W912HP22R6000 Fire Protection - Attachment 2 Descriptive Summary Sheet.pdf

PDF 125 KB Posted

Attached to
Construction/Fire Protection MATOC - Design-Build (DB)/Design-Bid-Build (DBB) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W912HP22R6000
Issued by
Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering District Charleston

About this file

This document contains details for two Multiple Award Task Order Contracts (MATOCs) being solicited by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Engineering District Charleston. The MATOCs are for general construction services with an emphasis on fire protection at various Defense Distribution Depots supported by the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA). The Charleston District intends to award MATOC "A" to contractors primarily covering facilities east of the Mississippi River and MATOC "B" to contractors primarily covering facilities west of the Mississippi River. Each MATOC pool will include five contractors. Task orders will generally range from the simplified acquisition threshold to $20 million, utilizing only firm-fixed price contracts. The total capacity valued at $49.5 million will be equally divided between the two MATOC pools. This acquisition is set aside 100% for small business concerns.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Construction/Fire Protection MATOC - Design-Build (DB)/Design-Bid-Build (DBB), newest first.
File Type Posted
B.08.03 W912HP22R6000 Amendment 0004.pdf PDF
B.08.03 W912HP22R6000 Amendment 0003.pdf PDF
B08.03 W912HP22R6000 Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
W912HP22R6000 Fire Protection - Attachment 1 Proposal data sheet.pdf PDF
W912HP22R6000 Fire Protection - Attachment 3 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf PDF
B08.03 W912HP22R6000 Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
W912HP22R6000 Fire Protection MATOC Solicitation.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 2

DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY SHEET

USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to the solicitation? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client�s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client�s Signature:

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner�s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government�s/Owner�s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable No information or did not apply to your contract Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR�S PERFORMANCE

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .