B08_Section J Attachment 0010 (Past Performance Questionnaire)_Solicitation Amendment 0001_W91CRB-21-R-0033 P00001.pdf

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

U.S. ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND - ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND

6515 INTEGRITY COURT, BUILDING 4310

ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MD 21005-3013

REPLY TO

ATTENTION OF

June 15, 2021

SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP)

W91CRB-21-R-0033

Dear Sir/Ma’am, The US Army Contracting Command Aberdeen Proving Grounds is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate Offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the Offerors provide information about their past performance on recent (past three years) and relevant federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.

Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation. Please complete the enclosure and return to the Army Contracting Command Aberdeen Proving Ground (ACC-APG), no later than 15 days after receipt of request or 25 June 2021, whichever occurs first. Submit your completed questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Hilary Shaw at hilary.shaw.civ@mail.mil.

Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the undersigned and/or Kelly.l.griffin.civ@mail.mil

Sincerely, Kelly L. Griffin Contracting Officer

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Performance Risk Assessment Questionnaire For

IMPROVED OUTER TACTICAL VEST and MODULAR SCALABLE VEST

SHOOT PACKS

Solicitation W91CRB-21-R-0033

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you personally do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this questionnaire to the person in your organization who does. Please return the completed questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.

Rating Definitions:

Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The Offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The Offeror has successfully performed the required effort.

Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The Offeror has had little success performing the required effort.

No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The Offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship.

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

Total Contract Value:

Name:

Company Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

*Note: rationale is required for each response.

Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence

Rationale: ________________________________________________________________

Rationale: _________________________________________________________________

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

D. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest.

E. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

F. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

G. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Point of Contact (Name): ______________________________________________________ Telephone Number: __________________________________________________________

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter Kelly Griffin at kelly.l.griffin11.civ@mail.mil or to the Contract Specialist, Hilary Shaw at hilary.shaw.civ@mail.mil

Thank you for your assistance.

mailto:kelly.l.griffin11.civ@mail.mil mailto:hilary.shaw.civ@mail.mil