W912DW-17-R-0007-0005.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Solicitation Number W912DW-17-R-0007, Amendment 0005

JBLM Decentralize Heating Plants

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 2

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 05-Sep-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912DW-17-R-0007

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

18-Jul-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

05-Sep-2017

CODE

USA ENGINEER DISTRICT, SEATTLE

ATTN: CENWS-CT

4735 EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH, BLDG. 1202

SEATTLE WA 98134-2388

W912DW 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912DW-17-R-0007

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The following have been added by full text:

SUMMARY AMENDMENT 0005

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

1. This amendment five (0005) is issued to replace Section 00 24 00 in its entirety.

2. All other information remains unchanged.

3. The current proposal due date remains unchanged: 15 September 2017 at 2:00PM PST

4. NOTICE TO OFFERORS: Offerors must acknowledge receipt of this amendment by number and date on proposal. Please mark outside of envelope in which your offer is enclosed to show amendment received.

Encl:

Section 00 24 00

(End of Summary of Changes)

SECTION 00 24 00

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1.0 BASIS OF AWARD

Award of this Contract will be made to the technically acceptable responsible Offeror submitting the lowest priced offer (based on the total of all line items on the Price Schedule) – Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable Offer (LPTA). This acquisition will result in the award of a firm-fixed price, construction contract.

The technical evaluation of each proposal will be solely on the basis of Technical Evaluation Factors found in this section. The Government will evaluate each proposal on a technically acceptable/unacceptable basis only with respect to the technical evaluation factors (criteria) described herein. Award will be to the Offeror who presents the technically acceptable proposal with the overall total lowest price. It is the intent of the Government to award off initial offers without discussions.

NOTE: The proposal that would result in the award of this construction contract will be part of the award including all letters of commitment submitted as part of proposal submission. Changes to the key personnel and or affiliates, parent companies, separate division or other entities, and subcontractors during the performance period of the resultant contract will be replaced and must be equal to or exceeds the initial submission of the proposal. Modifications to subsequent changes will be based on the previous change, which is equal to or better than the previous.

2.0 PROPOSAL EVALUATION

2.1 Technical Evaluation:

Acceptability will be based on all factors receiving an acceptable rating. The proposal will be evaluated according to the criteria for Non-Price Evaluation Factors of this section.

Proposals will receive either an ACCEPTABLE or an UNACCEPTABLE rating for each of the evaluation factors. Find the description of these ratings in Table 1.

TABLE 1: TECHNICAL ACCEPTABLE/UNACCEPTABLE RATINGS

Rating: Description:

Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

2.2 Pricing Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate price proposals in accordance with FAR 15.404-1 for award purposes of all line items identified on the Contract Line Item Schedule (Price-Schedule), Section 00 11 00 of this Solicitation.

3.0 EVALUATION PROCESS:

The evaluation process consists of three parts:

00 24 00 - 2

1) Proposal Compliance Review. This is an initial review to ensure that all required forms and certifications are complete and that a complete proposal is received. An initial review of each of the proposals will be conducted to check for apparent errors, omissions and areas that require clarification. The purpose of this preliminary review session is to eliminate minor irregularities or apparent clerical mistakes. This preliminary evaluation will ensure that each proposal contains the Technical Proposal Volume I and Price Proposal Volume II and the correct number of copies.

2) Relevant Experience and Past Performance. Relevant Experience and Past Performance will be evaluated according to the criteria for Non-Price Evaluation Factors found in this section.

3) Price Evaluation. The Government will evaluate price for fairness and reasonableness through the use of price analysis in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(b). Price will also be verified for unbalancing of line items in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(g). Prices that are deemed too high or too law may be found to be unreasonable.

3.1 Definitions:

a) Clarification is a limited exchange with an Offeror for the sole purpose of eliminating minor irregularities, informalities, or apparent clerical mistakes in the proposal or to address adverse past performance not previously addressed with the Offeror. Clarifications do not give an Offeror the opportunity to revise or modify its proposal and are used, as necessary, when not opening discussions.

b) Communications are a limited exchange with an Offeror used to assist in determinations of the competitive range. Communications are limited to enhancing Government understanding of proposals and addressing adverse past performance information not previously addressed if said information is the determining factor preventing an Offeror from being included in the competitive range. Such communications shall not be used to cure proposal deficiencies or material omissions, or otherwise revise the proposal.

c) Discussions offer the opportunity to resolve deficiencies or weaknesses in the proposals, based on the requirement and the evaluations factors set forth in the solicitation. If the Contracting Officer determines it is necessary to open discussions, they must discuss with all Offerors in the competitive range. Offerors have the opportunity to revise their proposals at the conclusion of discussions.

d) Relevant: defined as having a logical connection with the requirements in this request for technical proposals; that is, featuring work that is similar in nature, magnitude, and complexity to the current requirement. To be acceptable, there must be an explanation of how the provided project information is relevant to the proposed work.

e) Year: A “year” is 365 consecutive days.

3.2 Bid Guarantee:

The Offeror is required to submit a bid guarantee along with its proposal in accordance with FAR Subpart

28.101. The bid guarantee shall be included in Volume II of the proposal. Any proposal received without a bid guarantee will be rejected and is ineligible for review by the Government. The amount of the Bid Guarantee shall be twenty (20) percent of the Offeror’s proposed price or $3,000,000.00, whichever is less.

3.3 Submission Format: (Please refer to Section 00 21 00 for number of required copies)

00 24 00 - 3

All proposal materials shall be submitted in binders with a table of contents and tabbed section dividers.

The sections should parallel the submission requirements identified below. In Volume I, Technical Proposal, there shall be a tabbed section for each Non-Price Evaluation factor. Volume II, Price Proposal, shall be submitted in a clearly marked envelope.

3.3.1 Volume I - Offeror’s Technical Proposal shall include the following sections, in the general format specified below:

• Table of Contents for Volume I - (Listing of all sections of the technical proposal)

• Tab A/Factor A – Relevant Construction Experience of OFFEROR/PRIME (Or Affiliate as defined in Paragraph 5.2), Attachment 1.

• Tab B/Factor B – Relevant Design Experience of Offeror/Prime (Or Affiliate as defined in

Paragraph 5.2), Attachment 1.

• Tab C/Factor C – Relevant Experience of Team, Attachment 1 & 2.

• Tab D/Factor D– Past Performance of the Offeror (Or Affiliate as defined in Paragraph 5.2), Attachment 4.

3.3.2 Volume II – Offeror’s Price Proposal shall include the following, in the general format specified below:

• Price Proposal Format; Volume II

• SF 1442 and Bid Schedule, Section 00 11 00 (filled out in its entirety)

• Bid Guarantee

• Pre-Award Information found at back of Section 00 45 00 (filled out in its entirety)

• Section 00 45 00 Representations and Certifications

NOTE: Offeror’s Price Proposal is due at the same time as Technical Proposal.

4.0 EVALUATION CRITERIA

4.1 CRITERIA for Non-Price Evaluation Factors:

Proposals shall concisely, accurately, and completely provide the information required for each of the following non-price evaluation factors. NOTE: Absence of complete information will be deemed as if no support information was provided for that factor. Proposals that do not meet the minimum requirements of all of the non-price evaluation factors shall be determined to be UNACCEPTABLE and are not eligible for award consideration. No assumptions may be made by the Government. Your proposal must clearly demonstrate the requisite technical experience and qualifications to receive an ACCEPTABLE rating.

5.0 FACTOR A– Relevant Construction Experience of Offeror/Prime (Or Affiliate as defined in Paragraph 5.2):

5.1 Definitions for Factor A (Definitions for the purposes of this factor):

Complexity means the many varied elements of work or sequencing of the work required for a multi-facility project in which facilities will remain occupied and in operation during construction.

00 24 00 - 4

Function means management of design and construction of the following features of work in the following facility types; HVAC systems, heat pump systems, hydronic boilers and pumps, domestic water heaters, domestic water pumps, refrigeration piping, hydronic piping, domestic hot water piping, HVAC ductwork, natural gas piping, direct digital control and building automation systems (DDC/BAS), and interior electric systems.

Facility types that are relevant include dormitory/barracks/hotel, dining facility, office building, commercial garage and service station and similar.

Magnitude/Cost means projects equal to or greater than Contract amount of $5,000,000.

Relevant means the present or past performance effort involved with projects similar in function, scope, magnitude, and complexity. To be acceptable, there must be an explanation of how the provided project information is relevant to the proposed work.

Scope means containing many of the elements of work and of physical size of a HVAC and electrical system renovation project, with the minimum of twenty (20) occupied facilities. The scope may be demonstrated by multiple projects managed concurrently whose total number of occupied facilities is twenty (20) or greater.

Concurrent means projects executed during the same calendar time period for over 50% or more of each project’s duration.

Similar means a construction project that is equal or equivalent to the proposed project.

5.2 Submission Requirements for Factor A:

The Offeror shall submit examples of construction projects which illustrate the relevant experience on projects of similar function, scope, magnitude, and complexity as defined in paragraph 5.1. Projects for which the Offeror was the Prime Contractor or performed as a major (key) subcontractor should be submitted. Additionally, the Offeror may submit construction projects performed by parent companies, affiliates, separate divisions or other entities associated with the Offeror (hereinafter collectively referred to as Affiliate(s)). If the Affiliate(s) have the relevant experience, and the Offeror can show that this association will continue through the execution of this contract such that the resources of the Affiliate(s) will affect the performance of the Offeror in the execution of this contract, then that experience will be deemed relevant, and will be considered for this Factor.

Restated, only those projects for which the Offeror or its Affiliate(s) (as long as it is demonstrated that said Affiliate(s) will affect the performance of the Offeror) were the Prime Contractor or performed as a major (key) subcontractor should be submitted. If the experience of an Affiliate is submitted for evaluation, it must be accompanied by a letter of commitment signed by the Affiliate and the Offeror binding affiliate resources to the performance of the project. This letter must be signed by a person authorized to bind the Affiliate to dedicate its resources -- its workforce, management, facilities or other resources -- to the performance of the work under this Solicitation.

The Offeror shall document the teaming arrangement with the Affiliate by utilizing the Letter of Commitment for Affiliate, Parent Company, Separate Division or Other Entity (Attachment 3) found at the end of this Section 00 24 00, or of similar document.

00 24 00 - 5

Offeror shall submit two (2) project examples that demonstrate Offeror’s (or that of an Affiliate specifically for the execution of this contract) relevant experience as the Prime Contractor or as a major/key subcontractor. Each project submitted for consideration must have a construction value of at least $5,000,000.

The two (2) submitted projects shall be 100% complete within six (6) years prior to the date which the proposal for this solicitation is due. (A project is considered 100% complete when it has achieved beneficial occupancy date and facilities are occupied).

If the Offeror submits more than two (2) project examples, the Government shall only evaluate the first two (2) submitted projects.

Note: For project(s) submitted as Key Subcontractor versus Prime Contractor, submission shall include the total contract amount, the dollar amount of the work performed as the key subcontractor, and the percentage of work performed as the key subcontractor.

5.3 Evaluation Method for Factor A:

5.3.1 Factor A will be evaluated to determine whether it meets the requirements of this factor. If any of the required information is not provided in the Offeror’s proposal, the Offeror will be evaluated as “Unacceptable.” The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of cited projects or other recent projects by reviewing the Past Performance Information Retrieval system (PPIRS) which includes the CCASS/ACASS ratings, other DOD or Government appraisal systems, and Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) (Attachment 4). The Government may check any or all cited references to verify supplied information.

TABLE 3: FACTOR A - RELEVANT CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE OF

OFFEROR/PRIME

Rating: Description:

Acceptable The proposal clearly demonstrates how at least two of the project examples submitted meets the requirements of paragraph 5.2.

Unacceptable The proposal does not clearly demonstrate how at least two of the project examples submitted meets the requirements of paragraph 5.2.

6.0 FACTOR B– Relevant Design Experience of Offeror/Prime (Or Affiliate as defined in Paragraph 5.2):

6.1 Definitions for Factor B (Definitions for the purposes of this factor):

Complexity means the many varied elements of work or sequencing of the work required for a multi-facility project in which facilities will remain occupied and in operation during construction.

Function means management of design and construction of the following features of work in the following facility types; HVAC systems, heat pump systems, hydronic boilers and pumps, domestic water heaters, domestic water pumps, refrigeration piping, hydronic piping, domestic hot water piping, HVAC ductwork, natural gas piping, direct digital control and building automation systems (DDC/BAS), and interior electric systems.

00 24 00 - 6

Facility types that are relevant include dormitory/barracks/hotel, dining facility, office building, commercial garage and service station and similar.

Magnitude/Cost means projects equal to or greater than Contract amount of $5,000,000 for design and construction.

Relevant means the present or past performance effort involved with projects similar in function, scope, magnitude, and complexity. To be acceptable, there must be an explanation of how the provided project information is relevant to the proposed work.

Scope means containing many of the elements of work and of physical size of a HVAC and electrical system renovation project, with the minimum of twenty (20) occupied facilities. The scope may be demonstrated by multiple projects managed concurrently whose total number of occupied facilities is twenty (20) or greater.

Concurrent means projects executed during the same calendar time period for over 50% or more of each project’s duration.

Similar means a construction project that is equal or equivalent to the proposed project.

6.2 Submission Requirements for Factor B:

The Offeror shall submit examples of design on construction projects which illustrate the relevant experience on projects of similar function, scope, magnitude, and complexity as defined in paragraph 6.1.

Only those projects for which the Offeror (or Affiliate as noted in paragraph 5.2) was the Designer of Record (DOR) or performed as a major (key) design subcontractor for the elements of a project that are similar in function, scope, magnitude, and complexity should be submitted.

Offeror shall submit two (2) project examples that demonstrate Offeror’s (or its Affiliates’) relevant experience as the DOR or as a major subcontractor. Each project submitted for consideration must have construction value of at least $5,000,000.

The two (2) submitted projects shall be 100% complete (design AND construction) within six (6) years prior to the date which the proposal for this solicitation is due. (A project is considered 100% complete when it has achieved beneficial occupancy date and facilities are occupied).

If the Offeror submits more than two (2) project examples, the Government shall only evaluate the first two (2) submitted projects.

Note: For project(s) submitted as Key Subcontractor versus DOR, submission shall include the total contract amount, the dollar amount of the work performed as the key subcontractor, and the percentage of work performed as the key subcontractor.

6.3 Evaluation Method for Factor B:

6.3.1 Factor B will be evaluated to determine whether it meets the requirements of this factor. If any of the required information is not provided in the Offeror’s proposal, the Offeror will be evaluated as “Unacceptable.” The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of cited projects or other recent projects by reviewing the Past Performance Information Retrieval system (PPIRS) which

00 24 00 - 7 includes the CCASS/ACASS ratings, other DOD or Government appraisal systems, and Past Performance

TABLE 3: FACTOR B - RELEVANT DESIGN EXPERIENCE OF OFFEROR/PRIME

Acceptable The proposal clearly demonstrates how at least two of the project examples submitted meets the requirements of paragraph 6.2.

Unacceptable The proposal does not clearly demonstrate how at least two of the project examples submitted meets the requirements of paragraph 6.2.

7.0 FACTOR C – Relevant Experience of Team

7.1 Definitions for Factor C (Definitions for the purposes of this factor):

Complexity means the many varied elements of work or sequencing of the work required for a multi-facility project in which facilities will remain occupied and in operation during construction.

Function means design and construction of the following features of work in the following facility types;

Features of work; HVAC systems, heat pump systems, hydronic boilers and pumps, domestic water heaters, domestic water pumps, refrigeration piping, hydronic piping, domestic hot water piping, HVAC ductwork, natural gas piping, direct digital control and building automation systems (DDC/BAS), and interior electric systems.

Facility types that are relevant include dormitory/barracks/hotel, dining facility, office building, commercial garage and service station and similar.

Magnitude/Cost means projects equal to or greater than Contract amount of $5,000,000.

Relevant means the present or past performance effort involved with projects similar in function, scope, magnitude, and complexity. To be acceptable, there must be an explanation of how the provided project information is relevant to the proposed work.

Scope means containing many of the elements of work and of physical size of a HVAC and electrical system renovation project, with the minimum of twenty (20) occupied facilities. The scope may be demonstrated by multiple projects managed concurrently whose total number of occupied facilities is twenty (20) or greater.

Similar means a construction project that is equal or equivalent to the proposed project.

Concurrent means projects executed during the same calendar time period for over 50% or more of each project’s duration.

Team means the Prime Contractor/Offeror (including any Affiliates as defined in Paragraph 5.2, above) and/or its major/key sub-contracting firms, taken as a whole.

7.2 Submission Requirements for Factor C:

00 24 00 - 8

7.2.1 Offeror shall submit at least one (1) relevant project, but no more than four (4) project examples demonstrating relevant construction experience of the team. If the Offeror submits more than four (4) project examples, the Government shall only evaluate the first four submitted projects.

For all projects submitted, at least one (1) relevant project shall be 100% complete within the past six (6) years prior to the date that the proposals are due. All projects must be at least 75% complete. A project is considered 100% complete when it has achieved beneficial occupancy date and facilities are occupied. A project is considered 75% complete if TAB and Commissioning acceptance testing have been completed.

A project is considered relevant if it meets at least one of the following four especially relevant construction experience areas:

a) Construction projects that include the design of HVAC and electrical systems renovation projects in public and commercial facilities.

b) Construction projects that include construction of HVAC and electrical systems in public and commercial facilities.

c) Construction projects that include renovation and upgrade of existing facility HVAC systems.

d) Construction projects that include renovation of multiple occupied facilities of equivalent scope.

7.2.2 The total of one (1) and up to four (4) submitted projects combined, must include all four elements of the especially relevant construction experience areas listed above, although all four elements do not necessarily need to be present in any one project. However, each project submitted must demonstrate at least one of the four elements indicated above and in the chart below.

“Example” Chart for Factor C:

Submitted Projects:

Construction projects that include design of HVAC and electrical systems renovation projects in public and commercial facilities

Construction projects that include construction of HVAC and electrical systems renovation projects in public and commercial facilities

Renovation and upgrade of existing facility HVAC systems

Renovation of multiple occupied facilities of equivalent scope.

1 X

2 X

3 X X

7.2.3 Please note if any of the project(s) submitted to meet the criteria for Factor C is still in progress, the Offeror must demonstrate with details that the project is at least 75% complete. 75% complete is defined as projects in which TAB and Commissioning acceptance testing have been completed. Please submit photos with labels or markings showing that at least one of the four especially relevant areas.

7.2.4 If the experience involving the types of construction areas listed above was not self-performed by the Prime, the Offeror shall submit relevant experience information for the Key Subcontractor that will be

00 24 00 - 9 completing work for this project. The Offeror shall document the teaming arrangement with the Key Subcontractor(s) utilizing the Letter of Commitment of Key Sub-Contractor (Attachment 2) found at the end of this Section 00 24 00.)

Note: Project experience for Factor C must be submitted using Attachment 1.

7.3 Evaluation Method for Factor C:

Factor C will be evaluated to determine whether it meets the requirements of this factor. If any of the required information is not provided in the Offeror’s proposal, the Offeror will be evaluated as “Unacceptable.” The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of cited projects or other recent projects by reviewing the Past Performance Information Retrieval system (PPIRS) which includes the CCASS/ACASS ratings, other DOD or Government appraisal systems, and Past Performance

TABLE 4: FACTOR C - RELEVANT EXPERIENCE OF TEAM

Acceptable The proposal clearly demonstrates how at least one of the project examples submitted meets the requirements of paragraph 7.2.

Unacceptable The proposal does not clearly demonstrate how at least one of the project examples submitted meets the requirements of paragraph 7.2.

8.0 FACTOR D – Past Performance of Offeror

8.1 Submission Requirements for Factor D:

The project examples submitted for Paragraphs 5.2 Submission Requirements for Factor A and 6.2, Submission Requirements for Factor B will be used for evaluation of Past Performance of the Prime or Affiliate. DO NOT provide Past Performance references for projects other than those project examples provided for Factors A and B.

The Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment 4) included in the back of this Section 00 24 00 is provided for the Offeror to submit to the client of each project the Offeror includes in its proposal for Factor A in paragraph 5.2 and Factor B in paragraph 6.2. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client’s point of contact (POC). Completed Past Performance Questionnaires should be submitted with your proposal. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Kelly.L.Gunn@usace.army.mil, via email prior to proposal closing date and time.

We will accept previously submitted PPQs on Form PPQ-0. Please ensure all information is up to date and meets the requirements of the evaluation factor.

Note: You may submit CCASS ratings in lieu of the PPQ forms included in Attachment 4 if you completely fill in blocks 1 - 5 of the Contract Information portion of the NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (Form PPQ-0) and submit with the Final CCASS report. Be sure to include the POC’s information of the Client and the Contract Number of the project.

00 24 00 - 10

8.2 Evaluation Method for Factor D: The method of rating for Factor D shall be as follows:

The Government will evaluate an Offeror’s past performance based on a demonstrated record of performance. Past performance information is an indicator of an Offeror’s ability to perform the contract successfully.

The Government will evaluate the successful completion of all project examples for the past six (6) years.

The Government reserves the right to check any or all cited references to verify supplied information and to assess owner satisfaction.

The Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), including Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). This information may involve the Offeror or any of its affiliates as submitted for relevant experience in paragraphs 5.2 and 6.2.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

NOTE: In the case of an Offeror without a record of past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available; the Offeror’s past performance may not be evaluated as favorable or unfavorable. [Ref: FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)]. Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

9.0 PRICE:

Price proposals will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness through the use of a price analysis. Price will also be checked for unbalancing of line items. The Offeror shall provide it’s pricing on the price schedule provided with this Request for Proposal.

It is the intent of the Government to award without discussions.

10.0 REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS:

The following representations and certifications apply to this solicitation. The Offeror submitting a proposal in response to this solicitation shall fill in the appropriate information and/or check the appropriate boxes for each provision listed below and complete the Pre-Award Information which can be found in Section 00 45 00. This information shall be submitted with the Offerors Proposal.

TABLE 5: FACTOR D – PAST PERFORMANCE OF OFFEROR EVALUATION RATING

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

00 24 00 - 11

Contractors are required to be registered in the System for Awards Management (SAM) for awards resulting from solicitations.

This rule more efficiently implements the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, as it requires contractors to be registered in SAM for consideration of future solicitations, awards, and payment.

Registration is required prior to award of any contract, basic agreement, basic ordering agreement, or blanket purchase agreement from a solicitation issued after May 31, 1998.

LACK OF REGISTRATION IN THE SAM DATABASE WILL MAKE AN OFFER INELIGIBLE FOR

AWARD.

The web site may be accessed at www.sam.gov.

http://www.sam.gov/

00 24 00 - 12

ATTACHMENT 1 - OFFEROR/AFFILIATE’S RELEVANT EXPERIENCE

Use this Form for:Factor A – Relevant Construction Experience of Offeror/Affiliate(s) Factor B – Relevant Design Experience of the Offeror/Affiliate(s) Factor C – Relevant Experience of Team

Offeror/Affiliate must complete the applicable paragraphs as noted below.

Provide the following information to show examples of projects your company constructed within the last six (6) years indicating experience with projects of comparable type and scope. Use one form per project.

(a) Type of Facility Represented

(b) Your Firm’s Name

(c) Name of Project

(d) Location of Project

(e) Owner

(f) General Scope of Construction Project:

(g) Your Role (Prime, Joint Venture, or Subcontractor, etc.) and Work Your Company Self- Performed:

(h) Construction Cost (value of prime contract)

(i) Extent and Type of Work You Subcontracted Out / Or Extent and Type of Work You Performed as Key Subcontractor:

(j) Dates Construction Began: Completed:

(k) Percent Complete:

(l) Were You Terminated or Assessed Liquidated Damages?

[If either is “Yes,” attach an Explanation]

(m) Project Owner’s Point of Contact for Reference (Or Prime Contractor POC if Submitting Subcontracting Experience) [Name and Company and Telephone Number]

(n) Describe how the project relates to relevant experience areas under Factors A, B, or C:

00 24 00 - 13

ATTACHMENT 2

LETTER OF COMMITMENT OF KEY SUB-CONTRACTOR

(USE SUB-CONTRACTOR’S COMPANY LETTERHEAD)

TO: Contracting Officer:

SUBJECT: Letter of Commitment for Proposed Contract for:

Dear Sir or Madam:

I hereby indicate my commitment that, in the event of an award of a contract to (Fill in name of Proposer), (insert name of subcontractor) will fulfill the duties of (state role on project).

Sincerely, (Signed by Authorized Official)

Date: __________

00 24 00 - 14

ATTACHMENT 3

LETTER OF COMMITMENT

For

AFFILIATE, PARENT COMPANY, SEPARATE DIVISION,

OR OTHER ENTITY

(USE COMPANY’S LETTERHEAD)

TO: Contracting Officer:

SUBJECT: Letter of Commitment for Proposed Contract for Decentralize Heat Plants, JBLM, WA

Dear Sir or Madam:

I hereby indicate our commitment that, in the event of an award of a contract to (Fill in name of Proposer), (insert name of affiliate, parent company, separate division, or other entity) will fulfill the duties of (state role on project).

Sincerely, (Signed by Authorized Official)

Date: __________

00 24 00 - 15

ATTACHMENT 4: CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information:

Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact’s Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information:

Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yyyy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yyyy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yyyy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.):

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information:

Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

00 24 00 - 16

NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS

QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR

WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL,

AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE

SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES

DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED

DIRECTLY TO USACE. [PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC

INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL

INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

00 24 00 - 17

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT EVALUATION

(E) Exceptional:

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good:

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory:

Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal:

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory:

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable: No information or did not apply to your contract. Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT EVALUATION

00 24 00 - 18

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG S M U N

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E VG S M U N

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

E VG S M U N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

00 24 00 - 19

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks.

Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk. (Please attach additional pages if necessary)

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

E VG S M U N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

E VG S M U N

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements. E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

E VG S M U N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

00 24 00 - 20

End of Section 00 24 00