Attachment 2 - Specific Relevant Contract Reference Sheet (DRAFT).docx
DOCX document 28 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Fort Lee Job Order Contract (JOC)
- Solicitation number
- W91QF5-19-R-0008
About this file
This document provides guidance for submitting past performance references for a job order contract solicitation to support facilities maintenance and repair work at Fort Lee, Virginia. Offerors must provide details on up to three relevant contracts they have performed as a prime contractor or subcontractor, including the contracting agency, contract number, period of performance, awarded value, number of personnel, and relevancy rationale. The reference sheet requests contact information for contracting officers and technical representatives. Offerors must explain any contract performance issues like cure notices or discrepancy reports received. The related pre-solicitation notice indicates the Army Mission and Installation Contracting Command at Fort Eustis will issue a request for proposal for an indefinite delivery indefinite quantity job order contract with a one year base period and four one-year options. The contract will provide general construction and repair services for facilities at Fort Lee. The response deadline for questions on the draft pre-solicitation is December 19, 2019.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 4 - Price Schedule (DRAFT) .xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire (DRAFT).pdf | ||
| Draft Solicitation - W91QF5-19-R-0008.pdf | ||
| Response Format to Draft Solicitation.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 1 - Sample Partner Consent Letter (DRAFT).docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 2, Specific Relevant Contracts Sheet The Offeror shall provide documentation outlining the Offeror’s past performance with contracts, as a prime, major subcontractor, or its teaming partners, which is the same or similar in scope and magnitude to the services being procured under this solicitation. The submittal shall include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and how it was determined that the work performed previously was the same or similar in scope and magnitude to the work specified by this solicitation. Offerors are required to explain what aspects of the contracts are deemed relevant to the proposed effort, and to what aspects of the proposed effort they relate.
Note: This document may be altered but the required information listed below MUST be included or it will not be considered for evaluation.
1. Contractor Name (to include performance type: prime, subcontractor/team member, joint venture, etc.):
2. Contract Number/Task Order Number:
(Note: The Government will not consider an IDIQ or Requirements contract that does not also list recent and relevant performance under specified task orders.)
3. Contract Type:
4. Award Date:
5. Price/Cost (original awarded price):
6. Modified Price/Cost (Explain):
7. Period of Performance (original and revised, if applicable. Explain revisions.):
| 8. Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO): |
| Name: |
Phone Number:
Email Address:
| 9. Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO): |
| Name: |
Phone Number:
Email Address:
| 10. Government or commercial technical representative, or COR: |
| Name: |
Phone Number:
Email Address:
11. Number of Personnel (FTE) performing per year (average):
12. Relevancy Rationale:
13. Negative Performance Documentation[footnoteRef:1]: [1: A copy of any cure notices, show cause letters, or contract discrepancy reports received on each contract listed and a description of any corrective action by the Offeror or proposed subcontractor.]
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .