Amendment W912J623R0003 0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment of solicitation is to:

1. Incorporate Questions and Answ ers dated 08-June-2023.

2. Extend the Request For Proposal (RFP) offer due to date to 21-June-2023, 3:30pm HST.

See summary of changes. All other terms and conditions remain the same.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 19

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 08-Jun-2023

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912J623R0003

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

28-Apr-2023

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

08-Jun-2023

CODE

HAWAII AIR NATIONAL GUARD

ATTN: CEZAR Y. DE VEAS

BASE CONTRACTING HAWAII ANG

360 MAMALA BAY DRIVE, BLDG 3417

JBPHH HI 96853-5517

W912J6 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912J623R0003

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00010 - SOLICITATION CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 13-Jun-2023 03:30 PM to 21-Jun-2023 03:30 PM.

The number of offeror copies required has decreased by 1 from 1 to 0.

SECTION 00800 - SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

The following have been added by full text:

SOLICITATION Q & A

QUESTIONS & ANSWERS RELATED TO:

SOLICITATION W912J6-23-R-0003

In relation to the Solicitation RFP

Dated 24-May-2023

1. Will a site visit be provided for this evaluation task order?

ANSWER: Yes, Site Visit on the Prototypical Project was held on 10 May 2023 (immediately following the pre-proposal conference).

2. Are technical RFI’s intended or encouraged for this evaluation task order?

ANSWER: Yes, technical questions about the Prototypical Project is intended and/or encouraged.

3. RFP indicates a bid bond for values over $150k for this evaluation task order. Is a bid bond required?

ANSWER: This is a prototypical project and will not result in a task order award for project KNMD 200006 B3400 & 3416 Parking Re-Config, JBPHH-HI. A bid bond is not required for this RFP. The prototypical project is being used for pricing evaluation portion for MATOC evaluation purposes only. However, for MATOC evaluation purposes, offerors shall provide documentation of adequate financial resources as described in the solicitation RFP.

4. Shall the evaluation task order be bid entirely from the provided documents with no further information provided by the Govt? If No, Describe process.

ANSWER: No. Further information to the Prototypical Project will be provided unless changes to the SOW, Drawings, or RFI’s are incorporated into the Solicitation RFP via an amendment to the solicitation.

5. Please allow previously completed past performance questionnaires to be submitted with the proposal. Often once a PPQ is requested it is challenging to get the contracting officer or their representative to complete additional PPQs.

ANSWER: Previously completed past performance questionnaires WILL NOT BE ALLOWED.

Follow the instructions in Section 00110 Submission Requirements and Instructions of the Solicitation RFP and Exhibit C – Past Performance Reference Questionnaire package.

6. Is it acceptable for an offeror to submit previously completed past performance questionnaires from other agencies (e.g., naval facilities engineering systems command) in lieu of having the same previous customers complete and submit new RFP W912J6-23-R-0003 Exhibit C forms directly to the Contracting Officer for this procurement?

ANSWER: Same response as to question 5 above.

7. On page 19 of 127 of the document titled, “Solicitation RFP W912J623R0003.pdf”

2.4. PROPOSAL FORMAT, does the 10pt font pertain to clients response on past performance questionnaire exhibit C?

ANSWER: No.

8. On page 18 of 127 of the document titled, “Solicitation RFP W912J623R0003.pdf” 2.

PROPOSAL CONTENT verifying that only Volume 2, PART I – Technical Capability Proposal has a page limit of 20 single sided pages or 10 double sided pages.

ANSWER: Yes.

9. On page 110 of 127 of the document titled, “Solicitation RFP W912J623R0003.pdf”

8.2 KEY PERSONNEL DESCRIPTION states, “An individual Key Team Member may not hold more than one key role (Key Team Members consists of Project Mgr., Site Superintendent, QC Mgr. and Safety Mgr.) If the Seed SOW can be effectively and efficiently managed with dual hat roles in order to save Government unnecessary expense, would that be acceptable to Government? We will provide resumes qualifications for all Key Team Member positions to address the overall solicitation requirements.

ANSWER: Response to this Solicitation requires the following key personnel to be identified (an individual may not hold more than one key role) and pricing for the Prototypical Project should have separate four key personnel.

a. Project Manager

b. Site Superintendent

c. Quality Control Manager

d. Safety Manager

The Contracting Officer may allow dual roles depending on the nature of the project and complexity for FUTURE task orders. QCM and Supt are to be separate personnel. PM can double-hat as Supt or QCM but not both. PM, QCM, and Supt can double-hat as Safety. QCM and Supt are required onsite during any onsite work.

KNMD200006 B3400 & 3416 Parking Re-Config, JBPHH-HI is a Prototypical Project, not a seed project/seed SOW. No task order award will be made as a result of this Exhibit – this is for MATOC evaluation purposes only.

10. RFP Section 00100 Part 1, RFP Section 01000 Gen Req Part 4.e, i-ii, indicated task order set asides for 8a, HUB, WOSB and SDVOB over the life of the 5 years $50m MATOC. Is it intended to provide an equal percentage of task orders to all participants?

ANSWER: Every Contractor who is awarded a MATOC contract will be given a FAIR OPPORTUNITY to complete for the award of Task or Projects unless an exemption applies.

Fair Opportunity Exemptions

Urgent or emergency requirements

Services are unique or highly specialized interest of economy and efficiency

Satisfy the minimum guarantee

NOTE: THIS IS NOT A REQUIREMENTS CONTRACT

Other Times You May Not Be Given An Opportunity To Compete

KO May limit competition or exclude a contractor for the following reasons:

o Satisfy Agency Small Business Program Goals

Projects will be set-aside for 8(a) MATOC Contractors and/or HUB Zone and/or SDVB MATOC Contractors and/or Women Owned Small Business*

Failure to prosecute the work diligently on a current Task Order Award

Order outside your areas of consideration

* Task orders may be set-aside for socio-economic groups such as HUBZone, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Woman Owned Small Business, etc. provided two or more contractors in the socio-economic group are awarded a MATOC Basic

11. Will the program be equally funded per year over the 5 years, or is the funding subject to being exhausted before 5 years?

ANSWER: Individual task orders will be placed against this Construction IDIQ MATOC not to exceed $50M total over the five-year period. The Contract does not have annual limitations on total amount of task orders yearly.

12. RFP Section 01000, Gen Req Part 4.d.i-v, Requirement to respond to emergency repair task orders within 120-minute window.

a. Will the contractor be offloaded if unable to meet this requirement for a single task order?

b. Describe how a contractor based on one island will meet this requirement for another island’s emergency response?

ANSWER:

a. Contractor will not be off-loaded if unable to meet this requirement; however, the contractor may lose their opportunity to be awarded task order under emergency conditions.

b. Contractor should include these capabilities (two-day or 120-minute response under emergency conditions, and contractor based on one island and meet the requirement for another island’s emergency response) on their proposal under Part I, Technical Capability Proposal; Subfactor 1, Experience and Capability. Proposal provided information will be evaluated based on qualifying factors.

13. RFP Section 01000, Gen Req Part 8, Key Personnel: Confirm, all task orders are required to have on- site Supt, SSHO, and QC regardless of scope and Price magnitude.

ANSWER: For future project task orders per Section 01000, paragraph 8, the following key personnel should be identified and submitted with your proposal:

a. Project Manager

b. Site Superintendent

c. Quality Control Manager

d. Safety Manager

The Contracting Officer may allow dual roles depending on the nature of the project (magnitude) and complexity. QCM and Supt are to be separate personnel. PM can double-hat as Supt or QCM but not both. PM, QCM, and Supt can double-hat as Safety. QCM and Supt are required onsite during any onsite work.

14. Will (DBIDS) access to all bases under this MATOC be provided for the 5 years or will passes be issued on a Task Order basis only.

ANSWER: DBIDS access is required on JBPHH-HI. Other HING base locations outside of JBPHH-HI do not require DBIDS access process, rather they will have their base specific access requirements. We can process DBIDS access to Key Personnel for the life of the HING IDIQ MATOC. For HING base units located outside of JBPHH-HI, the contractor shall comply with all security regulations imposed by the base/post commander and/or agency occupying the space where work is to be performed. Any necessary security clearances shall be obtained prior to commencement of work.

15. Provide the full specifications that will be applied to all task orders.

ANSWER: MATOC Master Specifications will be added as an attachment to the solicitation.

16. Please confirm what amount the offeror needs to bond up to for this contract. Page 104 of the solicitation states that the maximum Task Order limitation is $5 million.

Page 4 of the solicitation states that the maximum task order value is $10 million.

Which value is the maximum task order value for this solicitation when providing a bonding capability letter?

ANSWER: The maximum task order initial award amount is $5M, but with changes or modifications the task order amount may increase up to total $10M.

Dated 6-June-2023

17. Per the detailed price proposal table on Exhibit D (last page 8 of 8), is it correct to assume that the total will be the sum of CLINS 0001 (Base Bid), 0002 (Bid Opt 1) and 003 (Bid Opt 2) only?

ANSWER: Correct. Total amount is sum of CLINS 0001 (Base Bid), 0002 (Bid Option 1) and 0003 (Bid Option 2) only. Note: CLIN 0001 (Base Bid) amount is a total of subCLINS 001AA through 001AG.

18. Per the detailed price proposal table on Exhibit D (last page 8 of 8), is it correct to assume that CLINS 0001AA through CLIN 0001AG are solely used as a detailed breakdown of the Base Bid CLIN 0001 and thus is not to be included in the total line item at the bottom?

ANSWER: YES

19. I have logged into PIEE at the link:

https://piee.eb.mil/sol/xhtml/unauth/search/oppMgmtLink.xhtml?solNo=W912J623R0003 At that site, there is no obvious spot where I can upload my submission. Can you clarify where on PIEE I am to submit my proposal?

ANSWER: In order to submit an offer, you need to make sure your role in PIEE is Proposal Manager and then you should see an additional tab “Offer” within that solicitation on the PIEE website. See screen shot below.

https://pieetraining.eb.mil/wbt/xhtml/wbt/sol/solicitation/proposals.xhtml There are videos how to submit offer in PIEE. Website link above.

20. Regarding Exhibit D. We are presuming that out of this Exhibit, our proposal only needs to include the 2 filled-out pages from this document on the 6th page (the 3 CLIN amounts) and on the 8th page (all line items shown in the detailed price proposal). We presume that no other pages of this document need to be included in our proposal. Is this correct?

ANSWER: Yes, just page 6 and 8

21. Again, regarding Exhibit D. The 7th page requests that a Construction Schedule be provided, along with a narrative discussing the scheduling process and resource allocations. However on page 21 of the RFP, under Volume 2 (Technical Capability section) there is mention of Subfactor 3--Scheduling methodology— which is further described on the same page under 3.2.6. Is the intent in the RFP for schedule and narrative to be provided in VOLUME 1 (PRICE) under Exhibit D, or is it to be provided under VOLUME 2 (Technical) (Subfactor 3)? We do not want to put it in the wrong VOLUME, and so have it be missed during the evaluation. Please advise.

ANSWER: Provide Construction Schedule (Gantt chart) in Volume 2, subfactor 3. Scheduling Methodology. Note: The Construction Schedule does not count toward the 20 page total of Volume 2, Part I.

22. See 3.1.6.1 on page 20 of the RFP. It states that ""Offerors shall provide all price/cost information necessary to provide a meaningful basis for Government's analysis and evaluation of price/cost for the project set forth in Section 00120 of this solicitation. Please confirm that this is not requesting additional detailed pricing information beyond the pricing requirements found on page 6 and 8 of the Exhibit D.

ANSWER: Yes, confirming that no additional detailed pricing information required beyond the pricing requirements found on page 6 and 8 of the Exhibit D.

23. See RFP page 19 of 127, items 2.4.4 and 2.4.5. Those sections indicate that the overall structure of the submissions will be broken out by TABS. While I understand that since this is an electronic submission, no traditional hardcopy TABS will be included, it still seems like the RFP would like us to provide an organizational approach that breaks submission components into TABS (easily done electronically). Typically, an RFP would assign specific ""TABS"" to specific topics, so that all proposals have topics organized under the same TAB structure. This RFP does not identify information requested according to TABS. Are we free to organize the various requested topics as we see fit, and rather than calling out specific TABS, just identifying proposal sections by topics?

ANSWER: Tab indexing will be used to identify sections as appropriate, e.g. be sure to “tab” each of the subfactors: Experience and Capability, Key Personnel, etc. in a logical manner.

24. This question regards the Exhibit A submissions (3-5 projects). On page 21 of the

RFP, under the Vol 2, Part I, Section 3.2.1 states that Exhibit A Part 1 info will be used for Subfactor 1 (Experience and Capability).

a. Are the Exhibit A submissions supposed to be provided in this part of the proposal? (Namely under Volume 2, Part 1)? If so, given that there is a 20 page limitation on this section (clearly stated on page 18 of RFP), if we submit 5 projects at 3 pages each, we will have used up 15 of the 20 pages allocated to this Section. Maybe we are just supposed to summarize our Exhibit A past projects in this section, and not submit the Exhibit A's themselves here. Please clarify.

ANSWER: Exhibit A, Parts 1 and Part 2 submissions go into Volume 2, Part II, Past Performance Information.

For Volume 2, Part I, Offeror Technical Capability Proposal, Subfactor 1 – Experience and Capability, please refer to pg 21, paragraphs 3.2.1. through 3.2.4.

25. See RFP page 22, item 3.3.10.

a. If we provide a FINAL CPARS rather than the Exhibit C Package, do we just print it as a PDF and include it in our PDF'ed Submission?

b. Furthermore, then we will only need to provide the Exhibit A Part 1 for that project. Is this correct?

ANSWER: a. Yes, a FINAL CPARS may be included in your PDF’ed submission in lieu Contracting receiving Exhibit C’s (Past Performance Reference Questionnaires’) from your prior clients.

b. Yes, provide Exhibit A, Part 1 for each particular project. Exhibit A, Part 2 need only be provided once in your submission package.

26. Regarding the Volume 2 Part II, Past Performance Information: On page 22 of the RFP, there are various requirements/attributes which the selected and submitted past performance projects must possess.

a. In reading sections 3.3.4 and 3.3.6 about this, is the request for us to select projects that match the Prototypical Project Scope, or can the projects match the general scope of projects associated with Task Orders under this MATOC (for instance, see Section 00100, 1.1, 1.1.2, 1.1.3, 1.2, 1.3.)?

b. Is it a requirement that the selected projects are for the federal government (see p. 22, 3.3.6), or can projects be for other types of entities also?

c. On page 3.3.6, the location is mentioned as a desired attribute. Does this mean, for instance that jobs must be in HI? Or does it mean Defense Facilities--can you clarify what "location" means?

ANSWER: a. Past performance should be matching with the scope of the MATOC projects as identified in Section 00100, paragraphs 1.1, 1.1.1 – 1.1.3, 1.2. and 1.3.

b. Instructions for page 22, paragraph 3.3.6 ask for the client type like federal government. The solicitation did not require federal government client type only.

c. Again, the solicitation did not specify Hawaii or Defense Facility but consider the similarity in terms of project geographic location.

27. It takes a lot of time to get folks to respond to the Exhibit B requests and to the non- CPARS past performance questionnaires. We are anticipating many more answered RFI’s that we will need to review and send out to our subs for the seed project bid. Is there any thinking that the response date may get delayed past the 13th.

ANSWER: We have extended the RFP offer due date to 20-June-2023, 03:30 pm, Hawaii Standard Time (HST).

28. See Volume 2, Part 1 (Offeror Tech Capability.) For Subfactor 2: Organization and Key Personnel: The request here is to provide org chart, key personnel, etc. Please confirm that the desired response is to be focused on the Prototypical Project--it is not to be focused on our full capabilities in responding to any and all Task Orders under the MATOC. An example would be: although there may be D-B Task Orders under the MATOC, we are to stay focused, in our proposal, on our capabilities related to fulfilling the requirements of the Prototypical project only. Please confirm.

ANSWER: See page 25 under Factor 1, Technical Capability; “Evaluation of the offeror’s proposal shall address each subfactor as it applies to the prototypical project and future requirements as detailed in the RFP.”

29. Where should we place Exhibit D in our bid package? We would like to suggest placing Exhibit D under Volume 1, Paragraph 3.1.6.

ANSWER: Yes, Exhibit D is part of your Volume 1, Price/Cost Information and Pro Forma Documents. Paragraph 3.1.6. pertains to that.

The following have been modified:

PROTOTYPICAL PROJECT Q & A

QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR:

SOLICITATION W912J6-23-R-0003

In relation to the Prototypical Project:

KNMD200006 B3400 & 3416 Parking Re-Config, JBPHH-HI

Dated 24-May-2023

1. As there are no demo plans, please confirm the extent of concrete removal when removing fence posts.

a. Please also confirm extent of concrete removal when removing vehicle sensors.

ANSWER: In dirt areas. remove all concrete associated with removed fencing. Where the fence is placed on concrete slabs, remove fence posts and existing concrete footers. Backfill with concrete approved for airfield small patch of parking aprons in Pavement Repair Material Certification Program. Place in accordance with UFC 3-270-01, Chapter 14.

Contractor means and methods. Vehicle sensors under the concrete may be abandoned in place and new sensors installed; OR demolish existing concrete, salvage existing sensors, repair concrete, and reinstall at the new location. The government’s desired end state is a functioning vehicle sensor at the new location and pavement in equal or better condition at the current location. Any concrete demolished shall be backfilled with airfield concrete. See ‘xyz’ for details on airfield concrete. Note: ‘xyz” will be answered in a follow-on answer on a future amendment for Q & A. This is not the same as normal concrete and must be approved prior to demo.

2. Please confirm if removal of existing STOP striping is required.

ANSWER: Black out existing “STOP” painting.

3. Please confirm if a staging area/COSA is allowed. If so, please provide location.

ANSWER: Yes, see image.

4. Please confirm if fence to building 3415 terminates at corner of building or to where location is shown on drawing. Please see attached drawing mark-up.

ANSWER: Mis-spoke at the site visit. Terminate the fence as shown in the drawings.

5. Please confirm amount of striping required behind building 3415(location closest to ocean).

ANSWER: Restripe 18 parking spaces as shown in the drawings.

6. Please provide signage locations.

ANSWER: See parking plan PPT.

7. Please confirm limits of fence line for northwest corner of building 3416. Please see attached drawing mark-up.

ANSWER: Erect fence as shown in the drawings. Connect to existing fence and terminate at the corner of B3416. What is meant by “Is the location subject to change?”

8. Please confirm if onsite superintendent, SSHO, and QCM is required for full duration of working days.

ANSWER: For this project, yes.

9. SOW, Page 7, Submittals & Design submissions- Confirm this is a design and build task order.

ANSWER: The prototypical project KNMD200006 B3400 & 3416 Parking Re-Config, JBPHH- HI is only for construction (Design-Bid-Build project). Spec is provided because the MATOC can include design-build services.

10. Describe the extent of electrical demo. Will the existing Airfield gate EHH in the grass remain?

ANSWER: EHH will remain and conduits abandoned in place. Remove all conductors back to the source panel in B3409 electrical room.

11. A-000, A-002 dets/1,2,3: Details indicate to relocate existing keypad and pedestal however site visit revealed this is not feasible due to deteriorated condition.

a. Shall the cost of replacement be included?

b. Shall new pedestal be Factory provided or fabricated.

c. Material to be used (Stainless, HD galv, other)

ANSWER:

a. Yes, include the cost to replace the damaged pedestal.

b. Factory

c. Powder coated aluminum, dark bronze

12. A-002 det4, note 2

a. Describe ‘jet Blast’ so the correct safety equipment can be provided.

b. Can this be equated to MPH?

c. Will temp fence require engineered stamp and approval?

ANSWER: Fence does not need to be stamped. Jet blast describes the winds generated when aircraft are taxing. Assume wind speeds of 120mph. Also see question 32 and 36. Pictures below show a nearby temp fence on the airfield.

13. A-001, Det/3 Personnel Gate

a. Details indicate width of gate at 2.32m (7.60’) confirm width.

b. Shall the Single Metal Louver Swing Gates (Ornamental) match the appearance and construction of the existing gate shown at the site visit (Vertical bars) or detail/3 (horizontal Bars)

c. Will pergola be required for gates?

ANSWER:

a. Width is corrected to 3’ 0” for the gate. The entire assembly should be 3’ 9” wide.

b. Site visit was for example purposes only. Conform to the drawings except as noted above.

c. The pergola is not required. Conform to the drawings except as noted above.

14. For continuity of maintenance, provide brand & model # of existing gate combo locks. Will shop drawings be required for approval?

ANSWER: Use a Kaba 5000 lock. The core will be GFE but the contractor will install the core.

15. Describe personnel gate painting requirements. Is Standard painting intended or specialty Powder coating?

ANSWER: Powder coat personnel gates.

16. SOW Page 2, Hours: Describe 5-4-9 “Down Mondays”. Provide schedule.

ANSWER: See attached A Schedule. Blue and yellow highlighted days are down days.

HQ HIANG 5-4-9- WORK SCHEDULE “A”

FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2023

17. SOW, Page 4,5, Elements of work, Item 6), Note: Indicates to reuse components.

SOW Page 6, Gen Note d., Indicates all new materials.

a. Identify method to be followed.

If not new materials,

b. For bidding purposes provide a percentage of parts expected to be re-used.

c. Who shall determine condition worthiness?

ANSWER:

a. All new materials except for those reused from the demolition.

b. Plan to reuse the existing vehicle gate/motor and 80% of the fencing from the demo.

c. The government assess the existing components mentioned above to be in acceptable condition for reuse. Contractor is responsible for removal without damage.

18. Describe any materials that will be salvaged and turned over to the Govt.

ANSWER: Swing gate shown on page A-000

19. Understanding the requirements for dig permits, Hot Work and Security permits, describe other permits required for this task order. (NPDES, FAA, Shoreline work, etc.)

ANSWER: No other permits are required.

20. Provide any soil or hazardous materials reports for all areas affected by this Task order.

ANSWER: No hazardous materials in the jobsite.

21. Shall hazardous material testing be required for this Task order? (Fence, paint, concrete, soils, etc.)

ANSWER: No.

22. Will contaminated soils requiring any off-island disposal be treated as a change condition for both time and costs?

ANSWER: None expected so yes.

23. Describe costs for escorts.

ANSWER: The government will provide escorts from 0630 to 1530. Start and end times can be flexed with approval of the KO but days will not exceed 9 hours. The first 2 days of escorts are included. Each additional 9 hour period or portion thereof will cost $600. The contractor is responsible for additional days of portion thereof for escorts at its expense and should be factored in their initial proposal if needed. The flightline must be secured without escorts overnight. Escorts are required anytime there is work occurring inside the flightline fence.

Upon demo of the existing fence the flightline fence changes to the new fence location and the entire jobsite will be considered inside the flightline. A temp fence may be used to change the flightline boundary.

24. Will a MUTCD traffic control plan be required?

a. For gate re-alignment.

b. For the design of the parking array.

ANSWER: No. Areas may be closed to all traffic while work occurs.

25. Drawing A-000 indicates parking stalls in the area of existing pad mounted HVAC equipment. Is it the intent to relocate this equipment? If no, Describe revised parking plan.

ANSWER: Do not relocate equipment. There is an error in the drawings. Assume creating only the 2 northern most parking spaces shown in the drawings for that area.

26. Site visit revealed an existing concrete curb, bollards and chain between B3415 and

B3400. Describe intent for demo or shall these features remain in place.

ANSWER: Features to remain.

27. Where will the COSA be located?

See Question 3 answer

a. Will temp fencing and Brown Obscure/dust screen be required?

ANSWER: Not necessarily. The Airfield must be secured at all times with either escorts, the permanent fence, or a temp fence. Demolition of the existing fence requires a temp fence or other approved FOD control measures.

An approved FOD control measure is wetting the soil prior to digging and only performing ground disturbing activities after flying hours. A flying schedule can be provided for actual days planned. Jul-Sep is not currently available. See attached for an example from Oct-Dec. Flying operations typically end 3 hours after the shown takeoff time.

28. Will Structural, Mechanical, Civil, Electrical, Environmental, and other Engineers (with Stamps) be required for this task order?

ANSWER: No

29. Describe any Anti-Terrorism or Force Protection specifications (AT/FP) that need to be incorporated into the design.

ANSWER: None. Construct as designed.

30. Describe warranty expectations for the relocated gate motor and controller(s).

ANSWER: The government understands the motor and controls are old. Before disassembly the contractor and government will preform a function check to mutually agree the gate is in working order. After relocation the same function check will be performed. No warranty on the motor or controls is required past completion of the task order.

31. Per Attach 1. SOW_KNMD 200006 B3400 and 3416 Parking Reconfig, page 7 of 13 discusses a design submission for design-build. Please verify if the intent of the seed project is to be a design-build or a scope of work task order project?

ANSWER: See question 11 answer. The prototypical project is not a design-build project.

32. Attach 2. KNMD 20006 Contract Drawings sheet A-001 detail 3 has the personnel gate painted dark bronze is there a spec section for the paint requested or would 154 CES prefer a powder coated dark bronze finish?

ANSWER: See Question 15 answer. Powder coat personnel gates.

33. Attach 2. KNMD 20006 Contract Drawings sheet A-000 shows a relocation of existing vehicle gate which may have a period of time when there will be no access to that area, and/or unsecure or will the temporary construction FOD fence detail 4 sheet A002 be located further plan north than demo area and require a vehicle gate?

ANSWER: Limited/no access through the vehicle gate for up to 5 consecutive days is acceptable. At no time may the flightline be left unsecured. See questions 23 and 27 answers for more details.

34. Does HI National Guard require contractor to route dig permit or will National Guard route the dig permit?

ANSWER: Contractor is responsible to route the dig permit

35. Sheet A-000 plan northeast corner of B3415 has AC units at NNE corner and fire hydrant/bollards and curbing at ENE corner not shown on drawing, how does this affect layout?

ANSWER: See question 25 answer.

36. Sheet A-000 does not show the areas that are asphalt vice concrete. New fencing to go into asphalt area or concrete area?

ANSWER: Place new fencing on the asphalt side of the pavement transition.

37. Is there a possibility of arch monitoring for any cultural or native Hawaiian remains?

ANSWER: No

38. What is the concrete repair detail for the fencing that is to be demolished?

ANSWER: See question 1 answer.

39. Will SIDA or Airfield security badges be required to work within airfield side?

ANSWER: See question 23, 27, and 33 answers.

40. Personnel fence area has an existing tree in the area with canopy and possibly root ball along fence line location is tree to remain (possibility it will die if root ball is damaged during auguring) or to be removed?

ANSWER: Tree is to remain. It is understood the tree may die from the auguring.

41. For Bid Option 1 at the site visit it was explained that the area to have the striping labels installed is in the hashed out area. Can contractor black out lines for new striping or seal coat/slurry seal to cover existing hashed line area?

ANSWER: Assuming this is to the plan south of B3415. Hashed out area to remain, no work required. It is to preserve access to the fire hydrant.

42. Personnel gate to match existing shown at site visit or drawings along with overhead gazebo?

ANSWER: See question 13 answer

43. Please verify personnel gate lockset requirement?

ANSWER: See question 14 answer

44. Existing keypad for airfield entry looks in a less than ideal condition, remove and reuse or provide new?

ANSWER: See question 11 answer

45. Does HING have as-builts of the working areas for thickness of concrete for coring and repairing as well as existing utilities in area?

ANSWER: No as-builts for existing concrete. Assume existing concrete is 8" thick.

46. Is Fence grounding or Lightning Protection required? If yes,

a. Shall it be UL Listed?

b. Provide spec.

ANSWER: NO

Dated 08-June-2023

47. Please provide requirement to rest/reinstall access security system. Please confirm if this will be a part of contractors SOW.

ANSWER: No functioning security system other than the gate keypad currently exists. Provide a spare 1” conduit with pull wire from the keypad to B 3415 for future security/comm connections.

48. Please confirm if tree between building 3415 and 3416 falls under tree protection as it is in line with installation of new fencing.

ANSWER: See question 40 answer

49. Drawing A-000

a. Provide drawings, photos, dimensions, etc. to accurately estimate the electrical requirements at B 3415 for the relocated gate.

b. If power is to be provided from another building, describe requirements.

ANSWER: a. 120/208 3 phase.

b. Power will be taken from B3415 2nd floor air handler room. Location is as shown in the plans.

Reconfigure breakers inside panel as needed to accommodate 3 phase gate breaker.

50. Drawing A-000, A-001 det/1: A-001 det/1 indicates 1HP, 3phase. No other information provided. Identify and describe the in-use electrical voltage source for the existing airfield vehicle gate motor.

a. Voltage required.

b. Breaker size and type

c. Building, panel name or #

ANSWER: See question 49 answer

51. Drawing A-000: Identify and describe the new electrical voltage source for the relocated airfield vehicle gate motor.

d. Breaker size, type, Brand

e. Building, panel name or #

ANSWER: See question 49 answer

52. Will outside telecommunications or base security systems be interfaced for the relocated airfield gate or personnel gates? If yes, describe.

ANSWER: See question 47 answer

53. Is there an electrical one line diagram for existing vehicle gate and new for primary power circuit to be used?

ANSWER: No as built electrical diagram exists

54. Are we to restripe the designated parking area (boxed in red) near the relocated existing vehicle gate w/ motor? Or just the designated parking area below B3415?

ANSWER: Restripe here too. Contractors should be assuming 28 total parking spaces need restriping.

(End of Summary of Changes)