Solicitation W91QV1-22-R-0065-P00002- extension of due date.pdf

0011668829-0001

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

the purpose of this amendment is to extend the solicitation proposal due date and time from 15 June 2022 at 1:00pm EST to 20 June 2022 at

1:00pm EST. all other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 5

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 09-Jun-2022

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W91QV122R0065

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

19-May-2022

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

09-Jun-2022

CODE

MICC-FORT BELVOIR

9410 JACKSON LOOP

BLDG. 1425

FORT BELVOIR VA 22060-5116

W91QV1 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W91QV122R0065

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 01 00 00 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTION TO OFFERORS

BASIS FOR AWARD for Lee Dr. Project:

The award will be made to the lowest priced technically acceptable Offeror.

Proposals will be evaluated for technical acceptability, but will not be ranked using the non-price

Factor and Sub-Factors. In order for an Offeror to be considered for award, the proposal must receive an "Acceptable" rating in every non-price Sub-Factor. A proposal receiving a rating of

"Unacceptable" in any non-price Sub-Factor will receive an "Unacceptable" rating on Technical

Capability (Non-Price) and not be eligible for award.

EVALUATION CRITERIA

The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

A. Technical Capability (Non-Price)

. Sub-factor 1: Quality Control Plan

. Sub-factor 2: Work Plan

. Sub-factor 3: Key Personnel

B. Price

FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED

The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers: Factor A, Technical Capability (Non-

Price) which has three (3) sub-factors 1) quality control plan, 2) work plan and 3) key personnel

Factor B, Price.

The following definitions will be used in evaluating the offeror's proposal against the technical requirement

FACTOR A. TECHNICAL CAPABILITY (NON-PRICE)

Offeror shall provide narrative as to their understanding of the specific requirements and the overall scope of work required within the SOW. The Offeror shall provide a scheduling narrative describing how they propose to accomplish the tasks outlined in the SOW, which demonstrates their capability of planning, managing and performing the work outlined under each task. Details should cover, at a minimum:

Sub-factor 1: Quality Control Plan: The Government will evaluate how the offeror intends to monitor, inspect, and correct deficiencies for the requirements of the SOW. The offeror's QCP must be tailored to performing at Arlington National Cemetery, and must address the specific tasks and standards required in the SOW. The Quality Control Plan shall clearly meet the minimum requirements outlined in 5.10 Work Plan "Quality Control (QC)" and 7.2 Attachment

2 "Performance Requirement Summary" (PRS). The Technical Capability (Non-Price) rating will be based on an "Acceptable" /"Unacceptable" basis. The following definitions will be used in evaluating the offeror's proposal against the technical requirement:

Rating Description Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

Sub-factor 2: Work Plan: The Offeror shall provide a scheduling narrative describing how they propose to accomplish the tasks outlined in 7.2 PRS, which demonstrates his/her, company's capability of planning, managing and performing the work outlined under each task. The narrative should clearly articulate the required steps to achieve each specific tasks in 7.2 PRS.

The plan should include but not limited to goals/objective, resources, constraints, strategies, communication plan, appendices, abstract and summary. The offeror's work plan must be tailored to performing at Arlington National Cemetery and U.S. Soldier's and Airmen's Home

National Cemetery. The work plan submitted with the proposal shall clearly meet the minimum requirements demonstrating goals and objectives of specific tasks outlined i in 7.2 PRS. The

Technical rating will be based on an "Acceptable" / "Unacceptable" basis. The following definitions will be used in evaluating the offeror's proposal against the technical requirement:

Rating Description Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation

Sub-factor 3: Key Personnel: The Government will evaluate the degree to which the offeror's proposal demonstrates the ability to provide qualified key personnel and staff/workers in a timely manner, and a management plan for execution of all of the tasks in the SOW. The offeror's proposal must describe a management approach to oversee tasks to ensure quality deliverables.

The offeror must provide resumes for the key personnel (Project Manager/Site Manager, and

Alternate Site Manager) that reflects at a minimum of 4 years of Federal contract experience as a direct supervisor in reconstruction roadways in installations, or similar and relevant work experience as outlined in the SOW. These individuals must demonstrate the operational knowledge, and relevant and sufficient experience and skill to complete the tasks outlined in the

SOW. The resumes of the Project Manager/Site manager and Alternative Site Manager submitted with proposal shall clearly meet the minimum requirements demonstrating experience and knowledge outlined in Submittals. The Technical rating will be based on an "Acceptable" /

"Unacceptable" basis. The following definitions will be used in evaluating the offeror's proposal against the technical requirement:

Rating Description Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation

FACTOR B. - PRICE

The Price Factor will not be scored or rated. Offered pricing response will be evaluated for completeness, price reasonableness, and pricing balance in accordance with FAR 12.602(b).

Options:

Definitions:

. Completeness/Accuracy: The Offeror's proposal is in compliance with the Price Volume instructions in the RFP.

. Reasonableness: A price is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person in the conduct of competitive business.

. Unbalanced: Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items is significantly over or understated as indicated by the application of price analysis techniques.

A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either part. Before the Offer's specified expiration time, the

Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

The Price proposal will include a line-by-line breakout to include fully burdened labor categories, material and equipment costs and all applicable profit/overhead, mobilization and security costs, etc. provide equipment name, amount and type of communication modules to be used as outlined in the PWS.

Provide Offers via email to Oswald Pascal at oswald.pascal.civ@army.mil by closing date and time listed on thesolicitation and Contracting Officer, Mr. Kenneth L. Mitchell, kenneth.l.mitchell.civ@army.mil

Closing Date: Solicitation closing date will be 20 June 2022 at 1:00pm EST.

Questions:

If offerors have any questions please provide them by 6 June 2022 No later than 1:00pm EST.

answers will be provided by 8 June 2022

Site Visit:

Site visit will be conducted on Friday 27 May 2022 at 10:00am EST. No other site visit will be conducted.

All contractors that attend the site visit will meet at the Arlington National Cemetery Gate on:

123 Patton Dr.

Ft. Myer, VA 22211

In order to gain access to Ft. Myer, Arlington National Cemetery, the names of no more than two personel plus license plate number of the vehicle must be provided to the contracting specialist oswald Pascal at oswald.pascal.civ@army.mil no later than 25 May 2022 at 1:00pm EST.

Failure to provide this information will not allow you to gain access to the installation. All contractors will be escorted by the COR, CW3 Enrique Rios and Francis Han.

(End of Summary of Changes) mailto:oswald.pascal.civ@army.mil mailto:kenneth.l.mitchell.civ@army.mil mailto:oswald.pascal.civ@army.mil