W912PM20R00010003_Amendment.docx.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to:

A) Extended the period of performance from 540 days to 730 days.

B) Revised the Notice to Offerors to show the correct number of clins and update the period of performance.

C) Information w as added to the Notice to Offerors to show that an additional 90 days w ill be added to the period of performance should any and/or all options are executed.

All other terms and conditions are unchanged.

///////////////////////////////////////////////LAST ITEM/////////////////////////////////////////////////////

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 25

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 12-Aug-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912PM20R0001

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

24-Jul-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

12-Aug-2020

CODE

U S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, WILMINGTON

WILMINGTON DISTRICT

ATTN: CONTRACTING DIVISION

69 DARLINGTON AVE

WILMINGTON NC 28403-1343

W912PM 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912PM20R0001

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION

The contractor period of performance end date has increased by 190 days from 540 days to 730 days.

CLIN 0001

The pricing detail quantity 1.00 has been added.

The unit of issue Job has been added.

CLIN 0002

CLIN 0003

SUBCLIN 0004AA

SUBCLIN 0004AB

SUBCLIN 0005AA

SUBCLIN 0005AB

SUBCLIN 0006AA

SUBCLIN 0006AB

SUBCLIN 0007AA

SUBCLIN 0007AB

SUBCLIN 0008AA

SUBCLIN 0008AB

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0001 has been changed from:

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

540 dys. ANP SOCOM

RON CANNADY

BUILDING 2-2414, WOODRUFF STREET

FORT BRAGG NC 28307-0069

910-908-0572

FOB: Destination

W912PM

To:

730 dys. ANP 1 SOCOM

BUILDING 2-2414, WOODRUFF STREET

FORT BRAGG NC 28307-0069

910-908-0572

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0002 has been changed from:

BUILDING 2-2414, WOODRUFF STREET

FORT BRAGG NC 28307-0069

910-908-0572

730 dys. ANP 1 SOCOM

BUILDING 2-2414, WOODRUFF STREET

FORT BRAGG NC 28307-0069

910-908-0572

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0003 has been changed from:

BUILDING 2-2414, WOODRUFF STREET

FORT BRAGG NC 28307-0069

910-908-0572

820 dys. ANP 1 SOCOM

BUILDING 2-2414, WOODRUFF STREET

FORT BRAGG NC 28307-0069

910-908-0572

The following Delivery Schedule item for SUBCLIN 0004AA has been changed from:

BUILDING 2-2414, WOODRUFF STREET

FORT BRAGG NC 28307-0069

910-908-0572

BUILDING 2-2414, WOODRUFF STREET

FORT BRAGG NC 28307-0069

910-908-0572

The following Delivery Schedule item for SUBCLIN 0004AB has been changed from:

BUILDING 2-2414, WOODRUFF STREET

FORT BRAGG NC 28307-0069

910-908-0572

BUILDING 2-2414, WOODRUFF STREET

FORT BRAGG NC 28307-0069

910-908-0572

The following Delivery Schedule item for SUBCLIN 0005AA has been changed from:

BUILDING 2-2414, WOODRUFF STREET

FORT BRAGG NC 28307-0069

910-908-0572

BUILDING 2-2414, WOODRUFF STREET

FORT BRAGG NC 28307-0069

910-908-0572

The following Delivery Schedule item for SUBCLIN 0005AB has been changed from:

BUILDING 2-2414, WOODRUFF STREET

FORT BRAGG NC 28307-0069

910-908-0572

CAGE

820 dys. ANP 1 SOCOM

RON CANNADY

BUILDING 2-2414, WOODRUFF STREET

FORT BRAGG NC 28307-0069

910-908-0572

The following Delivery Schedule item for SUBCLIN 0006AA has been changed from:

BUILDING 2-2414, WOODRUFF STREET

FORT BRAGG NC 28307-0069

910-908-0572

820 dys. ANP 1 SOCOM

RON CANNADY

BUILDING 2-2414, WOODRUFF STREET

FORT BRAGG NC 28307-0069

910-908-0572

The following Delivery Schedule item for SUBCLIN 0006AB has been changed from:

BUILDING 2-2414, WOODRUFF STREET

FORT BRAGG NC 28307-0069

910-908-0572

BUILDING 2-2414, WOODRUFF STREET

FORT BRAGG NC 28307-0069

910-908-0572

The following Delivery Schedule item for SUBCLIN 0007AA has been changed from:

BUILDING 2-2414, WOODRUFF STREET

FORT BRAGG NC 28307-0069

910-908-0572

820 dys. ANP 1 SOCOM

RON CANNADY

BUILDING 2-2414, WOODRUFF STREET

FORT BRAGG NC 28307-0069

910-908-0572

The following Delivery Schedule item for SUBCLIN 0007AB has been changed from:

BUILDING 2-2414, WOODRUFF STREET

FORT BRAGG NC 28307-0069

910-908-0572

BUILDING 2-2414, WOODRUFF STREET

FORT BRAGG NC 28307-0069

910-908-0572

The following Delivery Schedule item for SUBCLIN 0008AA has been changed from:

BUILDING 2-2414, WOODRUFF STREET

FORT BRAGG NC 28307-0069

910-908-0572

820 dys. ANP 1 SOCOM

RON CANNADY

BUILDING 2-2414, WOODRUFF STREET

FORT BRAGG NC 28307-0069

910-908-0572

The following Delivery Schedule item for SUBCLIN 0008AB has been changed from:

BUILDING 2-2414, WOODRUFF STREET

FORT BRAGG NC 28307-0069

910-908-0572

BUILDING 2-2414, WOODRUFF STREET

FORT BRAGG NC 28307-0069

910-908-0572

SECTION 00 21 16 - INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

The following have been modified:

GENERAL PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS

GENERAL PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS & REQUIREMENTS

PN 81165

SOF Human Platform FORGE, at Fort Bragg, Cumberland County, North Carolina

1. OVERVIEW.

1.1 This Request for Proposal (RFP) solicits construction of SOF Human Platform, FORGE at Fort Bragg NC. The scope of work includes: Construct a cardio/strength/nutrition training, physical/hydro therapy, special operations cognitive enhancement for performance training, human engagement and adaptive thinking training, and shower/locker space. Construction consists of concrete foundation and floor slab with metal frame structure. Built-in building systems will include fire alarm/mass notification, fire suppression, energy management control, telephone and advanced unclassified and classified communications networks, cable TV, intrusion detection, closed circuit surveillance, and electronic access control systems and a hardened protected distribution system. Department of Defense (DoD) principles for high performance and sustainable building requirements will be included in the design and construction of the project in accordance with federal laws and Executive Orders. Low Impact

Development features will be included in the design and construction of this project as appropriate. Supporting facilities include site preparation, utilities (electrical, water, gas, sanitary sewer, chilled water, and information systems distribution), lighting, vehicle parking, access drives, curb and gutter, sidewalks, storm drainage, landscaping, roads, demolition of 59,500 SF of existing facilities, and other site improvements. Appropriate cybersecurity measures will be applied to the facility-related control systems in accordance with current DoD criteria. Special construction includes sustainable construction features complying with and certifiable to Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) “Silver” with enhanced commissioning. Access for persons with disabilities will be provided. Comprehensive interior, electronic security systems, and audio visual design services are included.

The period of performance is 730 calendar days . Work location is Fort Bragg, North Carolina.

Antiterrorism/Force protection measures and sustainment mandates will be incorporated. The resultant contract will be Firm-Fixed Price (FFP).

1.2 The instructions and requirements contained herein establish uniform evaluation procedures for the technical evaluation of proposals by the Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) and the development of the Best Value Decision by the Source Selection Authority (SSA) using the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable Source Selection Process (See Federal Acquisition Regulation 15.101-2). Proposals should be specific and complete in every detail as well as be prepared simply and economically, providing a straightforward and concise description of capabilities to satisfactorily perform the contract.

1.3 Each offeror must submit both a Price Proposal and Technical Proposal, in addition to Past

Performance Questionnaires. The Price Proposal and Technical Proposal must be submitted as separate volumes/files. All information intended to be evaluated as part of the Technical Proposal must be submitted as part of the Technical Proposal. Do not cross-reference similar material in the

Price Proposal, or vice versa.

The Price and the Technical Proposals in addition to the Past Performance Questionnaires must be received by the closing date and time set for receipt of proposals. No dollar amounts from the Price

Proposal are to be included in the Technical proposal.

Do not include exceptions to the terms and conditions of the solicitation in either the technical or price proposal. Should the offer include any standard company terms and conditions that conflict with the terms and conditions of the solicitation, the offer may be determined “unacceptable” and thus ineligible for award. Should the offeror have any questions related to specific terms and conditions, these should be resolved prior to the submission of the offer.

The technical data criteria specified for each factor identified herein, shall be submitted as part of the proposal.

The offeror is responsible for including sufficient details in its proposal to permit a complete and accurate evaluation. Accordingly, the offeror shall be clear and concise in its proposal. The

Government will not make assumptions concerning the offeror’s intent.

Failure to submit all the data required by the RFP and its Attachments, may be cause for determining a proposal incomplete and therefore may not be considered for award.

2. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS.

In accordance with FAR Clause 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors – Competitive Acquisitions, the Government reserves the right to make award without discussions. Therefore, offerors should submit their best technical and price terms in their initial offer and not automatically assume that they will have an opportunity to participate in discussions or to submit a revised offer. The Government may make award of a conforming proposal without discussions, if deemed to be within the best interests of the Government.

In accordance with 15.306(c) (1) and FAR Clause 52.215-1(f) (4), Instructions to Offerors – Competitive Acquisitions, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. If the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

2.1 Contractor Team Arrangements. The Government will recognize the integrity and validity of contractor teaming arrangements, provided the arrangements are identified and company relationships are fully disclosed in the offer. As further described in paragraph 2.3, below, the

Government will only evaluate the information submitted by the legal entity with whom the Government would enter into a contract. This is the legal entity represented in Tab E, as registered in System for Award Management (SAM) and identified by its specifically assigned CAGE Code.

2.2 If applicable, a 8(a) Joint Venture or SBA/DoD approved Mentor-Protégé must submit all required documentation with their offer to be considered responsive, IAW the requirements set forth in Title 13 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 125.8.

2.3 The Government will only evaluate the information submitted by the legal entity with whom the Government would enter into a contract. This is the legal entity represented in Tab E, as registered in System for Award Management (SAM) and identified by its specifically assigned CAGE Code. However, IAW CFR 125.8(e), the Government will also evaluate past experience and past performance submitted by the individual firms that make up a joint venture.

2.4 Notwithstanding the specific requirements of any other area of the RFP, information submitted about any company other than the offeror, whether an affiliated company, subsidiary (including wholly owned subsidiaries), or subcontractor, WILL NOT be evaluated for any factor.

Successor entities shall clearly demonstrate in Volume I, Tab A of their proposal the official legal means performed to transform the former Predecessor Company to its current Successor, legal business entity. Examples of substantive documentation may include but is not limited to Articles of Incorporation, Joint Venture Agreements, Novation Agreements, and Merger Documentation.

"Successor" means an entity that has replaced a predecessor by acquiring the assets and carrying out the affairs of the predecessor under a new name (often through acquisition or merger).

Note: The term ''successor'' does not include new offices/ divisions of the same company or a company that only changes its name.

2.5 Offerors shall submit their proposal in accordance with the Section 3. General Proposal

Format, paragraph 3.4.

2.6 Proposals are due no later than the time and date specified in Block 13 of Standard Form 1442.

3. GENERAL PROPOSAL FORMAT.

3.1 Cover Page. Include the title of the solicitation, solicitation number, offeror name and date of the submittal.

3.2 Table of Contents. Each volume of the proposal shall contain a detailed table of contents. If more than one Adobe PDF file is used for a volume, the complete table of contents shall be included in each. Any materials submitted but not required by this solicitation (such as company brochures) shall be relegated to appendices.

3.3 All information intended to be evaluated as part of the Technical Proposal must be submitted as part of the Technical Proposal. Do not cross-reference similar material in the Price Proposal, or vice versa. No dollar amounts from the Price Proposal are to be included in the Technical

3.4

Each offeror must submit both a Price Proposal and a Technical Proposal via email to the

Wilmington District Contracting Division at saw-ct-militaryproposals@usace.army.mil. Ensure the solicitation number is included in the subject line of the email. Note that attachments exceeding 15

MB may not be accepted by the email server. No hard paper copies will be accepted or evaluated.

Both the Price Proposal and the Technical Proposal must be received by the closing date and time set for receipt of proposals. In an effort to reduce paperwork and reduce cost, all proposals shall be submitted electronically. All submissions shall be in Adobe PDF format and shall be on 8 ½ x 11 size pages in no less than a 10 pitch or 10 font. Page limitations, where specified in the RFP, shall be considered a maximum. Offerors may use compressions utility software such as WinZip or PKZip to reduce file size and facilitate transmission.

Title the file(s) in the following format:

W912PM20R0001_COMPANY NAME_VOLUME I

W912PM20R0001_COMPANY NAME_VOLUME II

Offerors shall submit bid bonds (Standard Form 24) in both electronic and hard copy format.

Electronic copies of bid bonds shall be included in Volume 1: Offerors Certifications and Price under

Tab G. Hard copies of bid bonds shall be submitted via USPS, UPS, FedEx or DHL. Hand carried bid bonds will not be accepted. Bid bond submissions shall be due by the proposal due date and time to the following address:

USACE-Wilmington

Contracting Division

Attn: Mr. John Hill

69 Darlington Avenue

Wilmington, NC 28403 Proposal due Date and Time:

Request For Proposal No: W912PM20R0001

Due Date of Proposal: 26 August, 2020

Time by which Proposals are due: 2:00 P.M. (Eastern Time) Title of Project: PN 81165 SOF Human Platform FORGE, Fort Bragg, Cumberland

County, North Carolina

The date and time of delivery will be established by the time of receipt by the email server (time stamped by the system), not by the date and time the offeror sent the proposal into their email account. Do not assume that electronic communication is instantaneous – in fact, it can take several minutes or even hours in some cases. Please make allowances for delays in transmittal. If an electronic submission is sent minutes before the deadline but notification is not actually received in the recipients’ email inboxes until after the deadline, the submission will be considered late. The

Government will not be responsible for proposals delivered to any location or to anyone other than those designated to receive proposals on its behalf. Offerors are responsible for ensuring that proposals are submitted so as to reach the designated recipient of proposals. Offerors are responsible for allowing sufficient time for the proposal to be received in accordance with the instructions provided.

3.5 The offeror is responsible for including sufficient details in its proposal to permit a complete and accurate evaluation. Accordingly, the offeror shall be clear and concise in its proposal. The

Government will not make assumptions concerning the offeror’s intent.

3.6 The technical data criteria specified for each factor identified herein and as described in these instructions shall be submitted as part of the proposal. Failure to submit all the data required by the RFP, and these instructions may be cause for determining a proposal incomplete and, therefore, not considered for award.

3.7 Do not include exceptions to the terms and conditions of the solicitation in either the technical or price proposal. Should the offer include any standard company terms and conditions that conflict with the terms and conditions of the solicitation, the offer may be determined “unacceptable” and thus ineligible for award. Should the offeror have any questions related to specific terms and conditions, these should be resolved prior to the submission of the offer.

3.8 Tabs. Proposal shall be organized and tabbed as follows:

3.8.1 VOLUME I: OFFEROR’S CERTIFICATIONS AND PRICE (FACTOR 1)

One (1) electronic copy Adobe PDF file as tabbed per the table below shall be submitted and one (1) original copy of the bid guarantee in both electronic and hardcopy shall be submitted.

TAB CONTENTS OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL

A The Proposal Cover Sheet

B Standard Form 1442

C Acknowledgement of Amendments (If Applicable)

D FACTOR 1: PRICE

E Section 00 45 00 – Representations and Certifications

F Teaming Arrangement (If Applicable)

G Bid Guarantee (Bid Bond)

H Financial Information and Bonding Capability

I Subcontracting Plan (FOR LARGE BUSINESSES ONLY)

TAB A – The proposal cover sheet is required by FAR 52.215-1 (c) (2) and must be submitted by all offerors. The format for the proposal cover sheet is as follows:

PROPOSAL COVER SHEET

Offerors should ensure telephone number; fax number, e-mail address, DUNS number and CAGE Code are all included. DUNS number will be used to access Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) data. Offerors should also provide any other assigned number that identifies them in the CPARS database. If a separate DUNS has been created for a joint venture (J-V) it must be submitted. The offeror should also submit their Tax ID number on the proposal data Sheet.

TAB B - Standard Form 1442, completed and signed by authorized individual(s) of the offeror. Offers submitted in the name of a Joint Venture must be signed in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the joint venture agreement as evidenced in the

TAB C - If applicable - All amendments must be acknowledged by all offerors and duly executed with an original signature by an official authorized to bind the company in accordance with FAR 4.102.

TAB D – Factor 1 - Price. Proposed price schedule is to be completed in its entirety by all offerors to include the Subtotals and Totals section as found in Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation, Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) Schedule.

TAB E - Section 00 45 00 – Representations and Certifications. Offerors shall include any narratives as it pertains to the requirement at 2.2 to document any teaming arrangement the offeror has or will enter into.

1. The solicitation number;

2. The name, address, and telephone and facsimile numbers of the offeror (and electronic address if available);

3. A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item;

4. Names, titles, and telephone and facsimile numbers (and electronic addresses if available) of persons authorized to negotiate on the offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation; and

5. Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal.

Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

TAB F - Teaming Agreement, if applicable. See paragraph 2.1 and 2.2 Note to 8(a)—SBA must approve a joint venture agreement prior to the award of an 8(a) contract on behalf of the joint venture.

TAB G - Offerors shall provide a fully executed Bid Bond as required by FAR Clause 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee in both Hard copy and electronically in Tab G. Hard copies of Bid Guarantees (submitted via UPS, FedEx, USPS, etc.) shall be addressed to the Contracting Officer at:

USACE – Wilmington District

Attention: John Hill

69 Darlington Ave

Wilmington NC 28403

For the purposes of this Request for Proposal, please note that in accordance with

(IAW) FAR 28.001:

“Bond means a written instrument executed by a bidder or contractor (the “principal”), and a second party (the “surety” or “sureties”) (except as provided in 28.204), to assure fulfillment of the principal’s obligations to a third party (the “obligee” or “Government”), identified in the bond. If the principal’s obligations are not met, the bond assures payment, to the extent stipulated, of any loss sustained by the obligee.”

Bonds shall therefore be executed in the name of the legal entity, whether a joint venture, partnership or the Prime Contractor of an informal teaming arrangement, with whom the government would enter into a contract for a successful offeror. The entity named on the bond must be able to acquire bonding capacity on its own merits, and not as the result of indemnification from a subcontractor or third party.

TAB H - Financial Information & Bonding Capability (e.g. past three years financial statements, annual reports, Dun & Bradstreet Ratings and/or number, etc.) Provide a list of all current contracts held, total dollar value, award date, anticipated completion, performance and payment bond amount.

TAB I - Subcontracting Plan – FOR LARGE BUSINESS OFFERORS ONLY.

Subcontracting Plan shall be prepared in accordance with FAR 52.219-9, and SBA’s

Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System (eSRS) located at http://esrs.gov. Instructions for completion of requisite forms, as well as guidance on coordinating and preparing for all compliance reviews by Federal agencies can be found at this website. Offerors are to ensure subcontractors agree to submit to ESRS.

3.8.2 VOLUME II: TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (FACTORS 2-5)

One (1) electronic copy Adobe PDF file as tabbed per the table below shall be submitted.

TAB CONTENTS OF THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

A Factor 2: Corporate Specialized Experience

B Factor 3: Past Performance

C Factor 4: Key Personnel

Page Limitations: The following page limitations are established for each factor described above:

Factor 2: Past Experience, Construction – Limited to 20 pages (maximum of 5 forms) Factor 3: Past Performance – Limited to no fewer than three (3) and no more than five (5) projects. Individual project Past Performance Assessment Questionnaires shall not exceed four (4) pages; Government evaluators will review and evaluate only the information contained on the first four (4) pages.

Factor 4: Key Personnel – Limited to 5 pages per individual resume

NOTE: Pages that exceed the required page limitations will not be evaluated. Additional pages over the maximum allowed will be removed or not read and will not be evaluated by the Government.

Tables of content, proposal cover letters, and tabs between proposal information do not count toward any page limitations in the proposal.

Offerors are cautioned that “parroting” of the Technical requirements or the Scope of Work with a statement of intent to perform does not reflect an understanding of the requirement or capability to perform. Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal.

Proprietary information shall be clearly marked.

4. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS & EVALUATION FACTORS

VOLUME II: TAB A—FACTOR 2 – Corporate Specialized Experience

4.1 SUBMISSION/MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS:

4.1.1 The offeror shall demonstrate the experience as a prime contractor on projects of similar size, scope, and complexity.

4.1.2 The minimum requirement for a project of similar size, scope, or complexity is defined as having all of the following criteria:

- Complex construction projects of similar size, scope and complexity on three (3) recent projects equal to or greater than $25,000,000.00 in value

- Projects equal to or greater than 60,000 square feet of total aggregate interior space

- One (1) project must include the construction of a physical training or therapy area (as the Prime Contractor).

4.1.3 The offeror shall complete a minimum of three (3), but no more than five (5), “Experience Information” forms, (See Example 1), in response to this factor. All projects submitted must be at least 50% complete within the last six (6) years preceding the date of the solicitation

4.1.4 Offerors shall utilize Experience Information Form in Attachment 2. This sheet is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded;

however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed FOUR (4) pages.

4.1.5 If the offeror is a Joint Venture (J-V), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity, or the individual firms that make up the joint venture. Offerors that are part of the DoD Mentor Protégé program may only submit two

(2) recent and relevant project completed by the Mentor. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects. Experience of proposed subcontractors to be utilized on this project will not be considered.

4.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA:

4.2.1 The Government will evaluate the extent of recent, relevant experience of the prime contractor as identified in paragraph 4.1.2. Projects that were awarded on an individual task/delivery order basis will not be aggregated for purposes of meeting minimum. Federal Government project experience will not be rated inherently more important than non-Federal Government project experience.

4.2.2 To be considered eligible for award, the Government will verify that each offeror has submitted a minimum of three (3) projects which meet the minimum criteria of paragraph 4.1.2.

4.2.3 The offeror’s Past Experience will be evaluated based on the Government’s assessment of each submitted project’s similarity (in terms of size, scope and complexity) to the work described in this RFP.

4.2.4 The Government will review the project experience of the offeror on projects provided in response to the Past Experience Factor. Offerors must meet all of the minimum acceptability standards to receive an “ACCEPTABLE” rating on this factor.

5. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS & EVALUATION FACTORS

VOLUME II: TAB C — FACTOR 3 - PAST PERFORMANCE.

5.1 SUBMISSION/MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS:

5.1.1 Past performance refers to the quality of recent and relevant project experience from the owner’s perspective. The offeror shall complete and provide a Past Performance Assessment Questionnaire (Attachment 3) on no fewer than three (3) and no more than five (5) projects.

Projects submitted under this factor must first be deemed recent and relevant.

5.1.1.1 Relevant: Offer must demonstrate experience as a prime contractor on projects of similar size, scope, or complexity. The minimum requirement for a project of similar size, scope, or complexity is defined as a requirement with all of the following:

- Complex construction projects of similar size, scope and complexity on three (3) recent projects equal to or greater than $25,000,000.00 in value

- Projects equal to or greater than 60,000 square feet of total aggregate interior space area (as the Prime Contractor)

5.1.1.2 Recent: Projects of similar size, scope, and complexity that must have been completed (fully designed and at least 50% construction progress completed) within six (6) years preceding the date of the solicitation

5.1.2 Though not required, ideally project past performance information submitted under this factor would be on the same projects submitted for consideration under FACTOR 2, PAST

EXPERIENCE. Individual project Past Performance Assessment Questionnaires shall not exceed four (4) pages; Government evaluators will review and evaluate only the information contained on the first four (4) pages. If any firm has multiple functions or divisions, limit the project examples to those performed by the division, unit or team member submitting the offer. The

Government will call and confirm information provided by the offeror on the Past Performance Assessment Questionnaire with the points of contact, to the extent necessary to conduct a meaningful evaluation. The Government reserves the right to interview other individuals if the point of contact is not available.

5.1.3 The Government may contact sources other than those provided by the offeror for information with respect to past performance. These other sources may include but are not limited to: Contract Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), other Government sources, and interviews with organizations or individuals familiar with the offeror’s performance.

5.1.4 Offerors shall utilize the Past Performance Assessment Questionnaire in Attachment 3.

5.1.5 If the offeror is a Joint Venture (J-V), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity, or the individual firms that make up the joint venture. Offerors that are part of the DoD Mentor Protégé program may only submit two

(2) recent and relevant project completed by the Mentor. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects. Experience of proposed subcontractors to be utilized on this project will not be considered.

5.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA:

5.2.1 The Government will consider past performance of the prime construction contractor. If a firm has multiple functions or divisions, the Government will only evaluate the past performance of the unit or division submitting the offer. Where the Government views an offeror’s role, or that of its team members, if any, as not significant or as not clearly defined, the Government reserves the right to view this lack of involvement, or clarity, as a risk which may impact an offeror’s rating for this factor despite the quality of recent, relevant past performance information.

5.2.2 Past performance shall be initially evaluated to determine whether the offeror’s present/past performance is recent, and relevant to the effort to be acquired.

- Relevant: Complex construction projects of similar size, scope and complexity on three (3) recent projects equal to or greater than $25,000,000.00 in value

- Projects equal to or greater than 60,000 square feet of total aggregate interior space area (as the Prime Contractor).

Recent: Projects of similar size, scope, and complexity that must have been completed (fully designed and at least 50% construction progress completed) within six (6) years preceding the date of the solicitation

5.2.3 The Government will evaluate ONLY recent and relevant past performance based on the elements listed below to assign a confidence rating of acceptable/unacceptable.

5.2.4 Second, the past performance evaluation shall determine how well the offeror performed on the prior contracts. The contractor shall have no “unsatisfactory” in criteria 1-7, and no

“marginal” ratings in criteria 1-4 (below) in the Contract Performance Assessment Reporting

System (CPARS): quality, schedule, cost control, management, and utilization of small business, regulatory compliance, and safety.

(1) Quality of Construction. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect to the quality of the actual construction undertaken and the offeror’s ability to maintain quality control and accuracy of quality control documentation.

(2) Schedule. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect to the completion of projects within the scheduled completion times.

(3) Cost Control. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect to the offeror’s ability to efficiently utilize resources and demonstrate cost responsibility.

(4) Management. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect to the offeror’s ability to manage resources and key personnel.

(5) Utilization of Small Business. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect to the offeror’s ability to meet small business subcontracting plan goals.

(6) Regulatory Compliance. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect the offeror’s ability to enforce laws and regulations, correct deficiencies when non-compliant, and communicate laws and regulations to subcontractors.

(7) Safety. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect to the contractor’s safety program or efforts.

5.2.5 Failure to demonstrate the minimum acceptability standards under this factor will result in an “UNACCEPTABLE” rating and possible elimination from further consideration for contract award.

6. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS & EVALUATION FACTORS

VOLUME II: TAB C —FACTOR 4 – KEY PERSONNEL.

6.1 SUBMISSION/MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS:

6.1.1 Each offeror shall provide resumes for the following Key Personnel proposed for this contract. Resumes shall not exceed five (5) pages per person. The proposed position of each person shall be clearly stated at the beginning of the resume.

CQC System Manager The CQC System Manager is required to be a graduate engineer, graduate architect, or a graduate of construction management with a minimum of 5 years construction experience on construction similar to this Contract or possess 10 year’s construction experience as a CQC on construction similar to this Contract. Construction similar to this contract is defined previously in paragraph 5.1.2. not all projects identified in the resume need to meet these criteria, and the requirement for experience on a physical training or therapy area is not mandatory, but at least one project identified must clearly meet the minimum size criterion and dollar value.

For further information refer to:

3.4.2 CQC SYSTEM MANAGER

SECTION 01 45 00.00 10 QUALITY CONTROL

Project Superintendent

The Project Superintendent shall have a minimum of 5 years of experience as a Project Superintendent.

Refer to:

3.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

SECTION 01 45 00.00 10 QUALITY CONTROL

6.1.2 Sample suggested resume format is included with this RFP (Attachment 2). If offerors elect not to use the suggested resume format, all information identified on the sample format is still required for each resume submitted under this Factor. Proposals that fail to include resumes or that fail to include all required information on these resumes may be rejected as unacceptable.

6.1.3 The Key Personnel identified must be used on the project. No deviations will be permitted unless they meet the same qualifications and experience of those individuals proposed and are expressly approved by the Contracting Officer in advance. An offeror’s use of different personnel than those proposed without approval from the Contracting Officer will be grounds for a Termination for Default.

6.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA:

6.2.1 The Government will review the resumes provided in response to the Personnel Factor.

Offerors must demonstrate all of the following minimum acceptability standards to receive an

“ACCEPTABLE” rating on this factor.

6.2.2 The offeror must demonstrate in all resumes that the key personnel proposed have a minimum of five (5) years of specialized and relevant experience in the following roles: CQC

System Manager and Project Superintendent.

6.2.3 Failure to demonstrate the minimally acceptability standards under this factor will result in an “UNACCEPTABLE” rating and possible elimination from further consideration for contract award.

Each evaluation factor and its risk rating combined will be determined and assigned using the adjectival and color descriptions contained herein. Upon assessment of each individual sub-factor and its risk rating, the appropriate overall rating for the technical proposal will be assigned using these acceptable and unacceptable (pass/fail) ratings as defined below:

Color Rating Description

Green Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Red Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Upon assessment of past performance information, the appropriate overall rating for past performance will be assigned using these acceptable and unacceptable (pass/fail) ratings as defined below:

Color Rating Description

Green Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below)

Red Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the

Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a) (2) (iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or “neutral”) past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating shall be considered “acceptable.”

To be considered technically acceptable, no technical factor in the proposal may be determined to be unacceptable. The failure of a proposal to meet any of the acceptability standards for non-cost factors will result in a technically unacceptable rating and preclude award.

NOTICE TO OFFERORS

SUBTOTAL Base Bid Items; CLINS 0001-0002 $______________________

SUBTOTAL of all Optional Bid Items; CLINS 0003-0008 $______________________

TOTAL AMOUNT OF ALL LINE ITEMS 0001-0008 $________________________

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE __730 days ANP__ __ _______

*If any Option (one or all) is executed an additional 90 days will be added to the base duration. The period of performance would then be 820 days.

NOTE 1:

The period of performance of CLIN’s 0001-0002 shall run concurrently with the entire contract duration so that the period of performance shall not exceed 730 calendar days.

NOTE 2:

The exercise of all optional bid items (CLIN’s 0003-0008) shall be subject to the availability of funds.

NOTE 3:

The government reserves the right to exercise optional bid items 1 through 6 (CLIN’s 0003-0008) by no later than 230 Days after Notice To Proceed. If any/all of the optional bid items be exercised, the total period of performance will increase by 90 calendar days, from 730 to 820 calendar days.

SECTION 00 73 00 - SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS

The following have been modified:

52.211-10 COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION, AND COMPLETION OF WORK (APR 1984)

The Contractor shall be required to (a) commence work under this contract within 10 calender days after the date of the notice to proceed, (b) prosecute the work diligently, and (c) complete the entire work ready for use not later than 730 calendar days . The time stated for completion shall include final cleanup of the premises.

(End of clause)

(End of Summary of Changes)