B08.03 W912HP22R6000 Amendment 0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Purpose of the amendment is to update information to the solicitation, and also extend the proposal due date from 14 Jan 2022 to 25 Jan 2022, See Summary of changes

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 8

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 07-Jan-2022

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W912HP22R6000

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10-Dec-2021

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

07-Jan-2022

CODE

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, CHARLESTON

DISTRICT, CONTRACTING DIVISION

69-A HAGOOD AVENUE

CHARLESTON SC 29403

W912HP 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912HP22R6000

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SECTION 00 00 00 - PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00 00 00 - PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS

The following have been added by full text:

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Amendment 02 – 6 January 2022

1) Section 2.3.1.1– DELETE Section 2.3.1.1 which describes requirements for

HubZone Joint Venture Requirements.

2) Supplementary Instructions - Section 2.4.2:

DELETE the table in Section 2.4.2 and replace with the following:

File Electronic File Name

Electronic Submission Requirements Format

PHASE ONE

Cover Letter (optional)

00CovLtr Limit 1 page (Reference FAR 52.215- 1(c)(2), Information to Offerors – Competitive Acquisition.)

pdf

Factor 1: Technical Approach for Design- Build

01Technical pdf

Factor 2: Past Performance

02PastPerf Performance Evaluations

- USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Submit both Attachment 2 & 3 as provided to the client)

-(2 page limit per project permitted in addition to PPQ / CPARS) pdf

Teaming Agreement (or letters of commitment)

03TeamAgree Joint Venture, Teaming Agreement, and/or letters of commitment, as applicable. (no page limit). See paragraph 2.3.

pdf

Additional Administrative Requirements

04SF1442 Completed and signed by an official(s) with the authority to contractually bind the company IAW FAR 4.102.

Acknowledge all Amendments in Block pdf

19. Reference para 2.4.8.

05DataSht See format in Attachment 1. A DUNS number shall be provided for each company identified in any proposed teaming arrangement. If JV, a DUNS shall be provided for the JV in addition to separate DUNS for each team ..member.

Reference para 2.4.8.

06RepsCerts Reference para 2.4.8 and 2.4.9. pdf

PHASE TWO

Factor 3: Design and Design Narrative

07Design pdf

Factor 4: Schedule 08Schedule pdf Price 09Price Prices will constitute binding rates for the term of the contract. Prices must be proposed on all line items.

pdf

Phase Two Administrative Requirements

10Financials Statements must include three years’ worth of Balance Sheets and Income Statements. See paragraph 2.4.8 and 2.4.10.

3) Supplementary Instructions. Section 2.2 DELETE the text in Section 2.2 and replace with the following:

The Government will consider past performance experience of affiliates of the Offeror and those entities in a teaming agreement, whether a predecessor company, affiliated company, subsidiary (including wholly owned subsidiaries), or subcontractors if the resources of those affiliates will have a direct impact on the performance of this contract. For the Past Performance factor only, the Government will consider projects submitted for the DOR if a letter of commitment for the DOR firm is provided with the proposal.

4) Section 3.2 – Phase One – Factor 2: Past Performance

DELETE the text in Paragraphs 11 (final paragraph) in Section 3.2.2 and REPLACE with the following:

The Government may contact references provided for information regarding the offeror’s past performance on the project and for the purposes of assessing and verifying the scope of work performed. This section does not have an overall page limit, as there are no limitations on the pages submitted for CPARS and PPQ forms, when using only the forms. However, offerors may submit up to an additional two (2) single-sided, 8.5” x 11” pages per project to describe or provide supplementary information. Pages beyond the page limit specified in this factor will not be evaluated.

5) Section 3.2.1.1 – Submission Requirements for Prime / Construction

Offeror

DELETE the first bullet in the second paragraph and REPLACE with the following:

At least two (2) submitted project of the three (3) to five (5) to be evaluated shall be a fire protection renovation project of at least $500,000. This is not to be a general renovation that included aspects of fire protection, but rather a project that was primarily for the purpose of fire protection renovations. (See Section 3.2.1.3)

6) Section 3.1.2 – Phase One – Evaluation Criteria for Factor 1.

DELETE the text in Paragraph 1 in Section 3.2.1 – Evaluation Criteria for Factor 1, and replace with the following:

The Government will review and identify the strengths, weaknesses, and any deficiencies in the proposal. The Government will evaluate the proposal based on the offeror’s understanding of the USACE Design/Build process and how well it has demonstrated its ability to successfully execute design-build projects. Offerors are encouraged to tailor their proposal to demonstrate their approach for successfully completing work under this MATOC.

7) Section 3.2.1.2 – Phase One – Factor 2: Past Performance

DELETE the first paragraph in Section 3.2.1.2 and REPLACE with the following:

Provide descriptions of three (3) to five (5) projects that have been constructed (i.e., construction is substantially complete) within the last five (5) years (from the solicitation closing date) which are similar in size and scope (see relevancy). In order to be considered similar, the proposed A/E firm must have been the DOR on the submitted project. The listed design firm must be used on the projects submitted. No deviations will be permitted unless approved by the Contracting Officer. Identification of more than one (1) design firm will result in an evaluation based on the least qualified firm. Indicate any previous working relationship with the prime contractor. All PPQ's or CPARS submitted for the DOR must be for that entity and describe / evaluate their performance on that project.

8) Section 3.2.1.3 – Recency and Relevancy

Delete the Relevancy Section and REPLACE with the following:

Relevancy: Projects shall demonstrate the same or similar type of work and complexity to those described in this solicitation. Projects completed outside the

Continental United States (OCONUS) must also demonstrate similar construction techniques and standards as CONUS projects.

All projects submitted for the construction contractor shall have an awarded value of at least $500,000 and be for the primary purpose of fire protection renovation/construction with minimal incidental or associated work. Construction offerors must demonstrate at least 50% of the project award value was for fire protection work, or had at least $2 million of fire protection work if fire protection work was less than 50% of the total project award value. Fire protection work must be the primary, or a major feature of work ($2M as stated above), and not otherwise incidental to construction or other added work. Submitted projects unrelated to fire protection, or otherwise do not meet the stated criteria will not be considered relevant.

All projects submitted for the AE / DOR must have an awarded value of at least $200,000 and be for the primary purpose of design of fire protection systems with minimal incidental work. Project submissions where the A-E acted as DOR for relevant fire protection systems portions of a larger design will be considered, provided it meets all other requirements. Submitted projects unrelated to fire protection, or otherwise do not meet the stated criteria will not be considered relevant.

Where a project was awarded as a task order or delivery order under an IDIQ-type contract, Offerors are cautioned to submit information specific to the project awarded by task order or delivery order rather than the base contract itself. Submissions referencing the base indefinite delivery contract alone will not be considered. The Government will not permit multiple projects, such as individual task orders or delivery orders, to be combined to meet the minimum value of any of the three types of projects. Projects with an award value less than the values stated herein will not be considered. Offerors shall provide sufficient detail to clearly demonstrate relevancy.

Offerors shall provide all of the information requested for Factor 2-Past Performance by submitting Attachments 2 and 3, or a CPARS evaluation for each project. If the rating information in Attachment 3 is not able to be submitted, at least a fully completed Attachment 2 – Descriptive Summary Sheet must be submitted for each project in order for that project to receive consideration. Offerors may elect to not use Attachment 2 when only providing this information without ratings. However, submissions must provide, at minimum, the same information required by the provided form as well as adhere to all other requirements for this factor. If Attachment 2 is not used to submit the required minimum information, the project description shall not exceed 2 pages (as mentioned in Section 3.2.2 that allows the submission of additional pages).

For recognized contractor team arrangements, Offerors shall submit a minimum of one

(1) relevant project from each member of the team, but Offerors remain responsible to collectively submit at least three (3) relevant projects. Offerors shall not exceed the five (5) project maximum for the Prime / Construction Offeror and the five (5) project maximum for the AE / DOR. The Government will review projects in the order they appear in the proposal, and those projects submitted beyond the maximum limitations specified in this factor will not be evaluated.

Offerors shall indicate whether the team members were the prime contractor on each project. Offerors shall also describe their primary roles/duties in execution of the work (i.e., the major components of the project which were completed by the prime’s staff and major components which were subcontracted). Additionally, Offerors shall provide information as to the size, complexity, distinctive/unique features of each project and any specific information to demonstrate that the project is relevant to the work required by this solicitation. Projects submitted by the team may include those performed by individual team members, as well as those where all team members have prior experience together as a team. Offerors shall clearly demonstrate how their submitted projects are similar in size, scope and complexity, including any distinctive/unique features of each project and any project-specific information that support project relevance to the work required by this solicitation.

All submitted projects shall have been awarded to the Offeror / team member (or have been awarded to the DOR) as the prime contractor. In the case of an Offeror which is a JV, the project shall have been awarded to one of the members of the JV as the prime contractor. In the case of an Offeror that is a prime contractor - subcontractor team, the project may have been completed by the subcontractor, as a prime contractor, if a formal prime-sub teaming agreement is provided within the proposal.

9) Section 01 00 00 – General Requirements, Scope of Work

Delete the Scope of Work and REPLACE with the following:

SCOPE OF WORK

General:

The Charleston District intends to award two (2) Multiple Award Task Order Contracts (MATOCs) for Construction projects located in two (2) distinct regional CONUS areas.

One (1) MATOC is planned to be awarded for the East Region, and one (1) MATOC is planned to be awarded for the West Region. The regions will be separated by the Mississippi River. Only firm-fixed-price (FFP) task orders will be awarded under these two (2) MATOCs. Each set of MATOCs will have a total capacity of $49.5M, to be shared among all of the MATOC awardees for that regional pool. This procurement is issued as a 100% small business set-aside.

1.1 The design team shall include the services of qualified fire protection engineers as defined in UFC 3-600-01. The successful proposer will be required to validate the design against the RFP requirements and accept design responsibility (i.e. sign and seal design drawings and specifications by registered professional engineers and architects). The work includes but is not limited to:

1.2 Fire Protection Construction (Vertical and Horizontal):

1.2.1 This construction contract has an emphasis on Fire Protection Construction.

Such construction and related design work may include, but is not limited to the following: New construction, rehabilitation, maintenance or repair of fire suppression systems (wet, dry, pre-action, ESFR, and CMSA), water supplies (fire pumps, tanks and underground water mains), low and high expansion foam, gaseous (carbon dioxide and clean agents) special hazards protection, and fire alarm systems (detection, reporting, and mass communication).and all devices, equipment and components associated with constructing and installing these systems.

1.3. Other Construction Work Under This Contract:

1.3.1 In addition to fire protection construction, other construction and related design work may be performed under this contract. Other construction and related design work may include, but is not limited to the following: new construction, renovation, rehabilitation repair, or demolition (with other construction). This work also includes, but is not be limited to, carpentry, painting, lighting, electrical work, mechanical, structural, and utilities that may be required to provide a complete, safe, and usable facility.

1.3.2 Other work may include:

1.3.2.1 Testing, reports and surveys associated with new construction, renovation, rehabilitation of, repairs and additions to, buildings (including lead and asbestos and other hazardous materials), structures, roads, drainage systems, mechanical systems and utility systems.

1.4 Professional Registration and Licensing. The Government will generally follow the guidance in ER 1110-1-81 (Professional Registration and Signature on Design Documents) for professional registration and licensing for Engineering and Design.

However, individual task orders may state other requirements based on need.

2.0 The list below is a partial list of DLA locations where there is a probability of work occurring under this contract. This list is only an aide to assist in the preparation of proposals. In no way are task orders under this contract limited to these locations.

DLA Distribution Anniston, AL (DDAA) DLA Distribution Barstow, CA (DDBC) DLA Distribution Hill, UT (DDHU) DLA Distribution Norfolk, VA (DDNV) DLA Distribution Oklahoma City, OK (DDOO) DLA Distribution Red River, TX (DDRT) DLA Distribution Richmond, VA (DDRV) DLA Distribution Susquehanna, PA (DDSP) DLA Distribution Tobyhanna, PA (DDTP)

DLA Distribution Warner Robins, GA (DDWG)

10) Attachment 1: Proposal Data Sheet

Add the following to the end:

6. Intent to submit proposal (Check either or both):

East MATOC _______ West MATOC ______

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION, CONTRACT LINE ITEM NUMBER (CLIN) SCHEDULE

The required response date/time has changed from 14-Jan-2022 03:00 PM to 25-Jan-2022 03:00 PM.

(End of Summary of Changes)