PPQ.pdf
PDF 139 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Atterbury/Muscatatuck Center for Complex Operations Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W912L9-16-R-0003
About this file
This form should be used for the Past Performance requirement found on page 128 of the Solicitation Paragraph L.6.4.4 - Past Performance Questionnaire.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| W912L9-16-R-0003-0003.pdf | ||
| W912L9-16-R-0003_amendment_P0002.pdf | ||
| Amendment_02_DD254.pdf | ||
| W912L9-16-R-0003-P0001.pdf | ||
| Amendment_01_SCA_Wage_Determination_WD_05-2193_Rev-18.pdf | ||
| Amendment01_QandA_W912L9-16-R-0003.pdf | ||
| Amendment_01_DD254_W912L9-16-R-0003v2.pdf | ||
| Preproposal_Sign_in_Sheet.pdf | ||
| MUTC_Pre-Proposal_Slides_14_Sept_2016.pptx | PPTX presentation | |
| W912L9-16-R-0003_SOLICITATION.pdf | ||
| Pre-Solicitation_Notice.doc | DOC document |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU
111 SOUTH GEORGE MASON DRIVE
ARLINGTON VA 22204-1382
NGB-AQ 30 AUG 2016
Dear Sir or Madam:
National Guard Bureau (NGB) has a requirement to establish support to assist the government with training and training support services contract to support the overarching Whole of Government Support Services and Deployment Program (WGTSSDP).
This program consists of various programs such as OSD’s Civilian Expeditionary Workforce (CEW); Ministry of Defense Advisory (MoDA) program; Cyber Command initiatives; Dept of Homeland Security (DHS); and Dept of Energy (DoE). The breadth of training and support may range from individual civilian/military personnel, their agencies, and other supporting agencies.
Depth of training may range from introductory to intermediate to advanced theories, concepts and programs. The various training and support dimensions that may be contemplated under this requirement include situational training for both civilian and military members with reach forward / reach back capabilities; pre-deployment and post-deployment support; training support to include but not limited to administrative, medical, logistical, IT, and equipment procurement;
support to rapidly emerging technology support to include but not limited to prototyping, testing, simulation, and evaluation; and to asymmetric / irregular threat support.
NGB is conducting a performance confidence assessment in anticipation of a possible contract award. An offeror interested in proposing on this work has identified you as a Point of Contact (POC) on a past or present contract which the offeror deems relevant to this effort. We are, therefore, requesting your assistance in completing the attached Past Performance Assessment Questionnaire so that we may evaluate the offeror under the Factor of past performance. The Questionnaire has been developed for ease of electronic completion. Please provide your comments regarding the overall assessment of the offeror’s performance on the contract identified and any additional information that your organization deems relevant to our evaluation team. It is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators.
Please complete and submit the Questionnaire via e-mail to Contract Specialist at christopher.j.purtell.mil@mail.mil and cicely.d.simmons-carroll.civ@mail.mil. If you have any questions relative to the enclosed Questionnaire, please contact me or the Contract Specialist.
Thank you in advance for your assistance.
Sincerely, Cicely D. Simmons-Carroll Contracting Officer mailto:christopher.j.purtell.mil@mail.mil
Corporate Experience and Past Performance Information Form
Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Official identified in the cover letter.
Adjectival Rating Definitions:
Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user.
Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.
Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
Acceptable
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
Acceptable
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).
Acceptable
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
Acceptable
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
Signature:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Official identified in the cover letter.
Thank you for your assistance.
| 2016-09-01T10:18:53-0400 | |
| SIMMONS-CARROLL.CICELY.D.1381612640 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .