W912EK22R0008 AMENDMENT 0002.pdf

96514720887500

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The reason for this amendment is to extend the propsal due date, amend the Source Selection Plan, Wage Determination, and Plan Set: Miter Gate Machinary Installation.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 43

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W912EK22R0008

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

25-Apr-2022

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

24-May-2022

CODE

CONTRACTING DIVISION

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 1500 ROCK ISLAND D

ROCK ISLAND IL 61201

W912EK 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912EK22R0008

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0002

PLEASE NOTE: Past Performance Questionnaires submitted in response to previous solicitations should not be submitted for this solicitation. New Past Performance Questionnaires must be submitted in response to this solicitation.

SECTION 00010 - SOLICITATION CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 24-May-2022 02:00 PM to 09-Jun-2022 02:00 PM.

SECTION 00100 - BIDDING SCHEDULE/INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

SOURCE SELECTION PLAN

A. BASIS FOR AWARD

This acquisition is a full and open, competitive procurement utilizing Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) best value continuum source selection procedures in accordance with FAR 15.101-2.

A single award will be made to the Offeror who provides a technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price.

Proposed prices will be evaluated but not scored or otherwise combined with the other aspects of the proposal evaluation.

B. FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED

Factor 1: Price Factor 2: Technical Factor 3: Past Performance

C. EVALUATION APPROACH

All proposals will be evaluated by the Source Selection Team (SST). In order for any offeror to be considered for award, the proposal must receive an “Acceptable” rating in every non-price factor. The two non-price factors are Technical and Past Performance.

Factor 1: Price

Price will be evaluated and considered but will not be scored or combined with other aspects of the proposal evaluation. An award will be made to the lowest priced, technically acceptable proposal. The lowest price will be determined by adding up all listed line items. Offerors shall complete and submit the Schedule of Prices with its proposal and include a price for each line item. Failure to submit a price for any of the required line items on the Schedule of Prices will render the Offeror’s proposal as ineligible for award. Offerors will be allowed one proposal submission.

The Source Selection Evaluation Board will evaluate each Offeror’s price and verify that unbalanced pricing is not present. The Contracting Officer will evaluate each Offeror’s price in accordance with FAR 15.404-1 to determine price reasonableness. Price reasonableness will be determined by comparing all proposed prices, the Independent Government Estimate, and pricing of previous work that is same or similar to the requirement.

The otherwise technically acceptable lowest priced Offeror may be required to confirm/validate their offered price. Certified cost and pricing data are not currently required; however, the Government reserves the right to request such data prior to award.

Factor 2: Technical The Government will evaluate the Technical Proposal on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis.

This factor identifies the minimum requirements that are imperative to successful contract performance.

The Source Selection Team will evaluate the Offeror’s proposal against the factors listed below to determine whether the technical proposal is Acceptable or Unacceptable. To be considered acceptable, all factors under the technical proposal must receive an acceptable rating. The adjectival rating depicts whether or not the offeror’s proposal meets the Technical Proposal factor requirements.

Table C-1

Technical Proposal Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings

Rating Description

ACCEPTABLE Proposal meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

UNACCEPTABLE Proposal does not meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Subfactor 1: Schedule

Technical Subfactor 1 evaluates the Offeror’s proposed schedule for the lock closure period.

The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s proposed schedule to determine understanding of and compliance with the Government’s requirements.

Minimum requirements for this factor include a preliminary bar chart schedule showing the following activities as outlined in Specification Section 01 14 00, WORK RESTRICTIONS

a. Survey of existing lock components

b. Receipt of Government Furnished Equipment (GFE)

c. Precast concrete segment procurement and delivery

d. Installation of dewatering systems and dewatering/rewatering/dewatering/rewatering of lock chamber.

e. Government miter gate removal/installation activities

f. Installation of miter gate anchorage, quoin, pintle

g. Adjustment of the miter gates

h. Miter gate machinery installation at each corner

i. Valve recess construction at each corner

j. Control stand construction at each corner

k. Switchboard building construction

l. Construction of the electrical crossover ductbank

m. Utility trench construction on each wall

n. Electrical installation

o. Bubbler system installation

p. Commissioning

n. Curing of concrete

The Government will evaluate the schedule based on demonstration of all activities listed above being complete by the end of the lock closure period, and the sequences provided are logical and activity durations are reasonable.

The Government will evaluate Subfactor 1: Schedule on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis based on the descriptions outlined in Table C-2. Offerors who are determined “Unacceptable” will not be eligible for award.

Table C-2. Subfactor 1: Schedule Evaluation Ratings

ACCEPTABLE The proposed Schedule includes all required activities and sequences provide are logical and activity durations are reasonable. Based on the Schedule proposed by the Offeror, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

UNACCEPTABLE The proposed Schedule does not include all required activities and/or sequences provide are not logical and activity durations are reasonable. Based on the Schedule proposed by the Offeror, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Subfactor 2: Experience

The Government will evaluate relevant experience of the Offeror, and/or committed sub-contractor as described in the following.

Relevant experience is what an Offeror, and/or committed sub-contractor(s), has done on projects that are the same or similar in size, scope and complexity as the project in this solicitation.

The Offeror shall submit a minimum of three (3) projects which demonstrate experience similar to this requirement and have been substantially completed within the last ten (10) years prior to the issue date of the solicitation. The project information must demonstrate relevancy to the project described in the solicitation and all information submitted must be accurate, current, and complete.

Substantially complete as defined for this solicitation: A project is considered substantially complete when the project is sufficient for the use of which it is intended, as of the closing date of this solicitation.

All project examples shall contain a Point of Contact (POC) as well as one alternate Point of Contact, to include the name, job title of the POC, address, telephone, and e-mail address. The POC and alternate shall be familiar with the construction performance of the contractor and be a representative of the owner/customer/prime contractor, not affiliated with the contractor. The POC and alternate shall be able to verify the experience cited.

Minimum requirements for this factor include:

Offeror or subcontractor must have at least two (2) projects demonstrating experience with Floating Plant on Navigable Waterways.

Offeror or subcontractor must have at least two (2) projects demonstrating experience with working on a lock or dam structure.

Offeror must have at least two (2) projects demonstrating experience with construction of concrete structures involving formwork over 4 feet high.

Offeror or subcontractor must have at least two (2) projects demonstrating experience with the installation and commissioning of industrial electrical or mechanical systems.

If using a subcontractor as team members in demonstrating experience, describe the roles the prime contractor and subcontractors will play in the project and the percentage of any type each will perform. For the purpose of this requirement, subcontractors are defined as members of an Offeror’s overall team who are expected to perform ten (10%) percent or more of the proposed effort.

If using experience for work performed as a joint venture, the experience information must state in detail the nature of the work performed by both of the joint venture partners, the total percentage of the overall contract performed by both of the joint venture partners, and the total amount of work performed by both of the joint venture partners.

The Government will evaluate Subfactor 2: Experience on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis based on the descriptions outlined in Table C-3. Offerors who are determined “Unacceptable” will not be eligible for award.

Table C-3. Subfactor 2: Experience Evaluation Ratings

ACCEPTABLE Offerors (in combination with experience of their Joint Venture (JV) partners or committed key subcontractors) who show experience described in the experience subfactor in the past ten (10) years will be determined to meet the minimum requirements of the contract and will be found Acceptable.

UNACCEPTABLE Offerors (in combination with the experience of their JV partners or committed key subcontractors) failing to show experience described for the experience subfactor in the past ten (10) years will be found Unacceptable.

Factor 3: Past Performance

The Government will evaluate the Past Performance factor on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis based on the descriptions outlined in Table C-4. Offerors who are determined “Unacceptable” will not be eligible for award.

Table C-4. Past Performance Evaluation Ratings

ACCEPTABLE Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below)

UNACCEPTABLE Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or “neutral”) past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating shall be considered “acceptable.”

3.3.2. Evaluations of past performance shall be in accordance with this plan while utilizing the Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) and forms in Appendix D, Enclosure 1.

3.3.4. An Offeror’s past performance is a measure of the degree to which an Offeror was successful on projects of similar size. The Government will evaluate the information/performance data provided by Offerors, as well as information from other sources, such as Government databases.

3.3.5. The Offeror shall submit up to five (5) PPQ’s for work performed since 2010 for construction projects with a dollar value equal to, or greater than five million dollars. If more than five (5) are submitted, only the five (5) most recent projects will be considered. The forms shall identify whether the contract is active or complete, whether the contract was with a Government (federal, state, local, etc) or a commercial entity, and whether the Offeror was the prime contractor, a subcontractor, or member of a joint venture. The PPQ respondent must have been a client, or client representative, with whom the Offeror/subcontractor had a contract, or subcontract (if applicable) for one or more projects.

3.3.6. The PPQ respondent must hold, or have held at the time, a senior position in the client organization with responsibilities for either contract administration, quality control, engineering, or technical supervision, or was otherwise in a position to evaluate the Offeror’s performance in executing the contract or subcontract. The PPQ respondent must have first-hand knowledge of the Offeror’s performance.

3.3.7. In addition to the above, past performance information may be obtained from established systems such as the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; and may be obtained from other sources available to the Government, such as the Defense Contract Management Agency; and interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, and Fee Determining Officials.

3.3.8. The Government reserves the right to evaluate the past performance of any subcontractor identified in the Offeror’s proposal as part of its assessment of the acceptability of that Offeror’s proposal.

3.3.9. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

D. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION

INTRODUCTION: The Offeror’s proposal shall be submitted electronically via email to the Contract Specialist, Jeffrey Voss, jeffrey.r.voss@usace.army.mil, as set forth below. The first page of the Standard Form 1442, or solicitation, provides the Government address and receipt date for proposal submittal.

The Offeror’s proposal shall consist of the following three (3) volumes:

I – Price Proposal II – Technical Proposal III- Past Performance

Files shall not contain classified data. The use of hyperlinks in proposals is prohibited.

Offerors are cautioned that “parroting” of the Technical requirements or the Project Scope of Work with a statement of intent to perform does not reflect an understanding of the requirement or capability to perform. Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal. Proprietary information shall be clearly marked.

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: The proposal submission requirements are as follows:

Each volume shall be submitted as a separate PDF file. Each volume shall be clearly labeled with its title. Offeror shall sign the first two pages of SF 1442.

Typing should be single spaced. Each paragraph shall be separated by at least one (1) blank line. A standard, 12-point minimum font size applies. Arial or New Times Roman fonts are required. Tables and illustrations may use a reduced font size no less than 8-point and may be landscape.

Table D-1 illustrates the volumes of material that shall be submitted:

Table D-1: Proposal Submission Requirements

VOLUME TITLE DIGITAL

COPIES

MAXIMUM

PAGES

I - Price Proposal 1 N/A

Signed SF1442 and Acknowledgement of Amendments

N/A

Schedule of Prices N/A

Representations, Certifications, and other Solicitation, Offer and Award Documents

N/A

Bid Guarantee (Bid Bonds) N/A

Joint Venture and/or Articles of Organization for LLC, if applicable

N/A

**Small Business Subcontracting Plan- IF

A LARGE BUSINESS

N/A

II – Technical Proposal 1 50

Schedule

Experience

III - Past Performance 1 20

** A Small Business Subcontracting Plan shall be prepared in accordance with FAR 52.219- 9 and is excluded from the page count.

Note: Pages that exceed the required page limitations will not be evaluated. Additional pages over the maximum allowed will be removed or not read and will not be evaluated by the Government. Pages submitted for organization purpose to include cover sheets, title pages, and indexes do not count toward to page limitations. Past Performance Questionnaires do not count toward page limitations.

PROPOSAL FILES:

a. Format. The submission shall be clearly indexed and logically assembled. Each volume shall be clearly identified and shall begin at the top of a page. All pages of each volume shall be appropriately numbered and identified by the complete company name, date and RFP number in the header and/or footer. A Table of Contents should be created using the Table of Content feature in MS Word. MS Word (doc) files shall use the following page setup parameters:

Margins – Top, Bottom, Left, Right – 1” Gutter – 0” From Edge – Header, Footer 0.5” Page Size, Width – 8.5” Page Size, Height – 11”

NOTE: 11x17 pages are acceptable for tables/graphic representations; however, each 11x17 page counts as two (2) pages.

The following additional restrictions apply:

b. File Packaging. Files shall be in read-only format, using PDF files. If disc are submitted, each disc shall be externally labeled with the volume number, date, and the Offeror’s name.

**Note – Self extracting exe. files are not acceptable.

CONTENT ORGANIZATION:

All information shall be confined to the appropriate file. The Offeror shall confine submissions to essential matters, sufficient to define the proposal in a concise manner, to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal. Proprietary information shall be clearly marked. Each volume of the proposal shall consist of a Table of Contents, along with the detailed information provided below:

VOLUME I – Price Proposal: The volume shall consist of all information required to support the offered price. Certified cost and pricing data are not currently required; however, the Government reserves the right to request such data prior to award. No pricing information shall be contained in any other volume of this proposal. There are no page limits for this volume.

Other than U.S. Small Business Offerors must submit a subcontracting plan meeting the requirements of FAR 52.219-9 and DFARS 252.219-7003 (or DFARS 252.219-7004 if the Offeror has a comprehensive subcontracting plan) to be eligible for award. The Subcontracting Plan is NOT rated.

VOLUME II – Technical Proposal: The volume shall consist of all information required to support the technical requirements and shall not exceed fifty (50) pages. No technical information shall be contained in any other volume. The volume shall be organized into the following sections:

Subfactor 1: Schedule

Subfactor 2: Experience

VOLUME III – Past Performance Proposal: This volume shall contain past performance information and shall not exceed 20 pages.

Past Performance Questionnaires do not count toward the page limitation.

No past performance information should be contained in any other volume of this proposal. Past Performance Questionnaire:

The Offeror shall submit up to five (5) Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) Forms which identify if the contract is active or complete; if the contract was for the Government (Federal, state, local, etc.) or commercial; and if the Offeror was the prime contractor, a teaming partner, and/or joint venture. If more than five (5) are submitted, only the five (5) most recent projects will be considered. The PPQ respondent must have been a client, or client representative, with whom the Offeror/subcontractor had a contract, or subcontract (if applicable) for one or more projects.

In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Government-wide Past Performance Information Application using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

E. DISCUSSIONS

GENERAL INFORMATION:

In accordance with FAR 15.306(d), discussion sessions with each Offeror may be held. Should discussions take place, all Offerors in the competitive range will be allowed a minimum of seven

(7) calendar days to submit Final Proposal Revisions. However, award may be made without discussions.

DISCUSSION SCHEDULING:

If discussions are conducted, the Contracting Officer will schedule the discussion sessions, and each Offeror will be notified of the time and place at least three (3) business days prior to their discussion session. Appropriate security clearances should be provided by the Offerors in sufficient time to process the requests. The Contracting Officer will provide additional instructions with the notification. The discussion sessions will take place by the method of the Government’s choosing and provided to the contractor in writing.

APPENDIX D

Enclosure 1

USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information

Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain):

Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information

Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work: High Med Routine

How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information

Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: USACE requests that the client completes this questionnaire and submits directly back to the Offeror.

The Offeror will submit the completed questionnaire to USACE with their proposal, and may duplicate this questionnaire for future submission on USACE solicitations. Clients are highly encouraged to submit questionnaires directly to the Offeror. However, questionnaires may be submitted directly to USACE. Please contact the Offeror for USACE POC information. The Government reserves the right to verify any and all information on this form.

USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR

EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

Form PPQ -0

RATING DEFINITION

NOTE

(E) Exceptional

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory

Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance

E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort

E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines

E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)

E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)

Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks.

Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary)

The following have been deleted:

MVR.01 ISLAND ACCESS DEC 2015

SECTION 00800 - SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

The following have been modified:

WAGE RATES

"General Decision Number: IL20220013 05/13/2022

Superseded General Decision Number: IL20210013

State: Illinois

Construction Types: Heavy and Highway

Counties: Ford, Grundy, Iroquois, Kankakee, La Salle, Livingston, Marshall, McLean, Putnam and Woodford Counties in Illinois.

HEAVY AND HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS (does not include landscape projects for GRUNDY COUNTY).

Note: Contracts subject to the Davis-Bacon Act are generally required to pay at least the applicable minimum wage rate required under Executive Order 14026 or Executive Order 13658.

Please note that these Executive Orders apply to covered contracts entered into by the federal government that are subject to the Davis-Bacon Act itself, but do not apply to contracts subject only to the Davis-Bacon Related Acts, including those set forth at 29 CFR 5.1(a)(2)-(60).

|If the contract is entered |. Executive Order 14026 | |into on or after January 30, | generally applies to the | |2022, or the contract is | contract. | |renewed or extended (e.g., an |. The contractor must pay | |option is exercised) on or | all covered workers at | |after January 30, 2022: | least $15.00 per hour (or | | | the applicable wage rate |

| | listed on this wage | | | determination, if it is | | | higher) for all hours | | | spent performing on the | | | contract in 2022. | |If the contract was awarded on|. Executive Order 13658 | |or between January 1, 2015 and| generally applies to the | |January 29, 2022, and the | contract. | |contract is not renewed or |. The contractor must pay all| |extended on or after January | covered workers at least | |30, 2022: | $11.25 per hour (or the | | | applicable wage rate listed| | | on this wage determination,| | | if it is higher) for all | | | hours spent performing on | | | that contract in 2022. |

The applicable Executive Order minimum wage rate will be adjusted annually. If this contract is covered by one of the Executive Orders and a classification considered necessary for performance of work on the contract does not appear on this wage determination, the contractor must still submit a conformance request.

Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the Executive Orders is available at https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/government-contracts.

Modification Number Publication Date 0 01/07/2022 1 02/25/2022 2 03/04/2022 3 03/11/2022 4 04/08/2022 5 05/06/2022 6 05/13/2022

CARP0174-001 05/01/2021

LASALLE, MARSHALL, and PUTNAM COUNTIES

Rates Fringes

CARPENTER........................$ 37.35 33.14

CARP0237-010 05/01/2021

WOODFORD COUNTY

Rates Fringes

CARPENTER........................$ 37.06 31.16

PILEDRIVERMAN....................$ 37.06 31.16

CARP0237-016 05/01/2021

LIVINGSTON, McLEAN, AND FORD COUNTIES

Rates Fringes

CARPENTER........................$ 37.06 31.16

PILEDRIVERMAN....................$ 37.06 31.16

CARP0555-013 06/01/2020

GRUNDY COUNTY

Rates Fringes

CARPENTER........................$ 49.76 35.87

CARP0555-015 05/01/2021

IROQUOIS AND KANKAKEE COUNTIES

Rates Fringes

CARPENTER........................$ 41.50 37.29

ELEC0009-001 05/30/2021

GRUNDY and KANKAKEE COUNTIES

Rates Fringes

Line Construction Groundman...................$ 44.11 62.32% Lineman and Equipment Operator....................$ 56.55 62.32%

ELEC0034-001 03/01/2022

PEORIA DIVISION - MARSHALL (Area West of Bell Plain & Roberts TWPS) AND WOODFORD (Area West of Kansas, Linn, Palestine & Roanoke TWPS) COUNTIES

Rates Fringes

ELECTRICIAN......................$ 39.50 24.24

ELEC0051-001 03/07/2022

FORD, IROQUOIS, LASALLE, LIVINGSTON, MCLEAN, MARSHALL, PUTNAM,

and WOODFORD COUNTIES

Line Construction Groundman/Equipment Operator (All crawler type equipment larger than D-4, 15 ton crane or larger).....$ 50.97 32.5%+7.00 Groundman/Truck Driver......$ 38.66 32.5%+7.00 Lineman and Substation Technician..................$ 56.74 32.5%+7.00

ELEC0176-001 06/01/2020

Rates Fringes

ELECTRICIAN

Grundy County...............$ 47.00 41.09 LaSalle County..............$ 46.60 41.08 Putnam County...............$ 45.45 41.04

ELEC0176-004 06/01/2021

FORD (Remainder), IROQUOIS (Excluding Artesia, Pegeon Grove, Loda, Fountain Creek, Lovejoy & Prairie Green TWPS), LA SALLE (Deer Park, Eden, La Salle, Peru, Utica, & Vermilion) KANKAKEE, & PUTNAM (Granville, Hennipin & Senachwine TWPS) COUNTIES

ELECTRICIAN

Ford, Iroquois, and Putnam Counties....................$ 45.45 41.04 Kankakee and LaSalle Counties....................$ 48.11 42.32

ELEC0197-002 12/01/2021

MCLEAN (Remainder) and WOODFORD (Palestine, El Paso, & Kansas

TWPS) COUNTIES

ELECTRICIAN......................$ 41.25 21.30

ELEC0538-001 08/01/2020

IROQUOIS COUNTY (Fountain Creek, Lovejoy, and Prairie Green

TWPS)

ELECTRICIAN......................$ 36.08 21.88

ELEC0601-002 03/01/2022

FORD (South of Benton TWP), IROQUOIS (Artesia, Pegeon Grove, & Loda TWPS), LA SALLE (Southeastern part), LIVINGSTON, McLEAN (Cropsey, Anchor, Cheney Grove, & Belleflower TWPS), MARSHALL (Roberts, Evans, Bell, Plain, & Bennington TWPS), PUTNAM (Magnolia TWP), and WOODFORD (Linn, Clayton, Minonk, Roanoke, Green, & Panola TWPS) COUNTIES

ELECTRICIAN......................$ 45.21 19.40

* ENGI0150-007 06/01/2021

GRUNDY, KANKAKEE, LA SALLE, LIVINGSTON, AND PUTNAM (East and south of the Illinois River) COUNTIES

OPERATOR: Power Equipment Group 1.....................$ 51.80 44.40 Group 2.....................$ 51.25 44.40 Group 3.....................$ 49.20 44.40 Group 4.....................$ 47.80 44.40 Group 5.....................$ 46.60 44.40

POWER EQUIPMENT OPERATOR CLASSIFICATIONS

GROUP 1: Asphalt Plant*; Asphalt Heater and Planer combination; Asphalt Heater Scarfire*; Asphalt Spreader;

Autograder; ABG Paver*; Backhoes with Caisson Attachment*;

Belt Loader*; Caisson Rigs*; Car Dumper, Central Redi-Mix Plant*; Combination Backhoe Front End Loader Machine (1 cu yd or over Backhoe bucket with attachments); Concrete Breaker (truck mounted)*; Concrete Conveyor; Concrete Paver over 27E cu ft*; Concrete Placer*; Concrete Tube Float;

Cranes, all attachments*; Cranes, Hammerhead, Linden, Peco and machines of a like nature*; Creter Crane; Crusher, stone etc.; All Derricks; Derrick Boats; Derricks, traveling*; Dredges*; Field Mechanic Welder; Formless Curb and Gutter Machine; Gradall and machines of a like nature;

Grader, Elevating; Grader, Motor Grader, Motor Patrol, Auto Patrol, Form Grader, Pull Grader, Subgrader; Guard Rail Post Driver mounted*; Hoists, one, two, and three Drum;

Hydraulic Backhoes; Locomotive, all Mucking Machine; Pile Drivers and Skid Rig*; Pre-Stress Machine; Pump Cretes Dual Ram (Requires frequent lubrication and water)*; Rock/Track Tamper; Rock Drill truck mounted; Roto Mill Grinder, 36"" and over*; Roto Mill Grinder, less than 36""; Slip- Form Paver*; Soil Test Drill Rig, truck mounted*; Straddle Buggies; Hydraulic Telescoping Form (tunnel); Tractor Drawn Belt Loader*; Tractor Drawn Belt Loader with attached Pusher (two engineers); Tractor with boom; Tractaire with attachments; Raised or Blind Hoe Drill (Tunnel & Shaft)*;

Trenching Machine; Truck Mounted Concrete Pump with boom;

Underground Boring and/or Mining Machines 5 ft in diameter and over tunnel, etc.*; Underground Boring and/or Mining Machines under 5 ft; Wheel Excavator* & Widener (Apsco)

GROUP 2: Batch Plant; Bituminous Mixer; Boiler and Throttle Valve; Bulldozer; Car Loader Trailing Conveyors;

Combination Backkhoe Front End Loader Machine, less than 1 cu yd Backhoe Bucket with attachments; Compressor and Throttle Valve; Compressor, common receiver (3); Concrete Breaker or Hydro Hammer; Concrete Grinding Machine;

Concrete Mixer or Paver 7S series to and including 27 cu ft; Concrete Spreader; Concrete Curing Machine, Burlap Machine; Belting Machine and Sealing Machine; Concrete Wheel Saw; Conveyor Muck Cars (Haglund or similar type);

all Drills; Finishing Machine-Concrete; Greaser Engineer;

Highlift Shovels or Front End Loader; Hoist-Sewer Dragging Machine; Hydraulic Boom Trucks, all attachments; Hydro- Blaster requires two operators (one Group 4); Hydraulic Boom Trucks (All attachments); Locomotives, Dinky; Off-Road Hauling Units (including articulating); Laser Screed; Pump Cretes, Squeeze Cretes-Screw Type pumps, Gypsum Bulker and Pump; Rock Drill-Crawler or Skid*; Rock Drill-Truck Mounted*; Roller Asphalt; Rotary Snow Plows; Rototiller, Seaman, etc. self-Propelled; Scoops-Tractor Drawn;

Self-propelled Compactor; Spreader-Chip-Stone etc; Scraper;

Scraper-Prime Mover in Tandem regardless of size (add $1.00 to to Group 2 hourly rate for each hour and for each machine attached thereto); Tank Car Heater; Tractors, Push, pulling Sheeps Foot, Disc, Compactor, etc; Tug Boats

GROUP 3: Boilers; Brooms, all power propelled; Cement Supply Tender; Compressor, Common Receiver (2); Concrete Mixer, two bag and over; Conveyor, Portable; Farm type Tractors used for mowing, seeding, etc; Fireman on Boilers; Forklift Trucks; Grouting Machines; Hoists, Automatic; Hoists, all Elevators; Hoists, Tugger single Drum; Jeep Diggers; Low Boys; Pipe Jacking Machines; Post-Hole Digger; Power Saw, Concrete, Power Driven; Pug Mills; Rollers, other than asphalt; Seed and Straw Blower; Steam Generators; Stump Machine; Winch Trucks with A-Frame; Work Boats;Tamper-Form motor driven

GROUP 4: Air compressor - Small 250 and under (1 to 5 not to exceed a total of 300 ft); Air Compressor - Large over 250;

Combination - Small Equipment Operator; Generators - Small 50 kw and under; Generators - Large, over 50 kw; Heaters, Mechanical; Hydraulic power unit (Pile Driving, Extracting or Drilling); Hydro-Blaster requires two operators (one Group 2); Light Plants All (1 to 5); Pumps, over 3"" (1 to 3, not to exceed a total of 300 ft); Tractaire; Welding Machines (2 through 5); Winches, 4 small electric drill winches

GROUP 5: Bobcats (All); Brick Forklifts; Directional Boring Machine Locator; Oilers

*Equipment requires an Oiler

ENGI0649-004 04/01/2022

McLEAN, MARSHALL, PUTNAM (West of the Illinois River), and

WOODFORD COUNTIES

Group 1.....................$ 43.96 38.05+A Group 2.....................$ 40.65 38.05+A Group 3.....................$ 35.19 38.05+A

POWER EQUIPMENT OPERATOR CLASSIFICATIONS

GROUP 1: Cranes: Overhead Cranes; Hydro Crane; Shovels;

Crane type Backfiller; Tower Cranes-Mobile, Crawler, Stationary; Derricks, Hoist (3 drum); Draglines; Drott Yumbo & similar types considered as Cranes; 360 Degrees Swing Excavator, Backhoe; Derrick Boats; Pile Driver and Skid Rigs; Clam Shell; Locomotive Cranes; Road Pavers (Single Drum, Dual Drum, Tri Batcher); Motor Patrol & Power Blades (Dunmore, Elevating & similar types); Mechanics;

Central Concrete Mixing Plant Operator; Asphalt Batch Plant Operator and Plant Engineer; Gradall; Caisson Rigs; Skimmer Scoop, Koehring Scooper; Dredges (all types); Hoptoe; All Cherry Pickers; Work Boat; Ross Carrier; Helicopter; Dozer;

Tournadozer; Tournapulls (all & similar types); Concrete and all recycle machines, Multiple Unit Earth Movers; 75 cents per hour for each scoop over one; Scoops (all sizes);

Pushcats; Endloaders (all types); Asphalt Surfacing Machine; Slip Form Paver; Rock Crusher; Material Crusher (outside pits and quarries); Screening Plants (outside pits and quarries); Tunnel Boring Machine; Heavy Equipment Greaser (Top Greaser on Spread); CMI, Auto Grade, CMI Belt Placer (3 track & similar types); Side Booms; Starting Engineer on Pipeline or Construction (eleven 11 pieces or more); Asphalt Heater & Planer Combination; Wheel Tractors with Dozer, Hoe or End Loader attachements; CAT Earthwork Compactors and similar types; Blaw Knox Spreader & similar types; Trench Machines; Pump Crete, Belt Crete, Squeeze Crete, Screw Type Pumps & Gypsum; Creter Crane; Concrete Pump Truck; Formless Finishing Machines; Flaherty Spreader or similar types; Screedman on Laydown Machine; Vermeer Concrete Saw; Laser Screed; Span Saw; Dredge Leverman;

Dredge Engineer; Lull or similar type; Hydro-Boom Truck;

Guard Rail Machine.

GROUP 2: Bulker & Pump; Power Launches; Boring Machine & Pipe Jacking Machine; Dinkeys; Carts, powered haul unit for a boring machine; P-H one Pass Soil Cement Machines and similar types: Wheel Tractor; Back Fillers; Euclid Loader;

Fork LIfts; Jeep with Ditching Machines or other attachments; Tuneluger; Automatic Cement & Gravel Batching Plants; Mobile Drills Soil Testing and similar types);

Pugmill with Pump; All 1 and 2 Drum Hoists; De-watering Systems; Straw Blower; Hydro Seeder; Bump Grinders, Self Propelled; Assistant Heavy Equipment Greaser; Apsco Spreader Tractors (Track-Type w/o Power Units pulling Rollers); Rollers on Asphalt, Brick, or Macadam; Concrete Breakers; Concrete Spreaders; Cement Strippers; Cement Finishing Machines & CMI Texture & Reel Curing Machines;

Vibro-Tampers & similar types self-propelled; Mechanical Bull-Floats; Self-Propelled Concrete Saw; Truck Mounted Power Saws; Curb Cutters; Mixers over 3 bags to 27E; Winch & Boom Trucks; Tractor pulling Power Blade or Elevating Grader; Porter Rex Rail; Clary Screed; Mule pulling Rollers; Pugmill w/o Pump; Barber Greene or similar Loaders; Track Type Tractor with power unit attached;

Fireman; Spray Machine on paving; Curb Machine; Paved Ditch Machine; Power Broom; Self-Propelled Sweepers; Self- Propelled Conveyors; Power Subgrader; Oil Distributor;

Straight Tractor; Truck Crane Oiler; Truck Type Oilers;

Directional Boring Machine; Horizontal Directional Drill;

Articulating End Dump Vehicles; Starting Engineer (6 to 10 pieces).

GROUP 3: Straight Framed Truck and Truck Mounted Vac Unit, Starting Engineer (3 to 5 pieces); Trac Air Machine w/o attachments; Rollers, 5 tons & under on earth & gravel;

Form Grader; Bulk Cement Plant; Oilers.

- Escalated Rate on Crane, Derrick Booms, and Tower Cranes:

Additional $1.00 per hour over scale when Crane or Derrick is positioned 50 ft. or more above adjacent ground level or water level. $.05 per hour, per foot, over 90 feet including jib. $0.02 per hour, per ton - over 50-ton capacity.

- Operating engineers who operate Lattice Boom Crawler Cranes, Lattice Boom Truck Cranes, Telescopic Boom Cranes less than 17.5 Tons, Tower Cranes, Overhead Cranes and have been Certified by hte National Commission for the Certification of Crane Operators on the equipment they operate shall receive $1.60 per hour over scale.

A. On designated Hazardous Waste jobs, operators shall receive:

Level A add $4.00 to the appropriate group rate; Levels B and C add $3.00 to the appropriate group rate; and Level D add $2.00 to the appropriate group rate.

ENGI0841-002 04/01/2019

FORD and IROQUOIS COUNTIES

GROUP 1.....................$ 41.65 22.00

GROUP 2.....................$ 26.55 22.00

POWER EQUIPMENT OPERATOR CLASSFICATIONS

GROUP 1: Power Cranes, Draglines, Derricks, Shovels, Gradalls, Mechanics, Tractor Highlift, Tournadozer, Concrete Mixers with Skip, Tournamixer, Two-Drum Machine, One-Drum Hoist with Tower or Boom, Cableways, Tower Machines, Motor Patrol, Boom Tractor, Boom or Winch Truck, Winch or Hydraulic Boom Truck, Truck Crane, Tournapull, Tractor Operating Scoops, Bulldozer, Push Tractor, Asphalt Planer, Finishing Machine on Asphalt, Large Rollers on Earth, Rollers on Asphalt Mix, Ross Carrier or Similar Machine, Gravel Processing Machine, Asphalt Plant Engineer, Paver Operator, Farm Tractor with Half Yard Bucket and/or Backhoe Attachments, Dredge Engineer, or Dredge Operator, Central Mix Plant Engineer, CMI or Similar Type Machine, Truck or Skid Mounted Concrete Pump, Tower Crane, Engine or Rock Crusher Plant, Concrete Plant Engineer, Ditching Machine with Dual Attachment, Tractor Mounted Loaders, Cherry Picker, Hydro Crane, Standard or Dinkey Locomotives, Scoopmobiles, Euclid Loader, Soil Cement Machine, Back Filler, Elevating Machine, Power Blade, Drilling Machines Including Well Testing, Caissons, Shaft or Any Similar Type Drilling Machines, Motor Driven Paint Machine, Pipe Cleaning Machine, Pipe Wrapping Machine, Pipe Bending Machine, Apsco Paver, Boring Machine, (Head Equipment Greaser), Barber- Greene Loaders, Formless Paver, (Well Point System), Concrete Spreader, Hydra Ax, Span Saw and Similar Types, Marine Scoops, Brush Mulcher, Brush Burner, Mesh Placer, Tree Mover, Helicopter Crew (3), Piledriver - Skid or Crawler, Stump Remover, Root Rake, Tug Boat Operator, Refrigerating Machine, Freezing Operator, Chair Cart-Self Propelled, Hydra Seeder, Straw Blower, Power Sub Grader, Bull Float, Finishing Machine, Self-Propelled Pavement Breaker (Backhoe Attached), Lull (or Similar Type Machine), Two Air Compressors, Compressors Hooked in Manifold, Overhead Crane, Chip Spreader, Mud Cat, Sull-Air Fork Lifts (Except When Used For Landscaping Work), Soil Stabilazer…