W912EP25R0009 - Amendment 0005 - Specs_Volume_2_AM0004.pdf

Amendment 0005

1. SPECIFICATIONS:

VOLUME 1: No Change.

VOLUME 2: DELETE Section 01 33 16, paragraph 2.4.1.1.

2. DRAWINGS: No Change.

Canaveral Lock Sector Gate Replacement Brevard County, Florida

SECTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

DIVISION 01 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

SECTION 01 33 16

DESIGN DATA (DESIGN AFTER AWARD)

PART 1 GENERAL

1.1 SUMMARY

1.2 REFERENCES

1.3 DEFINITIONS

1.3.1 Designers of Record (DOR)

1.3.2 Government Furnished Material (GFM)

1.3.3 USACE CAD/BIM Technology Center

1.4 ORDER OF PRECEDENCE

1.5 SUBMITTALS

1.6 DESIGNER OF RECORD MINIMUM EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS

1.6.1 Structural Engineer

1.6.2 Mechanical Engineer

1.7 PREFABRICATION ACTIVITIES

1.7.1 Design Quality Control Plan

1.7.2 Design And Code Checklists

1.7.3 Meetings and Conferences

1.7.3.1 Post Award Conference

1.7.3.2 Initial Design Conference

1.7.3.3 Design Charrette

1.7.3.4 Regular Progress Meetings

1.8 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING

1.8.1 Electronic Design Submittal

1.8.1.1 Malicious Content

1.8.2 Advanced Model File Packaging

1.8.2.1 Autodesk Revit, AutoCAD

1.8.3 PDF File Packaging

1.8.3.1 Bookmarking

1.8.3.2 Hyperlinking

PART 2 PRODUCTS

2.1 ADVANCED MODELING DOCUMENTS

2.1.1 Advanced Modeling Electronic Files

2.1.1.1 Quality Control (QC) Reports

2.1.1.1.1 Graphics Standards Checks and Report

2.1.1.1.2 CAD Standards Checks and Report

2.2 DESIGN DRAWINGS

2.2.1 Electronic Drawing Files

2.2.2 Drawing Index

2.2.3 Shop Drawings Used as Design Drawings

2.2.3.1 Drawing Format For Shop Drawings Used as Design Drawings

2.2.3.2 Identification of Shop Drawings Used as Design Drawings

2.2.4 Seal on Documents

2.3 SPECIFICATIONS

2.3.1 Specifications Format

SECTION 01 33 16 Page 1 W912EP25R0009 Amendment

2.3.2 Identification of Manufacturer's Product Data Used as

Specifications.

2.3.3 Specifications Packaging

2.3.4 Specification Deliverable

2.4 DESIGN ANALYSIS

2.4.1 Design Requirements and Provisions

2.4.1.1 Structural

2.4.1.2 Mechanical

2.4.2 Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Provisions

2.4.3 Design Analysis Packaging

2.4.3.1 Assembly and Identification

2.4.4 Calculations

2.4.4.1 Structural

2.4.4.2 Mechanical

PART 3 EXECUTION

3.1 DESIGN SUBMITTALS

3.2 DESIGN SUBMITTALS PHASES

3.2.1 Interim Design Submittals

3.2.1.1 Interim Design Development Management

3.2.1.2 Fast-Tracking

3.2.1.3 Over-the-Shoulder Progress Review

3.2.2 100 Percent Final Design Submission

3.2.3 Design Complete Submittals

3.3 DESIGN PLATFORM AND FILE FORMATS

3.3.1 CAD

3.3.1.1 Native CAD Authoring Content

3.3.1.2 CAD Extracted From BIM/CIM Authoring Platforms

3.4 DESIGN CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT (DCM)

3.4.1 Procedures

3.4.2 Government Quality Assurance Reviews (QARs)

3.4.3 Tracking Design Review Comments

3.4.3.1 ProjNet Initial Account Set-Up

3.4.3.2 ProjNet Review Comments

3.5 DISCIPLINE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

3.5.1 Structural Systems

3.5.1.1 General

3.5.2 Mechanical Systems

3.6 INTERIM DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

3.6.1 Submission Review

3.6.2 Interim Review Conference

3.6.3 Conference Documentation

3.6.3.1 Minutes and Comment Process

3.6.3.2 Availability

3.7 FINAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

3.7.1 Design Drawings

3.7.2 Design Analysis

3.7.3 Specifications

3.7.4 Submittal Register

3.8 DESIGN COMPLETE DOCUMENT REQUIREMENTS

3.9 ACCEPTANCE AND RELEASE FOR FABRICATION

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A

-- End of Section Table of Contents --

SECTION 01 33 16 Page 2

SECTION 01 33 16

DESIGN DATA (DESIGN AFTER AWARD)

PART 1 GENERAL

1.1 SUMMARY

After award, develop the accepted proposal into the completed design, as described herein. Design includes but is not limited to, fabrication plans, specifications, modeling, and design analysis. Consider all stages of the project lifecycle, including deconstruction, rehabilitation, re-purposing, or demolition.

1.2 REFERENCES

The publications listed below form a part of this specification to the extent referenced. The publications are referred to within the text by the basic designation only.

INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION (ISO)

ISO 19005-3 (2012) Document Management -- Electronic Document File Format for Long-Term Preservation -- Part 3: Use of ISO 32000-1 with Support for Embedded Files (PDF/A-3)

ISO 32000-1 (2008) Document Management -- Portable Document Format -- Part 1: PDF 1.7

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (USACE)

ER 1110-1-12 (2006; Change 1) Engineering and Design -- Quality Management

ERDC/ITL SR-23-1 (2023) A/E/C Graphics Standard, Release 2.2

ERDC/ITL SR-24-3 (2024) A/E/C CAD Standard - Release 6.2

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD)

UFC 1-300-02 (2014; with Change 3, 2021) Unified Facilities Guide Specifications (UFGS) Format Standard

1.3 DEFINITIONS

1.3.1 Designers of Record (DOR)

Professional Registered members of the design team that check, approve, sign, date, and certify, prior to submitting the deliverables to the Government, that the design submittals comply with the contract requirements.

The DOR(s) stamp, sign, and date each design drawing and other design deliverables under their responsible discipline at each design submittal

SECTION 01 33 16 Page 3 stage. The DOR(s) are responsible for maintaining the integrity of the design and for compliance with the contract requirements through fabrication and installation by coordination, review and approval of extensions of design, material, equipment, and other post-award submittals, review, and approval or disapproval of requested deviations to the accepted design or to the contract, coordination with the Government of the above activities, and by performing other typical professional design responsibilities.

1.3.2 Government Furnished Material (GFM)

Government material that may be incorporated into, or attached to, an end item to be delivered under a contract or which may be consumed in the performance of a contract. It includes, but is not limited to, raw and processed material, parts, components, assemblies, and small tools and supplies.

1.3.3 USACE CAD/BIM Technology Center

The USACE CAD/BIM Technology Center hosts all standard content for USACE.

This content can be accessed through the CAD/BIM Technology Center website at https://cadbimcenter.erdc.dren.mil/ .

1.4 ORDER OF PRECEDENCE

In the event of a conflict or inconsistency between any of the requirements within the Contract, precedence is applied:

a. Any portions of the accepted proposal which both conform to and exceed the requirements of the solicitation.

b. The provisions of the solicitation.

c. All other provisions of the accepted proposal.

d. Any design products including, but not limited to, plans, specifications, engineering studies and analyses, shop drawings, and equipment installation drawings. These are "deliverables" under the contract are not part of the contract itself. Design products must conform to all provisions of the contract, in the order of precedence.

1.5 SUBMITTALS

Each submittal includes an associated approval level designation as defined in the following table:

Approval Level Designation

Definition

G Government approval no designation for information only

D Designer of Record approval

C Government Conformance Review of Design

SECTION 01 33 16 Page 4

Approval Level Designation

Definition

R Designer of Record Approval and Government Conformance Review

A Designer of Record Approval and Government Approval

When used, a designation following the approval level designation identifies the office that will review the submittal for the Government.

Submit the following in accordance with Section 01 33 00 SUBMITTAL

PROCEDURES:

SD-01 Preconstruction Submittals (Prefabrication Submittals)

Design Quality Control Plan ; G, DO

Initial Design Conference

DCM Procedures ; G, DO

Submittal Register ; R, RO

SD-05 Design Data

Design and Code Checklists ; C, DO

Proposed Load Cases And Load Combinations ; A, DO

30 Percent Interim Design ; R, DO

60 Percent Interim Design ; R, DO

90 Percent Interim Design ; R, DO

Gate Rendering

Conference Documentation

100 Percent Final Design ; R, DO

Design Complete Documents ; R, DO

Design Charrette ; A, DO

1.6 DESIGNER OF RECORD MINIMUM EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS

1.6.1 Structural Engineer

The Structural Engineer of Record must be a registered Professional Engineer, active within any state, with at least 10 years licensed design experience, within the last 10 years, in similar projects to this scope of work. Similar projects include fiberglass products/systems fabricated using a vacuum infusion process. Provide a record of at least five previous, separate, similar successful fabrications in the last ten years.

1.6.2 Mechanical Engineer

The Mechanical Engineer must be a registered Professional Engineer, active within any state, with at least 5 years licensed design experience, within the last 10 years, in similar projects to this scope of work. Similar

SECTION 01 33 16 Page 5 projects include marine bearing systems.

1.7 PREFABRICATION ACTIVITIES

1.7.1 Design Quality Control Plan

a. Identify, for approval, the Designer of Record (“DOR”) that is responsible for each area of design. Listed, Professional Registered, DOR(s) must account for all areas of design disciplines. Include resumes for all DOR(s). The DOR(s) are also be responsible for maintaining the integrity of the design and for compliance with the contract requirements through installation by coordination, review, and approval of extensions of design, material, equipment, and other pre- and post-fabrication submittals, review, and approval or disapproval of requested deviations to the accepted design or to the contract, coordination with the Government of the above activities, and by performing other typical professional designer responsibilities.

b. Submit and maintain a Design Quality Control (DQC) Plan as an effective quality control program which assures that all services required by this contract are performed and provided in a manner that meets professional engineering quality standards. As a minimum, all documents must be technically reviewed by competent, independent reviewers identified in the DQC Plan. The same element that produced the product may not perform the independent technical review (ITR).

Correct errors and deficiencies in the design documents prior to submitting them to the Government.

c. Include the design schedule in the master project schedule, showing the sequence of events involved in carrying out the project design tasks within the specific Contract period. This should be at a detailed level of scheduling sufficient to identify all major design tasks, including those that control the flow of work. Include review and correction periods associated with each item. This should be a forward planning as well as a project monitoring tool. The schedule reflects calendar days and not dates for each activity. If the schedule is changed, submit a revised schedule reflecting the change within 7 calendar days. Include in the DQC Plan the discipline-specific checklists to be used during the design and quality control of each submittal. Submit at each design phase as part of the project documentation these completed discipline-specific checklists. ER 1110-1-12 provides some useful information in developing checklists.

d. Implement the DQC Plan by a Design Quality Control Manager who has the responsibility of being cognizant of and assuring that all documents on the project have been coordinated. This individual must be a person who has verifiable engineering or architectural design experience and is a registered professional engineer or architect.

Notify the Contracting Officer, in writing, of the name of the individual, and the name of an alternate person assigned to the position.

The Contracting Officer will notify the Contractor in writing of the acceptance of the DQC Plan. After acceptance, any changes proposed by the Contractor are subject to the acceptance of the Contracting Officer.

SECTION 01 33 16 Page 6

1.7.2 Design And Code Checklists

Develop and utilize appropriate discipline-specific checklists during the design and quality control of each submittal. Submit these completed checklists with each design submittal, as applicable, as part of the project documentation. See Section 01 45 04 Fabricator Quality Control.

1.7.3 Meetings and Conferences

1.7.3.1 Post Award Conference

The Government will conduct a post award conference as soon as possible after Contract award, coordinated with issuance of the notice to proceed (NTP). The meeting may be held virtually via Microsoft Teams but it is expected that the contractor's key staff will perform a site visit either before, during, or after this meeting. There are no facilities to conduct the meeting at the project site. Participation by the Contractor and major subcontractor representatives is mandatory. All designers need not attend this first meeting. The government will provide an agenda, meeting goals, meeting place, and meeting time to participants prior to the meeting.

As a minimum the following will be addressed during the conference:

determination and introduction of contact person and their authorities;

contract administration requirements; discussion of expected project progress processes; and coordination of subsequent meeting.

a. The government will introduce the Government project delivery team members and installation representatives.

b. Introduce key personal, major subcontractors, and other needed staff.

c. Define expectations and duties of each participant.

d. Develop a meeting roster with complete contact information including name, office, project role, phone, mailing and physical address, and e-mail address for distribution to all participants. Also, provide minutes of the meeting to all participants.

1.7.3.2 Initial Design Conference

After Contract award and Government approval of the Design Quality Control Plan, conduct the initial design conference, and provide a record of the meeting. All Designers of Record must participate in the conference. The primary purpose of the meeting is to make sure any needs are assigned and due dates established, as well as points of contact identified. The initial design conference may be scheduled and conducted at the project installation after the Post Award Conference and prior to initiation of significant preliminary design development, although it is recommended that the partnering process be initiated at the time of or before the initial design conference. Limit any design work conducted after award and prior to this conference to site work.

1.7.3.3 Design Charrette

After the Initial Design Conference and prior to the first interim design package submission, submit the plans and design narrative from the awarded contract proposal as the Charrette submittal, which clearly document the type of structural framing system proposed. The Charrette is an opportunity to improve the design proposal documents at no increased cost.

SECTION 01 33 16 Page 7

a. Capture the outcome of the Charrette Meeting in a Charrette Report consisting of minutes, revised drawings, and updated narrative.

b. A conference call will be scheduled approximately five days after the Charrette Report to discuss the Report. A direction to proceed with subsequent design based on the agreed charrette report will be provided after the conference call.

c. Provide a Revised Charrette Document to all parties.

d. The decisions from the Revised Charrette Conference Call must be incorporated into the Interim Design Submittal.

1.7.3.4 Regular Progress Meetings

After the award of the contract, schedule regular progress meetings with the government. Set up these progress meetings via Microsoft Teams. The intent of these meetings is to help both the contractor and government to progress the project in such a manner that will resolve any issues or forecast project work. Within those meetings, scheduled deliverables may be the primary discussion. Depending on the phase of the project these regular meetings can be held bi-weekly or as needed. Include the Contracting Officer's Representative, Project Manager, and engineering staff from the government's side; other personnel will be included as required. The Contractor will have the discretion of who they will include and the schedule for these meetings.

1.8 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING

1.8.1 Electronic Design Submittal

All design submittals must be submitted electronically through RMS. The Government will provide a link via an upload platform to submit large files.

1.8.1.1 Malicious Content

Scan all electronic files for malicious viruses using commercially available scanning program that is routinely updated to identify and remove current virus threats.

1.8.2 Advanced Model File Packaging

Execute the following actions for all design drawing and modeling files:

1.8.2.1 Autodesk Revit, AutoCAD

a. Purge unused

b. Audit

c. Compress

1.8.3 PDF File Packaging

Utilize PDF file format in accordance with ISO 32000-1 and ISO 19005-3 .

Provide files from original sources, text-searchable, and saved in "Standard" (uncompressed) resolution whenever possible.

SECTION 01 33 16 Page 8

1.8.3.1 Bookmarking

a. Bookmark drawing submittal PDF sets to include one Parent Bookmark per Discipline and one Child Bookmark per sheet within each Discipline.

Format Parent Bookmarks as "Discipline" (e.g. Architectural). Format Child Bookmarks as "Sheet ID Sheet Title" (e.g. A-101 First Floor Plan).

b. Bookmark specification submittal PDF sets using the SpecsIntact Print Processing PDF Print/Publish feature, combining processed sections into one PDF document. Insert the Submittal Register into the file where specified by Section 01 33 00 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES and bookmark.

c. Bookmark design analysis and calculation submittal PDF sets to include one Parent Bookmark per design analysis section and one Child Bookmark per major paragraph per section. Format Parent Bookmarks as "Section" (e.g. Architectural). Format Child Bookmarks as "major paragraph designation Sheet Title" (e.g. 2.1 Primary Facility Functions).

1.8.3.2 Hyperlinking

Hyperlink all reference annotation symbology (e.g. section cut symbology, detail callout symbology, elevation callout symbology) to the sheet referenced by the annotation.

PART 2 PRODUCTS

2.1 ADVANCED MODELING DOCUMENTS

2.1.1 Advanced Modeling Electronic Files

2.1.1.1 Quality Control (QC) Reports

2.1.1.1.1 Graphics Standards Checks and Report

Provide QC checks on all graphic deliverables demonstrating that the fonts, dimensions, symbology and other design document formatting are compliant with the requirements of this specification. Identify and report non-compliant content.

2.1.1.1.2 CAD Standards Checks and Report

Provide QC checks on CAD Output demonstrating that filenames, sheet borders, layer/level names, and symbology are compliant with the requirements of this specification. Identify and report non-compliant content.

2.2 DESIGN DRAWINGS

From advanced model files, produce design drawings that describe the scope of the Contract for all required submittals including all interim and final deliverables.

2.2.1 Electronic Drawing Files

Provide electronic drawing files in PDF format for each project drawing in the design set.

SECTION 01 33 16 Page 9

2.2.2 Drawing Index

Provide an index of drawings sheet as part of the drawing set, and an electronic table of all drawings submitted. Include the electronic file name, the sheet reference number, the sheet number, and the sheet title containing the data for each drawing.

2.2.3 Shop Drawings Used as Design Drawings

Design drawings may be prepared similar to shop drawings to minimize fabrication submittals after the Design Complete Submittals. Prepare and submit with the design drawings, appropriate connection, fabrication, layout, and product specific drawings.

2.2.3.1 Drawing Format For Shop Drawings Used as Design Drawings

Use the Contractor-originated drawings as the basis for the record drawings. Conform shop drawings included as design documents with the same drawing requirements such as drawing format, sheet size, layering, lettering, and title block used in design drawings.

2.2.3.2 Identification of Shop Drawings Used as Design Drawings

Indicate which shop drawings are being submitted as design drawings in the transmittal letter.

2.2.4 Seal on Documents

Sign, date, and seal all Contractor-originated design drawings by the registered engineer of the respective discipline. This is the seal of the Designer of Record for that drawing. For specifications, seal each individual section's table of contents. Application of the electronic seal and signature accepts responsibility for the work shown thereon.

2.3 SPECIFICATIONS

Provide a Contractor-originated design specification that, in conjunction with the drawings, demonstrates compliance with materials, equipment, execution, and field quality control requirements of the RFP and accepted proposal.

2.3.1 Specifications Format

Utilize the Unified Facility Guide Specifications (UFGS) using MASTERFORMAT 2004 numbering system. The UFGS are available through the “Whole Building Design Guide” website, http://wbdg.org . Manufacturers’ product specifications, utilizing CSI’s Manu-Spec, three part format may also be used in conjunction with the UFGS. The DORs must edit and expand the appropriate Specifications to insure that all project design requirements, current code requirements, and regulatory requirements are met. Specifications shall clearly identify, where appropriate, specific products chosen to meet the contract requirements (i.e., manufacturers’ brand names and model numbers or similar product information). Note that the UFGS are NOT written for fabrication supply contracts and must be edited appropriately. For instance, they assume that the Government will approve most submittals, whereas in fabrication supply contracts, the DOR has that action, unless this Solicitation requires Government approval for specific submittals. The Designer of Record should also note that some UFGS sections might either prescribe requirements exceeding the

SECTION 01 33 16 Page 10

Government’s own design standards in applicable references or contain requirements that should be selected where appropriately required by the applicable references. At any rate, where the UFGS are consistent with other major, well known master commercial guide specifications, then generally retain such requirements, as good practices. Process the specifications with the SpecsIntact software package located at https://www.wbdg.org/dod/specsintact .

a. Edit and expand the appropriate specifications to ensure that all project design requirements, current code requirements, and regulatory requirements are met. Design specifications may be prepared that include manufacturer specific data and catalog cuts in lieu of non-proprietary, descriptive specifications. Clearly identify, where appropriate, specific products chosen to meet the contract requirements (i.e., manufacturers' brand names and model numbers or similar product information).

b. Note that the UFGS are based on design-bid-build contracting and will require editing to apply to a fabrication and supply project. For instance, they assume that the Government will approve most submittals, whereas in design-build, the DOR has that action, unless this solicitation requires Government approval for specific submittals.

c. Organize project sections not based on UFGS in accordance with CSI MasterFormat and UFC 1-300-02 .

2.3.2 Identification of Manufacturer's Product Data Used as Specifications.

Provide complete and legible catalog cut sheets, product data, installation instructions, operation and maintenance instructions, warranty, and certifications for products and equipment for which final material and equipment choices have been made. Indicate, by prominent notation, each product that is being submitted including optional manufacturer's features, and indicate where the product data shows compliance with the Contract requirements.

2.3.3 Specifications Packaging

Provide specifications to include the following:

a. Cover sheet and project table of contents.

b. Specification sections, each section with a table of contents.

c. Manufacturer's Product Data. If providing as attachments to the applicable specification section, incorporate as attachment reference within the section and section table of contents.

2.3.4 Specification Deliverable

Submit a bundled specification package in PDF format for each design package. As a minimum, bookmark each specification section in the bundled package. Also, submit the source files, in the processing system format, used to create the PDF.

2.4 DESIGN ANALYSIS

Prepare, organize, and present a design analysis that will document the general parameters, functional and technical requirements, design

SECTION 01 33 16 Page 11 objectives, design assumptions, and provides design calculations applicable to a project's design. Organize the design analysis into three parts; Part 1 - General Description; Part 2 - Design Requirements and Provisions; and Part 3 - O&M Provisions.

The design analysis states the purpose, authorization, applicable criteria and the project description for the project, and provides a summary of the factors influencing the choice of the environmental, architectural, structural, mechanical, and electrical design features used in the project along with an indication of how the initial costs and life cycle costs were factored into final selections. In the final design analysis clearly and succinctly include:

a. An introductory description of the project concepts that addresses the salient points of the design

b. An orderly and comprehensive documentation of criteria and rationale for system selection, supported by life cycle cost analysis.

c. Identify all applicable codes and criteria and highlight specific requirements within these codes and criteria for critical issues in the design.

d. Required calculations as specified and as needed to support the design.

1) Finite Element Analysis (FEA)

Perform an FEA for the following components: global model with all primary structural members (except the skin plate assembly), detailed models of the connections for the hinge and pintle assemblies, and detailed models of the horizontal framing members and panel point locations on the channel side under concentrated barge impact load.

2) Stress

3) Deflection

e. Proposed load cases and load combinations including all adjustment factors. Refer to Paragraph LOADS AND LOAD COMBINATIONS within Section 01 10 00 STATEMENT OF WORK.

2.4.1 Design Requirements and Provisions

Include subparts for each major design discipline and basic project design requirements for each discipline that justify and validate design decisions.

2.4.1.1 Environmental

Include an impact assessment checklist covering air and water effects from the project; worker health and safety; transportation and disposal regulation requirements; quality control for chemical sampling/analysis;

special wildlife, plant, and endangered species considerations.

2.4.1.1 Structural

Include gate analysis and design.

SECTION 01 33 16 Page 12

2.4.1.2 Mechanical

Include bearing systems and operating machinery connection design.

2.4.2 Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Provisions

Identify design provisions made to enhance and to reduce the cost of operating and maintaining the gate when completed. Identify any special safety considerations or occupational health related considerations that may affect operation and maintenance activities as a result of the final design.

2.4.3 Design Analysis Packaging

2.4.3.1 Assembly and Identification

Assemble design analysis in a single volume with a table of contents if possible. Include a cover page in the basis of design for each discipline indicating the project title and locations, contract number, table of contents, and tabbed separations or bookmarks for quick reference. At a minimum tab or bookmark for each discipline.

2.4.4 Calculations

Place the signature and seal of the designer of record responsible for the work on the cover page of the calculations for the respective design discipline. Include the native finite element analysis model files in calculations.

2.4.4.1 Structural

a. Identify all loads to be used for design. Submit proposed load cases and load combinations including all adjustment factors for approval before design commences. Refer to Paragraph LOADS AND LOAD COMBINATIONS within Section 01 10 00 STATEMENT OF WORK for further information. Describe the method of providing lateral stability for the structural system to meet applicable hydraulic and impact forces.

Include sufficient calculations to verify the adequacy of the method.

b. Provide calculations for all principal structural members and bracing and secondary members.

c. Computer generated calculations must identify the program name, source, and version. Provide input data, including loads, loading diagrams, node diagrams, and adequate documentation to illustrate the design. The schematic models used for input must show, as a minimum, nodes/joints, element/members, materials/properties, and all loadings, induced settlements/deflections, etc., and a list of load combinations. Include an output listing for maximum/minimum stresses/forces and deflections for each element and the reactions for each loading case and combination.

d. Fully coordinate and integrate the overall structural design between two different or interfacing construction types. Provide substantiation of structural, etc., as applicable, through the interfaces.

SECTION 01 33 16 Page 13

2.4.4.2 Mechanical

a. Include analysis and calculations for all bearings, ropes, and turnbuckles, including material selection.

PART 3 EXECUTION

3.1 DESIGN SUBMITTALS

Include all deliverable products and associated support documents described in Part 2 of this specification with each design submittal.

3.2 DESIGN SUBMITTALS PHASES

The stages of design submittals described below define requirements with respect to process and content. Determine how to best plan and execute the design and review process for the project, within the parameters listed below. As a minimum, provide at least three interim design submittal, at least one final design submittal before fabrication of a design package may proceed, and at least one Design Complete submittal that documents the accepted design.

3.2.1 Interim Design Submittals

Submit a 30 Percent Interim Design , 60 Percent Interim Design , and 90 Percent Interim Design for review, representing a complete package with all design disciplines. This is not necessarily a hold point for the design process; the Contractor may designate the interim design submittal(s) as a snapshot and proceed with design development at its own risk.

The 30 Percent Interim Design at a minimum must include calculations necessary to size main structural members, and forces transmitted through the pintle, hinge, and machinery connection. Also include further development of the concept drawings, although it is not necessary to determine structural member sizing at this time. Include at minimum for the specifications a table of contents for all sections expected to be included in the project.

3.2.1.1 Interim Design Development Management

Maintain a fully functional configuration management system as described herein to track design revisions, regardless of whether or not there is a need for a formal interim design development review.

3.2.1.2 Fast-Tracking

Fast-tracking is not allowed for this project.

3.2.1.3 Over-the-Shoulder Progress Review

To facilitate a streamlined design process, the Government and the Contractor may agree to one-on-one review or small group reviews, on-line, or at the Contractor's design offices or other agreed location, when practicable to the parties. Coordinate such reviews to minimize or eliminate disruptions to the design process. Due to limits on project funding, utilize the maximum virtual teaming methods. Facilitate these reviews with electronic format data transfer and collaboration. Through the partnering process, find ways to facilitate the quality assurance

SECTION 01 33 16 Page 14 process and to facilitate meeting or bettering the design schedule.

3.2.2 100 Percent Final Design Submission

After acceptance of the interim design package, revise the design package to incorporate the comments generated and resolved, perform and document a back-check review and submit the final design package.

3.2.3 Design Complete Submittals

After the 100% final design submission and review conference for a design package, revise the design package to incorporate the comments generated and resolved in the final review conferences, perform and document a back-check review and submit the final, design complete documents, which represents released for fabrication documents.

3.3 DESIGN PLATFORM AND FILE FORMATS

Design the project using the systems and platforms defined below:

3.3.1 CAD

3.3.1.1 Native CAD Authoring Content

All content produced through CAD authoring software outside of any object/element based BIM or CIM platform must be compliant with ERDC/ITL SR-23-1 and ERDC/ITL SR-24-3 . Autodesk AutoCAD Template Files Most recent version at the time of Contract award. Download form the CAD/BIM Technology Center website as part of the A/E/C Work Structure.

3.3.1.2 CAD Extracted From BIM/CIM Authoring Platforms

Provide editable CAD sheet files extracted from the BIM or CIM files. CAD content exported from a BIM or CIM modeling platform must comply with ERDC/ITL SR-23-1 and ERDC/ITL SR-24-3 .

3.4 DESIGN CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT (DCM)

3.4.1 Procedures

Develop and maintain effective, DCM procedures to control and track all revisions to the design documents subsequent to the Interim Design Submission and continuing through fabrication. After the final design is accepted, this process provides control of and documents revisions to the accepted design (See Special Contract Requirement: Deviating From the Accepted Design). Submit the DCM procedures within the Design Quality Control Plan.

a. Include authorities and concurrences in the DCM system to authorize revisions, including documentation as to why the revision is required.

b. An internal system may be used with interactive Government concurrences or the Government's "Dr Checks Design Review and Checking System" may be used.

c. Make the DCM data available to the Government reviewers at all times.

SECTION 01 33 16 Page 15

3.4.2 Government Quality Assurance Reviews (QARs)

The Government will perform QARs on all design submissions. The purpose of this paragraph is to inform the Contractor the level of effort required to respond to Government comments. Comments will be made on all work products from the following personnel which will encompass all disciplines:

a. USACE Jacksonville Engineering Division

b. USACE Jacksonville Construction Division

c. USACE Jacksonville Operations Division

d. USACE Inland Navigation Design Center

e. Third-Party A-E Firm #1

f. Third-Party A-E Firm #2

In total, there are expected to be approximately 15 reviewers between all USACE teams and both independent A-E firms. As there are three interim design submittals and two final design submittals, expect a total of 30 separate reviews to be conducted within ProjNet. These reviews will be conducted as separate reviews within the ProjNet system as described in the paragraph below.

3.4.3 Tracking Design Review Comments

Although an internal system for overall design configuration management is allowed, use the ProjNet Design Review and Checking System to initiate, respond to, resolve and track Government design review comments.

ProjNet can be accessed at https://projnet.org/

The Government will set up the project in ProjNet. Throughout the design process parties enter, track, and back-check comments using the ProjNet system. Designers of Record annotate comments timely and specifically to indicate exactly the action to be taken or why the action is not required. After the design review conference and prior to the next design submittal for the package, the DORs annotate those comments that require DOR action or design revision to show how and where it has been addressed in the design documents. These procedures are part of the required design configuration management plan. Flag comments considered critical by the conference participants.

3.4.3.1 ProjNet Initial Account Set-Up

Identify a contact person within the office to act as the administrator for all Contractor personnel, including subcontractors, that will be accessing the ProjNet system. Through the Contracting Officer, coordinate with the Project Manager and the District ProjNet administrator for system access, system instruction and comment process instructions.

PROJNET contains an introductory file and other tutorial material that can be accessed once user accounts have been established. Upon log in, select Portals/User Documentation.

3.4.3.2 ProjNet Review Comments

Annotate and resolve all comments prior to the next submittal. Include the ProjNet comments and responses in the design analysis for record in the next design submittal for the package.

a. Upon review of comments prior to the design review conference, the

SECTION 01 33 16 Page 16

DOR(s) evaluate the comments. Include exactly what action will be taken or why action is not required.

b. After the review conference, the DOR(s) formally respond to each applicable comment in ProjNet a second time, prior to the next submittal, clearly indicating what action was taken and what drawing/spec/analysis changed. Designers of Record are encouraged to directly contact reviewers to discuss and agree to the formal comment responses rather than relying only on ProjNet and review meetings to discuss comments. With the next design submittal, reviewers will back-check answers to the comments against the new submittal, in addition to reviewing additional design work.

c. Clearly annotate in ProjNet those comments that require effort outside the requirements of the contract. Do not proceed with work outside the contract until a modification to the contract is properly executed.

3.5 DISCIPLINE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

Provide interim design deliverables that include drawings, specifications, and design analysis for the part of design that the Contractor considers ready for review.

a. Drawings: Include comments from any previous design conferences incorporated into the documents to provide an interim design for the feature of work submitted.

b. Specifications: Provide specifications to ensure that all project design features are addressed, meeting current code requirements, and regulatory requirements. Use the track changes feature (redlines) to facilitate review of additions and deletions.

c. Design Analysis: Prepare and present design analysis under the authority of the DOR, with calculations necessary to substantiate and support all design documents submitted. Address design substantiation required by the applicable codes and references.

d. Gate Rendering : Provide a draft color computer, artist, or hand drawn rendering with the conceptual design submittal of the gate. After Government review and acceptance, provide a final rendering, including the following:

(1) One image file in JPG format.

3.5.1 Structural Systems

3.5.1.1 General

a. Identify all loads to be used for design.

b. Describe the method of providing lateral stability for the structural system to meet dead load, gravity loads, hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads, operating loads, and impact load requirements. Include sufficient calculations to verify the adequacy of the method.

c. Calculations for all principal members and bracing and secondary members.

d. Drawings showing structural members for framing plans as applicable.

SECTION 01 33 16 Page 17

e. Typical sections.

h. Identify the program name, source, and version used for computer generated calculations. Provide input data, including loads, loading diagrams, node diagrams, and documentation to illustrate the design.

On the schematic models used for input, show, at a minimum, nodes/joints, element/members, materials/properties, and all loadings;

induced settlements/deflections; and a list of load combinations.

Include an output listing for maximum and minimum stresses, forces, and deflections for each element, and the reactions for each loading case and combination.

3.5.2 Mechanical Systems

a. Identify all loads to be used for design.

b. Describe the method of alloy identification and environmentally friendly grease requirements.

c. Calculations for all bearing sizes.

3.6 INTERIM DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

At least three interim design submittals (30%, 60%, 90%), review, and review conference is required for each design package. Additional interim design conferences or over-the-shoulder reviews may be scheduled, as needed, to assure continued Government concurrence with the design work.

Include the interim submittal review periods and conferences in the Section 01 32 16 FABRICATION PROGRESS SCHEDULES and indicate in periodic schedule updates what part of the design work is at what percentage of completion. See also paragraph INTERIM DESIGN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW WAIVER for a waiver to the formal interim design review.

3.6.1 Submission Review

After receipt of an Interim Design submission, the Government requires 30 calendar days after receipt of the submission to review and comment on the interim design submittal. For smaller design packages, especially those that involve only one or a few separate design disciplines, the parties may agree on a shorter review period or alternative review methods (e.g., over-the -shoulder or electronic file sharing), through the partnering process.

a. For each interim design review submittal, the Contracting Officer will furnish a single consolidated, validated set of comments from the various design sections and from other concerned agencies involved in the review process using the ProjNet Design Review and Checking System. The review will be for conformance with the technical requirements of the Contract.

b. The Government reserves the right to reject design document submittals if comments are deemed significant.

c. Furnish disposition of all comments, in writing, through ProjNet. If there are technical disagreements with any comments, clearly outline, with justification, the reasons for disagreement and noncompliance within seven calendar days after receipt of these comments.

SECTION 01 33 16 Page 18

d. The Contractor is cautioned that if it believes the action required by any comment exceeds the requirements of this contract, that it should take no action and notify the Contracting Officer in writing immediately.

3.6.2 Interim Review Conference

Hold a virtual Interim Review conference for each design submittal.

Attendees include, at a minimum, the DOR(s) involved in development of the design submittal. Schedule the conference to take place after comments have been evaluated in ProjNet. Notify the Contracting Officer of any comments that with concurrence would require further design development.

3.6.3 Conference Documentation

3.6.3.1 Minutes and Comment Process

Provide meeting minutes within five work days after the conference adjourns, and enter final resolution of all comments into ProjNet.

Include copies of comments, annotated with comment action agreed on, with the minutes.

a. Resolve issues remaining open after the conference adjourns by immediate follow-on action to close the issue within 30 calendar days.

b. Incorporate comments as agreed upon during the conference.

3.6.3.2 Availability

In order to facilitate the Government code and contract conformance reviews, identify, track resolution of, and maintain all comments and action items generated during the design review process. Make this available to the designers and reviewers prior to the subsequent design reviews.

3.7 FINAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

Provide final design submittals that consist of 100% complete drawings, specifications, submittal register, design analyses for Government review and acceptance. The Government requires 30 calendar days after receipt of the submission to review and comment on the final design submittal

a. In order to expedite the final design review, prior to the conference, ensure that the design configuration management data and all review comment resolutions are up-to-date.

b. Perform independent technical reviews and back-checks of previous comment resolutions. For independent design reviews, provide, as a minimum, identification of the Independent Technical Review (ITR) team, the ITR review comments, responses and the record of resolution of the comments, and certification form. Refer to Attachment A for certification form.

3.7.1 Design Drawings

Submit drawings complete with all contract requirements incorporated into the documents to provide a 100% design for each package submitted. In addition to all native Advanced Modeling files, provide separate electronic files in a PDF format.

SECTION 01 33 16 Page 19

3.7.2 Design Analysis

Provide a design analysis with calculations necessary to validate and support all design work submitted. Expand and advance calculations and information presented in the interim design stage to the current level of design. The responsible DOR(s) stamp, sign and date the design analysis.

3.7.3 Specifications

Provide specifications 100% complete and in final form.

3.7.4 Submittal Register

Provide an updated, cumulative submittal register with each design package that identifies the design and fabrication submittals required by that design package. For the design complete submittal, provide the exported comma-delimited file from SpecsIntact.

3.8 DESIGN COMPLETE DOCUMENT REQUIREMENTS

After the Final Design Submission and Review Conference, revise the design documents for the design package to incorporate the comments generated and resolved in the final review conference. Perform and document a back-check review and submit the final, design complete documents . The deliverable includes all documentation and supporting design analysis in final form, as well as the final review comments, disposition and the back-check. As part of the quality assurance process, the Government may perform a review of the released for fabrication documentation. Promptly correct any errors or omissions found during the Government review. The Government requires 14 calendar days after receipt of the submission to review the design complete documents and backcheck outstanding comments from the previous final design submission.

3.9 ACCEPTANCE AND RELEASE FOR FABRICATION

After acceptance of the Design Complete Document(s) the Contracting Officer will allow fabrication to start for that design package.

Acceptance will only be granted once all comments within ProjNet have closed backchecks. This includes all interim designs, the final design, and the design complete submission.

Government review and acceptance of design submittals is for contract conformance only and does not relieve the Contractor from responsibility to fully adhere to the requirements of the contract, including the Contractor's accepted proposal, or limit the Contractor's responsibility of design as prescribed under Special Contract Requirement:

"Responsibility of the Contractor for Design" or limit the Government's rights under the terms of the contract. The Government reserves the right to rescind inadvertent acceptance of design submittals containing contract deviations not separately and expressly identified in the submittal for Government consideration and approval.

-- End of Section --

SECTION 01 33 16 Page 20

2.2.4 Seal on Documents

3.5.2 Mechanical Systems