Solicitation Amendment W912PF26RA0050002 SF 30.pdf

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER.

If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Addendum to 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors - Commercial Products and Commercial Services

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

FAR 52.212-1 Addendum - INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

1. GENERAL

This solicitation is issued for the acquisition of commercial services in accordance with FAR Part 12, Acquisition of Commercial Products and Commercial Services, utilizing evaluation techniques from FAR Part 15, Contracting by Negotiation. The Government intends to award a single-award, Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP), Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract for non-personal Army Community Service (ACS) consolidated support services at USAG Italy. The source selection will be conducted using the Highest Technically Rated with a Fair and Reasonable Price (HTR-FRP) methodology. Under this approach, proposals will first be ranked based solely on technical merit, after which the price of only the highest-rated proposal will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness.

Failure to comply with the submission instructions in this solicitation may result in the Offeror's proposal being found non-compliant and ineligible for award.

Contract Type: Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ)

Competition: Full and Open Competition

Source Selection Method: FAR 12.201-1 Simplified procedures in conjunction with FAR 15.103- 3, Highest Technically Rated with Fair and Reasonable Price.

Ordering Period: Five (5) one (1) year ordering periods, with a potential six-month extension of services per FAR 52.217-8

Maximum Contract Value: 800,000.00 Euro

Minimum Contract Value: 10,000.00 Euro

Pricing Currency: All pricing shall be submitted in Euros

W912PF26RA0050002

NOTE on Minimum Guarantee: The minimum order quantity represents the guaranteed obligation of the Government and constitutes legal consideration for this contract. Offerors shall not interpret the minimum guarantee as an indication of anticipated order volume. The quantities of supplies or services specified in the Pricing Schedule are estimates only.

2. PROPOSAL ORGANIZATION

Offerors shall submit proposal organized into three (3) separate, clearly labeled volumes as follows:

Volume Title Page Limit Format

I Program Management 12 pages Read-only PDF

II Price Attachment 1 Microsoft Excel (.xlsx)

III Mandatory Documentation No limit Read-only PDF

NOTE 1: Title pages, tables of contents, and section dividers do not count toward page limits.

NOTE 2: Pages exceeding the stated page limit will not be evaluated. The Government will stop reading and evaluating upon reaching the page maximum.

NOTE 3: Other than Mandatory Document required documents issued by external offices (e.g., DURC, Chamber of Commerce certificate), all proposal content shall be in English.

3. PROPOSAL FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

All volumes shall conform to the following format requirements:

Font: Arial or Times New Roman, minimum 12-point. Tables and illustrations may use no less than 8-point. The use of a reduced 8-point minimum font is permissible only for data within tables and for text within illustrations (e.g., captions or labels). This exception shall not be used to circumvent the 12-point requirement for narrative text.

Page size: 8.5" x 11" with one-inch margins on all sides.

Pages formatted to 11" x 17" for charts, tables, or illustrations will each be counted as two (2) pages against the page limit.

Spacing: Single-spaced paragraphs.

Landscape orientation is permitted for tables, charts, and figures only.

All pages shall include the company name, solicitation number, and page number in the header or footer.

Volumes I and III: Read-only Adobe PDF format.

Volume II: Microsoft Excel (.xlsx) format. Do not embed files within the workbook or convert to PDF.

Email submissions only. Attach files as distinct, standalone documents. Self-extracting archives (.exe) and ZIP files are not acceptable. Attach files as distinct, standalone documents.

Proprietary information shall be clearly marked on each affected page.

4. SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

Submit all questions regarding this solicitation via email to the Contracting Officer daniel.l.veenstra.

civ@army.mil and Specialist at matthew.n.park.mil@army.mil by the deadline specified in the solicitation. Questions must be submitted in the following format: Email Subject: W912PF-26-R- A005 Question (Company name) Email body: Question Number, Solicitation Reference (e.g., PWS Para 5.1), and the specific Question. Questions are due no later than the date and time specified in the solicitation. Questions received after this deadline may not be addressed by the Government.

Solicitation submission shall be made via email to the Contracting Officer daniel.l.veenstra.

civ@army.mil and Specialist at matthew.n.park.mil@army.mil by the deadline specified in the solicitation. Solicitation must be summited in the following format: W912PF-26-R-Email Subject:

A005 (Company name) (Email # of #, if applicable) : aEmail body t a minimum, identify the Primary and Alternate Points of Contact for this proposal submission, including name, title, email, and phone number. Hard copy will not be accepted. It is the Offeror's sole responsibility to ensure their full proposal is received by the Government via email prior to the proposal due date and time specified in Block 8 of the SF 1449. Late proposals are governed by FAR 12.203(c)(1) and 52.212- 1(c). Signed SF 1449: The Offeror must complete Blocks 17a, 30a, 30b, and 30c of the Standard Form 1449. The form must be signed by an official authorized to bind the company. The Offeror must also acknowledge, sign, and include all solicitation amendments.

5. Volume I - PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL

The Program Management volume shall be organized into three (3) subfactors, each addressed in a clearly labeled, separate section. This volume is the Non-Price Technical Volume. Offerors are hereby instructed that no cost or pricing data of any kind shall be included in Volume I. The inclusion of any pricing information in Volume I may result in the proposal being determined non-compliant and ineligible for award. Offerors are advised that quality of information is more important than quantity. Proposals shall be specific, substantiated, and directly tied to the requirements of the Performance Work Statement (PWS). Assertions without supporting evidence will receive no evaluative credit.

5.1 Subfactor 1 - Relevant Experience

Offerors shall provide a minimum of one (1) contract reference demonstrating recent and/or relevant experience. For this reference, the Offeror must have performed as the Prime Contractor.

This reference shall include:

Contract number and title Period of performance (start and end date) Total contract value Customer organization name, contracting office, and a current, verifiable point of contact (name, title, email address, and phone number) Staffing level number of Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) or Part-Time Equivalent (PTE) employees supported A detailed narrative (minimum one page) describing: (1) the work performed and its similarity in scope to the requirements of this PWS; (2) the Offeror's experience managing a workforce in a European or EU operating environment; and (3) any specific experience navigating host-nation labor laws, employment regulations or compliance in the country of performance

Relevance Standards:

Scope: Relevant experience is defined as providing professional, administrative, language, or community support services in a European or EU operating environment, similar in nature to the functions described in the PWS. For the purposes of evaluation, experience performed within Italy will be considered more relevant than experience performed in other locations.

Magnitude and Complexity: The Government will evaluate the magnitude and complexity of the referenced work. More relevant experience will involve managing a workforce of a similar size (e.g., 3-6 FTE/PTE) and performing a comparable diversity of service types as required by this PWS.

Recency: Work must have been performed within the last three (3) years from the date of solicitation issuance.

5.2 Subfactor 2 - Staffing and Personnel Management

Offerors shall provide a detailed Staffing and Personnel Management Plan that addresses all the following topics:

(a) Recruitment and Retention: Offerors shall detail their integrated approach to both attracting and retaining a qualified workforce. This section must describe the Offeror's specific sourcing strategy for the Vicenza, Italy labor market, their detailed vetting and verification process for all PWS-mandated qualifications, and the specific retention strategies (e.g., incentives, management techniques) that will be used to ensure workforce stability.

(b) Continuity of Operations: Offerors shall describe their plan to ensure uninterrupted service delivery. and a vacancy s This must include a detailed transition-in plan to ensure Day 1 readines management plan that demonstrates the ability to fill any personnel vacancy in accordance with PWS timelines.

(c) Quality Control Approach: Offerors shall describe their Quality Control (QC) methodology for inspecting performance, identifying deficiencies, and implementing corrective actions. To demonstrate the practical application of this methodology, the narrative must provide specific examples of how the QC process would be applied to ensure the quality and timeliness of key PWS requirements, including, but not limited to the Detailed Field Trip Plan, the Monthly Progress Report, and Front Desk customer service standards.

(d) Subcontracting Plan: The offeror must describe its comprehensive approach to managing subcontractors, detailing their integration into the organizational structure, their specific work share percentages (based off total contract value) for their company and each subcontractor, and the processes for monitoring subcontractor performance and resolving issues. Total work share percentages identified shall add up to 100%. Finally, the offeror is required to provide signed, legally binding agreements for any major subcontractor that is expected to perform 10% or more of the contract's work value.

5.3 Subfactor 3 - Host Nation Compliance Approach

The purpose of this subfactor is to evaluate whether the Offeror has the legal infrastructure, organizational knowledge, and operational processes to employ workers legally in Italy for the duration of this contract.

The Government will not award a contract to an Offeror whose proposed approach to Italian legal compliance is vague, theoretical, or unsupported.

Offerors - Required Elements:

Legal Business Presence: Describe your current legal presence in Italy. If you are an Italian company, confirm your registration status with the Camera di Commercio and INPS/INAIL. If you are a non-Italian company, identify the legal structure through which you will employ workers in Italy (e.g., Italian subsidiary, branch office, employer-of-record arrangement) and provide evidence that this structure is established or in active formation. Plans to establish a presence at some future date without supporting documentation will not be considered compliant.

Italian Labor Law Compliance: Describe how you will comply with all applicable Italian employment law requirements, including: (a) applicable National Collective Bargaining

Agreements (Contratto Collettivo Nazionale di Lavoro (CCNL)), including which CCNL applies to the employees to be hired under this contract and why; (b) mandatory social security registration and contribution obligations to INPS (Istituto Nazionale della Previdenza Sociale); (c) mandatory workers' compensation insurance obligations through INAIL (Istituto Nazionale Assicurazione Infortuni sul Lavoro); (d) mandatory severance fund contributions (Trattamento di Fine Rapporto (TFR)); and (e) Italian law requirements related to employee paid leave, sick leave, and working hours.

Italian Tax Compliance: Describe how you will comply with Italian tax obligations applicable to your business operations in Italy, including VAT (IVA) registration and filing requirements and applicable corporate tax obligations. Non-Italian companies shall specifically address whether and how they have analyzed their potential permanent establishment (stabile organizzazione) exposure under Italian tax law and the applicable bilateral tax treaty.

Workforce Employment Model: Identify whether your workforce will be employed directly by your company or through a subcontractor, employer-of-record, or staffing agency arrangement. If you will use a third-party employer arrangement, describe how you will maintain legal responsibility for compliance with Italian employment law and how you will ensure that the third-party entity meets all compliance requirements.

6. VOLUME II - PRICE PROPOSAL

The Offeror shall complete the Price Schedule Workbook provided as List of Contract Documents, Exhibits, or Attachments, Attachment 1 to this solicitation. All pricing shall be submitted in Euros ().

The following requirements apply:

The Offeror shall provide all Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs) unit prices. Failure to price any CLIN may result in the proposal being determined non-compliant. The Offeror shall not alter pre-existing formulas, structure, or values within the workbook. All inserted values shall be editable and executable by Government evaluators.

Unit prices proposed in Attachment 1 shall be binding for the full five-year ordering period and the six-month extension of services period. Prices shall not be subject to adjustment based on actual order quantities.

Estimated quantities in the workbook are not a guarantee of work and are provided solely for evaluation purposes.

7. VOLUME III - MANDATORY DOCUMENTATION

All Offerors shall provide:

a. Standard Form 1449 (SF 1449): Complete Section A in full. Acknowledge, sign, and include all solicitation amendments.

b. SAM.gov Registration: Provide proof of active registration by providing your Unique Entity Identifier (UEI). The Government will independently verify active registration and the absence of exclusions.

c. Key Personnel Documentation: Identify the Contract Manager and Alternate Contract Manager required by PWS paragraphs 1.18 and 1.18.1. For each individual, provide: (a) a resume of no more than two (2) pages clearly demonstrating the candidate meets PWS qualifications, and (b) a signed Letter of Commitment from the individual.

d. Statement of Compliance: A signed statement from an authorized official certifying that the proposal remains valid for a minimum of 180 calendar days from the proposal due date and that the Offeror agrees to comply with all solicitation requirements.

Italian-Registered Companies shall provide:

a. Certificato Storico di Iscrizione alla Camera di Commercio (Historical Chamber of Commerce Certificate): Current and valid. Self-certifications are not acceptable. The business purpose (oggetto sociale) shall be relevant to the services described in the PWS.

b. Documento Unico di Regolarita Contributiva (DURC): Current and valid. The document must include a statement confirming the company is regular for DURC purposes. Self-certifications are not acceptable.

c. List of Contract Documents, Exhibits, or Attachments, Attachment 2 - Anti-Mafia Self- Certification: Completed in full by the authorized company representative.

d. List of Contract Documents, Exhibits, or Attachments, Attachment 3 - Suitability of Contractor: Completed with Blocks A and B1 filled in.

Volume III - Mandatory Documentation will not be evaluated and will not receive an adjectival rating. The Mandatory Documentation will be considered in the Contracting Officer's Responsibility Determination, in accordance with FAR Part 9 - contractor qualification requirements. Failure to comply with or meet the Mandatory Documentation requirements may result in the Offeror being determined non-responsible and ineligible for award. If, prior to award, the Government has questions regarding the potential awardee's Mandatory Documentation Volume, the communications and exchanges are not part of negotiations or discussion as defined in this RFP.

8. COMMUNICATION

a. The Government is not obligated to communicate with offerors during the evaluation process.

However, solely at its discretion, the Government may communicate with an offeror for any purpose such as to gain a better understanding of the proposal or to address Government concerns. Communications may be conducted using any means convenient for the Government (e.

g., e-mail, telephone, in person, etc.)

b. The Government may request an offeror clarify, modify, or revise its proposal. If proposal clarifications, modifications or revisions are allowed, the Government may, solely at its discretion, impose non-common due dates for the clarifications, modifications or revisions. In other words, the Government may elect to have a proposal clarification / modification / revision date for an offeror that is different from the proposal clarification / modification / revision date for another offeror.

c. The Government need not conduct communications with all offerors. Rather, the Government may, at its discretion, conduct communications with one or only some Offerors Furthermore, the Government need not permit all offerors to submit proposal clarifications, modifications, or revisions. Rather, the Government may, at its discretion, seek proposal clarifications, modifications, or revisions from only one or only some offerors. At any time prior to award, including upon receipt of proposals, the Government may exclude a proposal from further consideration for reasons such as (but not limited to) non-compliance with instructions related to this solicitation or the proposal is not likely to be selected for award.

9. Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use Disclosure:

The Offeror shall state whether Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools or systems (e.g., generative AI models such as Gemini, ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot) were utilized to assist in the drafting, formulation, or generation of any portion of their proposal. If AI tools were utilized, the Offeror shall explicitly identify the specific AI tool(s) used and briefly describe the extent of their application. This disclosure shall be submitted as a separate, standalone document (PDF) and will not count against the Offeror's Volume I page limit.

Addendum to Evaluation - Commercial Product and Commercial Services

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

FAR 52.212-2 Addendum - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. BASIS FOR AWARD

This is a competitive acquisition for commercial services conducted in accordance with FAR Part 12, utilizing evaluation techniques from FAR Part 15. The evaluation will be conducted using the Highest Technically Rated with a Fair and Reasonable Price (HTR-FRP) methodology, informed by FAR 15.103-3. The Government will award a contract to the responsible offeror whose offer, conforming to the solicitation, is most advantageous to the Government. Offerors are advised that the Government will not consider tradeoffs between cost or price and non-price factors. This acquisition will utilize the Highest Technically Rated with a Fair and Reasonable Price (HTR-FRP) source selection methodology. The evaluation process will be conducted as follows:

All proposals will first be evaluated based on the non-price factors outlined in this solicitation, and the Government will determine the highest technically rated proposal.

The price of the highest technically rated proposal will then be evaluated to determine if it is fair and reasonable.

If the highest technically rated proposal's price is determined to be fair and reasonable, that proposal will be selected for award.

If the price is not fair and reasonable, that proposal will be rejected. The Government will then determine the next highest technically rated proposal and evaluate its price for fairness and reasonableness. This process will continue until a contract is awarded to the highest technically rated responsible offeror with a fair and reasonable price.

2. EVALUATION PROCESS

The Program Management factor is the basis for the technical evaluation and rating of offers. The overall rating for this factor is a consolidated assessment derived from the evaluation of three equally weighted subfactors:

Subfactor 1: Relevant Experience

Subfactor 2: Staffing and Personnel Management

Subfactor 3: Host Nation Compliance Approach

All proposals will be evaluated against the non-price criteria under Factor 1, Program Management.

Adjectival ratings will not be assigned to the Price. Price will not be used in the technical evaluation. Price is evaluated for the highest technically rated offeror solely to determine whether the proposed price is fair and reasonable, utilizing the price analysis techniques described in FAR subpart 15.4.

3. EVALUATION FACTORS

Factor 1: Program Management

The Government will evaluate the Program Management factor by assigning the highest technically rated, overall adjectival rating. This rating will be based on a consolidated assessment of the proposal against all three subfactors.

Subfactor 1 - Relevant Experience

The Government will evaluate the Offeror's submitted contract reference to assess the degree to which their experience provides a sound basis for predicting successful performance of this requirement. The evaluation will consider the following aspects of the Offeror's experience:

Relevance: The Government will assess the overall relevance of the offeror's experience. A more relevant contract reference is one that is similar in scope (e.g., ACS-type functions), magnitude (e.g., managing a 3-6 FTE/PTE workforce), and complexity to the requirements of this PWS. As stated in 52.212-1 instructions, experience performed within Italy will be considered more relevant and therefore more advantageous to the Government.

Recency: Whether the experience was performed within the required timeframe. More recent experience will be viewed as more indicative of current capability and understanding.

Applicability: The extent to which the described experience is a direct predictor of the Offeror's ability to successfully perform the PWS requirements for this effort

The Government will assign a combined technical/risk rating for this subfactor based on how the Offeror's demonstrated experience reflects an understanding of the requirements and the associated level of performance risk.

Subfactor 2 - Staffing and Personnel Management

The Government will evaluate the offeror's plan to determine if it provides a realistic and effective approach to maintaining a qualified and stable workforce. The evaluation will assess the proposed methods for:

- Recruitment and Retention: The Government will evaluate the Offeror's approach for recruiting, qualifying, and retaining the necessary workforce. The quote must demonstrate a understanding of the local Vicenza labor market and the effectiveness of its processes for verifying all PWS-mandated qualifications and ensuring long-term workforce stability.

Continuity of Operations: The Government will evaluate the degree to which the Offeror's proposed Vacancy Management process presents a clear, actionable, and low-risk approach to maintaining a full workforce. The evaluation will assess the plan's effectiveness in preventing service degradation by addressing both routine and sudden, unplanned personnel vacancies

Quality Control Approach: The effectiveness of the proposed QC methodology as demonstrated by its specific application to the deliverables and performance standards identified in 52.212-1 Section 5.2(c). Generic QC descriptions without demonstrable application to this contract's specific requirements will not receive credit.

Subcontracting Plan: If subcontractors are proposed, the Government will evaluate the soundness of the offeror's proposed subcontracting approach. The evaluation will assess the degree to which the plan presents a clear, integrated, and effective strategy for managing subcontractors to ensure successful contract performance. The Government will also evaluate the signed, legally binding agreements submitted for any subcontractor proposed to perform 10% or more of the total contract value to assess the level of commitment and stability within the proposed team.

The Government will assign a combined technical/risk rating for this subfactor based on the credibility of the Offeror's integrated approach to staffing, quality, and subcontractor management, and the resulting level of risk associated with that approach.

Subfactor 3 - Host Nation Compliance Approach

The Government will evaluate the degree to which the Offeror's proposed Host Nation Compliance Approach presents a credible, comprehensive, and substantiated plan for ensuring full compliance with Italian legal, labor, and tax requirements throughout the contract. The assessment will focus on the viability and clarity of the company infrastructure and processes proposed.

The Government will assign a combined technical/risk rating based on the confidence provided by the Offeror's approach and the resulting risk of non-compliance with host nation laws.

Factor 2: Price

Adjectival ratings are not assigned to price. The Government will evaluate the Offeror's Price proposal for completeness and reasonableness using one or more of the analytical techniques in FAR 15.404-1. The price evaluation will include:

Completeness: All CLINs must be priced. Incomplete proposals may be determined non-compliant.

Reasonableness: The Government will compare proposed prices against the Independent Government Estimate (IGE), prices received from other offerors, and any other available pricing data. Prices that appear unreasonably high may render the proposal ineligible for award.

Unbalanced Pricing: Proposals will be screened for unbalanced pricing per FAR 15.404-6. Significant imbalance between CLINs for example, front-loading early ordering period pricing at the expense of later ordering periods will be assessed as a performance risk.

Unrealistically Low Pricing: Should the Government determine proposed prices are unrealistically low (an indication of "buy-in"), this will be considered a performance risk and may be deemed ineligible for contract award.

Total Evaluated Price: The Total Evaluated Price will include the sum of all CLIN prices plus six (6) months of the final ordering period price, calculated by dividing the final ordering period total by two and, in accordance with FAR 52.217-8 (Option to Extend Services). The Total Evaluated Price will be used solely for the purpose of determining whether the Offeror's proposed price is fair and reasonable.

4. EVALUATION RATING

Factor 1 and its subfactors will be assigned one of the adjectival ratings defined in the table below, which includes an assessment of performance risk.

Rating Description

Outstanding Offer demonstrates an exceptional ability to meet the requirements. The approach clearly exceeds expectations in multiple areas, providing the Government with high confidence in successful contract performance.

Good Offer demonstrates a strong ability to meet the requirements. The approach exceeds expectations in one or more areas, providing the Government with above-average confidence in successful contract performance.

Acceptable Offer demonstrates an adequate ability to meet the requirements. The approach meets expectations, providing the Government with reasonable confidence in successful contract performance.

Marginal Offer does not adequately demonstrate the ability to meet the requirements.

The approach has gaps or shortcomings that create significant doubt about successful contract performance.

Unacceptable Offer fails to meet the requirements of the solicitation and is not eligible for award.

5. COMMUNICATION WITH OFFERORS

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without conducting exchanges. However, the Government reserves the right, at its sole discretion, to conduct communications with one, some, or none of the offerors if determined necessary by the Contracting Officer. Such communications may include requests for an offeror to clarify, modify, or revise its proposal. The Government is not required to provide all offerors with the same opportunity to revise their proposals. The specific procedures governing all communications with offerors are detailed in the Addendum to FAR 52.212-1.

6. Government Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Proposal Evaluation

The Government reserves the right to utilize authorized Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, including natural language processing and generative AI technologies, to assist and advise in the administrative review, organization, and evaluation of proposals submitted in response to this solicitation. Authorized AI tools may be used to assist and advise Government evaluators in tasks such as locating specific information, cross-referencing proposal volumes, and summarizing narrative text against the solicitation requirements. Offerors are advised of the following parameters regarding the Government's use of AI:

Human-in-the-Loop: AI tools may be used strictly as an assistive and advisory technology. If used, AI-generated outputs, summaries, or analyses may be independently reviewed and verified by Government evaluators. All final evaluation ratings, responsibility determinations, and the ultimate Source Selection Decision will be made exclusively by authorized human Government personnel. AI will not be used to autonomously score proposals or make the award decision.

Data Protection: Any AI tools utilized by the Government will operate within secure, authorized Government IT environments. Offeror proposal data, including confidential business strategies, pricing, and proprietary technical approaches, will be strictly protected and will not be shared with unauthorized third parties.

KO DIRECTORATE OF CONTRACTING, UNIT 31423 BOX 77

APO, AE 09630

UNITED STATES

MATTHEW PARK, EMAIL: MATTHEW.N.PARK.MIL@ARMY.MIL TELEPHONE: (314) 646-6921

AdminBy:

SCD: PAS: