B.08.03 Amendment 03.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Please see the continuation page for the purpose of this amendment.

Offeror must acknow ledge receipt of this amendment by the date specified in the proposal (or as amended) by one of the follow ing methods: in the space provided on SF1442, by separate letter, or by signing block 15 below . FAILURE TO ACKNOWLEDGE AMENDMENTS

BY THE DATE AND TIME SPECIFIED MAY

RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SUBMISSION, MODIFICATION, REVISION, AND WITHDRAWAL OF

PROPOSALS (FAR 15.208).

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 3

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W912DS22B0020

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

15-Jul-2022

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

31-Aug-2022

CODE

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, NEW YORK

26 FEDERAL PLAZA, RM 16-300

NEW YORK NY 10278-0090

W912DS 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912DS22B0020

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00 72 00 - GENERAL CONDITIONS

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 3

W912DS-22-B-0020

Amendment No. 3

To Bidders The following changes shall be made to the drawings and specifications.

DRAWINGS

1. The following DRAWINGS have been REVISED and REISSUED:

-G-103,C-110,C-309 to C-312

2. The following DRAWINGS have been ADDED:

-None

3. The following DRAWINGS have been REVISED but NOT REISSUED:

-None

SPECIFICATIONS:

1. The following SPECIFICATION SECTIONS have been ADDED and are provided in their entirety herein:

-None

2. The following SPECIFICATIONS SECTIONS have been DELETED in their entirety:

-None

3. The following SPECIFICATION SECTIONS have been REVISED and REISSUED in their entirety:

-None

4. The following SPECIFICATION SECTIONS have been REVISED but NOT REISSUED:

- Section 01 11 00 par 1.1 b

REVISED PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS:

1- Section 01 11 00 par 1.1 b – first sentence revised to “The completion date is based on the assumption that the successful offeror will receive the notice to proceed by 30 September, 2022.”

2- Revised reference line, notes and cross sections for CPF 7.

Questions and Answers:

W912DS22B0020

Question 1. It appears the elevations in the northwestern Fill on Land area (between stations 4+00c and 8+00c) are already higher than el. 0. Would this area need to be cut to el. 0, or is it left alone, if it's above 0?

Response 1. This area would not be cut to el. 0. Contractor to submit shop drawings of grading plan based on contractor’s post clearing and grubbing survey of CPF 7 as per note 6 on sheet C-110.

Question 2. Are all the hatched areas on page 14 of the plans, labeled Fill on Land, and Fill on Water to be brought to el. 0, whether by cut or fill, or only filled to el. 0 as needed?

Response 2. Only fill to el. 0 as needed. Contractor to submit shop drawings of grading plan based on contractor’s post clearing and grubbing survey of CPF 7 as per note 6 on sheet C-110.

Question 3. If excess material is accumulated, where does the government intend the excess material to go? Shall it be trucked off site? If so, will there be a disposal item?

Response 3. If there is excess material, it is to be used on site.

Question 4. The coordinates given for the CPF7 reference line appear to be wrong. When georeferenced, the proposed contours and Burma Rd offset do not match up with the Burma Rd alignment. If this is the case, can the government provide an updated page 14 of the plans with the correct alignment?

Response 4. Coordinates are correct. See revised cross section sheet.

Question 5. The proposed contours for CPF7 grading appear to start around station 1+80 of the CPF7 reference line and go to ~26+60. Pages 23-26 of the plans give cross-sections for CPF7 grading, and the stations that are covered are from 7+00 - 30+25. Is there a mismatch between what the cross-sections reference and the plan-view stationing shown on page 14? If so, can the government re-issue a correct set of plans and cross-sections for CPF7 grading?

Response 5: See revised plan sheets.

Question 6. Please provide recent x,y,x file of CPF7 area of existing and proposed conditions.

Response 6: Provided existing conditions xyz file.

Question 7. Sections on C-309 -C 312 does not show any work north of the referenced stationing line. The plan view on C-110 shows grading work there. Please provide sections detailing work there.

Response 7: See revised plan sheets.

Question 8. Please provide soils report information on the CPF7 area.

Response 8: None available.

(End of Summary of Changes)