MUTC_Pre-Proposal_Slides_14_Sept_2016.pptx

Whole of Government Training Support Services and Deployment Program

PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE

September 15, 2016

UNCLASSIFIED

Introduction Cicely D. Simmons-Carroll Contracting Officer

(NGB)

LTC Eric Honaker- Requiring Activity (Camp Atterbury)

Mr. James Callahan - Requiring Activity (Camp Atterbury)

HOUSEKEEPING

Doors Smoking Restrooms Please place cell phones on Vibrate/Silent

AGENDA

0800 – 0830 – Registration / Sign In – Camp Atterbury, Bldg 4A, Classroom 134 0830 – 0945 – Solicitation W912L9-16-R-0003 Presentation 0945 – 1000 – Break 1000 – 1030 – Question / Answer on Presentation 1030 – 1130 – Tour of Camp Atterbury 1130 – 1230 – Break 1230 – 1330 – Move to Muscatatuck Urban Training Center 1330 – 1430 – Tour MUTC 1430 – 1530 – Return to Camp Atterbury

*Note: Times listed above are flexible and subject to change.

Solicitation Summary (1 of 2) Competitive SDVOSB Single Award Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) will be assigned to the base contract Contract Type:

Non-Commercial, Firm Fixed Price Task Orders Estimated Period of Performance (POP) One (1) Base year with 4 one (1) year option periods

Solicitation Summary (2 of 2) Solicitation Released on 30 AUG 2016 Contract Value Maximum value of $100M Minimum value $100K Award of base contract will be made at National Guard Bureau All post-award contract actions and delivery orders will be issued by the Contracting Office for the United States Property and Fiscal Office (USPFO) for Indiana

SOLICITATION

Solicitation W912L9-16-R-0003 and all Amendments can be found at:

FedBizOpps - https://www.fbo.gov/ Questions and Answers will be posted as an Amendment Final Questions Due 04:00PM, 23 September 2016 Check FBO regularly for solicitation updates and amendments

PREPARING YOUR PROPOSAL

Submit all information required in the RFP with your initial proposal - in the required format ( Section L&M) Provide a proposal that represents the best- value to the Government The lowest price is not necessarily the best value

DISCLAIMER

THE FOLLOWING IS A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

OFFERORS ARE STRONGLY CAUTIONED TO CAREFULLY READ THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOLICITATION AND COMPLY ACCORDINGLY. IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION AND THE SOLICITATION, THE SOLICITATION AND AMENDMENTS TAKE PRECEDENCE.

THE GOVERNMENT INTENDS TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSION AND THERE MAY NOT BE A CHANCE FOR DISCUSSIONS, CORRECTIONS, OR REVISED PROPOSALS!!

Performance Work Statement (1 of 2) Primary Task Areas Task 1: Design/Build Curricula/Courses/Programs Task 2: Deliver/Execute Curricula/Courses/ Programs Task 3: Assess/Analyze/Evaluate Curricula/ Courses/Programs Task 4: Modify Curricula/Courses/Programs Task 5: Deployment/Redeployment Planning/ Operations/Management

Performance Work Statement (2 of 2) Supporting Task Areas Task 6: Program Management Process Task 7: Organizational Support Task 8: Task Order Management

Historical Workload Data

WHAT DO I NEED TO SUBMIT??

SECTION L of the RFP details the required information and format for the proposal

3 VOLUMES ARE REQUIRED

VOLUME I - RFP Documents and Price Proposal VOLUME II – Technical and Management Volume VOLUME III- Past Performance

Volume I -RFP DOCUMENTS AND PRICE PROPOSAL

TAB 1 – Executive Summary TAB 2 – Section A – SF33, Solicitation offer and Award. Acknowledgement of Amendments TAB 3 – Section K, Representations and Certifications TAB 4 – Price - completed price schedule including options

SAM REGISTRATION

Make sure your SAM registration is current https://www.sam.gov

Must have Marketing Partner Identification Number (MPIN) and valid CAGE Code

Volume II (1 of 4) Technical & Management

3 FACTORS

Technical Approach Management Approach Past Performance

Volume II (2 of 4)

FACTOR 1 – Technical Approach Subfactor 1 – IDIQ Technical Approach General Approach Understanding of Requirements Program Management Subfactor 2 – Sample Task Order Understanding of Task Order Task Execution Approach Proposed Personnel and Staffing Plan

Volume II (3 of 4)

FACTOR 2 – Management Approach Subfactor 1 – Management/Staffing Plan Subfactor 2 – Proposed Personnel Subfactor 3 – Quality Control Plan

Volume III- Past Performance

Factor 3 – Past Performance Questionnaires Send out questionnaires to references as soon as possible Ensure references return questionnaires to the Contracting Office not later than the solicitation closing date

CPARS/PPIRS

Performance within last 5 years

PROPOSAL AND DUE DATES

All volumes must be received not later than October 14, 2016, 2:00 p.m. EST Make sure boxes/envelopes are clearly marked No facsimile or electronic offers will be accepted May hand-carry proposal Past Performance Reference Questionnaires are also due by this date and time. Late PPQ’s will not be evaluated

HOW WILL THE PROPOSAL

BE EVALUATED?

Evaluation process detailed in RFP Section M Carefully review Section M when preparing proposal Comply with Section L requirements Non-price factors, when combined, are considered to be significantly more important than Price

COMPLIANCE REVIEW

Proposal timely Price Schedule complete Technical & Mgmt Proposal included Past Performance included 3 Hard copies and 1 soft copy Failure to furnish a complete proposal may be considered as non-responsive and could result in elimination from consideration

EVALUATION OF TECHNICAL APPROACH

Subfactor 1 – “IDIQ Technical Approach” is equal in importance to Subfactor 2 – “Sample Task Order Technical Approach”

EVALUATION OF MANAGEMENT APPROACH

Subfactor 1 – “Management/Staffing Plan” is more important than Subfactor 2 – “Proposed Personnel” Subfactor 2 – “Proposed Personnel” is more important than Subfactor 3 – “Quality Control Plan (QC Plan)”

EVALUATION OF PAST PERFORMANCE

Emphasis on recent and relevant experience Include information for all Subcontractors or Teaming Partners Questionnaires must be received from references not later than solicitation closing Government may obtain past performance information from other sources

EVALUATION OF PRICE

Price will be reviewed for compliance before evaluations Pricing for Base and options will be evaluated Basic and option pricing cannot be unbalanced

WHO WILL RECEIVE THE AWARD?

THE CONTRACTOR WHOSE PROPOSAL PROVIDES BEST VALUE TO THE GOVERNMENT, PRICE AND OTHER FACTORS CONSIDERED, WILL BE AWARDED THE CONTRACT

BEST VALUE AWARD DECISION

Award will be made to the Offeror whose proposal conforms to the requirements of the solicitation and is judged to represent the best value to the Government in accordance with the rules outlined in FAR Subpart 15.3.

The best value represents an integrated assessment of the price and non-price factors.

While price is not a significant factor in the evaluation, the importance of price as an evaluation factor will increase with the degree of non-price factor equality of competing proposals.

Socio-Economic Considerations Offerors must be a Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Teaming arrangements and partnerships can be tricky, consult your SBA/VA representative for guidance

WHAT IF I HAVE A QUESTION?

Reference Section L Questions must be submitted in writing via Email only to: cicely.d.simmons-carroll.civ@mail.mil and christopher.j.purtell.mil@mail.mil

SUBMIT QUESTIONS no later than 4:00 pm, EST, September 23, 2016

HOW WILL MY QUESTIONS BE ANSWERED ?

All questions and responses will be published in an amendment and posted to FedBizOpps(FBO).

Check the web site regularly

QUESTIONS ???

image3.jpeg image4.png image1.png image2.png