9._Site_Visit_Memo_for_Interested_Parties.pdf
PDF 211 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Command Post Console Furniture Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W912LC-18-Q-5001
About this file
Site visit memo / Q&As
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1b._140WG_CP_Statement_of_Need_-_28_Jun_2018.pdf | ||
| 10._Q&As_Consolidated_-_Final.pdf | ||
| 11._Radio_Mount_Pictures.pdf | ||
| Solicitation_W912LC-18-Q-5001,_Amendment_2.pdf | ||
| Solicitation_W912LC-18-Q-5001,_Amendment_1.pdf | ||
| 1a._140WG_CP_Statement_of_Need_-_14_Jun_2018.pdf | ||
| 8._Additional_Pics_of_Current_Configuation.pdf | ||
| 2._Base_Access_Roster.pdf | ||
| 3._F&R_Console_Concept.pdf | ||
| 1._140WG_CP_Statement_of_Need_-_02_Jun_2018.pdf | ||
| 7._Existing_Furniture_2.pdf | ||
| 5.__Rear_Console_Concept.pdf | ||
| 6._Existing_Furniture.pdf | ||
| 4._Front_Console_Concept.pdf | ||
| Combined_Synopsis-Solicitation_W912LC-18-Q-5001.pdf |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
“Building America’s First Team Together”
COLORADO AIR NATIONAL GUARD
140TH WING
BUCKLEY AIR FORCE BASE COLORADO
15 June 2018
MEMORANDUM FOR ALL INTERESTED PARTIES
FROM: 140 MSG/MSC
18860 E. Breckenridge Ave, Bldg 801, Room N-210
Buckley AFB CO 80011-9562
SUBJECT: W912LC-18-Q-5001 Command Post Console Site Visit Summary
1. A site visit for the subject solicitation was held on 14 June 2018 at the 140th Wing Command
Post for all interested parties. As a result of the site visit, several changes to the statement of need were made. Please see revised Statement of Need dated 14 June 2018 for most current information. Additionally, some questions were asked by participating vendors that are not incorporated in to the revised statement of need and are listed below along with the corresponding answer.
Q1. Does the proposed rear storage area have to remain the same depth as existing storage area
(~31” for countertop), or can proposed solution be more shallow?
A1. A more shallow solution would be acceptable (no less than 24”)
Q2. Existing rear storage area is ~44” tall. Should the height of proposed storage solution for rear storage area be the same?
A2. Yes, the proposed solution should remain as close to existing height as possible
LUCAS C. MARTINEAU, MSgt, COANG
Contract Specialist
| 2018-06-15T13:11:03-0600 | |
| MARTINEAU.LUCAS.COLTER.1187386671 |
File details come from the government source that posted it.