RFP - Response to Questions Round 1.pdf
PDF 24 KB Posted
- Attached to
- W912LM-20-Q-0004 - Non-Clinical Case Management
- Solicitation number
- W912LM-20-Q-0004
About this file
This document contains responses to questions regarding a solicitation for non-clinical case management services. The current contract is held by Spectrum Services Group, Inc. under contract number W912LM-F-15-0013. The solicitation number for this requirement is W912LM-20-Q-0004. The U.S. Property & Fiscal Office for Minnesota requires nonclinical case management and administrative care coordinator staffing services in support of Individual Medical Readiness. This is a 100% set-aside for Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Businesses. The contract type will be firm-fixed-price for a one-year base period and three one-year option periods, for a potential total of four years. The purpose of these services is to produce real-time medical readiness reporting and achieve a goal of over 90% readiness for the Minnesota Army National Guard. Subcontractors may submit past performance surveys and will be evaluated in accordance with the criteria in the RFP.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES PROPERTY AND FISCAL OFFICER FOR MINNESOTA
15000 HWY 115, CAMP RIPLEY
LITTLE FALLS, MN 56345-4173
NGMN-USP 2 April 2020
SUBJECT: MN Non-Clinical Case Management Solicitation (W912LM-20-Q-0004)
1. Is this a new requirement or was there a previous contractor that fulfilled these services? If the latter, would you be able to provide the Contractor Name and Contract Number.
Response: This is not a new requirement. Current contract: W912LM-F-15-0013;
Spectrum Services Group, Inc.
2. Are there current personnel in these roles, how many, current occupation codes?
Response: This information will not be provided.
3. Are subcontractors also allowed to submit past performance surveys? And if so, will the subcontractors past performance be judged equally to that of the prime contractor?
Response: Subcontractors may submit past performance surveys. Evaluation method of proposals is in accordance with FAR 13.106-2 and listed on pages 59-60 of the RFP. In addition see FAR 52.212-1 Addendum.
4. Regarding evaluation criteria; is the technical volume more important than the price volume? And how are these weighted to include past performance?
Response: Per FAR 12.602, Evaluation method of proposals is in accordance with FAR 13.106-2 and listed on pages 59-60 of the RFP. In addition see FAR 52.212-1 Addendum.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .