W91WRZ24Q0014_AM0005_XRay Unit.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is as follow s:

1. Correct the Technical Capabilities Submission Instructions as follow s:

FROM: Detail Xray Machine specif ications that meets or exceeds specif ications listed at PWS paragraphs 1.4 & 5.

TO: Detail Xray Machine specif ications that meets or exceeds specif ications listed at PWS paragraphs 1.2 & 4.

Revision to the Technical Capabilities Submission Instructions as a result. Updates are notated in green.

All other terms and conditions w ill remain the same.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 9

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 06-Sep-2024

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W91WRZ24Q0014

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

09-Aug-2024

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

06-Sep-2024

CODE

RCO GTMO

DIRECTORATE OF CONTRACTING

JTF GTMO

BLDG 752

APO AA 34010

W91WRZ 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W91WRZ24Q0014

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

The following have been modified:

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES (NOV 2021)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

EVALUATION FACTORS

The Government will assess its level of confidence that vendor’s quote will successfully perform all requirements regarding the technical capabilities of the Xray machine, vendor’s past performance, and delivery and site-specific requirement’s narrative.

The evaluation factors will measure the Government’s confidence that the quoter understands the requirement, proposes a sound approach, and will be successful in performing the contract.

Quoters shall provide sufficient information for the Government to determine its level of confidence in the ability of the Quoter to perform the requirements of the RFQ based on an assessment of relevant experience from the contractor.

Basis for Award

The Government will assess its level of confidence that the contractor will successfully perform the requirements based on their experience performing similar magnitude of work. The Government intends to award one contract to the responsible quoter whose quote is determined to be the best value to the Government. Selection of the best value to the Government will be achieved through a process of comparative evaluation of all quotes against the evaluation factors described below.

Quotes will be evaluated solely on the factors specified in the solicitation. The contracting officer will conduct a comparative evaluation of offers against the evaluation factors in this section to determine the quoter’s ability to perform the contract. Award will be made to that quote deemed fair and reasonable resulting in the best value to the government in accordance with FAR 13.106- 2(b)(3).

Factor 1: Technical Capabilities (non-cost/price factor)

The Government will evaluate the degree to which the technical and management approach demonstrates a thorough understanding of the requirements and provides a viable plan and means for successful completion, including installation, training, methodology for completion of the work, and quality assurance procedures. The Government will also evaluate how the offeror plans to assess difficulties and risks it may encounter, and how the offeror plans to deal with them while still successfully performing the work.

Technical Capabilities Submission Instructions: (Not to exceed 50 pages) The quoter shall provide information to facilitate the Government’s consideration. The contractor shall provide:

- Detail Xray Machine specifications that meets or exceeds specifications listed at PWS paragraphs 1.4 & 5 1.2 & 4.

- Provide a commercial warranty that covers the lifespan of the unit and is consistent for all the Xray components.

- Ability to provide Instructor Led Training (ILT) at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba upon installation of the unit to familiarize the users with the basic functionality of the unit.

Factor 2: Past Performance (non-cost/price factor)

The Government will evaluate relevant and recent past performance information obtained from the quoter performing work similar in scope, size, and complexity to the outlined in the Performance Work Statement. The information will be evaluated to assess the quoter’s potential success in performing the work required by the contract. The Government will evaluate recent past performance information for contracts that are currently being performed or have a period of performance end date within the last five (5) years from the original solicitation issuance date.

No record of past performance. If the quoter do not have a record of relevant past performance or if information is not available, the quoter will be evaluated neither favorably nor unfavorably.

Terminations. The Government may consider contracts of the quoter, (1) were terminated for default, (2) terminated for cause over the preceding five (5) years from original solicitation issuance date, including the reasoning for the aforementioned actions.

Source of Past Performance. The government may consider past performance information from sources other than those provided by the quoter, such as commercial and government clients, government records, regulatory agencies, and government databases such as the Government’s Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). The Government may contact any or all of the references provided by the quoter and will consider such information obtained in its evaluation.

Evaluation Factor Submission Instructions: The offeror shall provide past performance information for no more than three (3) of the most relevant contracts performed for Federal agencies, state/local governments and/or commercial customers within the last five (5) years from the issue date of this RFQ or currently being performed. Relevant contracts include contracts similar or greater in scope, magnitude, and complexity than the effort described in this RFQ. The Offeror shall provide a Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) for the referenced project, if one is available. If a CPAR is not available, the Offeror shall submit a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) signed by the customer reference (see attachment PPQ attached below). PPQs shall not be sent directly to the Contracting Office soliciting this requirement; it is the responsibility of the Offeror to include the completed CPAR and/or PPQ as part of its quote.

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does and notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.

Factor 3: Delivery and Site-Specific Requirement’s Narrative (non-cost/price factor) The delivery approach and site-specific narrative assess the contractor’s understanding of the logistics required to delivery, install, and provide maintenance in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The quoters shall include a delivery narrative addressing delivery, security requirement, and base access to complete the contract effort.

a. Delivery: Shall comply with Barge Shipping Instructions included in the solicitation.

To ensure the supplies arrive at the designated point in good condition, the vendor must deliver them in packaging suitable for a barge trip. This packaging needs to protect the contents from potential damage caused by bad weather and barge motion due to wave and current. This includes using appropriate wrapping and cushioning materials. Each packet needs to be properly marked. Failure to do so will result in goods return to sender.

b. Site-specific Requirements:

• SPOT: To arrive at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba- GTMO, the contractor needs to gain access to the Synchronized Pre-deployment and Operational Tracker

(SPOT).

Note: Access to SPOT requires a Common Access Card (CAC) or External Certification Authority (ECA) certificate. For more information about CAC or ECA certificates, see the SPOT Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) document.

This guide is available on the SPOT “Program Support” page https://www.acq.osd.mil/log/LOG_CSD/spot.html. Failure to gain access to the system will deem the vendor unqualified for award.

• Defense Base Act: In order to travel into Guantanamo Bay, Cuba-GTMO, the contractor must agree to provide evidence of compliance with FAR 52.228-3 Worker’s Compensation Insurance (Defense Base Act) before commencing work.

Federal law requires all U.S. government contractors and subcontractors to secure workers' compensation insurance for their employees working overseas.

The related statutes include the Defense Base Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1651-54 and https://www.acq.osd.mil/log/LOG_CSD/spot.html the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-50.

Implementing regulations can be found at 20 C.F.R. Parts 701, 702, 703 and

704. The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) also sets out the workers' compensation insurance requirements for all overseas contracts at 48 C.F.R.

§§ 28.305 and at §§ 52-228-3 and § 52-228-4.

Evaluation Factor Submission Instructions: 5-page max. Vendor shall provide a narrative addressing the delivery and performance approach (sections a, b, and c.)

Factor 4: Price. Each quoter’s price will be evaluated separately from the non-cost/price factors.

The contracting officer will conduct a form of price analysis to determine if the quoter’s price is fair and reasonable. The Government hereby seeks further price reductions and most favorable customer pricing for all priced elements.

Evaluation Factor Submission Instructions: Vendor shall complete SF 1449 and include the 6-month option period in accordance with 52.217-8.

Ratings

Rating Definitions:

Factors 1, Technical Capabilities and Factor 3, Delivery and Site-Specific Requirement’s Narrative.

Rating Description Acceptable Submission meets the requirements of the solicitation Unacceptable Submission does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

Factor 2, Past Performance.

Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.

Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions, or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.

No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.

** Use form below if CPARS are not available**

PART I. (To be completed by the Vendor)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

Total Contract Value:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF VENDOR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence

Rationale: _________________________________________________________

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

Comments: _________________________________________________________

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does and notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)

(End of Summary of Changes)

Rating Definitions: