PN89057_W912PM19R00220001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to:

A. Update General Description in paragraph 1.1 of "General Proposal Submisstion Instructions & Requirements".

B. Include site visit pictures, sign-in roster, and unit holiday calendar.

C. Updated Liquidated Damages (LD) - Construction to reflect $664.51 LD daily rate.

D. Included updated Technical Summary of Changes.

E. All other solicitation terms and conditions remain unchanged.

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////LAST ITEM///////////////////////////////////////////////////////

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 21

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 21-Feb-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912PM19R0022

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

15-Jan-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

20-Feb-2020

CODE

U S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, WILMINGTON

69 DARLINGTON AVE.

WILMINGTON NC 28403

W912PM 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912PM19R0022

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00 01 10 - TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Table of Contents has changed from:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 1 NAVFAC USACE PPQ to:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 1 NAVFAC USACE PPQ Attachment 2 Site Visit Sign-In Roster Attachment 3 Site Visit Pictures Attachment 4 Technical Summary of

Changes

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION

The Issued By organization has changed from

U S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, WILMINGTON

WILMINGTON DISTRICT

ATTN: BOBBY LAW

69 DARLINGTON AVE

WILMINGTON NC 28403-1343

to

U S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, WILMINGTON

WILMINGTON DISTRICT

ATTN: CONTRACTING DIVISION

69 DARLINGTON AVE

WILMINGTON NC 28403-1343

SECTION 00 21 16 - INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS

GENERAL PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS & REQUIREMENTS

PN 89057

SOF Dining Facility (DFAC), at Fort Bragg, Cumberland County, North Carolina

1. OVERVIEW.

1.1 Construct a Dining Facility (DFAC) addition and renovation at Fort Bragg, NC. The project renovates existing food preparation areas, serving areas, and administrative areas. The renovation includes replacement of failing drainage piping systems, floor surfaces, electrical services, lighting, fire detection and suppression systems, ceiling systems, plumbing, and mechanical systems. Renovation will result in reconfigured food preparation areas, serving areas, showers, latrines, locker room and administrative areas to greatly improve the efficiency of serving the unit population and to improve the daily through-put time for individuals. The DFAC addition includes dry storage facility, administrative offices, shower/latrine areas, loading dock, swing space for refrigerated food storage, and temporary mechanical room. Project includes Intrusion Detection System installation and Energy Monitoring and Control System (EMCS) connections. Supporting facilities include electric service, water, sewer, and gas, paving, walks, curbs, gutters, storm drainage, site improvements, information systems, and anti-terrorism measures. Measures in accordance with the Department of Defense (DoD) Minimum Antiterrorism for Buildings standards will be provided. Comprehensive building and furnishings related interior design services are required.

Access for individuals with disabilities will be provided. Sustainability/Energy measures will be provided. Facilities will be designed to a minimum life of 40 years in accordance with DoD's Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC 1-200-02) including energy efficiencies, building envelope and integrated building systems performance. Air Conditioning (Estimated 10 Tons).

The period of performance shall not Exceed 540 calendar days. Work location is Fort Bragg, North Carolina.

Antiterrorism/Force protection measures and sustainment mandates will be incorporated. The resultant contract will be Firm-Fixed Price (FFP).

1.2 The instructions and requirements contained herein establish uniform evaluation procedures for the technical evaluation of proposals by the Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) and the development of the Best Value Decision by the Source Selection Authority (SSA) using the Trade-Off Process (See Federal Acquisition Regulation 15.101-1). The proposal shall describe the capability of the offeror to perform the contract. The proposal should be specific and complete in every detail as well as be prepared simply and economically, providing a straightforward and concise description of capabilities to satisfactorily perform the contract as set forth in these instructions and requirements.

1.3 Each offeror must submit both a Price Proposal and Technical Proposal, in addition to Past Performance Questionnaires. The Price Proposal, Technical Proposal, and Past Performance Questionnaires must be submitted as separate volumes/files. All information intended to be evaluated as part of the Technical Proposal must be submitted as part of the Technical Proposal. Do not cross-reference similar material in the Price Proposal, or vice versa.

The Price and the Technical Proposals in addition to the Past Performance Questionnaires must be received by the closing date and time set for receipt of proposals. No dollar amounts from the Price Proposal are to be included in the Technical proposal.

Do not include exceptions to the terms and conditions of the solicitation in either the technical or price proposal. Should the offer include any standard company terms and conditions that conflict with the terms and conditions of the solicitation, the offer may be determined “unacceptable” and thus ineligible for award. Should the offeror have any questions related to specific terms and conditions, these should be resolved prior to the submission of the offer.

The technical data criteria specified for each factor identified herein, shall be submitted as part of the proposal.

The offeror is responsible for including sufficient details in its proposal to permit a complete and accurate evaluation. Accordingly, the offeror shall be clear and concise in its proposal. The Government will not make assumptions concerning the offeror’s intent.

Failure to submit all the data required by the RFP and its Attachments, may be cause for determining a proposal incomplete and therefore may not considered for award.

2. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS.

In accordance with FAR Clause 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors – Competitive Acquisitions, the Government reserves the right to make award without discussions. Therefore, offerors should submit their best technical and price terms in their initial offer and not automatically assume that they will have an opportunity to participate in discussions or to submit a revised offer. The Government may make award of a conforming proposal without discussions, if deemed to be within the best interests of the Government.

In accordance with 15.306(c) (1) and FAR Clause 52.215-1(f) (4), Instructions to Offerors – Competitive Acquisitions, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. If the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

2.1 Contractor Team Arrangements. The Government will recognize the integrity and validity of contractor teaming arrangements, provided the arrangements are identified and company relationships are fully disclosed in the offer.

As further described in paragraph 2.3, below, the Government will only evaluate the information submitted by the legal entity with whom the Government would enter into a contract. This is the legal entity represented in Tab E, as registered in System for Award Management (SAM) and identified by its specifically assigned CAGE Code.

2.2 If applicable, the offeror shall submit evidence from the offeror’s SBA Servicing Agency that the offeror has notified and discussed the proposed joint venture for this project with the appropriate SBA personnel. For 8(a) set-aside procurements, all prospective Joint Ventures must comply with Title 13 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 124.513. For HUBZone set- aside procurements and awards to HUBZone SBCs through full and open competition after a price evaluation preference in favor of qualified HUBZone SBCs, a Joint Venture must comply with 13 CFR 126.616.

2.3 The Government will only evaluate the information submitted by the legal entity with whom the Government would enter into a contract. This is the legal entity represented in Tab E, as registered in System for Award Management (SAM) and identified by its specifically assigned CAGE Code. However, IAW CFR 125.8(e), the Government will also evaluate past experience and past performance submitted by the individual firms that make up a joint venture.

2.4 Notwithstanding the specific requirements of any other area of the RFP, information submitted about any company other than the offeror, whether a predecessor company, affiliated company, subsidiary (including wholly owned subsidiaries), or subcontractor, WILL NOT be evaluated for any factor. Successor entities shall clearly demonstrate in Volume I, Tab A of their proposal the official legal means performed to transform the former Predecessor Company to its current Successor, legal business entity. Examples of substantive documentation may include but is not limited to Articles of Incorporation, Joint Venture Agreements, Novation Agreements, and Merger Documentation.

"Successor" means an entity that has replaced a predecessor by acquiring the assets and carrying out the affairs of the predecessor under a new name (often through acquisition or merger).

Note: The term ''successor'' does not include new offices/ divisions of the same company or a company that only changes its name.

2.5 Offerors shall submit their proposal in accordance with the Section 3. General Proposal Format, paragraph 3.4.

2.6 Proposals are due no later than the time and date specified in Block 13 of Standard Form 1442.

3. GENERAL PROPOSAL FORMAT.

3.1 Cover Page. Include the title of the solicitation, solicitation number, offeror name, and date of the submittal.

3.2 Table of Contents. Each volume of the proposal shall contain a detailed table of contents. If more than one Adobe PDF file is used for a volume, the complete table of contents shall be included in each. Any materials submitted but not required by this solicitation (such as company brochures) shall be relegated to appendices.

3.3 All information intended to be evaluated as part of the Technical Proposal must be submitted as part of the Technical Proposal. Do not cross-reference similar material in the Price Proposal, or vice versa. No dollar amounts from the Price Proposal are to be included in the Technical proposal.

3.4 Each offeror must submit both a Price Proposal and a Technical Proposal via email to the Wilmington District Contracting Division at saw-ct-militaryproposals@usace.army.mil. Ensure the solicitation number is included in the subject line of the email. Note that attachments exceeding 15 MB may not be accepted by the email server. No hard paper copies will be accepted or evaluated. Both the Price Proposal and the Technical Proposal must be received by the closing date and time set for receipt of proposals. In an effort to reduce paperwork and reduce cost, all proposals shall be submitted electronically. All submissions shall be in Adobe PDF format and shall be on 8 ½ x 11 size pages in no less than a 10 pitch or 10 font. Page limitations, where specified in the RFP, shall be considered a maximum.

Offerors may use compressions utility software such as WinZip or PKZip to reduce file size and facilitate transmission.

Title the file(s) in the following format:

W912PM19R0022_COMPANY NAME_VOLUME I

W912PM19R0022_COMPANY NAME_VOLUME II

Offerors shall submit bid bonds (Standard Form 24) in both electronic and hard copy format.

Electronic copies of bid bonds shall be included in Volume 1: Offerors Certifications and Price under Tab G. Hard copies of bid bonds shall be submitted via USPS, UPS, FedEx or DHL. Hand carried bid bonds will not be accepted. Bid bond submissions shall be due by the proposal due date and time to the following address:

USACE-Wilmington Contracting Division Attn: Mr. John Hill 69 Darlington Avenue Wilmington, NC 28403

Proposal due Date and Time:

Request For Proposal No: W912PM19R0022 Due Date of Proposal: 2 March, 2020 Time by which Proposals are due: 2:00 P.M. (Eastern Time) Title of Project: PN 89057 SOF Dinging Facility (DFAC), Fort Bragg, North Carolina

The date and time of delivery will be established by the time of receipt by the email server (time stamped by the system), not by the date and time the offeror sent the proposal into their email account. Do not assume that electronic communication is instantaneous – in fact, it can take several minutes or even hours in some cases. Please mailto:saw-ct-militaryproposals@usace.army.mil make allowances for delays in transmittal. If an electronic submission is sent minutes before the deadline but notification is not actually received in the recipients’ email inboxes until after the deadline, the submission will be considered late. The Government will not be responsible for proposals delivered to any location or to anyone other than those designated to receive proposals on its behalf. Offerors are responsible for ensuring that proposals are submitted so as to reach the designated recipient of proposals. Offerors are responsible for allowing sufficient time for the proposal to be received in accordance with the instructions provided.

3.5 The offeror is responsible for including sufficient details in its proposal to permit a complete and accurate evaluation. Accordingly, the offeror shall be clear and concise in its proposal. The Government will not make assumptions concerning the offeror’s intent.

3.6 The technical data criteria specified for each factor identified herein and as described in these instructions shall be submitted as part of the proposal. Failure to submit all the data required by the RFP, and these instructions may be cause for determining a proposal incomplete and, therefore, not considered for award.

3.7 Do not include exceptions to the terms and conditions of the solicitation in either the technical or price proposal.

Should the offer include any standard company terms and conditions that conflict with the terms and conditions of the solicitation, the offer may be determined “unacceptable” and thus ineligible for award. Should the offeror have any questions related to specific terms and conditions, these should be resolved prior to the submission of the offer.

3.8 Tabs. Proposal shall be organized and tabbed as follows:

3.8.1 VOLUME I: OFFEROR’S CERTIFICATIONS AND PRICE (FACTOR 1)

One (1) electronic copy Adobe PDF file as tabbed per the table below shall be submitted and one (1) original copy of the bid guarantee in both electronic and hardcopy shall be submitted.

TAB CONTENTS OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL

A The Proposal Cover Sheet

B Standard Form 1442

C Acknowledgement of Amendments (If Applicable)

D FACTOR 1: PRICE

E Section 00 45 00 – Representations and Certifications

F Teaming Arrangement (If Applicable)

G Bid Guarantee (Bid Bond)

H Financial Information and Bonding Capability

I Factor 6: Small Business Participation Plan

J Subcontracting Plan (FOR LARGE BUSINESSES ONLY)

TAB A – The proposal cover sheet is required by FAR 52.215-1 (c) (2) and must be submitted by all offerors.

The format for the proposal cover sheet is as follows:

PROPOSAL COVER SHEET

Offerors should ensure telephone number; fax number, e-mail address, DUNS number and CAGE Code are all included. DUNS number will be used to access Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) data. Offerors should also provide any other assigned number that identifies them in the CPARS database. If a separate DUNS has been created for a joint venture (J-V) it must be submitted. The offeror should also submit their Tax ID number on the proposal data Sheet.

TAB B - Standard Form 1442, completed and signed by authorized individual(s) of the offeror. Offers submitted in the name of a Joint Venture must be signed in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the joint venture agreement as evidenced in the proposal.

TAB C - If applicable - All amendments must be acknowledged by all offerors and duly executed with an original signature by an official authorized to bind the company in accordance with FAR 4.102.

TAB D – Factor 1 - Price. Proposed price schedule is to be completed in its entirety by all offerors to include the Subtotals and Totals section as found in Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation, Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) Schedule.

TAB E - Section 00 45 00 – Representations and Certifications. Offerors shall include any narratives as it pertains to the requirement at 2.2 to document any teaming arrangement the offeror has or will enter into.

TAB F - Teaming Agreement, if applicable. See paragraph 2.1 and 2.2 Note to 8(a)—SBA must approve a joint venture agreement prior to the award of an 8(a) contract on behalf of the joint venture.

TAB G - Offerors shall provide a fully executed Bid Bond as required by FAR Clause 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee in both Hard copy and electronically in Tab G. Hard copies of Bid Guarantees (submitted via UPS, FedEx, USPS, etc.) shall be addressed to the Contract Officer at:

USACE – Wilmington District Attention: John Hill 69 Darlington Ave

1. The solicitation number;

2. The name, address, and telephone and facsimile numbers of the offeror (and electronic address if available);

3. A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item;

4. Names, titles, and telephone and facsimile numbers (and electronic addresses if available) of persons authorized to negotiate on the offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation; and

5. Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

Wilmington NC 28403

For the purposes of this Request for Proposal, please note that in accordance with (IAW) FAR 28.001:

“Bond means a written instrument executed by a bidder or contractor (the “principal”), and a second party (the “surety” or “sureties”) (except as provided in 28.204), to assure fulfillment of the principal’s obligations to a third party (the “obligee” or “Government”), identified in the bond. If the principal’s obligations are not met, the bond assures payment, to the extent stipulated, of any loss sustained by the obligee.”

Bonds shall therefore be executed in the name of the legal entity, whether a joint venture, partnership or the Prime Contractor of an informal teaming arrangement, with whom the government would enter into a contract for a successful offeror. The entity named on the bond must be able to acquire bonding capacity on its own merits, and not as the result of indemnification from a subcontractor or third party.

TAB H - Financial Information & Bonding Capability (e.g. past three years financial statements, annual reports, Dun & Bradstreet Ratings and/or number, etc.) Provide a list of all current contracts held, total dollar value, award date, anticipated completion, performance and payment bond amount.

TAB I - Factor 6- Small Business Participation Plan. Further Description and information of TAB I, Factor 6 can be found in the subsequent paragraph 9 of this section, entitled the GENERALPROPOSAL SUBMISSION

INSTRUCTIONS & REQUIREMENTS

TAB J - Subcontracting Plan – FOR LARGE BUSINESS OFFERORS ONLY. Subcontracting Plan shall be prepared in accordance with FAR 52.219-9, and SBA’s Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System (eSRS) located at http://esrs.gov. Instructions for completion of requisite forms, as well as guidance on coordinating and preparing for all compliance reviews by Federal agencies can be found at this website. Offerors are to ensure subcontractors agree to submit to ESRS.

3.8.2 VOLUME II: TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (FACTORS 2-6)

One (1) electronic copy Adobe PDF file as tabbed per the table below shall be submitted.

TAB CONTENTS OF THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

A Factor 2: Corporate Specialized Experience

B Factor 3: Past Performance

C Factor 4: Schedule

D Factor 5: Key Personnel

Page Limitations: The following page limitations are established for each factor described above:

Factor 2: Past Experience, Construction – Limited to 25 pages (maximum of 5 forms) Factor 3: Past Performance – Limited to no fewer than three (3) and no more than five (5) projects. Individual project Past Performance Assessment Questionnaires shall not exceed four (4) pages; Government evaluators will review and evaluate only the information contained on the first four (4) pages.

Factor 4: Schedule– Limited to 5 pages Factor 5: Key Personnel – Limited to 5 pages per individual resume

NOTE: Pages that exceed the required page limitations will not be evaluated. Additional pages over the maximum allowed will be removed or not read and will not be evaluated by the Government.

Tables of content, proposal cover letters, and tabs between proposal information do not count toward any page limitations in the proposal.

Offerors are cautioned that “parroting” of the Technical requirements or the Scope of Work with a statement of intent to perform does not reflect an understanding of the requirement or capability to perform. Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal.

Proprietary information shall be clearly marked.

4. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS & EVALUATION FACTORS

VOLUME II: TAB A—FACTOR 2 – Corporate Specialized Experience

4.1 SUBMISSION/MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS:

4.1.1 The offeror shall demonstrate the experience as a prime contractor on projects of similar size, scope, and complexity.

4.1.2 Projects must be deemed relevant to be considered for this procurement. Relevant projects are those projects which meet all of the minimum criteria specified in paragraph 4.1.2.1. The Government will not consider multiple projects such as individual task orders combined to meet the criteria referenced in 4.1.2.1 below.

Projects which do not meet all of the minimum criteria specified shall be deemed not relevant and shall not be considered further. Relevant projects which meet some or all of the additional criteria specified in paragraph

4.1.2.2 may be given more weight by the Government in determining the appropriate rating.

4.1.2.1 The minimum requirement for a project of similar size, scope, or complexity is defined as having all of the following criteria:

o Eleven thousand 11,000 square feet (SF) or more aggregate interior space.

o Total value of project equal to or greater than $10,000,000.00 o At least one (1) project must include the construction of a single facility with occupancy capacity greater than 250 personnel.

o At least one (1) project must include the construction of a similar facility as cafeteria, commercial kitchen, restaurant and/or DFAC.

o At least one (1) project shall have been constructed on a site with security and work restrictions similar to this RFP including the requirement for full vehicle inspections, armed guards, and personnel identification badges.

4.1.2.2 Additional Criteria:

o Fifteen thousand 15,000 square feet (SF) or more aggregate interior space.

o Total value of project equal to or greater than $15,000,000.00 o Construction executed in a continuously occupied space.

o Submission of multiple projects that were a cafeteria or commercial kitchen.

o Submission of projects that were for the construction of military dining facilities.

o Projects that include construction of a facility within high security-controlled area. A high security control area is defined as an area requiring armed security guard escort at all times, perimeter intrusion detection or access control measures (into the actual project site), and contractor personnel require identification badges and are subject to random searches of vehicles, equipment and personnel (by users special security).

4.1.3 The offeror shall complete a minimum of three (3), but no more than five (5), “Experience Information” forms, (See Example 1), in response to this factor. All projects submitted must be at least 50% complete within the last six (6) years preceding the date of the solicitation

4.1.4 Offerors shall utilize Experience Information Form in Attachment 2. This sheet is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed Five (5) pages.

4.1.5 If the offeror is a Joint Venture (J-V), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity, or the individual firms that make up the joint venture. Offerors that are part of the DoD Mentor Protégé program may only submit two (2) recent and relevant project completed by the Mentor.

Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects. Experience of proposed subcontractors to be utilized on this project will not be considered.

4.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA:

4.2.1 The Government will evaluate the extent of recent, relevant experience of the prime contractor as identified in paragraph 4.1.2. Projects that were awarded on an individual task/delivery order basis will not be aggregated for purposes of meeting minimum or additional criteria. Federal Government project experience will not be rated inherently more important than non-Federal Government project experience.

4.2.2 To be considered eligible for award, the Government will verify that each offeror has submitted a minimum of three (3) projects which meet the minimum criteria of paragraph 4.1.2.1. The offeror’s Corporate Relevant Specialized Experience will be evaluated based on the Government’s assessment of each submitted project’s similarity (in terms of size, scope and complexity) to the work described in this RFP.

4.2.3 The Government intends to give greater consideration to proposals that demonstrate experience with the additional criteria listed in paragraph 4.1.2.2 when assigning evaluation standards in accordance with paragraphs 9.1 through 9.4.

4.2.4 The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of cited projects or other recent projects by reviewing the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), and other DOD or Government appraisal systems or by contacting owners or references. The Government may check any or all cited references, or available uncited references, to verify supplied information.

4.2.5 The relevant experience of key personnel proposed for this project will not be evaluated or considered under this factor.

4.2.6 If the offeror is determined to have insufficient recent, relevant experience in accordance with the submission requirements of this RFP, the offeror will be considered ineligible for award.

5. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS & EVALUATION FACTORS

VOLUME II: TAB B — FACTOR 3 - PAST PERFORMANCE.

5.1 SUBMISSION/MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS:

5.1.1 Past performance refers to the quality of recent, relevant project experience from the owner’s perspective. The offeror shall complete and provide a NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ), see Attachment 3, on no fewer than three (3) and no more than five (5) projects. Projects submitted under this factor must first be deemed Relevant in accordance with the minimum criteria specified in paragraph 4.1.2.1 and additional criteria in paragraph 4.1.2.2 before being evaluated for quality in accordance with the criteria specified in paragraph 5.2.4 and the evaluation standards set forth in paragraphs 9.2 and 9.3. For submissions to be considered Recent, Projects of similar size, scope, and complexity that must have been completed (fully designed and at least 50% construction progress completed) within six (6) years preceding the date of the solicitation.

It is at the offerors discretion if they would like NAVFAC/USACE PPQs completed by their previous clients to be completed and returned to them to be included in their submission or submitted electronically to the attention of both the Contract Specialist, Robert Law at robert.n.law@usace.army.mil and the Contracting Officer, John Hill, via email at john.t.hill@usace.army.mil.

mailto:robert.n.law@usace.army.mil mailto:john.t.hill@usace.army.mil

5.1.2 Other Sources. The Government may contact sources other than those provided by the offeror for information with respect to past performance. These other sources may include but are not limited to: Past Contractor Past Performance Reporting System (CPARS), Federal Awardee Performance Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), other Government sources, and interviews with organizations or individuals familiar with the offeror’s performance.

5.1.3 Though not required, ideally project past performance information submitted under this factor would be on the same projects submitted for consideration under FACTOR 2, PAST EXPERIENCE. Individual project Past Performance Assessment Questionnaires shall not exceed four (4) pages; Government evaluators will review and evaluate only the information contained on the first four (4) pages. If any firm has multiple functions or divisions, limit the project examples to those performed by the division, unit or team member submitting the offer. The Government will call and confirm information provided by the offeror on the Past Performance Assessment Questionnaire with the points of contact, to the extent necessary to conduct a meaningful evaluation. The Government reserves the right to interview other individuals if the point of contact is not available.

5.1.4 If the offeror is a Joint Venture (J-V), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity, or the individual firms that make up the joint venture. Offerors that are part of the DoD Mentor Protégé program may only submit two (2) recent and relevant project completed by the Mentor.

Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects. Experience of proposed subcontractors to be utilized on this project will not be considered.

5.1.5 The past performance of individuals will not be considered under this factor.

5.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA:

5.2.1 The Government will evaluate the offeror's past performance using the sources available to it including but not limited to: the example projects identified by the offeror and submitted on the NAVFAC/USACE PPQs and any additional information received from references, CPARS or other sources. Offerors may be provided an opportunity to address any negative past performance information about which the offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond if such information is determined to present an impact on the rating to be assessed.

5.2.2 The Government will consider past performance of the prime construction contractor. If a firm has multiple functions or divisions, the Government will only evaluate the past performance of the unit or division submitting the offer. Where the Government views an offeror’s role, or that of its team members, if any, as not significant or as not clearly defined, the Government reserves the right to view this lack of involvement, or clarity, as a risk which may impact an offeror’s rating for this factor despite the quality of recent, relevant past performance information

5.2.3 The Government will consider recent, relevant projects that are successfully completed, or substantially completed (fully designed and at least 50% construction progress completed) within six (6) years preceding the date of the solicitation. To be deemed relevant, projects must comply with minimum criteria in paragraph 4.1.2.1. The Government will consider the recency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor performance. The Government places higher value on projects that comply with the additional criteria in paragraph 4.1.2.2. The Government places higher value on projects for which successful performance can be validated by means other than the offeror’s self-assessment such as through independent telephone interviews with points of contact identified in the proposal, CPARS or other agency performance databases, offeror furnished references or personal knowledge. The Government places a higher value on projects which provided particularly difficult or unique challenges and the innovative methods the offeror used to resolve problems successfully.

5.3 The Government will evaluate recent, relevant past performance (as set forth in paragraph 10.3) based on the elements listed below to assign a confidence rating in accordance with paragraph 10.4:

5.3.1 Quality of Construction. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect to the quality of the actual construction undertaken and the standards of workmanship exhibited by the offeror.

5.3.2 Timeliness of Performance. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect to the completion of projects within the scheduled completion times.

5.3.3 Customer Satisfaction. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect to customer satisfaction, cooperation with customers, and interaction on past projects.

5.3.4 Management. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect to effective management of subcontractors, suppliers and labor on past projects.

5.3.5 Cost. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect to the contractor’s ability to perform within the contractually agreed price.

5.3.6 Safety. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect to the contractor’s safety program or efforts.

5.3.7 General. The Government will evaluate all general information and comments provided by previous clients with respect to the contractor’s efforts.

5.4 Failure to demonstrate the minimum acceptability standards under this factor will result in an “UNACCEPTABLE” rating and possible elimination from further consideration for contract award. In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. In this case, the offeror’s past performance is unknown and assigned a performance confidence rating of “neutral.” Although the Government may not rate an offeror that lacks recent, relevant past performance favorably or unfavorably with regard to past performance, the Government may determine, that a “Substantial Confidence” or “Satisfactory Confidence” past performance rating is worth more than a “Neutral Confidence” past performance rating.

6. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS & EVALUATION FACTORS

VOLUME II: TAB C —FACTOR 4 – SCHEDULE.

6.1 SUBMISSION/MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS:

6.1.1 The offeror shall propose a detailed schedule and which shall become the Contract Period of Performance.

6.1.2 Schedules must be deemed reasonable to be considered for this procurement. Reasonable Schedules are those schedules which meet all of the minimum criteria specified in paragraph 6.1.2.1. The Government will not consider multiple schedules. Projects which do not meet the minimum criteria specified shall be deemed not reasonable and may not be considered further. Schedules which meet the additional criteria specified in paragraph

6.1.2.2 may be given more weight by the Government in determining the appropriate rating.

6.1.2.1 The minimum requirement for a schedule is defined as having all of the following criteria:

o A Gantt chart that shows each major project phase from mobilization through project turnover and clearly labels the construction phases for partial shutdown of the dining facility as shown in the design documents.

o Contractors are encouraged to utilize the phase plan show in the design drawings but are permitted to submit schedules deviating from these phases. Deviations from the phase plan must be clearly annotated and justified (i.e. i.e. schedule advantage, cost advantage, or logical construction sequence issue) o Schedules shall clearly show any planned period of DFAC Shutdown or Outages.

o Contractors’ schedules shall not reflect any Shutdown period of longer than 14 continuous calendar days at any one time. Contractor schedules shall not reflect any more than 4 Shutdown periods during the period of performance, regardless of individual Shutdown period length. A “Shutdown” is defined in the design as any interruption that prevents food preparation or food service in the dining facility for more than 12 hours.

o An Outage is defined in the design as any interruption that prevents food preparation or food service in the dining facility for less than 12 hours.

o Contractors are encouraged to keep the required number of outages to an absolute minimum.

Contractors are also encouraged to utilize SOTF Training Holidays for planned Outages. See ATTACHMENT 6 for the SOTF 2020 Training Holiday Calendar.

o The Period of Performance does not exceed 540 days.

o Schedules shall comply with the hours of operation for construction as noted in the plans and specs.

Normal working hours are considered Monday through Friday, 0630-1730 hours, with contractor check in and security badge issue beginning at 0600. No work is to be conducted on federal holidays.

Offerors may not shorten their proposed timeframes by utilizing overtime hours or working during non-work days or federal holidays except where specifically allowed in the plans and specs (i.e.

during coordinated Dining Facility Shutdown periods).

6.1.2.2 Additional Criteria:

The Government will give additional consideration for schedules that provide some or all of the following:

o Schedules that complete construction in the shortest period of time will be given additional consideration, if deemed reasonable.

o Schedules that reflect the least amount of Shutdown and Outage time will be given additional consideration.

o Schedules that logically display a higher level of detail than major project phases (i.e. tasks other than critical path, subtasks, resource loading) will be given additional consideration.

o Schedules may include a narrative explaining the sequence of construction.

6.1.3 Schedules shall not exceed Five (5) pages.

6.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA:

6.2.1 The Government will evaluate the schedule length offered by the contractor as identified in paragraph 6.1.2.

6.2.2 To be considered eligible for award, the Government will verify that each offeror has submitted a schedule which meets the minimum criteria of paragraph 6.1.2.1.

6.2.3 The Government intends to give greater consideration to proposals that demonstrate experience with the additional criteria listed in paragraph 6.1.2.2 when assigning evaluation standards in accordance with paragraphs 9.2.

7. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS & EVALUATION FACTORS

VOLUME II: TAB D —FACTOR 5– KEY PERSONNEL.

7.1 SUBMISSION/MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS:

7.1.1 Each offeror shall provide resumes for the following Key Personnel proposed for this contract. Resumes shall not exceed five (5) pages per person. The proposed position of each person shall be clearly stated at the beginning of the resume.

CQC System Manager The CQC System Manager is required to be a graduate engineer, graduate architect, or a graduate of construction management with a minimum of 5 years construction experience on construction similar to this Contract or possess 10 year’s construction experience as a CQC on construction similar to this Contract. Construction similar to this contract is defined previously in paragraph 4.1.2.

For further information refer to:

3.4.2 CQC SYSTEM MANAGER

SECTION 01 45 00.00 10 QUALITY CONTROL

Project Superintendent The Project Superintendent shall have a minimum of 5 years of experience as a Project Superintendent with at least 5 of those years as a superintendent on projects similar in size and complexity. The individual must be familiar with the requirements of EM 385-1-1 and have experience in the areas of hazard identification and safety compliance.

Refer to:

3.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

SECTION 01 45 00.00 10 QUALITY CONTROL

7.1.2 Sample suggested resume format is included with this RFP (Attachment 3). If offerors elect not to use the suggested resume format, all information identified on the sample format is still required for each resume submitted under this Factor. Proposals that fail to include resumes or that fail to include all required information on these resumes may be rejected as unacceptable.

7.1.3 The Key Personnel identified must be used on the project. No deviations will be permitted unless they meet the same qualifications and experience of those individuals proposed and are expressly approved by the Contracting Officer in advance. An offeror’s use of different personnel than those proposed without approval from the Contracting Officer will be grounds for a Termination for Default.

7.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA:

7.2.1 The Government will evaluate each offeror’s proposed Key Personnel submitted in response to Paragraph 7.1 assigning each a rating in accordance with paragraph 9.2.

7.2.2 Minimum qualification requirements for Key Personnel are found in the specifications and in paragraph 7.1.1.

7.2.3 Additional Criteria. The Government places higher value on Key Personnel who have:

o Ten (10) years or more experience in proposed position working on projects of similar size, scope, and complexity to the work described in this RFP.

o A degree or advanced degree in a field of study applicable to the proposed position (i.e.

construction management, engineering, architecture, or related fields).

o Five (5) years or more of experience in their assigned position while an employee of the prime contractor.

o Professional accreditations, licenses, or certifications applicable to the assigned position.

o Documentation that the CQC System Manager and Project Superintendent have worked together in their respective positions on other recent and relevant projects.

8. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS & EVALUATION FACTORS

VOLUME I: TAB I—FACTOR 6 – Small Business Participation Plan This factor requires all offerors (both large and small businesses) to submit a proposed Small Business Participation Plan utilizing the template provided as Attachment 5 of this solicitation. The Small Business Participation Plan will be evaluated on the level of proposed participation of U.S. small businesses in the performance of acquisition (as small business prime offerors or 1st tier small business subcontractors) relative to the objectives and goals established herein. This is NOT a sub-contracting plan. Evaluation of this factor is based on the percentage of total contract value and not total subcontracted dollars. For large business offerors, the goals set forth in the Small Business Participation Plan shall mirror the goals set forth in VOLUME I: Offerors Certifications and Price Tab J - Subcontracting Plan – FOR LARGE BUSINESS OFFERORS ONLY.

8.1 SUBMISSION/MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS:

8.1.1 Planned Small Business Utilization: All offerors are required to provide a Small Business Participation Plan utilizing the template entitled Attachment 5 “Proposed Small Business Participation Plan” and a supporting narrative discussion of no more than 5 pages total addressing their corporate approach and methodology for acquiring, soliciting and using small and small disadvantaged businesses in the performance of this contract. All narratives should address the offeror's commitment to providing subcontracting opportunities, as well as evidence of planned and/or continued outreach efforts to encourage and use small and small disadvantaged businesses.

Narratives should demonstrate the historical execution of small business participation on no fewer than three (3) and no more than five (5) projects. Offeror’s proposal must meet the minimum mandatory Total Small Business Participation goal (20%) through collective small business participation from any type of small business or sub-category small business, whether small business prime or 1st tier small business subcontractor. The subcategory small business goals are NOT mandatory.

8.1.2 The overall extent to which each small business subcategory will be utilized shall be provided. This should include a general description of the type of work, product or service anticipated to be supplied via a small business concern along with the estimated percentage of each subcontracted portion in relation to the overall project. Identification of the names of specific subcontractors is not required for the small business utilization evaluation; however, successful offerors will ultimately be required to name subcontractors as a part of their subcontracting plan submission (Example: Demolition Work- 10% of total work effort- SDVOSB identified).

8.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA:

8.2.1 Small Business Participation Plans will be evaluated on the basis of:

o The extent to which such Small Business firms are specifically identified in proposals;

o The extent of commitment to use such Small Business firms o Identification of the complexity and variety of the work small firms are to perform;

o The extent of participation of small business prime offerors and 1st tier small business subcontractors in terms of the percentage of the value of the total acquisition and the extent to which the proposal meets or exceed the small business participation goals for this acquisition.

o The work to be performed directly by a small business prime will be evaluated as small business participation.

The small business participation goal for this acquisition is Total Small Business (any type of small business) goal of 20% of the total contract value for this acquisition.

The Sub-category Small Business goals are:

3.0% of total contract value to Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) 3.0% of total contract value to HUBZONE 3.0% of total contract value to Women Owned (WOSB) 2.0% of total contract value to Service-Disabled Veteran Owned (SDVOSB) 2.0% of total contract value to Veteran Owned (VOSB)

0.0% of total contract value to Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Minority Institutions

(HBCU/MI)

(Note, for example, that a participation plan that reflects 1% of the total contract value for WOSB would also count…