16R00080001.pdf

W68MD963230496

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

1. INCORPORATE REVISED SOW FOR SEED PROJECT TASK ORDER DATED 19 DECEMBER 2016. (Changes highlighted in red)

2. EXTENSION OF PROPOSAL DUE DATE: fFROM THE 9TH OF JANUARY 2017 TO THE 11TH OF JANUARY 2017. THE TIME OF 2:00 P.M.

LOCAL TIME REMAINS UNCHANGED.

3. INCORPORATION OF THE PRE-CONSTRUCTION SLIDES.

4. INCORPORATION OF THE PRE-CONSTRUCTION SIGN IN SHEET.

5. CORRECTION TO PARAGRAPH 8.2 IN SECTION 00 24 00 (Changes highlighted in red)

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 28

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 20-Dec-2016

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912DW-16-R-0008

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

09-Dec-2016

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

20-Dec-2016

CODE

USA ENGINEER DISTRICT, SEATTLE

ATTN: CECT-NWS

4735 EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH, BLDG. 1202

SEATTLE WA 98134-2388

W912DW 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912DW-16-R-0008

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00 24 00 - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

EVALUATION FACTORS

SECTION 002400

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

SUBMISSION AND EVALUATION

W912DW-16-R-0008

Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) for Electrical Construction and Repairs in the Interior/Exterior Electrical Discipline at Joint Base Lewis-McChord (JBLM), Washington and its Sub-installations to include various locations in the States of Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and Montana.

1. Introduction:

1.1 Offerors are invited to submit a proposal in response to this Request for Proposals (RFP) entitled SDVOSB, Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) for Electrical Services and minor Construction and Repair Services Tasks for the Interior/Exterior Electrical Discipline, at JBLM, located in the State of Washington, its Sub-installations, and include various locations in the states of Washington, Idaho, Montana and Oregon.

This RFP establishes project requirements and provides procedures, format, and other data to assist Offerors in preparing their proposals. This solicitation is set aside for eligible SDVOSB Small Business concerns only. The NAICS code for this requirement is 237130, Power and Communication Line and Related Structures Construction with a size Standard of $36.5M.

1.2 Indefinite-delivery indefinite-quantity type contracts will be awarded up to five (5) SDVOSB contractors. All awarded contractors will share the capacity limitations and contract requirements as described throughout this RFP. It is the intent of the Government to make award based upon initial offers, without further discussions or additional information.

1.3 MATOC IDIQ Contracts to be awarded under this solicitation will consist of a one-year base period and four one-year option periods (total of five (5) years). The $45M capacity will be the maximum amount for the base year plus four (4) one year option period years. The Task Order Contracts are for a broad range of electrical maintenance and repair work on real property at JBLM. Task orders will range from $2.5K to $5M however; most will be less than $3M. Task Orders will include construction and repair tasks in the interior/exterior electrical discipline. Interior work may include replacement, installation and relocation of circuits, panel boards, meter bases, main distribution panels, lighting and electrical equipment. Exterior work may include replacement, installation and relocation of underground and overhead distribution feeders and laterals (13.kV), transformers, disconnects, cutouts, lighting (including airfield lighting systems and components), poles and appurtenances, raceways, and electrical distribution substation components. Associated incidental carpentry, excavation, concrete & paving work, site restoration (e.g. landscaping, hydro-sampling, etc.), painting, fencing, demolition, low voltage electrical (i.e. less than 50VAC, including fire alarm, Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS), Supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA), and communications), ACM and LBP testing & abatement, and environmental clean-up may be required with the interior/exterior task orders.

This solicitation is set aside for 100% Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business concerns only.

2. Basis of Award:

2.1. Award of Base IDIQ MATOC Contract: Award will be made based on the Lowest- Priced, Technically-Acceptable (LPTA) Source Selection process, as outlined in FAR 15.101-

2. The Government will consider awarding to those Offerors who are determined to have met or exceeded the minimum requirements and offers the lowest pricing for a Seed Project (which will provided with the solicitation as an attachment). All technical or non-cost evaluation factors will be rated as “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable”. The Government intends to make award based upon initial offers, without further discussions or additional information. However, in the event it is determined conducting discussions is in the best interest of the Government, the Contracting Officer will establish a competitive range. If the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals. Therefore, the Offerors initial proposal should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint.

2.2. Awards will be made to the Offerors whose proposals are the most advantageous to the Government based upon an evaluation process assessing technical acceptability with the lowest evaluated price for the Seed Project.

2.3. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS: The Government may reject any proposal that is evaluated and determined to be unacceptable, fails to comply with the contract terms and conditions, or is excessively high or low in cost/price.

2.4 System for Award Management: No Contract or Task Order may be awarded to any firm that is not registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) Registry Website. To register go to http://www.sam.gov.

3. Evaluation Factors are as follows:

Factor 1: Relevant Experience of the Prime (Non-Cost) Factor 2: Key Personnel (Non-Cost) Factor 3: Past Performance (Non-Cost)

Factor 4: Price Evaluation Factor for Seed Project (Cost)

3.1.2. Award of the Seed Project: The Seed Project will be awarded to the Lowest-

Priced, Technically- Acceptable firm awarded a MATOC Contract under this solicitation.

To clarify: The Seed Project will be awarded to the MATOC Contract Holder that submits the lowest price for the seed project. This means that for the other four (4) Offerors who are going to be awarded an IDIQ Electrical MATOC contract for subject solicitation, award will be made with the minimum guaranteed amount of $2.5K.

3.2 Rating Scheme for Non-Cost Factors

3.2.1. Non-Cost Evaluation factors 1 & 2 will be rated using Appendix A of the DoD

Source Selection Procedures, using the ratings below.

Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

3.2.2. Rating Scheme for Past Performance - There are two aspects to the past performance evaluation. The first is to evaluate the Offeror’s past performance to determine how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the Offeror is to the effort to be acquired through the source selection. For purposes of this requirement, relevancy will be determined in accordance with the following table. For the definition of “recent,” see Paragraph 4.3.3 below

RATING DEFINITION

Relevant

Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant

Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

The second aspect of the past performance evaluation is to determine how well the contractor performed on previous contracts. Evaluators will review all past performance information deemed relevant and recent to determine the quality and usefulness as it applies to the performance confidence assessment as follows:

RATING DEFINITION

Acceptable

Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror’s performance record is unknown (See Note below).

Unacceptable

Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Those Offerors whose proposals meet the requirements of relevancy and whose performance on previous projects are rated acceptable will receive an overall rating of “acceptable.”

Note: A lack of past performance information will result in an “unknown” rating during evaluations. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

4. General Submittal Requirements:

4.1. Offerors submitting proposals for this project should limit submissions to data specifically essential for evaluation of proposals in order for a minimum of time and monies to be expended in preparing information required herein. Elaborate artwork, expensive paper and bindings, and expensive/extensive visual and other presentation aids are unnecessary. The Government will be specifically interested in the substance of an Offeror’s response.

4.2 Proposals shall be submitted in two separate volumes: (a) Volume 1 - Technical proposal (original plus 3 copies) and (b) Volume 2 - Price proposal (original plus one copy is required). Each page of each volume shall be presented on standard sized 8 ½ x 11-inch paper (to the maximum extent practicable). Volume 1 – Non-Cost Technical submittals shall not exceed 30 pages. Should additional pages be submitted, only the first 30 pages will be evaluated. Double sided pages count as 2 pages. Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ’s) or CPARS Evaluations submitted in relation to the Past Performance Factor are not included in the 30 pages count. Each volume shall be submitted on separate, standard size, 3-ring folders or binders. Each original Proposal with “wet signatures” shall be marked “Original” and all subsequent copies shall be marked as a “Copy”. Contents of binders shall be tabbed and labeled with a Table of Contents for easy identification. The Table of Contents page, cover letter, tab dividers, and copies of past performance questionnaires are not included in the page count. Do not incorporate any material by reference. Material presented as such will not be considered for evaluation. Be sure to apply all appropriate markings including those prescribed in accordance with FAR 52.215-1(e), Restriction on Disclosure and Use of Data, and 3.104-4, Disclosure, Protection, and Marking of Offeror Bid or Proposal Information and Source Selection Information.

Note: Offerors shall also submit one disc (either CD or DVD) containing copies of both Volumes one (Technical Proposal) and Volume II (Price Proposal).

4.3. Volume 1 – Non-Cost Technical Proposal Submittal Requirements (submit one original and three copies)

4.3.1 Cover Letter. Submit a cover letter as the first page of this volume. The cover letter shall reflect the following information:

(a) Solicitation number – W912DW-16-R-0008

(b) Name, address, email address, telephone numbers of the firm signing the SF 1442.

(c) Cage Code, Duns number, and the SAM expiration date of the Prime Offeror.

(d) Names, titles, email addresses, telephone of persons authorized to negotiate on the firm's behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation.

(e) Name, title, and signature of the person authorized to sign the proposal.

(f) A statement specifying agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any and all items upon which prices are offered at the proposed item prices.

(g) A statement indicating compliance with all insurance requirements stated herein and that evidence of such will be provided prior to contract award.

(h) Final Proposal Revisions: If required to submit a Final Proposal Revision following evaluation of initial proposals, the accompanying cover letter must identify all changes made to the firm's initial proposal.

4.3.2. Response to Technical Evaluation Factors. Since coordination with subcontractors can result in delays in response time to site visits, proposal preparation and work execution; it is the government’s intent to award contracts to those electrical contractors that can offer the most flexible and timely response by minimizing subcontractor involvement and performing the majority of work utilizing their in-house workforce. The Government is specifically looking for those Electrical Contractors that have the ability to respond to an emergency requirement whereby a site visit can be attended within a 24 hour notification and that can submit a proposal within 72 hours from notification.

4.3.3. Definitions.

“Relevancy” is defined as experience on electrical projects that are similar to those projects that may be performed under this contract and where the Offeror has performed 51% of the work in-house.

“Recent” is defined as having been completed within the past 5 years from the date this solicitation is issued.

“Project” is defined as work performed pursuant to one specific Task Order of an

Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) type contract or a single, site specific, stand-alone contract. An IDIQ type contract in and of itself, is NOT considered a project.

5. Factor 1 – Relevant Experience Of The Prime:

5.1. The Government is interested in those firms that are capable of self-performing electrical work utilizing their in-house labor force. If the Offeror is a Joint Venture, the Government must be confident that each of the JV partners is capable of self-performing electrical work utilizing their in-house labor force.

Submission Requirements – The Offeror shall provide five relevant electrical projects which have been completed by your firm within the last five years from the date of the issuance of the solicitation for commercial and industrial type buildings. Offerors shall avoid using Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts as examples of “Relevant” projects. Three of the five projects submitted must be between $250,000 and $3,000,000, and the other two projects can be any value up to $5,000,000. Joint Ventures:

Offerors must include at least one project from each of the Joint Venture Companies.

For each project, submit the following information using the attached Project Experience Form: (Attachment A)

a) Project Title, Location, Customer, and total dollar value of project.

b) Project Type (E.G., Repair, Renovation, Construction, Emergency Work)

c) Dollar Value of Electrical Work Your Firm Was Responsible For.

d) Start & Completion Dates (Month/Year)

e) Brief Description Of Project and Its’ Relevancy to Work That May Be Ordered Under Any Resulting Contract.

f) Your Company’s Role As Either Prime Or Sub-Contractor

g) Percentage, Dollar Value, and Specific Types Of Electrical Work Self

Performed.

h) Customer Point of Contact (I.E., Name, Relationship to Project, Agency/Firm

Affiliation, City, State, Current Phone No.) If you served as a Subcontractor, your Prime Contractor is an acceptable customer POC

5.1.2. Evaluation Method - Responses to this factor shall be considered “acceptable” if the Offeror can demonstrate all of the following:

a. The Extent to Which the Offerors Can Self-Perform Electrical Work: All submitted projects must clearly reflect a minimum of 51% of the electrical work performed in-house.

b. Experience In a Variety Of Electrical Work, as identified in Paragraph 1.3 of this Document.

c. Experience Performing a Range of Project Values (Between $250,000 and $5,000,000). At least 3 out of the 5 submitted projects shall have a dollar value between $250,000 and $3,000,000 with the remaining two projects any value up to $5,000,000.

d. Three out of five projects must demonstrate experience on a DoD or other Federal Agency Compound.

e. Ability to Manage Multiple Projects Simultaneously.

f. experience with Energized Work. Demonstrate 24 months at a minimum with projects regarding energized work on distribution voltages (15kV).

NOTE TO OFFEROR: Projects submitted in Factor 1 must have been performed by the Firm submitting an offer for this solicitation (same Cage Codes and DUNS numbers).

Projects performed by a parent company, sister company, teaming partner, or business other than the specific firm submitting an offer will not be evaluated.

If the proposal receives a rating of “unacceptable” under any of the requirements (a through f), as listed under 5.1.2. above, the entire Factor 1 will receive a rating of “unacceptable.”

6. FACTOR 2 – KEY PERSONNEL:

6.1. The Government is interested in those contractors who possess qualified Key Personnel who can demonstrate electrical experience and who can also meet or exceed the following requirements:

6.1.1. Project General Manager, Project Manager, Corporate Safety Manger, On-Site Quality Control (QC) Manager and On-Site Construction Superintendent

6.1.1.1. Project General Manager The employee in the Offeror’s company, or the offering entity in the case of a joint venture in your company who will lead the effort on all individual task orders under the Contract and shall possess either of the following qualifications:

i. Baccalaureate degree in engineering, architecture, or construction management and ten years’ experience as a General Project Manager simultaneously managing multiple construction and/or electrical projects or:

ii. Fifteen years’ experience as a Project General Manager or Project Manager simultaneously managing multiple construction and/or electrical projects. (12 months = One Year)

6.1.1.2. Project Manager The Offeror, or offering entity in the case of a joint venture, in your company who will lead the effort on individual task orders) shall possess either of the following qualifications:

five years’ experience as a Project Manager simultaneously managing multiple construction and/or electrical projects or:

ii. Ten years’ experience as a Project Manager simultaneously managing multiple construction and/or electrical projects. (12 months = One Year)

6.1.1.3. Corporate Safety Manager The Offeror, or offering entity in the case of a joint venture in your company responsible for Safety on a Corporate level shall possess either of the following qualifications:

five years’ experience as a Project Safety Officer (or in a position with equivalent responsibilities) simultaneously managing multiple construction and/or electrical projects or:

ii. Ten years’ experience as a Project Safety Manager (or in a position with equivalent responsibilities) simultaneously managing multiple construction and/or electrical projects. (12 months = One Year)

6.1.1.4 Quality Control (QC) Manager The Offeror, or offering entity in the case of a joint venture in your company responsible for QC performance under the resulting contract) shall possess either of the following qualifications:

i. Degree in Engineering, architecture, or Construction Management and five years’ experience working as a Quality Control Manger (or in a position with equivalent responsibilities) simultaneously managing multiple construction and/or electrical projects or:

ii. Ten years’ experience as a Quality Control Manager (or in a position with equivalent responsibilities) simultaneously managing multiple construction and/or electrical projects. (12 months = One Year)

6.1.1.5. Construction Superintendent The Offeror, or offering entity in the case of a joint venture, in your company assigned to task orders under the resulting contract) shall possess either of the following qualifications:

i. Baccalaureate degree in architecture, engineering, or construction management and four years’ experience as a Construction Superintendent or:

ii. Ten years construction and/or electrical experience in which at least five years were experienced as a Construction Superintendent. (Twelve Months = One Year)

6.2 Submission Requirements for Key Personnel- Offerors shall submit a resume reflecting the following information:

a. Name and Title

b. Proposed Duties/Function for this project, and;

c. Affiliation with Offeror and Years Affiliated with Offeror, and;

d. Months/Years of Experience performing duties/functions as proposed for this project,

e. Education – School attended, Degree, Certification, Year, and Specialization, and;

f. List Active Registrations (Professional or Technical Licenses/Certifications), and;

g. Describe Specific Qualifications for this project and how they meet the required qualifications

h. List Projects worked on to include:

- Project Title & Location

- Date of project (month/year project began and ended)

- Name of firm performing the project (and employing this individual)

- Brief description of project, to include size, scope, and Complexity (be sure to identify relevancy to the work to be ordered under this resultant contract, if applicable)

- Duties/Functions

- Current Point of Contact for the firm performing the project (ensure contact information is current)

The contractor agrees to assign those key personnel whose resumes were submitted with their proposal to Task Orders issued under this contract. No substitutions shall be made except in accordance with this paragraph. All proposed substitutions must be submitted in writing to the contracting officer 30 days in advance of the proposed substitutions and shall include the following information:

A detailed explanation of the circumstances necessitating the proposed substitutions, a complete resume for the proposed substitute, and any other information requested by the contracting officer needed by him to approve or disapprove the proposed substitution. ALL PROPOSED SUBSTITUTES MUST HAVE QUALIFICATIONS

THAT ARE EQUAL TO OR HIGHER THAN THE QUALIFICATIONS OF THE

PERSON TO BE REPLACED. The Contracting Officer or his authorized representative will evaluate such requests and promptly notify the contractor of his approval or disapproval thereof.

6.3. Evaluation Method – Responses to this factor will be deemed “acceptable” if all proposed Key Personnel meet or exceed the minimum qualifications as outlined above.

If the Offeror’s proposal receives a rating of “unacceptable” for any of the Key Personnel as listed above under paragraph 6. , the entire Factor 2 will receive a rating of “unacceptable.”

7. FACTOR 3 – PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE PRIME OFFEROR

7.1. - Submittal Requirements: Submittal Requirements: Submit a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for each project submitted in Factor 1. Submission of a (PPQ) for these projects will NOT be necessary IF a finalized performance assessment report has been completed and is available through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), which pulls finalized evaluations from the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). If a finalized performance assessment report is not available through PPIRS, the Offeror shall submit a PPQ. The PPQ is included as Attachment B to this solicitation. PPQ Questionnaires must be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Kathaleen Schollard, via email at kathaleen.schollard@usace.army.mil up to 3 days prior to proposal closing date. (Also please provide a copy of your submissions to the Contracting Officer, Ms. Elke Neal at elke.h.neal@usace.army.mil). Offerors may also submit a copy of the PPQ within their proposals. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other solicitations. Ensure correct and current phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact as your references may be contacted prior to being rated “acceptable” or “unacceptable.”

7.2. Government Research: The Government will also search the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) (www.ppirs.gov) for past performance information for recent projects for each Offeror; however, the Government reserves the right to obtain past performance information from any other sources available to include, but not limited to, interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, and the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA). Finalized CPARS evaluations are included in PPIRS.

7.3. Evaluation Method: There are two aspects to the past performance evaluation. The first is to evaluate the Offeror’s past performance to determine how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the Offeror is to the effort to be acquired through the source selection.

“Recent” is defined as “performed within the past five (5) years from the date on which the solicitation was issued.” “Relevant” is defined as “similar in scope and complexity to the types of projects that will be awarded as Task Orders under these contracts.” If the project is not similar in scope and complexity to the types of projects that will be awarded as Task Orders under these contracts, it may be considered “not relevant”. If the project is similar in scope and complexity to the types of projects that will be awarded as Task Orders under these contracts, it will be considered “relevant”. The Government will review the available past performance information and will consider only performance evaluations of those projects considered recent and relevant. The second aspect of the past performance evaluation is to determine how well the contractor performed on the contracts. Past performance will be rated on an “acceptable” or “unacceptable” basis using the ratings in Paragraph 3.2 of this Section 00 24 00 document.

Note: A lack of past performance information will result in an “unknown” rating during evaluations. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

8. Volume 2 - Price Proposal Submittal Requirements. (Submit one original and one copy):

8.1 Price: Price will be based on a proposed Seed Project entitled, “Replace Lights at Various Buildings on Joint Base Lewis –McChord, (JBLM), WA”. The Offeror is required to submit a lump sum proposed price for the Seed Project on Seed Project Bid Schedule (provided in solicitation). Offers received without a complete price proposal will not be considered for competition. Funding for this task order is currently available. The Seed Project is “live,” which means it is anticipated to be awarded at time of IDIQ contract award, and therefore, Offerors should submit their very best price.

8.2 Evaluation Method: A separate price evaluation team will be established to evaluate each Offeror’s proposed pricing. Each Offeror’s proposed price for the seed project will be evaluated for price reasonableness. In no instance will award be made unless the evaluated pricing is determined to be fair and reasonable by the Contracting Officer and provides the best value for the Government. For a price to be reasonable, it must represent a price to the

Government that a prudent person would pay in the conduct of competitive business. The Price Proposal for the Seed Project Task Order will not be rated or scored, but will be evaluated for completeness, fairness and reasonableness through the use of a price analysis IAW FAR 15.404-1(b), (c) and (e) and will be rated on an “acceptable” or “unacceptable” basis. Financial capacity and bonding ability will also be verified prior to award.

The Government reserves the right to require the submission of Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data if it is deemed necessary to arrive at a fair and reasonable price.

8.3 Summary of Price Proposal Format:

8.3.1 Submit one original and one copy of the following:

a) Standard Form 1442 Solicitation, Offer and Award (Front and Back)

b) Corporate Certificate (Fill out the Joint Venture section if applicable)

c) Bid Schedule

d) Section 00 45 00 (Reps and Certs). The Offeror shall complete the applicable sections of section 00 45 00.

e) Bank and Bonding Points of Contact (See Pre Award Information under section 00

45 00)

f) $180K Bid Bond (Most current SF24, dated August 2016)

g) A letter from your federally approved bonding corporate surety certifying your bonding capacity at a minimum of $5,000,000 single project and $12,000,000 in the aggregate.

h) Joint Venture Information (if applicable)

8.3.2 The price proposal must be signed by an official authorized to bind the organization. Note that the Standard Form 1442, Block 13D, states the minimum number of calendar days after the date offers are due for Government acceptance of the offer. All amendments must be acknowledged by date and number on the Standard Form 1442 BACK, Block 19.

8.3.3 Provide the name, point of contact, phone number, and address for the Bank and Bonding companies of the firm signing the SF 1442.

9. Bid Bonds: In accordance with Section 00 21 00, FAR 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee, a Bid Bond (SF24) must accompany your offer in response to this solicitation and shall be in the amount of $180,000. In accordance with FAR 28.101-3 (a) (b) (c) Authority of an Attorney-in-Fact for a Bid Bond, any person signing a bid bond as an attorney-in-fact shall include with the bid bond evidence of authority to bind the surety. An original, or a photocopy of an original, power of attorney is sufficient evidence of such authority. For purposes of this section, electronic, mechanically-applied and printed signatures, seals and dates on the power of attorney shall be considered original signatures, seals and dates, without regard to the order in which they were affixed.

Note: Payment and/or Performance Bonds, will be submitted with a penal sum at 100% of the Task Order amount for any Task Order issued against the MATOC contracts for all work considered to be construction by the Contracting Officer. Bid bonds will NOT be required for any task orders issued under the MATOC contract. Payment and/or Performance Bonds shall be provided within ten (10) calendar days after Task Order award and prior to issuance of the Notice-to-Proceed.

10. Joint Ventures. No contract may be awarded to a joint venture that is not registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) Website. To register go to http://www.sam.gov.

10.1 In the cover letter of your proposal, provide the complete names, addresses, and phone and fax numbers of all firms in the joint venture.

10.2. Signature requirements: SF 1442, SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD, Block 20 requires that the name and title of the person authorized to sign the offer for the joint venture be provided.

10.3. In addition to the requirements stated above, and to assure a single point of contact for resolution of contractual matters and payments, submit a certificate signed by each participant in the joint venture that includes the following statement:

“The parties hereto expressly understand and agree as follows:

(a) (Name, title, and company) is the principal representative of the joint venture.

As such, all communications regarding the administration of the contract and the performance of the work there under may be directed to him or her. In the absence of (same name, title, and company), (enter name, title, and company of alternate) is the alternate principal representative of the joint venture.

(b) Direction, approvals, required notices, and all other communications from the Government to the joint venture, including transmittal of payments by the Government, shall be directed to (enter name, title, and company of principal), principal representative of the joint venture.”

10.4. The bid bond form, Block “Principal” requires that the name and title of the person authorized to sign for the joint venture be included.

10.5. After award, the performance and payment bonds, and required insurance certificate(s) provided shall be in the name of the joint venture.

11. Debriefings. Upon written request, firms will be debriefed and furnished the basis for the selection decision and contract award in accordance with FAR 15.505 and FAR 15.506.

12. Proposal Expenses and Pre-Contract Costs. This solicitation does not commit the Government to pay costs incurred in preparation and submission of initial and subsequent proposals or for other costs incurred prior to award of a formal contract.

13. Release of Information. After receipt of proposals and until contract award, source selection information will not be furnished to any firm.

14. RFP Requirements, Terms And Conditions - Offerors are required to meet all RFP requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as factors or sub-factors. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the RFP may result in the Offeror being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the RFP terms and conditions and must provide complete supporting rationale.

-END OF SECTION-

SECTION 01 00 00 - DIVISION 01 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

The following have been modified:

SOW SEED PROJECT TASK ORDER

SECTION 01 11 00

STATEMENT OF WORK

(SEED PROJECT)

RFP: W912DW-16-R-0008

Version 1.31

Issued February 19, 2016

MATOC TASK ORDER

RFP Final

Date: November 29, 2016 Revised: 19 December 2016

1. GENERAL DISCUSSION

1.1. Project Identification

1.1.1. Project Title: Replace Lights at Various Buildings on Joint Base Lewis –McChord, (JBLM), WA.

1.1.2. IJO Number(s): TDA000833J, DLE150055J

1.1.3. Project Package Number(s): B1627

1.2. Description of Work

1.2.1. The contractor shall supply all supervision, labor, equipment, and materials to perform all work in strict accordance with the umbrella contract specifications, this statement of work, and to provide LED lights at various buildings on JBLM.

1.3. Area Description

1.3.1. Location

1.3.1.1. There are two separate locations on JBLM where work will be accomplished. (1)The various buildings in the gated and fenced 9000 area of the 1st SFG; and (2) The facility lights inside the gated and fenced portion of the Ammunition Supply Point (ASP) at Joint Base Lewis-McChord

(JBLM).

1.3.2. Known Existing Site Conditions

1.3.2.1. The exterior lights in the 9000 area will have normal accessibility. The ASP will need prior approval for each worker. Lay down yards will be unlikely at any of the sites. Most of the work will be done off of ladders or man lifts. Dedicated street lights and circuits are exempt and not part of this SOW.

1.4. Principal Items To Be Accomplished

1.4.1. Base Item CLIN 0001, TDA000833J::, Replace Exterior lights at various buildings in the 9000 area of JBLM.

1.4.1.1. Demo and dispose of all exterior building lights. (See attached 1SFG-9000 area – Lighting Breakdown) Contractor will demo and dispose of fixtures, photocells and fasteners except as stated in Paragraph 1.4.1.3, below.

1.4.1.2. Replace all exterior building lights with LED commercial grade, lights and fixtures. Replace all exiting photocells with LED rated photocells. If a light circuit has no photocell or is controlled by a timer, bypass the timer and install an LED rated photocell.

1.4.1.3. Contractor may reuse unique building fixtures and replace the insides with an LED retro fit.

1.4.1.4. All lighting fixtures shall be weather proof and secure. All exterior fasteners or anchors shall be of non-oxidizing material.

1.4.1.5. All LED lighting shall have a minimum color temperature of 4000K.

1.4.2. Base Item CLIN 0002, DLE150055J: Replace lights at the ASP on JBLM.

1.4.2.1. Demo and dispose existing interior and exterior fixtures in all the facilities inside the ASP gated complex. (See attached ASP Lighting Breakdown)

1.4.2.2. Replace and add LED, commercial grade, lights and fixtures. The lights and fixtures shall match the existing grade and purpose of the lights and fixtures removed and disposed of under this Task Order. The contractor is responsible to determine the number of fixtures and configuration that will produce a minimum of 30 foot candles (fc), 300 lux throughout the interior of bunkers.

Contractor may re-use the existing wiring and conduit. Any new conduit must be rigid galvanized steel (RGS) and utilize threaded connections. Exterior security light shall be bi-level LED wall pack and have a photocell to control low intensity illumination to a minimum of 0.2 fc, 2 lux, high intensity illumination with manual weather proof switch for loading activities to a minimum of 5 fc, (50 lux).

1.4.2.3. Each interior lighting circuit and exterior loading light shall be controlled by a separate switch and duty rated breaker.

1.4.2.4. All lighting fixtures shall be weather proof and secure. All exterior fasteners or anchors shall be of non-oxidizing material.

1.4.2.5. All LED lighting shall have a minimum color temperature of 4000K.

2. PERFORMANCE AND SCHEDULING

2.1. Performance Period Requirements

2.1.1. The Contractor is required to commence work under this Task Order within ten (10) calendar days after the date of issuance of the Notice to Proceed (NTP) for the Base Item(s), prosecute the work diligently, and complete all work on all Base Item(s) no later than 240 calendar days after the date of issuance of the Notice to Proceed for the Base Item(s). The time stated for completion includes final cleanup of the premises and submission of all required close-out documentation.

2.2. Construction Phasing Requirements

2.2.1. ASP area will only have 3 bunkers available at a time to perform work. A minimum of 3 days will be required to move ammunition to be removed from one bunker to the next. Exterior work will be allowed during the movement of ammunition on other bunkers.

2.3. Liquidated Damages

2.3.1. Liquidated damages shall be assessed in the amount of $441.00 in accordance with the base contract.

DRAWINGS

2.4. There are no drawings available for this project.

3. SPECIFICATIONS AND CODES

3.1. Codes

3.1.1. The Contractor shall comply with the most recent edition, at time of solicitation, of all pertinent Local, State, and Federal building and life/health/safety codes, to include the following:

a. Applicable Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC)

b. UFC 1-200-01: General Building Requirements

c. UFC 1-200-02: High Performance and Sustainable Building Requirements

d. ASA IE&E SDD policy http://www.asaie.army.mil/Public/IE/doc/ASA(IEE)‐SDD‐policy‐update‐ (16‐Dec‐2013).pdf.

e. EM 385-1-1 (http://www.publications.usace.army.mil/USACEPublications/EngineerManuals.aspx)

f. National Electric Code, NFPA 70

g. All applicable National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Codes

h. Telecommunication Industry Association/Electrical Industry Association Wiring Standards (Building Telecommunication Wiring Standards)

i. Army Installation Information Infrastructure Architecture Policy (I3A)080502

j. USACE Energy and Water Conservation Design Guide (http://www.wbdg.org/references/pa_dod_energy.php)

k. Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) Performance Requirements.

http://energy.gov/eere/femp/covered-product-category-exterior-lighting

l. JBLM Design Standard specifications (http://www.lewis-mcchord.army.mil/designstandards/)

m. PWE-707, Standard Operating Procedure for Construction and Demolition (C&D) Waste Planning and Reporting (Available through government Project Manager)

3.2. Specifications

3.2.1. The contractor shall comply with all relevant specification sections as set forth in the base contract.

4. SUBMITTALS

4.1. Project Submittal Requirements

4.1.1. All submittals shall be submitted in accordance with the specification section titled SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES. Required submittals are identified in their applicable specification sections.

4.1.2. In addition to the requirements as outlined in the specification section titled SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES, an electronic copy of each submittal shall be provided to the Government.

Delivery method shall be decided during the CQC coordination meeting.

4.1.2.1. Inspection report. Report to include 12 evenly spaced test area locations. Test to be taken 36” off the ground. Light meter type used to include manufacturer, model number, and calibration date.

Test results to meet 30 foot candles. Test report to be signed and dated by testing technician.

4.1.2.2. Project schedule.

4.1.2.3. Material product data meeting statement of work and umbrella specifications.

4.1.2.4. As-built drawings are only required where new circuits are added.

4.2. Close-out Submittal Requirements

4.2.1. The Contractor shall provide close-out submittals as required by the contract specifications.

4.2.2. The Contractor shall provide a Letter of non-retention for all contract documents, plans, drawings, and specifications after the destruction of all copies that are not required by the contractor to meet legal requirements.

5. ENVIRONMENTAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES

5.1. Asbestos Containing Material

5.1.1. If needed, inspections shall be accomplished in accordance with the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA), Federal and Local regulations. A Certified AHERA Asbestos Building Inspector shall perform all inspections. The inspection documentation shall comply with AHERA, Federal and Local regulations and shall include assessment of each asbestos-containing material (ACM), its location, quantity, type, friability and percentage of asbestos.

5.2. Lead-Containing Paint

5.2.1. The Contractor shall perform a complete lead paint inspection of all areas affected by the work described in this SOW in accordance with all Federal and Local regulations. A Certified Lead Paint Inspector shall perform the inspection. The inspection documentation shall comply with Federal and Local regulations and shall include identification of all lead paint, its location, quantity, percentage by weight and TCLP characteristics.

5.3. Environmental Coordination

5.3.1. The Contractor shall comply with all Joint Base Lewis-McChord (JBLM) environmental requirements, including the most current installation regulation 200-1 (Environmental Protection and Enhancement) and Design Standards specification section 01 57 20.00 10 (Environmental Protection). This includes the submission of an Environmental Protection Plan prior to commencement, as detailed in section 01 57 20.00 10. The JBLM Environmental Division will review the Plan and provide any necessary corrections or additions to the Contracting Officer or their representative. Regulation 200-1 and specification section 01 57 20.00 10 are available at the JBLM Design Standards website (http://www.lewis-mcchord.army.mil/designstandards/).

5.3.2. Any waste-water generated during this project is subject to JBLM EPA MS4 Storm Water Permit. To comply with the permit all contaminated wastewater produced by this project must be collected, processed, characterized, and disposed of into the JBLM sanitary sewer system or another authorized disposal method. JBLM sanitary sewer discharge requires a JBLM Sanitary Sewer Discharge Permit which is issued by DPW Waste Water Treatment Plan. Prior to discharge a laboratory analysis of the waste water may be required for review and approval by Wastewater Plant Personnel. Process water is not authorized to discharge to the ground or JBLM storm sewer. The Environmental Protection Plan for the project should identify any potential wastewater generation and the process to which that water will be properly disposed.

5.4. Sustainable Acquisition

5.4.1. In order to comply with federally mandated sustainable acquisition requirements and Department of Defense (DOD) and Department of the Army (DA) Green Procurement Program (GPP) policies, Joint Base Lewis-McChord (JBLM) requires the purchase, supply, and use of environmentally preferable products and services. Program elements include: recovered material products, energy and water efficient products, alternative fuels and fuel efficiency, bio-based products, non-ozone depleting substances, and environmentally preferable products.

These elements are described on the Office of Federal Procurement Policy website (http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/procurement_index_green/). For a listing of designated items, associated requirements and managing program websites, see https://sftool.gov/ Green Procurement.

5.4.2. Additionally, the JBLM Guide to Sustainable Acquisition for Construction is available in the “Reference Manuals” section of the JBLM Design Standards webpage (http://www.lewis-mcchord.army.mil/designstandards/index1.htm).

5.4.3. The Contractor shall comply with all applicable Federal, DOD, Army, and JBLM sustainable acquisition laws and policies. If compliant products are unavailable or determined to be impracticable based on cost or performance, the Contractor shall contact the Contracting Officer or their representative for further guidance and exception requirements. Claims of exception must meet applicable legal criteria and be justified in writing through the submission of a completed HJB Form 225 (Sustainable Acquisition Exception). The form is available at http://www.lewis‐mcchord.army.mil/designstandards/pdf/HJB%20225.pdf. Additional information is available from the JBLM Sustainable Acquisition Program at (253) 966-6466 or usarmy.jblm.imcom.list.dpw-green-procurement@mail.mil.

5.5. Environmental Management System

5.5.1. PW is responsible for day to day management of the Joint Base Lewis-McChord (JBLM) environmental program. The JBLM Environmental Management System (EMS) outlines procedures and provides guidance that addresses the operation, maintenance, support, and repair of facilities and infrastructure at JBLM. The JBLM EMS conforms to the criteria defined in the international standard, ISO 14001:2004 Environmental management systems – Requirements with guidance for use.

5.5.2. In accordance with EMS procedures, the Contractor shall be familiar with the JBLM environmental policy and shall ensure that this information is considered and incorporated into this project. The installation policy can be found at http://www.lewis-mcchord.army.mil/publicworks/sustainability/EMS/environ_policy.aspx (click on JBLM Policy). Additional information regarding the JBLM EMS is available from the installation EMS Coordinator (253-966-6470).

5.5.3. An environmental awareness training resource is available to the Contractor at http://www.lewis-mcchord.army.mil/publicworks/sustainability/EMS/EnvTraining.aspx.

5.6. Hazardous Materials

5.6.1. For any hazardous materials, the Contractor shall submit an initial list of hazardous materials to be used (including unit of measure, product data sheets and Safety Data Sheet for each product).

A copy of these documents must be submitted to the Joint Base Lewis-McChord (JBLM) Pollution Prevention Program (usarmy.jblm.imcom.list.dpw-hm-inventory@mail.mil) prior to commencement. These items must be reviewed by Pollution Prevention and authorized for use if they are not already on the JBLM installation Authorized Use List. The Contractor shall not use any hazardous materials not authorized by Pollution Prevention.

5.6.2. For any in-use hazardous materials, the Contractor shall submit a hazardous material inventory on HJB Form 953 noting the hazardous materials used, the units of measure, quantities used,…