AMENDMENT_02_-_SVED_-_W91CRB-18-R-0037.pdf

CODE

(Hour)

PAGE(S)

until 01:30 PM local time 18 May 2018

X

A X B X C

D

EX

X G F 80 - 86

87 - 99 H 100 - 109

RATING PAGE OF PAGES

7. ISSUED BY

(Date)

IMPORTANT - Award will be made on this Form, or on Standard Form 26, or by other authorized official written notice.

Previous Edition is Unusable 33-134 STANDARD FORM 33 (REV. 9-97)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.214(c)

1 109

(If other than Item 7)

15A. NAME 16. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO

AND

ADDRESS

SIGN OFFER (Type or print)

OF

OFFEROR

AMENDMENT NO. DATE

15B. TELEPHONE NO (Include area code) 17. SIGNATURE15C. CHECK IF REMITTANCE ADDRESS

IS DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE - ENTER

SUCH ADDRESS IN SCHEDULE.

18. OFFER DATE

1. THIS CONTRACT IS A RATED ORDER

UNDER DPAS (15 CFR 700)

2. CONTRACT NO.

W91CRB 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

See Item 7

9. Sealed offers in original and 1 copies for furnishing the supplies or services in the Schedule will be received at the place specified in Item 8, or if handcarried, in the depository located in

CAUTION - LATE Submissions, Modifications, and Withdrawals: See Section L, Provision No. 52.214-7 or 52.215-1. All offers are subject to all terms and

AMRDEC Website conditions contained in this solicitation.

10. FOR INFORMATION

CALL:

A. NAME (NO COLLECT CALLS)

11. TABLE OF CONTENTS

SOLICITATION/ CONTRACT FORM

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/ COSTS

1 - 2 3 - 8

X I CONTRACT CLAUSES

DESCRIPTION/ SPECS./ WORK STATEMENT X

PACKAGING AND MARKING

9 - 57 J LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

X K

REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND

OTHER STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA 60 - 61 X

SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror) X M

L INSTRS., CONDS., AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

NOTE: Item 12 does not apply if the solicitation includes the provisions at 52.214-16, Minimum Bid Acceptance Period.

is inserted by the offeror) from the date for receipt of offers specified above, to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item, delivered at the designated point(s), within the time specified in the schedule.

13. DISCOUNT FOR PROMPT PAYMENT

(See Section I, Clause No. 52.232-8)

14. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments

AMENDMENT NO. DATE

to the SOLICITATION for offerors and related documents numbered and dated):

FACILITY

12. In compliance with the above, the undersigned agrees, if this offer is accepted within calendar days (60 calendar days unless a different period

SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD

X

(X) SEC. DESCRIPTION (X) SEC. DESCRIPTION PAGE(S)

PART I - THE SCHEDULE

26. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print) 27. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 28. AWARD DATE

EMAIL:TEL: (Signature of Contracting Officer)

CODE CODE

B. TELEPHONE (Include area code) C. E-MAIL ADDRESS

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

19. ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS NUMBERED 20. AMOUNT 21. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION

22. AUTHORITY FOR USING OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION:

10 U.S.C. 2304(c)( ) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)( ) (4 copies unless otherwise specified)

23. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

24. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 7) CODE 25. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE

PART IV - REPRESENTATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS

PART III - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

62 - 78

PART II - CONTRACT CLAUSES

ACC - APG - W91CRB

BLDG 4310

6515 INTEGRITY COURT

ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND MD 21005-3013

FAX:

TEL:

FAX:

TEL:

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

SOLICITATION

6. REQUISITION/PURCHASE NO.5. DATE ISSUED

03 Apr 2018

4. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

[ X ]

3. SOLICITATION NO.

W91CRB18R0037

Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Solicitation W91CRB-18-R-0037

The Army Contracting Command – Aberdeen Proving Ground (ACC-APG) is soliciting proposals for test support services for the Survivability Evaluation Directorate (SVED) under the US Army Evaluation Center (AEC), Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD. This solicitation is for a single-award contract, with Firm Fixed Price (FFP) and Cost Reimbursable Travel Contract Line Items (CLINs). The contract will have one (1) Base Year and four (4) Option Years.

This requirement is set aside for Small Businesses under NAICS 541330, Engineering Services with a small business size standard of $38.5 million.

This is a negotiated contract action pursuant to Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 15. Proposals will be evaluated utilizing Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) Source Selection Process described in FAR Part 15.101-2.

Proposal due date is 1:00 pm EST on 4 May 2018. The proposal due date is being extended to 1:30 PM Eastern Time on 24 May 2018.

Questions concerning this acquisition should be sent by email to either Mr. Gerald Taulbee (Contracting Officer) at gerald.h.taulbee.civ@mail.mil or Ms. Kristin Height at Kristin.m.height.civ@mail.mil.

Section B - Supplies or Services and Prices

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 Job

SVED Labor Base Year

FFP

Firm Fixed Price. Contractor shall perform nonpersonal services in accordance with the Performance Work Statement contained in Section C.

FOB: Destination

PSC CD: R425

NET AMT

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0002 Job

SVED Labor Base Year

CPFF

Cost-Plus Fixed Fee. Contractor shall perform nonpersonal services in accordance with the Performance Work Statement contained in Section C.

FOB: Destination

PSC CD: R425

ESTIMATED COST

FIXED FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0003 Job

SVED ODC Base Year

COST

Other Direct Costs. Contractor shall perform nonpersonal services in accordance with the Performance Work Statement contained in Section C.

FOB: Destination

ESTIMATED COST

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0004 Job OPTION SVED Labor Option Year 1

FFP

Firm Fixed Price. Contractor shall perform nonpersonal services in accordance with the Performance Work Statement contained in Section C.

NET AMT

0005 Job OPTION SVED Labor Option Year 1

CPFF

Cost-Plus Fixed Fee. Contractor shall perform nonpersonal services in accordance with the Performance Work Statement contained in Section C

FIXED FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

0006 Job OPTION SVED ODC Option Year 1

COST

Other Direct Costs. Contractor shall perform nonpersonal services in accordance

0007 Job OPTION SVED Labor Option Year 2

FFP

Firm Fixed Price. Contractor shall perform nonpersonal services in accordance

0008 Job OPTION SVED Labor Option Year 2

CPFF

Cost-Plus Fixed Fee. Contractor shall perform nonpersonal services in accordance with the Performance Work Statement contained in Section C.

0009 Job OPTION SVED ODC Option Year 2

COST

Other Direct Costs. Contractor shall perform nonpersonal services in accordance

0010 Job OPTION SVED Labor Option Year 3

FFP

Firm Fixed Price. Contractor shall perform nonpersonal services in accordance

0011 Job OPTION SVED Labor Option Year 3

CPFF

Cost-Plus Fixed Fee. Contractor shall perform nonpersonal services in

0012 Job OPTION SVED ODC Option Year 3

COST

Other Direct Costs. Contractor shall perform nonpersonal services in accordance

0013 Job OPTION SVED Labor Option Year 4

FFP

Firm Fixed Price. Contractor shall perform nonpersonal services in accordance

0014 Job OPTION SVED Labor Option Year 4

CPFF

Cost-Plus Fixed Fee. Contractor shall perform nonpersonal services in

0015 Job OPTION SVED ODC Option Year 4

COST

Other Direct Costs. Contractor shall perform nonpersonal services in accordance

Contractor Manpower Reporting App.

FFP

The contractor shall report ALL contractor labor hours (including subcontractor labor hours) required for performance of services provided under this contract for the Soldier Survivability (SVED) Directorate via a secure data collection site. The contractor is required to fill in all required data fields completely using the following web address: http://www.ecmra.mil/, and then click on "Department of the Army CMRA" or the icon of the DoD organization that is receiving or benefitting from the contracted services.

Reporting inputs will be for the labor executed during the period of performance during each Government fiscal year (FY), this runs October 1 through September

30. While inputs may be reported any time during the FY, all data shall be reported no later than October 31 of each calendar year, beginning with 2013.

Contractors may direct questions to the help desk by clicking on "Send an email" which is located under the Help Resources ribbon on the right side of the login page of the applicable Service/Component's CMR website".

The Dod mandates this for reporting proposed for each fiscal year.

PSC CD: R425

Section C - Descriptions and Specifications

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

Performance Work Statement (PWS) for the Army Evaluation Center (AEC) Survivability Evaluation

Directorate (SVED) Professional Support Services

7 March 2018

Page 10 of

Vision Statement 1 Introduction

1.1 Mission

1.2 Background

1.3 Scope

1.4 Functional Overview

2 General Requirements

2.1 Non-Personal Services

2.2 Business Relations

2.3 Contract Administration and Management

2.3.1 Contract Management

2.3.2 Contract Administration

2.3.3 Personnel Administration

2.3.4 Resource and Financial Management

2.3.5 Training

2.4 Subcontract Management

2.5 Contractor Personnel, Disciplines, and Specialties

2.6 Locations and Hours of Work

2.7 Travel / Temporary Duty (TDY)

2.8 Conflicts of Interest

3 Performance Requirements

3.1 Test and Evaluation Support

3.2 Data and Database Management

3.3 Evaluation, Analytical and Verification Support

3.4 Methodology, Studies and Analysis

3.5 Scientific and Technical Services

3.6 Test and Safety Management

3.7 Progress and Labor Reporting

4 Special Requirements

4.1 Protection, Security and Safety

4.2 Government Furnished Equipment

4.3 Contractor-Furnished Property and Services

4.4 Transition

4.5 Information Security and Intellectual Property

4.6 Applicable Directives

5 Deliverables

Page 11 of

Performance Work Statement (PWS) Survivability Evaluation Directorate 2018

Vision Statement

Support the Soldier with effective, suitable, and survivable evaluations of Soldier and Support Systems.

1 Introduction The United States Army Evaluation Center (AEC), as a component of the Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC), exists to support Soldiers and the Department of Defense (DoD) in defending our country and improving DoD's performance and accountability for the benefit of the American people. It is AECs responsibility to provide the most effective, efficient, creditable, and reliable system information. AEC conducts independent evaluations for all Army Acquisition Category (ACAT) systems, rapid acquisition systems, and systems undergoing experimental (demonstration) assessments.

1.1 Mission

To plan, support, conduct and provide independent evaluations, assessments, and experiments in order to provide essential information to decision-makers. Evaluations are based upon adequate, efficient, well-planned developmental, integrated, and operational testing designed in collaboration with cross functional system test teams, leveraging all available sources.

AEC values and invests in highly-skilled professionals who provide timely, responsive, high quality, independent analysis and evaluations of the safety, effectiveness, suitability, and survivability of Army and Joint systems --- which is essential to AEC's customers.

Survivability is an important consideration in the acquisition of all systems equal in value to cost, schedule and performance. The primary SVED domains are survivability, lethality, ballistic vulnerability, Live Fire Test and Evaluation (LFT&E), Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (E3), countermeasures (including atmospherics and obscurants), Electronic Warfare (EW), Chemical, Biological and Radiological Contamination Survivability (CBRCS), Initial Nuclear Weapon Effects (INWE), and Cybersecurity.

1.2 Background

AEC was established in 1999 as a result of the Vice Chief of Staff of the Army's decision to combine and reorganize two commands, the Operational Evaluation Command (OEC), which was responsible for operational evaluations, and the Evaluation Analysis Center (EAC), which was responsible for developmental evaluations. In partnership with the ATEC Test Centers and Operational Test Command (OTC), AEC plans and conducts independent, integrated evaluations to determine and report the effectiveness, suitability and survivability of Army systems.

Page 12 of

1.3 Scope

This Performance Work Statement (PWS) identifies the technical tasks and contractor deliverables required to ensure continued survivability evaluation of Army and Joint systems. Contractor support will be requested to provide analytical support/assistance of survivability evaluations including, but not limited to: analysis planning and methodology; provide relevant input to live fire test and evaluation strategies, test and evaluation master plans, system evaluation plans, M&S accreditation planning activities, emerging results briefs, OTA milestone assessment reports, OTA assessment reports, and OTA evaluation reports; preparation and review of other T&E documentation; on-site data reduction and analysis support during and after testing, including post-test damage assessments, Probability of Kill (Pk) analysis, comparisons of test data with M&S predictions; preparing survivability input to draft system assessment and evaluation documents. Contractors must be familiar with the system specific acquisition documentation, evaluation requirements, and DOD, Army and ATEC regulations, pamphlets, instructions and guidance. In addition, contractors must be familiar with the survivability performance areas of ballistic vulnerability/lethality; cybersecurity;

electromagnetic environmental effects (E3); electronic warfare; chemical, biological, and radiological (CBR) contamination survivability; initial nuclear weapons effects; high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP), counter radio controlled improvised explosive device (IED) electronic warfare (CREW), soldier survivability; and countermeasures (including atmospherics and obscurants).

1.4 Functional Overview

These services will provide survivability, lethality, and vulnerability test and evaluation (T&E) support including, but not limited to: planning for and review of M&S activities to include verification, validation, and accreditation (VV&A); support in survivability preparation, review, and analysis of T&E documentation/briefings; on-site test and evaluation support, data collection, data reduction and analysis support; survey development and collection; and assistance in preparation of input for draft system evaluation plans, reports, assessments and associated briefings.

2 General Requirements This section describes the general requirements for this effort. The following sub-sections provide details of various considerations on this effort.

2.1 Non-Personal Services

The Government shall neither supervise contractor employees nor control the method by which the contractor performs the required tasks. Under no circumstances shall the Government assign tasks to, or prepare work schedules for, individual contractor employees. It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to manage its employees and to guard against any actions that are of the nature of personal services, or give the perception of personal services. If the contractor believes that any actions constitute, or are perceived to constitute personal services, it shall be the contractor's responsibility to notify the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) immediately.

Page 13 of

2.2 Business Relations

The contractor shall successfully integrate and coordinate all activity needed to execute the requirement. The contractor shall manage the timeliness, completeness, and quality of problem identification. The contractor shall provide corrective action plans, proposal submittals, timely identification of issues, and effective management of subcontractors.

The contractor shall seek to ensure customer satisfaction and professional and ethical behavior of all contractor personnel.

2.3 Contract Administration and Management

The following subsections specify requirements for contract, management, and personnel administration.

2.3.1 Contract Management

The contractor shall establish clear organizational lines of authority and responsibility to ensure effective management of the resources assigned to the requirement. The contractor must maintain continuity between the support operations at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland and the contractor's corporate offices.

2.3.2 Contract Administration

The contractor shall establish processes and assign appropriate resources to effectively administer the requirement. The contractor shall respond to Government requests for contractual actions within the specified timeline. The contractor shall use the COR as their single point of contact between the Government and contractor personnel assigned to support contracts or task orders (TO). The Government COR and Subject Matter Expert for each task, and the corresponding Contractor Task Leader, will meet as necessary to determine and refine support requirements, products and timelines.

The contractor shall assign work effort and maintain proper and accurate time keeping records of personnel assigned to work on the requirement.

2.3.3 Personnel Administration

The contractor shall provide for the contracted personnel during designated Government non-work days or other periods where Government offices are closed due to weather, security, or other conditions. The contractor shall ensure all training requirements are up to date for all contracted employees during the lifetime of the contract/task order. The contractor shall make necessary travel arrangements for their employees. The contractor shall provide necessary infrastructure to support contract tasks when contractors are working off-site.

2.3.4 Resource and Financial Management

Contractor Manpower Reporting Application (CMRA): The contractor shall report all contractor labor hours (including subcontractor labor hours) required for performance of services provided under this contract for the DASA/CE via a secure data collection site.

The contractor is required to completely fill in all required data fields using the following web address: http://www.ecmra.mil/, and then click on “Department of the Army CMRA” or the icon of the DoD organization that is receiving or benefitting from the contracted services. Access the aforementioned website to determine when data entries are due.

Page 14 of

2.3.5 Training

The contractor shall develop a training program to ensure contractor personnel are trained to accomplish the requirements of this PWS. The contractor shall maintain records of all scheduled and completed accomplished training, which will be available for periodic inspections by the Government. In addition, copies of training certificates shall be available upon request by the COR as proof of training completion, as required.

Training does not relieve the contractor from ensuring that contractor personnel are qualified to perform their assigned tasks when they begin employment under this contract.

The contractor shall look to identify efficiencies in training that will reduce costs to the Government as well as minimize duty hours spent completing training. The contractor shall meet AEC’s annual mandated training requirements which will be provided by the Government.

The contractor shall pay for training, licensing and certifications. Labor and all associated cost for training, licenses, meetings and professional development not mandated by the Government shall be borne by the contractor.

The Government will only reimburse the contractor one time for training in new technologies or unique skills that are required to perform a task of this PWS and not for employee advancement. All travel, training and per diem requirements that are to be reimbursed to the contractor must be approved by the Directorate Director or authorized designee and COR within ten (10) workdays prior to commencement of training/travel.

Any retraining needed due to contract employee departure will be at the contractor's expense.

2.4 Subcontract Management

The contractor shall be responsible for any subcontract management necessary to integrate work performed on this requirement and shall be responsible and accountable for subcontractor performance on this requirement. The prime contractor will manage work distribution to ensure there are no Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) considerations. Contractors may add subcontractors to their team after notification to the COR. Cross teaming arrangements shall be in accordance with FAR Subpart 9.6.

The prime contractor shall provide the subcontracting plan and update the plan as needed to the COR within 30 days of initiation or changes.

2.5 Contractor Personnel, Disciplines, and Specialties

2.5.1 The contractor shall accomplish the assigned work by employing and utilizing qualified personnel with appropriate combinations of education, training, and experience. The contractor shall be in compliance with FAR 22.18 Employment Eligibility Verification. The contractor shall ensure the labor categories as defined in the Labor Categories document, labor rates, and man-hours utilized in the performance of each task issued hereunder will be the minimum necessary to accomplish the task. The

Page 15 of contractor shall provide the necessary resources and infrastructure to manage, perform, and administer the contract.

2.5.2 Contractor employees shall be trained, qualified, certified, and licensed in accordance with the requirements specified in the contract prior to starting work except for the training that is not commercially available and Government-unique. For training or certification that is not commercially available, Government-unique and readily available, contractor employees shall have a maximum of 90 days to complete the training and certification. Training or certification that cannot be completed within the 90 days based on availability or other significant factor can have an extension negotiated with the COR.

2.5.3 Key personnel for this requirement are Cyber Security Analyst III (2 people), General Engineer III (2 people), and Program/Systems Analyst III (2 people). A minimum of two (2) key personnel for each position will be required to start on day one (1) of the contract for a total of six (6) key personnel.

2.5.4 Provide three (3) resumes for each key personnel labor category (Cyber Security Analyst III, General Engineer III, and Program/Systems Analyst III) and a signed letter of intent with direct labor rate data for two (2) of the three (3) resumes.

The signed letter of intent shall confirm that each proposed key position will perform at the start of the contract, which is the first day of support. The resume(s) shall also confirm that all key Personnel currently have a Secret clearance.

Key Personnel are identified in the reference table below:

Labor Category

Key Personn el

Security Classification

Level Required Administrative Support I No S Cyber Security Analyst I No S Cyber Security Analyst II Yes S Cyber Security Analyst III Yes S General Engineer I No S General Engineer II Yes S General Engineer III Yes S General Engineer IV No S General Engineer V No S Operations, Test and Evaluation Specialist I

No S

Program/Systems Analyst I No S Program/Systems Analyst II Yes S Program/Systems Analyst III No S Scientist Engineer I No S

Page 16 of

Scientist Engineer II Yes S Scientist Engineer III Yes S Systems Engineer I No S Systems Engineer II Yes S Systems Engineer III Yes S Technical Editor I No S Technical Editor II No S

All must have the ability to obtain TS if required based on program progress.

2.5.4. Prior to hiring any employee, submit to the COR the candidate’s resume for a qualification review and approval (education and experience).

2.5.5 The COR’s qualification review will determine whether the candidate’s resume meets the education and experience requirements found in Exhibit A – Labor Category Qualifications and whether the candidate’s resumes demonstrates five (5) years of experience within the last ten years in at least one of the experience areas listed in Sections 2.5.5.1 through 2.5.5.6. Each key person does not need to have experience for all areas in Sections 2.5.5.1 through 2.5.5.X. Candidates may combine work experience in any of the following areas to meet the five (5) year requirement.

2.5.5.1 Experience in assessing cybersecurity and mission assurance. Experience is defined as activities to include exercise planning, assessment execution, data collection during assessment events, data analysis and reporting.

2.5.5.2 Experience providing test and evaluation expertise in survivability, lethality, ballistic vulnerability, Live Fire Test and Evaluation (LFT&E), Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (E3), countermeasures (including atmospherics and obscurants), Electronic Warfare (EW), Chemical, Biological and Radiological Contamination Survivability (CBRCS), Initial Nuclear Weapon Effects (INWE), and Cybersecurity (CS)/Information Assurance (IA).

2.5.5.3 Experience with timely planning, scheduling, testing, evaluation, analysis, preparation and generation of reports and documents, data acquisition, data validation, data reduction, and data management using standard T&E methodology, and analysis of results using standard engineering calculations, models, and performance criteria.

2.5.5.4 Experience with M&S capabilities such as Evaluation of Air Defense Effectiveness (EVADE), Enhanced Surface to Air Missile Simulation (ESAMS), Advanced Tactical Combat Model (ATCOM), Computation of Vulnerable Areas and Repair Times (COVART), Modular Unix®-Based Vulnerability Estimation Suite (MUVES), Stochastic Analysis of Fragmentation Effects (SAFE), Advanced Joint Effectiveness Model (AJEM), Dynamic Infrared Missile Evaluator (DIME), Parametric Endo/Exoatmosheric Lethality Simulation (PEELS), and Lethality End-Game Simulation (LEGS) for use in the evaluations of system survivability or lethality. Other system-

Page 17 of specific M&S capabilities shall be incorporated in the evaluation support at the direction of the Contracting Officer's Representative.

2.5.5.4.1 Note, additional commonly used models include: Operational Requirements-based Casualty Assessment (ORCA), Matrix Evaluator (ME)/ Joint Mean Area of Effect (JMAE), 3d PIMS, and MEVA. I would also recommend including experience with hardware in the loop simulators such as those used in support of munition guidance, warhead fuzing, and platform fault insertions / controlled damage experimentation.

Lastly, high fidelity physics based M&S such as Finite Element Analysis which may be used to generate input and assumptions to support lower fidelity empirical analysis tools. R5T

2.5.5.5 Experience in EW: assess system and threat wave forms, determine parametic relations between link distances and threat jammers, and reduce and assess developmental and operational EW test data. Individual shall have experience with EW M&S capabilities to include Terrain Integrated Rough Earth Model (TIREM) for use in the evaluations of system survivability.

2.5.5.6 Experience in preparing Operational Test Agency Test Plans (OTA TPs), Live Fire Strategies, Live Fire Evaluation Reports, and M&S Accreditation Plans and Reports. In addition, the contractor shall provide draft input to the development of and/or preparation of Test and Evaluation Master Plans [TEMP], Early Strategy Reviews (ESR), Concept In Process Reviews (CIPR), Lens charts, Rock Drills, System Evaluation Plans (SEP), OTA Evaluation Reports, OTA Assessment Reports, and OTA Milestone Assessment Reports. As part of this support, the contractor shall comply with Army and DoD directives to ensure that decisions necessary for the acquisition process (Milestones (MS) A through MS C) can be achieved from the system test event, simulation, and analysis results. The contractor shall identify methods or procedures that could be applied early in the procurement process that would increase the robustness of the development program and minimize the requirement for expensive, redundant testing at later stages of the program.

2.6 Locations and Hours of Work

Accomplishment of the tasks contained in this PWS requires work at Aberdeen Proving Ground (APG), MD; Fort Bliss, TX; White Sands Missile Range, NM; Huntsville, AL; and at various contractor, subcontractor, and Government facilities (mainly in the continental United States but will also include international locations). Normal Government workdays are Monday through Friday except U.S. Federal Holidays. Government workers typically work eight (8) hours per day, 40 hours per week and flextime workers start no earlier than 0600 and no later than 0900. The Government core hours of work are from 0900 to 1500 daily.

Much of the work requires frequent access to the Secret Internet Protocol Resource Network (SIPRNet). Access to the SIPRNet will be provided at Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD. The AEC will sponsor SIPRNet access at other geographic locations but

Page 18 of cannot guarantee access if local commands decline to grant access. If AEC is unable to secure SIPRNet access for contractor personnel at other locations, travel and temporary duty costs for contractor personnel SIPRNet access at Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD will be the responsibility of the contractor.

Due to frequency of tests and short-suspense timelines (historic and projected), surge support shall be made available within 48 hours of Government notification. Extended hours may be necessary during both weekdays and weekends in order to accomplish task requirements to meet customer suspense timelines. The on-site Government Security Officer will ensure that all security precautions and access privileges are in place.

INSTALLATION CLOSURES. The contractor shall adhere to curtailed operations of the Government which includes any time when the Government is in a non-operational status for events including but not limited to emergency situations, inclement weather, power curtailments, furlough, shutdowns, organization events, planned training days, etc. Contractors are expected to adhere to the Government curtailment or closure schedule; however, some contractor employees may be required to work during those periods and/or may be required to report to an alternate work site. Only personnel necessary for essential work will be scheduled for duty during these periods. The COR will notify the contractor of the dates of curtailment and closure and of any contractor employees required to work that day. Additionally, the local television/radio stations will announce any such delays or closures.

FEDERAL HOLIDAYS.

Federal Holidays in each calendar year are identified below. When such holidays fall on Saturday, the preceding Friday will be considered a holiday. When such holidays fall on a Sunday, the succeeding Monday is considered a holiday.

New Year's Day, January 1 (or observed) Martin Luther King, Jr. Birthday, the third Monday in January Washington's Birthday, the third Monday in February Memorial Day, the last Monday in May Independence Day, July 4 (or observed) Labor Day, the first Monday in September Columbus Day, the second Monday in October Veterans Day, November 11 (or observed) Thanksgiving Day, the fourth Thursday in November Christmas Day, December 25 (or observed)

2.7 Travel / Temporary Duty (TDY)

Travel to other Government facilities or other contractor facilities may be required and will be specified in the PWS. All travel requirements (including plans, agenda, itinerary, anticipated costs, trip reason and dates) shall be pre-approved by the COR (subject to local policy procedures), and is on a strictly cost reimbursable basis. Costs for travel

Page 19 of shall be billed in accordance with the regulatory implementation of Public Law 99-234 and FAR 31.205-46 Travel Costs (subject to local policy & procedures).

Travel will include multiple locations throughout the Contiguous United States (CONUS), many trips for multiple contiguous weeks. Some tasks may also include travel Outside the Contiguous United States (OCONUS).

Travel may include but is not limited to:

Table 1. SVED Base Year Travel Locations/Requirements

Destination

No. of Trips

No. of Travelers

No. of Days

Afghanistan 1 1 14 Augusta, Georgia 1 1 12 Alexandria, VA 3 1 4 Duke Field, FL 1 1 5 Fort Bliss, TX 3 1 4 Fort Hood, TX 3 2 14 Fort Sill, OK 2 1 4 Great Britain 1 1 7 Israel 1 1 14 Kansas City, MO 2 1 6 Killeen, TX 2 2 16 Redstone Arsenal, AL 3 1 4 Warren, MI 5 1 4 Washington, DC 10 1 1 Washington, DC 1 1 4

WSMR, NM 4 1 5

Table 2. SVED Option Period 1 Travel Locations/Requirements

No. of Trips

No. of Travelers

No. of Days

Afghanistan 1 1 14 Augusta, Georgia 1 1 12 Alexandria, VA 3 1 4 Duke Field, FL 1 1 5 Fort Bliss, TX 3 1 4 Fort Hood, TX 3 2 14 Fort Sill, OK 2 1 4 Great Britain 1 1 7 Israel 1 1 14

Page 20 of

Kansas City, MO 2 1 6 Killeen, TX 2 2 16 Redstone Arsenal, AL 3 1 4 Warren, MI 5 1 4 Washington, DC 10 1 1

Table 3. SVED Option Period 2 Travel Locations/Requirements

No. of Trips

No. of Travelers

No. of Days

Afghanistan 1 1 14 Augusta, Georgia 1 1 12 Alexandria, VA 3 1 4 Duke Field, FL 1 1 5 Fort Bliss, TX 3 1 4 Fort Hood, TX 3 2 14 Fort Sill, OK 2 1 4 Great Britan 1 1 7 Israel 1 1 14 Kansas City, MO 2 1 6 Kileen, TX 2 2 16 Redstone Aresenal, AL 3 1 4 Warren, MI 5 1 4 Washington, DC 10 1 1

In accordance with FAR 31.205-46, the contractor shall provide documentation for prime and subcontractor costs incurred by contractor personnel on official company business. These costs are allowable and are subject to the limitations contained in the FAR 31.205-46 subsections. Costs for transportation may be based on mileage rates, actual costs incurred (receipts), or a combination thereof, provided the method used results in a reasonable charge. Costs for lodging, meals, and incidental expenses may be based on per diem, actual expenses (receipts), or a combination thereof, provided the method used results in a reasonable charge. There will be no profit to the contractor on any travel performed either by the prime or subcontractor. Travel documentation shall be provided to the COR after travel has been performed to verify estimates versus actual costs, and to determine a reasonable charge. Travel documentation will be included as an attachment to the invoice and monthly report in WAWF, in a contractor preferred (COR approved) format. This requirement includes the prime contractor and all subcontractors.

Page 21 of

2.8 Conflicts of Interest

2.8.1 The contractor shall remain conflict of interest free during the entire duration of the contract. Additional information concerning conflicts of interest are located in Title 10, U.S. Code Section 2399 and FAR Subpart 9.5.

2.8.2 In the event that the prime or a subcontractor intends or becomes involved in development of DoD systems under eventual ATEC test and evaluation oversight as part of its Title 10 responsibilities, the contractor shall provide written notification to the COR within three working days of this potential OCI issue. The contractor shall not begin or continue performance once the contractor becomes aware of a 10 USC 2399 violation or any other OCI situation without the Contracting Officer’s approval. The contractor shall own the burden to monitor, report and resolve any Title 10, U.S. Code Section 2399 violations and all potential OCI issues that arise during the performance of this contract.

2.8.3 The Contracting Officer will analyze all potential OCIs as prescribed by FAR Subpart 9.5 and make a determination if an actual OCI exists and whether an actual OCI can be mitigated. The Contracting Officer will provide the rationale for an OCI determination and request a mitigation plan when the OCI is of a type that can be mitigated. The Contracting Officer will evaluate the mitigation plan and either approve or disapprove the mitigation plan.

2.8.4 The contractor shall not employ off-duty CORs, nor any other person who is an employee of the U.S. Government or the DoD, either military or civilian, if such employment would create a conflict of interest.

2.8.5 The above requirements include the prime contractor and all subcontractors.

3 Performance Requirements The following section describes the tasks expected to be executed under this contract.

The contractor will be expected to perform all or a subset of these tasks concurrently.

The contract company will need to manage their personnel in order to execute the tasks which will change depending on the systems being evaluated and their current stage of development. A list of potential systems that may be evaluated during this contract is provided.

Note: Under no circumstances shall the term “assist” imply personal services; nor shall the terms “analysis” or “assess” imply that the contractor shall have any responsibility or requirement to make an actual judgment or recommendation on the issues/items involved.

3.1 Test and Evaluation Support

The Test and Evaluation (T&E) Support section covers all tasks supporting the planning and execution of AEC Survivability test and evaluation activities.

3.1.1 The Contractor shall support planning for test and evaluation.

Page 22 of

The contractor may need to develop mission scenarios as required in support of developmental and operational test events.

3.1.1.1 The Contractor shall develop proposed/draft inputs for and prepare test and evaluation planning documents for system evaluations and assessments.

3.1.1.1.1 The Contractor shall study, analyze, and trace functional and performance requirements for test and evaluation events.

The contractor shall study the functional and performance requirements traces through successively lower levels of system documentation. The contractor shall identify inconsistencies or discrepancies in the documentation; traceability, testability or measurability of system requirements; and provide applicable inputs in accordance with DA Pam 73-1 and ATEC Pam 73-1. The contractor may need to create and maintain a traceability matrix; such as a requirements traceability matrix (RTM), Data Source Matrix or similar matrices.

3.1.1.1.2 The Contractor shall develop proposed/draft inputs for methodology analysis and planning, data elements, analytical design, and procedures for system evaluations and assessments.

Each plan shall provide data sources, methodology, computational forms, data requirements, and contractor personnel responsibilities.

3.1.1.2 The Contractor shall review and provide analysis and recommendations for program documents.

Analyze typical acquisition, T&E program documents in order to: participate in the identification of T&E issues; make recommendations in determining necessary improvements to documents with supporting rationale; and propose applicable changes to T&E strategy, plans and objectives.

3.1.1.2.1 The Contractor shall analyze and review test and evaluation plans to ensure data will be captured during the test event.

T&E plans and resources used for this task include: Data Source Matrix (DSM);

Measures of Effectiveness (MOE); Measures of Performance (MOP); RTM; Live Fire Critical Issues (CI); Live Fire additional issues (AI); Cyber-Electromagnetic Activities (CEMA) Critical Operational Issues and Criteria (COIC); and M&S acceptability criteria.

3.1.1.3 The Contractor shall prepare and analyze survey and/or interview questions for test events, experiments, assessments, and demonstrations.

Survey and/or interview questions are developed to capture data used to answer evaluation measures. In this task, assessments include Forward Operational

Page 23 of

Assessments (FOA), Rapid Fielding Initiatives (RFI), Operational Tests (OT), and Network Integration Evaluation (NIE) events.

3.1.1.4 The Contractor shall create and maintain a project calendar for the program or project.

The contractor shall develop proposed/draft inputs and maintain an up-to-date file which contains the information needed to manage the key events and products (file format to be determined at time of use).

3.1.1.5 The Contractor shall conduct research on threats and use that knowledge to ensure correct threat representation for evaluation strategies, evaluation plans, test events, and evaluation reports.

3.1.1.6 The Contractor shall maintain repositories for test and evaluation documents and products.

Provide file archival and retrieval services for documentation provided by Government and contractor personnel.

3.1.1.7 The Contractor shall plan, develop proposed/draft inputs, and update mission scenarios for developmental and operational test events.

3.1.2 The Contractor shall support early involvement for future program efforts.

Participate in the planning and development of evaluation documentation; meeting support to include Integrated Product Teams (IPTs), Working Level Integrated Product Teams (WIPTs), Operational Test Readiness Reviews (OTRRs), and other working groups as required.

3.1.3 The Contractor shall prepare, review, and update briefings for system evaluation meetings.

Support will include participating in the planning and development of evaluation briefings and meeting support. The contractor will be expected to attend meetings and provide complete and comprehensive meeting minutes, trip reports, action items, and due-outs with continued tracking of all action items from meetings.

3.1.4 The Contractor shall coordinate and plan Combatant Commanders' exercise support for cybersecurity and interoperability assessments.

3.1.5 The Contractor shall support test, assessment, and demonstration events for system evaluations.

Support will include the planning of data requirements and the observing and reporting of all test and demonstration events that impact the system evaluation. Planning will include development of measures that assess system mission accomplishment and

Page 24 of sustainment, data definitions, review of test planning documentation, and identifying potential sources of data to support the evaluation. The contractor must notify the COR if the planned events are not sufficient to assess system performance, sustainment, and operational utility.

3.1.5.1 The Contractor shall review and assess technical documentation for test readiness.

Support will include reviewing system or software-related technical documents including, but not limited to, formal qualification test reports, technical test reports, user test reports, test incident reports, software problem reports, software corrective action reports, and software version descriptions. Additionally, evaluation readiness will be assessed by addressing unresolved problems, significant documentation discrepancies, software maturity, and incompleteness or inconsistency in system testing.

3.1.5.2 The Contractor shall support on-site monitoring for tests and evaluations.

3.1.5.2.1 The Contractor shall monitor and collect data during a test or demonstration.

3.1.5.2.2 The Contractor shall conduct surveys and interviews for tests and demonstrations.

3.1.5.2.3 The Contractor shall record observations and lessons learned in support of tests and demonstrations.

3.1.5.2.4 The Contractor shall monitor and record observations of on-site training for test participants.

3.1.5.3 The Contractor shall review and execute preliminary scoring and analysis of Test Incident Reports (TIRs) for data collected from test events and demonstrations.

3.1.5.4 The Contractor shall execute and perform analysis of After Action Reviews (AARs) for tests and evaluations.

3.1.5.5 The Contractor shall perform on-site updates of data collection and evaluation plans for tests and evaluations.

3.2 Data and Database Management

The contractor shall provide support for the evaluator by designing and developing tools for managing and using automated and manual T&E to include assisting in the development of DSMs The contractor shall be capable of providing computer-programming support, and to prepare formats for data collection forms, data files, displays and reports. After data has been collected the contractor shall analyze test data and results using standard T&E methodology and standard engineering and statistical calculations, models, and performance criteria. Analyses may include, but are not limited to, the review of all test data and the preparation of a narrative of the functional and performance requirements that have been adequately traced through the

Page 25 of test plan. The contractor shall be capable of providing data displays including tables, charts, graphs and listings of test data in support of test execution, data authentication, evaluation, briefings and reports.

3.2.1 The Contractor shall identify data requirements for system evaluations.

3.2.2 The Contractor shall develop proposed/draft inputs for and modify tools to store, search, and retrieve data for system evaluations.

3.2.2.1 The Contractor shall develop proposed/draft inputs for and/or maintain databases for system evaluations.

3.2.2.2 The Contractor shall develop proposed/draft inputs for, modify, and maintain tools to receive and/or retrieve data from external sources for system evaluations.

3.2.2.3 The Contractor shall develop proposed/draft inputs for and update routines and procedures to support analysis for system evaluations.

3.2.2.4 The Contractor shall develop proposed/draft inputs for and update comprehensive instructions for execution of the tools and databases.

Provide instruction materials for evaluators and analysts for hands-on use of the database, including how to perform data entry, develop queries and produce reports.

The instruction materials will include a data element dictionary.

3.2.2.5 The Contractor shall conduct database validation exercises, pilot tests, and dry runs for the tools and databases.

3.2.3 The Contractor shall interface and coordinate with organizations to receive data for tests and evaluations.

3.2.4 The Contractor shall perform data authentication and reduction for system evaluations.

This task may include development and demonstration of software programs that flag data anomalies to assist the Data Authentication Group in assessing the completeness, accuracy, and consistency of data sets.

3.2.5 The Contractor shall participate in the review of data for the Data Authentication Group.

3.2.6 The Contractor shall archive data for tests and evaluations.

3.2.7 The Contractor shall conduct data entry for system evaluations.

3.2.8 The Contractor shall develop proposed/draft inputs and present data displays for test and evaluation.

Page 26 of

This will include providing, updating, presenting, and maintaining data displays that include tables, charts, graphs, and listings of test data in support of test execution, data authentication, evaluation, briefings, and reports.

3.3 Evaluation, Analytical and Verification Support

The contractor shall assist ATEC in interfacing with the respective test organizations to receive raw data and coordinate data input to the system level database, supporting the evaluator and analysts in the DAG process. The contractor shall provide support by proposing experimental designs and analysis techniques and procedures; analyzing all input; and integrating team members' input to reports. The contractor shall support the overall evaluation of effectiveness, suitability, and survivability to include on-site support at key events as identified by the COR. Length of the key event may dictate multiple visits. Data collection and evaluation plans shall be modified on-site as determined by the COR. Data collected from each event shall be entered into a database to address Measures of Effectiveness and Measures of Performance. Analysis of the test data shall be accomplished using tools determined by the AST which may include Microsoft tools (Access, Excel) or statistical analysis programs (Statistical Analysis System (SAS) routines, SAS JMP). Utilize data obtained from the analysis of previously conducted system program tests, results of the test events, and inputs obtained through M&S to augment or interpret the results of each event. Upon completion of each event, the contractor shall review and comment on the event test report as provided by the contractor/Government testers. This may include preparing draft reports incorporating contractor analysis and input from all AST members.

3.3.1 The Contractor shall evaluate system effectiveness, suitability, and survivability for systems under evaluation.

Effectiveness, Suitability and Survivability (ESS) evaluations are defined as:

- Effectiveness assesses the mission performance by evaluating how the system performs measured against the criteria as specified in the COICs – Mission Performance.

- Suitability assesses the system performance by evaluating how well the system performs with MANPRINT, training, logistic support and RAM characteristics – System Performance.

- Survivability assesses how well the system is protected by evaluating how the system performs against inadvertent and intentional threats, and how the system is able to withstand comprehensive damage through direct or indirect fires or similar threats. The system’s ability to resume mission or ability to protect the user is also considered – Protection Performance.

Considering this methodology, ATEC evaluates the systems according to the Critical Operational Issues as defined by the User Representative.

Page 27 of

3.3.2 The Contractor shall conduct data analysis and reporting for tests, evaluations and special projects.

As defined in the following sub-tasks, prepare draft input to T&E documentation: SEP, Operational Test Activity Test Plan (OTA TP), OTA Milestone Assessment Report (OMAR), OTA Assessment Report (OAR), OTA Evaluation Report (OER), Capabilities & Limitations Report (CLR), Safety Release/Confirmation, and special reports as appropriate in Government-directed formats.

3.3.2.1 The Contractor shall perform searches and conduct data trends and statistical analysis for system evaluations.

3.3.2.2 The Contractor shall develop proposed/draft inputs for…