RFI_Civil_Design_IDIQ.pdf
PDF 432 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CIVIL DESIGN INDEFINITE DELIVERY CONTRACTS (IDCs) WITHIN SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT AND SOUTH PACIFIC DIVISION
- Solicitation number
- W912P726RA002
About this file
This document is a Request for Information (RFI) for Civil Design Indefinite Delivery Contracts (IDCs) within the San Francisco District and South Pacific Division, solicitation number W912P726RA002. The pre-solicitation/synopsis requests A-E (Architect-Engineer) qualification submissions via SF 330 packages, due by December 3rd, with the full solicitation to be issued after selecting the most highly qualified firms. Key details include selection criteria focusing on specialized experience, technical competence, and past performance, with specific guidelines such as submitting no more than ten projects completed within the last five years, using 12-point font (Times New Roman, Arial, or Courier), and providing performance past questionnaires (PPQs) related to projects from the past five years.
The government responses to contractor questions clarify various aspects of the solicitation, including confirming the document type, submission requirements, and maintaining strict formatting guidelines. Notable responses include declining a request for a two-week submission extension, clarifying that this is an official request for SF330 proposals, and firmly stating that Arial Narrow 12-point font is not acceptable. The document emphasizes precise submission requirements and provides specific guidance to potential contractors about the qualification process for these civil design indefinite delivery contracts.
View the file
Other files
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
W912P726RA002 Civil Design Indefinite Delivery Contracts (IDCs) Within San Francisco District and South Pacific Division
RFI # Contractor Question Government Response 1 In regard to the subject solicitation, I would like to respectfully request a two-week extension to the current submittal due date. This request is due to the limited availability of key personnel during the week of the Thanksgiving holiday, which may impact our ability to complete the submission to our usual standards.
A time extension is not being provided at this time.
2 The announcement was posted as a “pre-solicitation” but includes submission requirements with SF 330 packages to be delivered by December 3rd. With that in mind, should we treat this as a formal solicitation or is there an error in the “document type”?
This is not an error. The pre-solicitation/Synopsis is a request for A-E qualification (SF330). The solicitation will be issued after selection of the most highly qualified firms.
3 In regards to the Past performance on Department of Defense (DOD) and other contracts -
Selection Criteria Item C states “only up to ten (10) past performance records for projects completed within the past 5 years will be considered.” However the Selection Criteria Item A.
Specialized Experience and Technical Competence: states “provide examples of not more than ten (10) projects completed within the last ten (10) years that best demonstrate specialized experience and technical competency.”
Could the Government confirm that any PPQs submitted are to be related to projects completed within the past 10 years?
See amended synopsis. Selection Criteria A Specialized Experience and Technical Competence allows for not more than ten (10) project completed within the last five (5) years. PPQs submitted for Selection Criteria C are to be related to projects completed within the past 5 years.
Note: Selection Criteria B Professional Qualifications was also updated to provide clarification.
4 Can you please confirm if this is a solicitation or a pre-solicitation?
See answer to question 2 above.
5 Reading the synopsis on pdf page 10 Paragraph 3, there is language: “This is not a request for proposal.” However, I wanted to verify that it is in fact the official IDIQ submission request for SF330 proposals due Dec 3, 2025.
Yes, this is an official request for SF330 (A-E Qualification submission). See answer to question 2 above.
6 The solicitation requests that we Use no smaller than 12 font type in either Times New Roman, Airal or Courier. Is the use of Arial Narrow 12 point acceptable or if not, would the government consider allowing the font size to be reduced to 11 point Times New Roman, Arial or Courier?
The use of Arial Narrow 12 point is not acceptable.
Font size will remain at 12 point Times New Roman, Arial or Courier as stated in the pre-solicitation/synopsis.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .