACS Training SOW

Attachment 2: Contractor Technical Certification Template (Note: Must accompany quote and  

capability statement to be considered for award)