B.07.01 HU Taxiway and Airfield PPC Slide Deck 5Dec22 Final.pdf
PDF 5 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Construct Parallel Taxiway and Construct Airfield Upgrades at Kecskemet Air Base, Hungary
- Solicitation number
- W912GB23R0004
- Issued by
-
Department of the Army European Command
View the file
Other files
Show all 29
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE
PARALLEL TAXIWAY
AND
AIRFIELD UPGRADES
KECSKEMET AIR BASE, HUNGARY
W912GB23R0004
Presented by:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Europe District 7 December 2022
1. Cellular phones on silent mode
2. Raise your hand if you want to speak
3. Avoid sidebar discussion
4. No technical discussion will be held in this forum
GROUND RULES AND PROCEDURES
AGENDA
Welcome / Introductory Remarks
Contracting Overview
U.S. Procurement Law & Overseas Contracting
Parallel Taxiway and Airfield Upgrades Project Overview
Q&A Session / Closing Remarks
USACE TEAM INTRODUCTIONS
Paul Audije Project Manager
Nancy van Noortwijk Assistant Counsel
Ryan Shoemaker Contracting Officer
Shawna West Contract Specialist
Matthew Marosek B&V Project Manager
Bolong, Luz Danielle Office of Counsel
Information Provided During the Pre-proposal Conference
Any remarks or explanations provided during this presentation today are for general information and will not change the terms and conditions of any resultant solicitation or subsequent contract.
DISCLAIMER
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Mission: USACE provides vital engineering solutions, in collaboration with our partners, to secure our Nation, energize the economy, and reduce risks of disasters.
QUESTIONS?
PROCUREMENT MATTERS
RYAN SHOEMAKER
CONTRACTING OFFICER
SHAWNA WEST
CONTRACT SPECIALIST
• Procurement Timeline
• System for Award Management
• Pre-Proposal Inquiries & ProjNet
• General Submission Information
• Submission Requirements
• Source Selection Approach
• Debriefings
OVERVIEW
• Contractors may ask questions during this Pre-Proposal Conference and Site Visit; however, those questions should also be submitted in writing in ProjNet Bidder Inquiry.
• These slides and sign-in sheets will be posted to sam.gov.
QUESTIONS DURING CONFERENCE AND SITE
VISIT
• RFP Issued – Scheduled for December 2022
PROCUREMENT TIMELINE
• Pre-Proposal Conference – 7 December 2022
• Pre-Proposal Site Visit – 8 December 2022
• Pre-Proposal Inquiries Due – 11 January 2023
• Subject to change (10 business days prior to proposal due date)
• Proposal Due Date – 24 January 2023
• Subject to change via amendment
• Anticipated Award – August 2023
• Provisions/clauses require all contractors to register and maintain an active SAM entity registration in order to be eligible for contract awards, as prescribed by the regulation at FAR Subpart 4.11.
Solicitations Provision: FAR 52.204-7 SAM Contract Clause: FAR 52.204-13 SAM Maintenance
• Contractors are required to update SAM registration ANNUALLY.
• In order to be eligible for the contract award resulting from this solicitation, Offerors are advised to take immediate action to ensure your SAM entity registration is current and/or will be current at the time of proposal receipt by this contracting office.
SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT
Ref: RFP Section 00 21 16 - Instructions
• U.S. Federal Government mandates contractor registration in the System for Award Management (SAM) prior to the award of a Federal contract.
• How does your company register in SAM? Go to: https://www.sam.gov/
• The website contains a video overview briefing and user guides for assistance.
• For Help with SAM or FBO, Contact the Federal Service Desk: www.fsd.gov Live Chat or Web form or via Phone U.S. Calls: 866-606-8220 International Calls: 334-206-7828 Hours of Operation: Monday - Friday 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. ET
SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT
Ref: RFP Section 00 21 16 - Instructions https://www.sam.gov/ http://www.fsd.gov/
Offerors shall submit inquiries via “Bidder Inquiry” in ProjNet at www.projnet.org\projnet. See the solicitation for ProjNet registration instructions.
Bidder Inquiry Key:
835UD7-4797JH
Bidder Inquiries will be closed to new inquiries TEN business days before the proposal due date in order to appropriately respond and amend the solicitation, if necessary.
PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES VIA PROJNET
Ref: RFP Section 00 21 16 - Instructions
Select USACE
Enter Email http://www.projnet.org/projnet
• The Government contemplates that the solicitation will result in a single Firm- Fixed-Price construction contract award using a best value tradeoff source selection process. This process permits tradeoffs among cost or price and non-cost factors.
• Offeror’s shall monitor the System for Award Management (sam.gov) for any amendments issued to the solicitation.
GENERAL SOLICITATION INFORMATION
• File Size Limitations. Offerors are advised that the file size limitation is 10MB due to email server restrictions.
• File Name. Each filename shall begin with the solicitation number, followed by the word “RESPONSE”, followed by your firm’s name, and finally a brief file description. EXAMPLES:
(1) “Firmname W912GB23R0004 PROPOSAL Volume I.pdf”
(2) “Firmname W912GB23R0004 PROPOSAL Volume I Schedule.XER”
(3) “Firmname W912GB23R0004 PROPOSAL Volume II.pdf”
GENERAL SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Reference Section 00 21 16 Instructions
File Organization, Formatting, and other instructions.
Although hard copies are not accepted, each file shall be clearly indexed, and logically assembled. Font size shall be 10 point or larger and font text shall be legible. Pages shall be letter or A4 sized- -larger page sizes (such as 11x17 foldouts, etc.) will be counted as two pages.
Offerors shall prepare proposals in the English language.
Proposals shall be in a narrative format, organized and titled so that each section of the proposal follows the order and format of the factors.
Information presented should be organized so as to pertain to only the evaluation factor in the section that the information is presented.
Files shall be submitted in their native format (i.e. doc, xls, ppt, etc.), or if in pdf format, shall be in searchable text.
GENERAL SUBMISSION INFORMATION (CONT)
• Submission & Deadline.
Interested parties shall submit responses no later than the date specified on solicitation document.
The time & date of proposal receipt will be the delivery time & date recorded of email receipt on the Government’s server. The time the electronic submission is sent by the interested party is not determinative.
Do not assume that electronic e-mail submission will occur instantaneously.
Offerors should time their email submission with prudence by not waiting until the last few minutes—this will allow for unexpected delays in the transmittal process and troubleshooting. Offerors are encouraged to keep a copy of the delivery and/or read confirmation for their record but shall also request confirmation.
GENERAL SUBMISSION INFORMATION (CONT)
RFP, VOLUME I, NON-PRICE
Section A - Executive Summary. Include a one page cover letter and any applicable fully-executed joint venture agreements and fully executed teaming agreements.
Section B - Factor 1, Past Performance. Offerors shall submit a maximum of five (5) projects completed within the last six (6) years (from the RFP issue date) which are similar to these projects in size and scope. Projects completed more than six (6) years before the solicitation issue date may be considered for evaluation purposes but may lessen the overall relevancy rating for that project.
Projects considered similar in size will have a minimum cost of $25,000,000.
Projects considered similar in scope will be horizontal airfield pavement and infrastructure construction projects.
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
Reference Section 00 22 16 Evaluation
Section B - Factor 1, Past Performance, Continued. Projects that contain the features below may be considered to be more relevant:
i. Projects that demonstrate working on sites having restricted access.
ii. Projects that demonstrate work in the European Union.
iii. Projects that demonstrate work in Hungary.
iv. Projects that demonstrate working with the United States Government Department of Defense.
v. Projects demonstrating working with proposed Key Subcontractors, team members and/or the proposed JV
Partners as applicable.
The Offeror should complete a Past Performance Information Sheet provided as an attachment to the RFP or a similar document for each project. Past Performance Information Sheets or a similar document shall not exceed four (4) pages per project.
For each project submitted under Factor 1, Offerors shall include completed Contractor’s Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) record or completed Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire (PPQ) Form if a CPAR is not available.
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS (CONT)
Section C - Factor 2, Management Approach. The Offeror shall provide a Management Approach limited to 10 pages, including the following:
i. One (1) organizational chart and a narrative description of the Offeror’s overall structure and management of the project team from the Offeror’s Headquarters to the Offeror’s site office(s). The chart and narrative must:
− identify all offices involved in this contract − identify position(s) to communicate with the U.S. government − identify all positions by title, organization, and physical location, including subcontractors and consultants − include lines of reporting and technical areas of responsibility under the contract − clearly show the lines of authority of the Offeror’s Project Manager, Quality Control and Safety Organization, including all JV Partners and subcontractors, when applicable
ii. Discuss how the Offeror will ensure consistent quality across the team. Discuss quality control lines of authority between subcontractors and prime.
iii. Discuss how the Offeror will ensure consistent safety across the team. Discuss safety lines of authority between subcontractors and prime.
iv. Discuss the Offeror’s plan to obtain, retain, coordinate, and manage subcontractors. Include any established relationships with organizations qualified for work within the scope of this RFP, including number of projects that have been completed together and/or number of years of partnering. Identify the significant aspects of the work that are to be self-performed and those that will be subcontracted. Identify the nature and overall percent of work that will be performed by the Prime Contractor and all key sub-contractors. Offerors are reminded of the requirements of 52.236-1, Performance of Work by the Contractor.
v. Discuss knowledge of construction and permitting requirements in Hungary to include coordination with local authorities.
vi. Discuss the Offeror’s understanding of certification and registration requirements for companies in Hungary and demonstrate the ability to meet these requirements along with the demonstrated ability to communicate in Hungarian and English.
Section D - Factor 3, Technical Approach Narrative and Schedule. The Offeror shall provide a plan describing their proposed approach to executing the work required by the RFP documents. The plan shall consist of (1) a Technical Approach Narrative and (2) Network Schedule. Limited to 10 pages for the Technical Approach Narrative, to include:
i. Describe the offerors overall plan for executing the work from NTP to final completion.
ii.Identify long lead-time items and describe steps to be taken to ensure they will be available on site timely.
iii.Identification of large equipment (including any proposed construction cranes, and batch plants) to be used to perform the work along with the source (self-owned, subcontractor, etc.).
iv.Identification of the 5 (five) main risks identified by the offeror in their schedule, along with mitigation measures.
v.Clearly identify any constraints on the schedules presented (e.g., labor or material availability, permits, weather, etc.).
Section D - Factor 3, Technical Approach Narrative and Schedule, Continued. The Network Schedule must include both a Schedule and a Schedule Narrative consisting of the following:
i.A schedule prepared in Primavera P6 and submitted in PDF format specifically tailored to the project contemplated by the solicitation. The schedule shall include all of the major portions of work, including submittals, reviews and approval periods.
ii.A description of activities along the critical path of the schedule and all activities with less than one week of float with their relation to the critical path.
iii.Explanation of how durations were determined, and logic developed.
VOLUME II, ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS / PRICE
Section A - Executive Summary. Offerors shall submit a one (1) page cover letter including the items listed in Section 00 22 16 of the solicitation
Section B – Completed Solicitation Form (and amendments). Offerors shall submit a completed Standard Form (SF) 1442 using a printed copy of the SF 1442 included in this Solicitation. If applicable, Offerors shall also submit a completed SF 30 for each Solicitation amendment, acknowledging all the amendments.
Section C – SAM Registration, Representations & Certifications. Offerors shall submit the following:
i. A completed clause FAR 52.204-8(d).
ii. A copy of their current “Entity Registration” in the System for Award Management (SAM) as recorded at www.sam.gov, showing the following sections: “core data, “assertions”, and “POCs”.
iii. A copy of their current “FAR & DFARS Report” that demonstrates all their completed representations and certifications as recorded at www.sam.gov.
Section D – Bank Letter of Assurance (BLA), Bank Letter of Guaranty (BLG), Bonds, Insurance and other Sureties, and Financial Information.
i. If an offeror intends to provide performance and payment bonds upon contract award, it must provide with its proposal a Bid Bond or other Bid Guarantee conforming to the requirements in FAR provision 52.228-1.
ii. If an offeror intends to provide a BLG upon contract award, it must provide with its proposal a BLA equal to 10% of the proposed price and substantively following the model provided in the RFP.
iii. Offerors shall submit financial information to demonstrate they have adequate financial resources to perform the contract, or the ability to obtain them. For example, past three years financial statements, annual reports, Dun & Bradstreet Ratings, and/or bank name, phone number and POC, etc.
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS (CONT)
http://www.sam.gov/
Section E – Price. The Offeror is required to submit a complete Price Schedule that includes completion of all contract line-item numbers (CLINs). An Offeror that fails to submit a complete price proposal may be considered unacceptable and may not receive further consideration.
Trade-off Process (FAR 15.101-1) The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow award to other than the lowest priced Offeror or other than the highest technically rated Offeror. Factors include:
Non-Price Factors:
Factor 1: Past Performance Factor 2: Management Approach Factor 3: Technical Approach Narrative and Schedule
Price Factor Factor 4: Price
Relative Importance of the Evaluation Factors. The non-price factors, when combined are of approximately equal importance to price. Factor, 1 Past Performance, is significantly more important than Factor 2, Management Approach and Factor 3, Technical Approach Narrative and Schedule. Factor 2, Management Approach and Factor 3, Technical Approach Narrative and Schedule are of equal importance.
SOURCE SELECTION APPROACH
What is a Debriefing?
A Debriefing under FAR Part 15 is an opportunity for an offeror to better understand the basis for an agency’s selection decision.
Debriefings give you a chance to hear from the agency regarding:
the evaluation process;
how your proposal was evaluated in relation to the evaluation criteria;
what was successful in your proposal;
what was lacking in need of improvement in your proposal; and reasonable responses to relevant questions about whether the source selection procedures were followed.
Offeror must submit a debriefing request to USACE within 3 calendar days after notification of exclusion from the competitive range or contract award.
DEBRIEFINGS
FINAL COMMENTS / REMINDERS
• These slides only summarized portions of the solicitation. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to thoroughly read the entire solicitation and understand the requirements. You may be disqualified for submitting a proposal that does not meet all the requirements.
• Offerors with questions and technical inquiries shall submit their inquiries via “Bidder Inquiry” in ProjNet at www.projnet.org\projnet. Bidder Inquiry Key:835UD7-4797JH
• Proposals shall be via emailed to both the Contract Specialist, Ms. Shawna West, at shawna.m.west@usace.army.mil and the Contracting Officer, Mr. Ryan Shoemaker, at ryan.s.shoemaker@usace.army.mil.
http://www.projnet.org/projnet mailto:shawna.m.west@usace.army.mil mailto:ryan.s.shoemaker@usace.army.mil
Ms. Shawna West Contract Specialist Phone: +49 611 9744 2340 Email: shawna.m.west@usace.army.mil
Mr. Ryan Shoemaker Contracting Officer Phone: +49 611 9744 2746 Email: ryan.s.shoemaker@usace.army.mil
POINTS OF CONTACT
mailto:etsy.weintraub@usace.army.mil
Legal Issues
Office of Counsel
Slide 31
U.S. PROCUREMENT
LAWS AND REGULATIONS
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vffara.htm
Defense FAR Supplement (DFARS) http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vfdfara.htm
Army FAR Supplement (AFARS) http://farsite.hill.af.mil/vfafara.htm
ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST
FAR Subpart 9.5 Organizational and Consultants Conflict of Interest Causes an unfair advantage May not be able to compete as construction contractor if involved in part of the design Must be brought to Contracting Officer’s attention immediately if an actual or potential conflict of interest exists
Slide 33
34CHOICE OF LAW (OVERSEAS)
(JUN 1997)
This contract shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the substantive laws of the United States of America. By the execution of this contract, the Contractor expressly agrees to waive any rights to invoke the jurisdiction of local national courts where this contract is performed and agrees to accept the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals and the United States Court of Federal Claims for the hearing and determination of any and all disputes that may arise under the Disputes clause of this contract.
(End of clause)
SPECIFICATION SECTION 00.74.01 PARA.
3.2. IMMUNITY FROM LEGAL PROCESS
The contractor agrees to indemnify and save harmless the United States Government against all claims and suits of whatsoever nature arising under or incidental to the performance of this contract by any subcontractor against the United States Government. The Contractor further agrees to waive his rights to bring suit or other legal action against the United States Government, except as provided in the Disputes clause of this contract and in the United States Federal Statutes.
BREACH
United States law will apply to resolve any applicable claim of breach of this contract
37JOINT VENTURES, TEAMING
ARRANGEMENTS, SUBCONTRACTORS &
PROPOSED PERSONNEL
Where a Joint Ventures or Teaming Arrangement is proposed, the solicitation requires fully executed JV agreements and fully executed teaming agreements. Agreements to negotiate such agreements upon award do not suffice.
When selecting contractors, prime contractors can receive credit for the past performance of a subcontractor or affiliate only to the extent provided for in the solicitation.
If a letter of commitment is provided for a subcontractor or affiliate, such letter of commitment is not a contract, but it represents a commitment by the firms to work together if a contract is awarded.
We expect firms to provide the subcontractors they specify in a letter of commitment.
38JOINT VENTURES, TEAMING
ARRANGEMENTS, SUBCONTRACTORS &
PROPOSED PERSONNEL
When a contractor specifies personnel by name in a proposal, we also expect those personnel will be provided.
Substitutes are allowed only with Contracting Officer approval.
Approval of substitution is given only where the proposed substitute is deemed by the Contracting Officer to be equal to the proposed personnel or subcontractor; this is a matter of Contracting Officer discretion.
39PRIME CONTRACTOR
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
The U.S. Government contracts are with the prime contractors.
We expect the prime to actively manage the project and ensure the work meets contract requirements and the U.S. Government will hold the prime contractors responsible for contract execution.
When issues arise, we deal with primes, not subcontractors.
The U.S. Government will enforce contract schedules and assessment of Liquidated Damages if the schedule is not met.
COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL LABOR LAWS
The U.S. Government is very concerned that laborers on our projects receive working conditions and wages in accordance with Host Nation laws and regulations.
There are some very important provisions in the contract that relate to labor:
The clause entitled “Compliance With Local Labor Laws”, provides that contractors must comply with all host nation labor laws and regulations including laws and regulations relating to hours of work and compensation.
41COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL
LABOR LAWS (CONT’D)
Please be aware that this applies to subcontractors as well as the prime contractor – the prime contractor is responsible for ensuring that all workers on the project are properly paid, regardless of whether the workers are employed directly by the prime contractor, principal subcontractor or subcontractors at any tier. The Government will hold the prime responsible.
Slide 41
42SPECIFICATION SECTION 00.74.01 PARA.
3.3.2. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITY
This part of the specifications provides that the contractor is responsible for (among other things):
Adequately manning and staffing the project.
Obtaining any necessary visas, permits, clearances for workers.
The contractor assumes the risk and cost of obtaining the necessary labor to execute the project.
The U.S. Government will not compensate you if labor turns out to be more expensive than you expected.
This is true even if the reason for the added expense is a change in HN laws and regulations that increases your labor cost.
The U.S. Government may not have any influence over the HN in regards visas or work permits and may not provide any assistance.
TAX EXEMPTIONS
United States contractors in Hungary solely for the purpose of supporting the U.S. forces shall not be subject to any form of income or profits tax by the Government of Hungary.
Importation of articles by contractors acting on behalf of the U.S. shall be free of any import duties or taxes.
VALUE ADDED TAX (VAT)
Articles and services acquired by contractors acting on behalf of the U.S. are not subject to direct or indirect taxation, to include value added taxes, excise taxes, sales taxes or similar taxes.
The contractor is responsible for properly filling out the VAT exemption forms provided by the U.S. Government.
The contractor is responsible for providing the Government with any information necessary to certify or process VAT exemption forms.
Exact VAT procedures are still being finalized between the nations and will be provided as soon as they are available.
SITE ACCESS
The contractor is responsible for providing all information and documentation required to obtain permissions to access the site.
The contractor will be responsible for any delay resulting form the contractor’s failure to fulfill access requirements.
DEFENSE BASE ACT (DBA)
The requirements for DBA is located in Clause UAI 5128.305-100 Overseas workers' compensation and war-hazard insurance.
Note that a waiver exists for Hungary. Nevertheless, DBA insurance will be required for certain personnel in accordance with the clause.
No other insurance can serve as a substitute.
Proof of DBA insurance MUST be received by the Contracting Officer prior to start of work, or issuance of the notice to proceed (NTP).
MISCELLANEOUS POINTS
The US acts through warranted Contracting Officers (KOs).
Contracting Officers are assisted by Administrative Contracting Officers (ACOs) and Contracting Officer’s Representatives (CORs) acting within the bounds of authority delegated to them by the Contracting Officer.
Only a warranted Contracting Officer (or designated ACO) may provide direction to a contractor on a U.S. Government contract.
PROJECT OVERVIEW:
PARALLEL TAXIWAY
AIRFIELD UPGRADES
MATT MAROSEK
A/E BLACK & VEATCH PROJECT MANAGER
KECSKEMÉT AIR BASE SITE OVERVIEW
Site Overview Parallel Taxiway Project
Site Overview Airfield Upgrades Project
Contract Base and Options Parallel Taxiway Project
TW Base:
• Parallel and Ladder
Taxiway Z
• Taxiway V lighting
TW Option 1:
• Ladder Taxiway W
TW Option 2:
• Ladder Taxiway Y
TW Option 3:
• Edge Lights Cables and Fixtures
Contract Base and Options Airfield Upgrades Project
AU Base:
• Parking Apron
AU Option 1:
• Apron Entrance Shoulder
Pavement AU Option 2:
• Apron Exit Shoulder Pavement
AU Option 3:
• Apron Kilo Mast Lighting
AU Option 4:
• Parking Apron South
Shoulder Pavement
Laydown
Access Road
Parallel and Ladder Taxiways
• Sized to accommodate NATO-equivalent Tactical Fighter Aircraft (TFA), Strategic Transport Aircraft (STA), and civil aircraft
• Governing design aircraft include the C-17 Globemaster and C-5 Galaxy
• Ladder Taxiway V and 70 meters of the parallel taxiway constructed by the Host Nation
• 45 meters of ladder taxiways W, Y and Z have been constructed by the Host Nation
Typical Parallel Taxiway Cross Section
Typical Ladder Taxiway Cross Section
Apron
• Sized to accommodate 12 NATO-equivalent Tactical Fighter Aircraft (TFA)
• Governing design aircraft include the F-15 and A-10
• Concrete with asphalt shoulders
Typical Apron Cross Section
Cargo Delivery Road
• Asphalt
• Connects the parking apron to the existing road at the east corner of the site
Apron Kilo Lighting
• Addition of 5 mast lights and new Main Distribution Panel
• New cables and conduit withing the Apron Kilo area
Demolition
• Removing abandoned cables within limits shown in the drawings
• No utilities will be relocated as part of this project (few cables will be lowered)
Continued for length of taxiway
• Modify existing fiber optic manholes (adjust elevation and add F900 covers)
• Modify existing storm water manholes located beneath the new pavement
Concrete and asphalt road.
Utilities – Electrical Parallel and Ladder Taxiways
• Includes airfields lighting and guidance signs for parallel and ladder taxiways
• Lighting components are separated into the base and options
• Grounding and lightning protection
• Addition of two new CCRs in the North Lighting Vault
• All newly installed airfield lighting will be LED type
• Airfield lighting types include:
• Edge Lights
• Centreline Lights
• Stop Bar Lights
• Runway Guard Lights
• End Lights (base cans and conduits within pavement)
• Displaced Threshold Lights (base cans and conduit within pavement)
• Approach Lights (base cans and conduits within pavement)
• Includes airfields lighting and guidance signs for the apron, apron lighting controls, grounding, and lightning protection
Apron
• Addition of 5 mast lights and new Main Distribution Panel
• New cables and conduit withing the Apron Kilo area
• Lightening protection and grounding
Apron Kilo Mast Lighting
Power
• North Vault
• Addition of two new CCRs
• Supply for Parallel Taxiway Lighting
• Supply for Parking Apron Lighting
• Center Vault
• Utilize existing CCRs
• Supply for Parallel Taxiway Lighting
• Supply for Apron Kilo Mast Lighting
•Connection made at Apron Kilo and new Main Distribution Panel
• South Vault
• Supply for Runway Guard Lights
Ladder Taxiways
• Sheet flow from pavement to area inlets
• Gravity drain to stormwater manholes
Utilities – Storm Water Parallel and Ladder Taxiways
Parallel Taxiways
• Sheet flow from pavement to area inlets
• Gravity drain to existing stormwater manholes
Utilities – Storm Water Apron
Parking Apron
• Apron runoff sheet flows from pavement to edge trench drain
• Stormwater passes through O/W Separator
• Gravity drain to existing open channel connection
• Runoff from apron entrance and exit drain to area inlets.
• Gravity drain to existing stormwater manholes
Utilities – Storm Water Roadway
Road
• Sheet flow from pavement surface to open channel parallel to roadway
Continued
THANK YOU!
CONCLUSION /
FINAL REMINDERS
• Dates: 8 Dec Thursday
• Time: 0930-1200 hrs *please arrive ahead of schedule
• Attendees: USG and KTRs
• Location: Kecskemet AB
• GPS coordinates: 46°54'30.8"N 19°45'10.2"E
PRE-PROPOSAL SITE VISIT
FINAL COMMENTS / REMINDERS
Offerors with technical inquiries shall submit their inquiries via “Bidder Inquiry” in ProjNet at www.projnet.org\projnet. Bidder Inquiry Keys: 835UD7-4797JH
• You may be disqualified for submitting a proposal that does not meet all of the requirements.
• Proposals must be submitted via RFP instructions.
http://www.projnet.org/projnet
Shawna West Contract Specialist Email: Shawna.M.West@usace.army.mil
Ryan Shoemaker Contracting Officer Email: ryan.s.shoemaker@usace.army.mil
POINTS OF CONTACT
Reference Section 00 00 00 - Procurement and Contracting Requirements mailto:Shawna.M.West@usace.army.mi mailto:Daniel.K.Unsen@usace.army.mil
THANK YOU!
BACK UP SLIDES FOR MORE INFO
USACE/U.S. GOVERNMENT
SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
1. Construction Quality Management Course
2. Safety
3. CPM Schedule & Payments
4. Resident Management System (RMS)
Course developed in partnership with Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC) and the Associated General Contractors
(AGC)
Details:
• Instructs Contractor Superintendents, Quality Control (QC) Staff, and
Foreman in construction quality control and how it relates to Owner quality assurance (QA)
• Describes the QC/QA system successfully used by USACE
• Required prior to commencement of construction. [Refer to §01 45 00]
USACE CONSTRUCTION QUALITY MANAGEMENT (CQM) COURSE
Registration:
https://www.nau.usace.army.mil/Business-With-Us/CQM/
Upcoming Courses:
January 19-20, 2023 April 20-21, 2023 July 19-20, 2023 (Weds / Thurs) Oct 19-20, 2023
The course is now being offered through University of North Florida and there is a $250 fee for course attendance. For other questions regarding registration or course information please email CENAU-EC- CQM@usace.army.mil.
CONSTRUCTION QUALITY MANAGEMENT COURSE (CONT.)
https://www.nau.usace.army.mil/Business-With-Us/CQM/ mailto:CENAU-EC-CQM@usace.army.mil
SITE SAFETY AND HEALTH
Engineer Manual (EM) 385-1-1 USACE Safety & Health Requirements Manual:
http://www.publications.usace.army.mil/USACE- Publications/Engineer-Manuals/
USACE Specifications:
• 01 35 26 Safety and Health Occupational Requirements
• 01 45 01 USACE Quality Control
• 01 45 01.01 Additional Quality Control Personnel http://www.publications.usace.army.mil/USACE-Publications/Engineer-Manuals/
PROJECT SCHEDULE (SECTION 01 32 01 )
The schedule is the basis for determining contract earnings during each update period and therefore the amount of each progress payment.
Activity cost loading must be reasonable and without front-end loading. Provide additional documentation to demonstrate reasonableness if requested by the Contracting Officer.
PAYMENTS
FAR 52.232-5 Payments under Fixed-Price Construction Contracts Monthly Invoices An itemization of the amounts requested, related to the various elements of work required by the contract covered by the payment requested.
A listing of the amount included for work performed by each subcontractor under the contract.
A listing of the total amount of each subcontract under the contract.
A listing of the amounts previously paid to each such subcontractor under the contract.
Additional supporting data in a form and detail required by the Contracting Officer.
RESIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (RMS)
• Comprehensive contract administration software used for ALL construction contracts.
• E.g. Submittals, schedules, pay estimates, contract modifications
CPM SCHEDULE, PROGRESS PAYMENTS AND RMS
The Resident Management System (RMS) is the contract administration programs designed by Resident Engineers. The systems provide an efficient method to plan, schedule, and control all aspects of construction.
Support and tutorials:
RMS Support Center YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_ID-JmaZgePmlrb2zdUOqg
RMS 3 Contractor Mode User Manual:
https://rms.usace.army.mil/datafiles/rmsdocwebsite/files/RMS3CM.pdf
Download RMS 3.0 Contractor Launcher:
https://rms.usace.army.mil/datafiles/rmsdocwebsite/files/RMSLauncherSetupKtr25.exe
Installing RMS 3.0 Contractor Mode https://rms.usace.army.mil/datafiles/rmsdocwebsite/files/Installing%20RMS%203.pdf
RESIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (RMS)
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_ID-JmaZgePmlrb2zdUOqg https://rms.usace.army.mil/datafiles/rmsdocwebsite/files/RMS3CM.pdf https://rms.usace.army.mil/datafiles/rmsdocwebsite/files/RMSLauncherSetupKtr25.exe https://rms.usace.army.mil/datafiles/rmsdocwebsite/files/Installing%20RMS%203.pdf
| Pre-proposal conference�Parallel Taxiway �and �Airfield Upgrades Kecskemet Air Base, Hungary�W912GB23R0004 |
| Ground Rules and procedures |
| Slide Number 3 |
| USACE TEAM INTRODUCTIONS |
| Disclaimer |
| QUESTIONS? |
| Procurement matters��Ryan shoemaker�Contracting Officer ��shawna west�contract specialist� |
| Overview |
| Questions During conference and site visit |
| PROCUREMENT timeline |
| System for award management |
| System for award management |
| Pre-proposal inquiries via projnet |
| GENERAL SOLICITATION INFORMATION |
| General submission information |
| General submission information (Cont) |
| General submission information (Cont) |
| SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS |
| SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS (cont) |
| SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS (cont) |
| SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS (cont) |
| SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS (cont) |
| SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS (cont) |
| SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS (cont) |
| SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS (cont) |
| Source Selection Approach |
| DEBRIEFINGs |
| Final comments / Reminders |
| POINTS of CONTACT |
| Slide Number 31 |
| U.S. Procurement�Laws and Regulations |
| Organizational Conflict of Interest |
| CHOICE OF LAW (OVERSEAS) �(JUN 1997)� |
| Specification Section 00.74.01 para. 3.2. Immunity From Legal Process� |
| Breach |
| Joint Ventures, Teaming Arrangements, Subcontractors & Proposed Personnel |
| Joint Ventures, Teaming Arrangements, Subcontractors & Proposed Personnel |
| Prime Contractor �Project Management |
| Compliance with Local Labor Laws |
| Compliance with Local �Labor Laws (Cont’d) |
| Specification Section 00.74.01 para. 3.3.2. Contractor Responsibility |
| Tax Exemptions |
| Value Added Tax (VAT) |
| Site Access |
| Defense Base Act (DBA) |
| Miscellaneous Points |
| Project overview:�Parallel Taxiway�Airfield Upgrades����Matt Marosek�A/E Black & Veatch Project Manager |
| KecskemÉt air base site overview |
| Slide Number 50 |
| Slide Number 51 |
| Slide Number 52 |
| Slide Number 53 |
| Slide Number 54 |
| Slide Number 55 |
| Slide Number 56 |
| Slide Number 57 |
| Slide Number 58 |
| Slide Number 59 |
| Slide Number 60 |
| Slide Number 61 |
| Slide Number 62 |
| Slide Number 63 |
| Slide Number 64 |
| Slide Number 65 |
| Slide Number 66 |
| Slide Number 67 |
| Slide Number 68 |
| Slide Number 69 |
| Slide Number 70 |
| Slide Number 71 |
| Slide Number 72 |
| Slide Number 73 |
| Thank you!� |
| Conclusion /�FINAL Reminders�� |
| Pre-Proposal Site Visit |
| Final comments / Reminders |
| POINTS of CONTACT |
| Thank you!� |
| BACK UP SLIDES FOR MORE INFO |
| USACE/U.S. Government �Specific Requirements |
| USACE CONSTRUCTION QUALITY MANAGEMENT (CQM) COURSE |
| Construction quality management course (Cont.) |
| Site SAFETY AND HEALTH |
| CPM Schedule, Progress Payments and RMS |
| Resident Management System (RMS) |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .