Package 2 - Youth Center - Specifications.pdf

NEW YORK DISTRICT

YOUTH CENTER ANNEX

JB McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, New Jersey

W912DS- 20-X-00XX

100% Submission

Specifications

December 2019

617.623.5555 www.arrowstreet.com mailto:ronald.e.st-laurent@usace.army.mil

100% Design September 14, 2016

Joint Base McGuire-Dix--Lakehurst Youth Center Annex Contract No.: F41999-11-D-011 Section 00 01 01 Project No.: PTFL 015000, AFBCIF 150015 Page 1 Table of Contents

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS

VOLUME I

DIVISION 00 - PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS

00 01 01 TABLE OF CONTENTS

00 31 32 GEOTECHNICAL DATA

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT

SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION REPORT

DIVISION 01 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

01 23 00 ALTERNATES

01 33 00 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES

01 33 29 LEED(TM) DOCUMENTATION

LEED 2009 for New Construction and Major Renovations Air Force MILCON Sustainability Requirements Scoresheet

01 42 00 SOURCES FOR REFERENCE PUBLICATIONS

01 57 19 TEMPORARY ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS

01 74 19 CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTE MANAGEMENT

01 78 00 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS

01 78 23 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA

01 86 12 RELIABILITY CENTERED ACCEPTANCE FOR MEHCHANICAL SYSTEMS

DIVISION 02 – EXISTING CONDITIONS

02 41 00 DEMOLITION

DIVISION 03 - CONCRETE

03 30 00 CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE

DIVISION 04 - MASONRY

04 20 00 MASONRY

04 21 13.13 NONBEARING MASONRY VENEER/STEEL STUD WALLS

DIVISION 05 - METALS

05 12 00 STRUCTURAL STEEL

05 30 00 METAL DECKING

05 40 00 COLD FORMED METAL FRAMING

05 50 13 MISCELLANEOUS METAL FABRICATIONS

DIVISION 06 - WOOD, PLASTICS, AND COMPOSITES

06 10 00 ROUGH CARPENTRY

06 20 00 FINISH CARPENTRY

06 41 16 LAMINATE CLAD ARCHITECTURAL CASEWORK

Project No.: PTFL 015000, AFBCIF 150015 Page 2 Table of Contents

DIVISION 07 - THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION

07 11 13 BITUMINOUS DAMPPROOFING

07 21 13 BOARD AND BLOCK INSULATION

07 21 16 MINERAL FIBER BLANKET INSULATION

07 22 00 ROOF AND DECK INSULATION

07 24 00 EXTERIOR INSULATION AND FINISH SYSTEM

07 27 26 FLUID-APPLIED MEMBRANE AIR BARRIERS

07 42 63 FABRICATED WALL PANEL ASSEMBLIES

07 60 00 FLASHING AND SHEET METAL

07 61 15 ALUMINUM STANDING SEAM ROOFING

07 72 53 ROOF SNOW GUARDS

07 84 00 FIRESTOPPING

07 92 00 JOINT SEALANTS

DIVISION 08 - OPENINGS

08 11 13 STEEL DOORS AND FRAMES

08 12 16 ALUMINUM FRAMES

08 14 00 WOOD DOORS

08 33 23 OVERHEAD COILING DOORS

08 41 13 ALUMINUM-FRAMED ENTRANCES AND STOREFRONTS

08 51 13 ALUMINUM WINDOWS

08 71 00 DOOR HARDWARE

08 81 00 GLAZING

08 91 19 ALUMINUM LOUVERS

DIVISION 09 - FINISHES

09 22 00 SUPPORTS FOR GYPSUM BOARD

09 29 00 GYPSUM BOARD

09 51 00 ACOUSTICAL CEILINGS

09 65 00 RESILIENT FLOORING

09 65 66 RESILIENT ATHLETIC FLOORING

09 67 23 STANDARD RESINOUS FLOORING

09 68 00 CARPETING

09 84 33 SOUND ABSORBING WALL UNITS

09 90 00 PAINTS AND COATINGS

DIVISION 10 - SPECIALTIES

10 14 00 INTERIOR SIGNAGE

10 14 01 EXTERIOR SIGNAGE

10 14 02 TRAFFIC SIGNAGE

10 21 13 TOILET COMPARTMENTS

10 26 13 WALL AND CORNER GUARDS

10 28 13 TOILET ACCESSORIES

10 44 16 FIRE EXTINGUISHERS

10 51 16 WOOD LOCKERS

Project No.: PTFL 015000, AFBCIF 150015 Page 3 Table of Contents

DIVISION 11 - EQUIPMENT

11 05 40 COMMON WORK RESULTS FOR FOOD SERVICE EQUIPMENT

11 06 40.13 FOOD SERVICE EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE

11 66 23 GYMNASIUM EQUIPMENT

11 68 16 PLAY STRUCTURES

11 68 23 EXTERIOR COURT ATHLETIC EQUIPMENT

DIVISION 12 - FURNISHINGS

12 24 13 ROLLER WINDOW SHADES

12 36 00 COUNTERTOPS

DIVISION 13 – SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION

13 48 00 SEISMIC PROTECTION FOR MISC. EQUIPMENT

13 48 00.10 SEISMIC PROTECTION FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT

DIVISION 14 – CONVEYING SYSTEMS

Not Used

Project No.: PTFL 015000, AFBCIF 150015 Page 4 Table of Contents

VOLUME II

DIVISION 21 - FIRE PROTECTION

21 13 13 FIRE PROTECTION

DIVISION 22 - PLUMBING SYSTEMS

22 00 00 PLUMBING

22 07 19 PLUMBING PIPING INSULATION

DIVISION 23 - HEATING VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING

23 00 00 HEATING, VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING

23 01 30 HVAC SYSTEM CLEANING

23 03 00 BASIC MECHANICAL MATERIALS AND METHODS

23 05 15 COMMON PIPING FOR HVAC

23 05 48 VIBRATION AND SEISMIC CONTROLS FOR HVAC PIPING AND EQUIPMENT

23 05 93 TESTING, ADJUSTING, AND BALANCING FOR HVAC

23 07 00 THERMAL INSULATION FOR MECHANICAL SYSTEMS

23 08 00 COMMISSIONING OF HVAC SYSTEMS

23 11 25 FACILITY GAS PIPING

23 23 00 REFRIGERANT PIPING

23 31 13 METAL DUCTS

23 37 13 DIFFUSERS, REGISTERS, AND GRILLS

23 38 13 COMMERCIAL-KITCHEN HOODS

23 41 13 PANEL FILTERS

23 54 19 BUILDING HEATING SYSTEMS, WARM AIR

23 74 33 PACKAGED, OUTDOOR, HEATING AND COOLING MAKEUP AIR-CONDITIONERS

23 82 00 TERMINAL HEATING UNITS

23 82 02 UNITARY HEATING AND COOLING EQUIPMENT

23 82 46 ELECTRIC UNIT HEATERS

23 83 00 ELECTRIC SPACE HEATING EQUIPMENT

DIVISION 25 – INTEGRATED AUTOMATION

Project No.: PTFL 015000, AFBCIF 150015 Page 5 Table of Contents

DIVISION 26 - ELECTRICAL

26 00 00 BASIC ELECTRICAL MATERIALS AND METHODS

26 05 00 COMMON WORK RESULTS FOR ELECTRICAL

26 05 19 INSULATED WIRE AND CABLE2

26 05 48 SEISMIC PROTECTION FOR ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT

26 05 71 LOW VOLTAGE OVERCURRENT PROTECTIVE DEVICE

26 08 00 APPARATUS INSPECTION AND TESTING

26 09 23 LIGHTING CONTROL DEVICES

26 20 00 INTERIOR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

26 24 16 PANELBOARDS

26 28 01 COORDINATED POWER SYSTEM PROTECTION

26 29 23 VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE SYSTEMS UNDER 600 VOLTS

26 41 00 LIGHTNING PROTECTION SYSTEM

26 51 00 INTERIOR LIGHTING

26 52 00 EMERGENCY LIGHTING

26 53 00 EXIT SIGNS

26 56 00 EXTERIOR LIGHTING

26 56 13 LIGHTING POLES AND STANDARDS

26 56 23 AREA LIGHTING

26 60 13 LOW-VOLTAGE MOTORS

DIVISION 27 – TELECOMMUNICATIONS

27 05 28 CABLE TRAYS FOR COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS

27 10 00 BUILDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CABLING SYSTEM

27 13 23 COMMUNICATIONS OPTICAL BACKBONE CABLING

27 21 10 FIBER OPTIC DATA TRANSMISSION SYSTEM

27 51 16 RADIO AND PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS

27 51 23 INTERCOMMUNICATION SYSTEM

27 54 00 COMMUNITY ANTENNA TELEVISION (CATV) SYSTEMS

DIVISION 28 – SECURITY

28 05 26 GROUNDING AND BONDING FOR ELECTRONIC SAFETY AND SECURITY

28 20 01 ELECTRONIC SECURITY SYSTEM

28 23 23 CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION SYSTEMS

28 31 02 FIRE ALARM REPORTING SYSTEMS - DIGITAL COMMUNICATORS

28 31 13 FIRE DETECTION AND ALARM CONTROL, GUI, AND LOGIC SYSTEMS

28 31 49 CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTORS

28 31 76 INTERIOR FIRE ALARM AND MASS NOTIFICATION SYSTEM

DIVISION 31 - EARTHWORK

31 00 00 EARTHWORK

31 11 00 CLEARING AND GRUBBING

31 13 00 TREE PRUNING AND REMOVAL

31 32 11 SOIL SURFACE EROSION CONTROL

Project No.: PTFL 015000, AFBCIF 150015 Page 6 Table of Contents

DIVISION 32 - EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS

32 11 24 GRADED CRUSHED AGGREGATE BASE COURSE FOR FLEXIBLE PAVING

32 12 17 HOT MIX BITUMINOUS PAVING

32 12 33 CHIP-SEAL SURFACE FLEXIBLE PAVING

32 13 13 LANDSCAPE CONCRETE PAVENET

32 16 13 CONCRETE CURBS

32 17 24 PAVEMENT MARKINGS

32 18 16 SYNTHETIC RESILIENT SURFACING

32 18 23 ATHLETIC COURT SURFACING

32 31 13 CHAIN LINK FENCES AND GATES

32 32 23 SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALLS AND STAIRS

32 33 00 SITE FURNISHINGS

32 90 00 PLANTING

DIVISION 33 - UTILITIES

33 11 00 WATER DISTRIBUTION

33 30 00 SANTIARTY SEWER

33 40 00 STORM DRAINAGE UTILITIES

33 51 15 NATURAL-GAS / LIQUID PETROLEUM GAS DISTRIBUTION

DIVISION 34 – TRANSPORTATION

-- END OF PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS --

441 Friendship Road Harrisburg, PA 17111

Phone: (717) 236-3006 Fax: (717) 233-0994 www.gtstech.com

Engineers Geologists Surveyors Environmental Consultants

GEO-Technical Services, Inc. d/b/a GTS Technologies, Inc.

July 3, 2014

Revised July 18, 2014

Tetra Tech- Framingham Office

One Grant Street

Framingham, MA 01701

Attention: Mr. Jonathan K. MacDonald, P.E.

Re: Youth Center Annex Facility

Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst Air Force Base

Burlington County, New Jersey

GTS Project No. P14008

Dear Mr. MacDonald, This letter report presents the results of subsurface investigations and geotechnical evaluations made for the design of the Youth Center Annex Facility, located at the Joint

Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst Air Force Base, Burlington County, New Jersey (Figure 1, Project Location Map). Services performed by GTS Technologies, Inc. (GTS) are consistent with our proposal dated March 20, 2014.

This report addresses recommendations for foundation design for the proposed

Youth Center Annex building. Recommendations for pavement design for the new parking area, truck path, and bus drop area are provided in an attachment at the end of this report.

Investigation

Five (5) test borings were performed for this investigation to determine the nature and competency of the bearing materials. Three (3) borings were performed inside the footprint of the proposed building (Borings B-6, B-8, and B-10). Borings B-1 and B-3 were performed in the pavement areas. Refer to Figure 2 for the Boring Location Plan.

Sano Drilling Inc., of Sewell, New Jersey performed the borings for GTS on June

23, 2014. Standard soil sampling methods (ASTM D-1586) were employed in drilling the test borings. Standard Penetration Tests (SPTs) were performed in the overburden soils to determine the character and consistency of the subsurface materials. In the SPT, a conventional two-inch-diameter split-spoon sampler, driven 24 inches by a 140-pound hammer freely falling 30 inches, is employed. The number of hammer blows (blow counts) for each six inches of penetration is recorded for use in evaluating the load-carrying capabilities of the soil. The “N-value” for each sample interval is computed by summing the blow counts of the second and third intervals of penetration and is measured in blows per foot (bpf). The Typed Boring Logs are included in the report.

Subsurface Conditions

Silty sand and poorly graded sand with varying gravel content was encountered below the topsoil layer in all borings, extending to 23.0 feet Below Existing Site Grades

(BESG). The sand is orangish-brown and medium dense in all borings except B-1, where it is very loose from 2.0 to 4.0 feet BESG. The borings were terminated at 6.0 feet BESG in the pavement areas, and at 21.0 to 23.0 feet BESG in the footprint of the building. No rock was cored at any boring location.

Groundwater was encountered at 14.0 feet BESG in Borings B-6 and B-10, and at

13.5 feet BESG in Boring B-8. Groundwater was not encountered in Borings B-1 and B-3.

Laboratory Testing

Two (2) representative samples of the on-site soil were tested to confirm the field visual classifications. Refer to the following table for the results of the laboratory testing.

The Laboratory Classifications are attached to this report.

SOIL CLASSIFICATION TESTING SUMMARY

Boring No.

Sample Depth

(ft)

Sample No.

Classification

Natural Moisture Content

LL

PI

Gravel

Sand

Silt and Clay

B-1 2.0-6.0 S-1,S-2 Silty SAND (SM, A-2-4(0)) 7.7 NP NP 11.8 75.4 12.8

B-1 1.0-5.0 Bag Silty SAND (SM, A-2-4(0)) N/A NP NP 11.0 54.2 34.8

Recommendations

It is recommended that spread footing foundations be used to support the proposed building. It is also recommended that all primary structural elements, such as columns and load-bearing walls, shall be placed on a minimum of 12 inches of imported, compacted coarse aggregate to provide a uniform bearing surface. The GTS Geotechnical Engineer or his qualified representative shall be contacted to verify the suitability of the subgrade prior to placement of concrete or coarse aggregate materials within the building foundation area.

Based on the 2012 International Building Code (IBC), Table 1806.2, the recent subsurface investigation, and the current laboratory testing, design the spread footings with a maximum foundation pressure of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf).

Based on footing designs not exceeding the maximum foundation pressures for each building, the total settlements should be less than 1-inch and differential settlements less than ½-inch.

Interior footing grades may be set at nominal depths below the floor slab. Properly place exterior footings a minimum of 30 inches below final grade for frost protection.

Footings separated in grade shall bear at a slope not exceeding 1H:1V between adjacent edges of footing bottoms.

According to the 2012 IBC, the proposed building shall be designed based on

Seismic Site Class D, as defined by 2012 IBC Section 1613.3.2.

Support the floor slabs for the proposed building on subgrades prepared in accordance with this report. Found all interior slabs-on-grade on a minimum of 6 inches of

Dense Graded Aggregate Base Course (DGABC), compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by the Modified Proctor Test, ASTM D-1557, within 3 percent of the optimum moisture content. Furthermore, provide a moisture vapor barrier, consisting of a minimum 6-mil polyethylene sheeting, between the bottom of the concrete slab and the top of the granular subbase material. The floor slabs may be designed based on a modulus of subgrade reaction (k) of 100 pci. All construction should comply with the 2012 International Building Code.

The site surface shall be stripped and grubbed of existing vegetation, topsoil, and random fill materials to a minimum depth of two (2) feet BESG and replaced with compacted granular fill material, as required. After stripping and grubbing, proof-rolling shall be performed under the supervision of a qualified representative to verify the suitability of the subgrade soils. Perform proof-rolling with a fully loaded dump truck or with a full-size smooth drum roller. Within the building pad area, special care shall be taken to ensure that loose or soft soils do not exist at the ground surface where new structural fill or subgrade aggregate will be placed. Any unsuitable soils shall be undercut and then grades re-established by backfilling with suitable soils, placed and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by the Standard Proctor

Test, ASTM D-698, within 3 percent of the optimum moisture content. Care shall be taken to control water during construction to minimize ponding, especially near proposed foundations. Exercise caution when proof-rolling adjacent to existing structure or utilities.

General

The evaluations and recommendations presented in this report are based on the information available to GTS at the time of the writing of this report and the on-site surface and subsurface conditions that existed at the time the investigation was performed. A further assumption has been made that the conditions encountered in the limited subsurface investigation program are representative of the subsurface in general. If subsurface conditions are encountered during construction that vary significantly from those reported herein, the Geotechnical Engineer should be contacted immediately so that the impact of any unanticipated conditions can be properly evaluated.

TOPSOIL

Silty SAND (SM, A-2-4(0)), orangish-brown, moist, very loose to medium dense

End of boring at 6.0'

M

M

ADV

S-1

S-2

1.0

6.0

2.0

1.4

1.0'-5.0': Bulk sample collected (2 bags)

A-2-4

SM

GTS - 14008

DRILLING METHODS Cont. SS

SHEET

DATE:

TIME: 0 HR

A A

S H

T O

ENGINEERS FIELD BORING LOG

DATE: 07/01/2014

H 2O

C O

N T

E N

T

O.G. ELEV.

DATE:; DEPTH: DRY

INSPECTOR (SIGNED) E. Weltmer

GTS Technologies, Inc.

DRILLERS NAME/COMPANY S. Parisano/Sano Drilling S

A M

P

LE

N O

T

Y P

E /C

O R

E R

U N

PROJECT NAME Fort Dix Youth Annex

CASING: SIZE: Solid Auger: 3.25" O.D.DEPTH: 5.0'

DEPTH: -

REMARKS

MSR

OFFSET FROM BASELINE

N/A

R E

C O

V E

R Y

(F t.)

DATE:

COUNTY Burlington, New Jersey

R Q

D

LE

N G

T H

F t.)

STATE RT. NO.

EQUIPMENT USED Truck Rig w/ Auto Hammer

SEGMENT

AS-DRILLED: STATION

GWL ELEV.

N/A

R Q

D

R E

C O

V E

R Y

SECT.

START 6/23/14

M:\14000\14008_JOINT BASE - MCGUIRE AFB - FORT DIX - LAKEHURST AFB\CADD\GEOTECHNICAL\LOGS\14008-FORT DIX.GPJ

P O

C K

E T

P E

N T

T

O R

V A

N E

T

S F

WATER:

B

LO

W S

/0 .5

F T

O

N S

A M

P

LE

R

Printed: - 7/1/2014

OF

BORING NO. B-1

TIME: -

OFFSET

END 6/23/14

DESCRIPTION

U S

C S

CHECKED BY: MCM

D E

P T

H

F t.)

2.0

4.0

6.0

Poorly graded SAND (sp, a-3), orangish-brown, moist, medium dense

End of boring at 6.0'

M

M

ADV

S-1

S-2

1.0

6.0

2.0

1.5

1.0'-5.0': Bulk sample collected (2 bags) a-3 sp

GTS - 14008

DRILLING METHODS Cont. SS

SHEET

DATE:

TIME: 0 HR

A A

S H

T O

ENGINEERS FIELD BORING LOG

DATE: 07/01/2014

H 2O

C O

N T

E N

T

O.G. ELEV.

DATE: 6/23/2014; DEPTH: DRY

INSPECTOR (SIGNED) E. Weltmer

GTS Technologies, Inc.

DRILLERS NAME/COMPANY S. Parisano/Sano Drilling S

A M

P

LE

N O

T

Y P

E /C

O R

E R

U N

PROJECT NAME Fort Dix Youth Annex

CASING: SIZE: Solid Auger: 3.25" O.D.DEPTH: 5.0'

DEPTH: -

REMARKS

MSR

OFFSET FROM BASELINE

N/A

R E

C O

V E

R Y

(F t.)

DATE:

COUNTY Burlington, New Jersey

R Q

D

LE

N G

T H

F t.)

STATE RT. NO.

EQUIPMENT USED Truck Rig w/ Auto Hammer

SEGMENT

AS-DRILLED: STATION

GWL ELEV.

R Q

D

R E

C O

V E

R Y

SECT.

START 6/23/14

M:\14000\14008_JOINT BASE - MCGUIRE AFB - FORT DIX - LAKEHURST AFB\CADD\GEOTECHNICAL\LOGS\14008-FORT DIX.GPJ

P O

C K

E T

P E

N T

T

O R

V A

N E

T

S F

WATER:

B

LO

W S

/0 .5

F T

O

N S

A M

P

LE

R

Printed: - 7/1/2014

OF

BORING NO. B-3

TIME: -

OFFSET

END 6/23/14

DESCRIPTION

U S

C S

CHECKED BY: MCM

D E

P T

H

F t.)

2.0

4.0

6.0 orangish-brown and light gray, moist to wet, medium dense, homogeneous

M

M

M

M

M

UNS

S-1

S-2

S-3

S-4

ADV

S-5

ADV

2.0

1.7

1.8

1.3

1.7

1.8 a-3 sp

GTS - 14008

DRILLING METHODS Cont. SS

SHEET

DATE:

TIME: 0 HR

A A

S H

T O

ENGINEERS FIELD BORING LOG

DATE: 07/01/2014

H 2O

C O

N T

E N

T

O.G. ELEV.

DATE: 6/23/2014; DEPTH: 14.0'

INSPECTOR (SIGNED) E. Weltmer

GTS Technologies, Inc.

DRILLERS NAME/COMPANY S. Parisano/Sano Drilling S

A M

P

LE

N O

T

Y P

E /C

O R

E R

U N

PROJECT NAME Fort Dix Youth Annex

CASING: SIZE: HSA: 3.25" I.D. DEPTH: 19.0'

DEPTH: -

REMARKS

MSR

OFFSET FROM BASELINE

N/A

R E

C O

V E

R Y

(F t.)

DATE:

COUNTY Burlington, New Jersey

R Q

D

LE

N G

T H

F t.)

STATE RT. NO.

EQUIPMENT USED Truck Rig w/ Auto Hammer

SEGMENT

AS-DRILLED: STATION

GWL ELEV.

R Q

D

R E

C O

V E

R Y

SECT.

START 6/23/14

M:\14000\14008_JOINT BASE - MCGUIRE AFB - FORT DIX - LAKEHURST AFB\CADD\GEOTECHNICAL\LOGS\14008-FORT DIX.GPJ

P O

C K

E T

P E

N T

T

O R

V A

N E

T

S F

WATER:

B

LO

W S

/0 .5

F T

O

N S

A M

P

LE

R

Printed: - 7/1/2014

OF

BORING NO. B-6

TIME: -

OFFSET

END 6/23/14

DESCRIPTION

U S

C S

CHECKED BY: MCM

D E

P T

H

F t.)

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

14.0

16.0

19.0 orangish-brown and light gray, moist to wet, medium dense, homogeneous

End of boring at 23.0'

M

M

S-6

S-7

23.0

1.6

1.7

S-6: Loose a-3 sp

GTS - 14008

DRILLING METHODS Cont. SS

SHEET

DATE:

TIME: 0 HR

A A

S H

T O

ENGINEERS FIELD BORING LOG

DATE: 07/01/2014

H 2O

C O

N T

E N

T

O.G. ELEV.

DATE: 6/23/2014; DEPTH: 14.0'

INSPECTOR (SIGNED) E. Weltmer

GTS Technologies, Inc.

DRILLERS NAME/COMPANY S. Parisano/Sano Drilling S

A M

P

LE

N O

T

Y P

E /C

O R

E R

U N

PROJECT NAME Fort Dix Youth Annex

CASING: SIZE: HSA: 3.25" I.D. DEPTH: 19.0'

DEPTH: -

REMARKS

MSR

OFFSET FROM BASELINE

N/A

R E

C O

V E

R Y

(F t.)

DATE:

COUNTY Burlington, New Jersey

R Q

D

LE

N G

T H

F t.)

STATE RT. NO.

EQUIPMENT USED Truck Rig w/ Auto Hammer

SEGMENT

AS-DRILLED: STATION

GWL ELEV.

R Q

D

R E

C O

V E

R Y

SECT.

START 6/23/14

M:\14000\14008_JOINT BASE - MCGUIRE AFB - FORT DIX - LAKEHURST AFB\CADD\GEOTECHNICAL\LOGS\14008-FORT DIX.GPJ

P O

C K

E T

P E

N T

T

O R

V A

N E

T

S F

WATER:

B

LO

W S

/0 .5

F T

O

N S

A M

P

LE

R

Printed: - 7/1/2014

OF

BORING NO. B-6

TIME: -

OFFSET

END 6/23/14

DESCRIPTION

U S

C S

CHECKED BY: MCM

D E

P T

H

F t.)

21.0

23.0

Poorly graded SAND with gravel (sp, a-1-b), orangish-brown and white, moist, medium dense to dense, homogeneous

Poorly graded SAND (sp, a-3), orangish-brown and light gray, moist, medium dense, homogeneous

M

M

M

M

M

UNS

S-1

S-2

S-3

S-4

ADV

S-5

ADV

2.0

9.0

1.6

2.0

1.8

1.6

1.5 a-1-b a-3 sp sp

GTS - 14008

DRILLING METHODS Cont. SS

SHEET

DATE:

TIME: 0 HR

A A

S H

T O

ENGINEERS FIELD BORING LOG

DATE: 07/01/2014

H 2O

C O

N T

E N

T

O.G. ELEV.

DATE: 6/23/2014; DEPTH: 13.5'

INSPECTOR (SIGNED) E. Weltmer

GTS Technologies, Inc.

DRILLERS NAME/COMPANY S. Parisano/Sano Drilling S

A M

P

LE

N O

T

Y P

E /C

O R

E R

U N

PROJECT NAME Fort Dix Youth Annex

CASING: SIZE: HSA: 3.25" I.D. DEPTH: 19.0'

DEPTH: -

REMARKS

MSR

OFFSET FROM BASELINE

N/A

R E

C O

V E

R Y

(F t.)

DATE:

COUNTY Burlington, New Jersey

R Q

D

LE

N G

T H

F t.)

STATE RT. NO.

EQUIPMENT USED Truck Rig w/ Auto Hammer

SEGMENT

AS-DRILLED: STATION

GWL ELEV.

R Q

D

R E

C O

V E

R Y

SECT.

START 6/23/14

M:\14000\14008_JOINT BASE - MCGUIRE AFB - FORT DIX - LAKEHURST AFB\CADD\GEOTECHNICAL\LOGS\14008-FORT DIX.GPJ

P O

C K

E T

P E

N T

T

O R

V A

N E

T

S F

WATER:

B

LO

W S

/0 .5

F T

O

N S

A M

P

LE

R

Printed: - 7/1/2014

OF

BORING NO. B-8

TIME: -

OFFSET

END 6/23/14

DESCRIPTION

U S

C S

CHECKED BY: MCM

D E

P T

H

F t.)

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

14.0

End of boring at 21.0'

M-806

S-6

21.0

1.6 a-3 sp

GTS - 14008

DRILLING METHODS Cont. SS

SHEET

DATE:

TIME: 0 HR

A A

S H

T O

ENGINEERS FIELD BORING LOG

DATE: 07/01/2014

H 2O

C O

N T

E N

T

O.G. ELEV.

DATE: 6/23/2014; DEPTH: 13.5'

INSPECTOR (SIGNED) E. Weltmer

GTS Technologies, Inc.

DRILLERS NAME/COMPANY S. Parisano/Sano Drilling S

A M

P

LE

N O

T

Y P

E /C

O R

E R

U N

PROJECT NAME Fort Dix Youth Annex

CASING: SIZE: HSA: 3.25" I.D. DEPTH: 19.0'

DEPTH: -

REMARKS

MSR

OFFSET FROM BASELINE

N/A

R E

C O

V E

R Y

(F t.)

DATE:

COUNTY Burlington, New Jersey

R Q

D

LE

N G

T H

F t.)

STATE RT. NO.

EQUIPMENT USED Truck Rig w/ Auto Hammer

SEGMENT

AS-DRILLED: STATION

GWL ELEV.

R Q

D

R E

C O

V E

R Y

SECT.

START 6/23/14

M:\14000\14008_JOINT BASE - MCGUIRE AFB - FORT DIX - LAKEHURST AFB\CADD\GEOTECHNICAL\LOGS\14008-FORT DIX.GPJ

P O

C K

E T

P E

N T

T

O R

V A

N E

T

S F

WATER:

B

LO

W S

/0 .5

F T

O

N S

A M

P

LE

R

Printed: - 7/1/2014

OF

BORING NO. B-8

TIME: -

OFFSET

END 6/23/14

DESCRIPTION

U S

C S

CHECKED BY: MCM

D E

P T

H

F t.)

orangish-brown and light gray, moist, medium dense to dense, homogeneous

M

M

M

M

UNS

S-1

S-2

S-3

S-4

ADV

S-5

ADV

2.0

20.0

0.0

1.6

1.1

1.7

1.5

S-1: No recovery due to driving a rock; cuttings placed in jar.

a-3 sp

GTS - 14008

DRILLING METHODS Cont. SS

SHEET

DATE:

TIME: 0 HR

A A

S H

T O

ENGINEERS FIELD BORING LOG

DATE: 07/01/2014

H 2O

C O

N T

E N

T

O.G. ELEV.

DATE: 6/23/2014; DEPTH: 14.0'

INSPECTOR (SIGNED) E. Weltmer

GTS Technologies, Inc.

DRILLERS NAME/COMPANY S. Parisano/Sano Drilling S

A M

P

LE

N O

T

Y P

E /C

O R

E R

U N

PROJECT NAME Fort Dix Youth Annex

CASING: SIZE: HSA: 3.25" I.D. DEPTH: 19.0'

DEPTH: -

REMARKS

MSR

OFFSET FROM BASELINE

N/A

R E

C O

V E

R Y

(F t.)

DATE:

COUNTY Burlington, New Jersey

R Q

D

LE

N G

T H

F t.)

STATE RT. NO.

EQUIPMENT USED Truck Rig w/ Auto Hammer

SEGMENT

AS-DRILLED: STATION

GWL ELEV.

R Q

D

R E

C O

V E

R Y

SECT.

START 6/23/14

M:\14000\14008_JOINT BASE - MCGUIRE AFB - FORT DIX - LAKEHURST AFB\CADD\GEOTECHNICAL\LOGS\14008-FORT DIX.GPJ

P O

C K

E T

P E

N T

T

O R

V A

N E

T

S F

WATER:

B

LO

W S

/0 .5

F T

O

N S

A M

P

LE

R

Printed: - 7/1/2014

OF

BORING NO. B-10

TIME: -

OFFSET

END 6/23/14

DESCRIPTION

U S

C S

CHECKED BY: MCM

D E

P T

H

F t.)

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

14.0

End of boring at 21.0'

M-704

S-6 1.4 a-3 sp

GTS - 14008

DRILLING METHODS Cont. SS

SHEET

DATE:

TIME: 0 HR

A A

S H

T O

ENGINEERS FIELD BORING LOG

DATE: 07/01/2014

H 2O

C O

N T

E N

T

O.G. ELEV.

DATE: 6/23/2014; DEPTH: 14.0'

INSPECTOR (SIGNED) E. Weltmer

GTS Technologies, Inc.

DRILLERS NAME/COMPANY S. Parisano/Sano Drilling S

A M

P

LE

N O

T

Y P

E /C

O R

E R

U N

PROJECT NAME Fort Dix Youth Annex

CASING: SIZE: HSA: 3.25" I.D. DEPTH: 19.0'

DEPTH: -

REMARKS

MSR

OFFSET FROM BASELINE

N/A

R E

C O

V E

R Y

(F t.)

DATE:

COUNTY Burlington, New Jersey

R Q

D

LE

N G

T H

F t.)

STATE RT. NO.

EQUIPMENT USED Truck Rig w/ Auto Hammer

SEGMENT

AS-DRILLED: STATION

GWL ELEV.

R Q

D

R E

C O

V E

R Y

SECT.

START 6/23/14

M:\14000\14008_JOINT BASE - MCGUIRE AFB - FORT DIX - LAKEHURST AFB\CADD\GEOTECHNICAL\LOGS\14008-FORT DIX.GPJ

P O

C K

E T

P E

N T

T

O R

V A

N E

T

S F

WATER:

B

LO

W S

/0 .5

F T

O

N S

A M

P

LE

R

Printed: - 7/1/2014

OF

BORING NO. B-10

TIME: -

OFFSET

END 6/23/14

DESCRIPTION

U S

C S

CHECKED BY: MCM

D E

P T

H

F t.)

Project: Fort Dix Youth Annex, NJ

Boring No.: B-1

Station: USCS, AASHTO Symbol: SM, A-2-4 (0)

Offset: LL = NP PL = NP

Sample No.: S-1 to S-2 PI = NP w = 7.71 %

Depth: 2.0 - 6.0 ft Specific Gravity: 2.65 (assumed)

Note: Minimum mass requirement was not met. Mass used for the test = 614.72 grams

Testing Date: 7/1/2014

GTS No. 14008 By: DFS Ckd: MCM

441 Friendship Road . Harrisburg, PA 17111 . Ph: 717/236-3006 . Fax: 717/233-0994 . www.gtstech.com silty SAND

CLASSIFICATION TEST RESULTS

or ASTM D 422, D 4318, D 2487

USCS Soil

Classification:

AASHTO T-88, T-89, T-90, M-145

i n

/2 in

/4

/2

/8

N o

.0 m

0.0010.010.1110100

P e rc e n t

F in e r b y W e ig h t

Grain Size (mm)

Grain Size Distribution Curve

GRAVEL

COARSE FINE

SAND

COARSE FINE

FINES

MEDIUM SILT CLAY

11.82 %

1.82 % 10.00 %

75.38 %

3.48 % 49.07 %

12.80 %

22.83 % 6.56 % 6.24 %

U S

C S

GRAVEL

COARSE MEDIUM FINE

15.30 %

0.00 % 6.65 % 8.65 %

SAND

FINE

COARSE

71.90 %

49.07 % 22.83 %

FINES

SILT CLAY

12.80 %

8.03 % 4.77 %

A A

SH

TO

Project: Fort Dix Youth Annex, NJ Boring No.: B-1 Station: USCS, AASHTO Symbol: SM, A-2-4 (0) Offset: LL = NP PL = NP Sample No.: Bag Sample PI = NP Depth: 1.0 - 5.0 ft Specific Gravity: 2.65 (assumed)

Testing Date: 7/14/2014

GTS No. 14008 By: DFS Ckd: VBS

441 Friendship Road . Harrisburg, PA 17111 . Ph: 717/236-3006 . Fax: 717/233-0994 . www.gtstech.com

CLASSIFICATION TEST RESULTS

or ASTM D 422, D 4318, D 2487

AASHTO T-88, T-89, T-90, M-145

in in

1/ in in 3/ in

1/ in

3/ in

N o.

N o.

N o.

N o.

N o.

N o.

0.

m m

0.

m m

0.

m m

0.0010.010.1110100

Pe rc en t F in er b y

W ei gh t

Grain Size (mm)

Grain Size Distribution Curve

GRAVEL

COARSE FINE

SAND

COARSE FINE

FINES

MEDIUM SILT CLAY

10.97 %

2.37 % 8.60 %

54.23 %

4.37 % 30.60 %

34.80 %

19.26 % -- --

U

SC

S

GRAVEL

COARSE MEDIUM FINE

15.34 %

1.24 % 4.60 % 9.50 %

SAND

FINECOARSE

49.86 %

30.60 %19.26 %

FINES

SILT CLAY

34.80 %

AA

SH

TO

http://www.actengineers.com/

Soil Investigation Report SWM Facility Design at the Proposed Youth Center Fort Dix, NJ

INTRODUCTION

This report documents the findings of a study conducted at the northeast intersection of Maryland Avenue and 8th Street, Fort Dix, NJ (part of Joint Base McGuire-Dix- Lakehurst) to document the properties of the soils and to determine if the soils are appropriate for the construction of a stormwater infiltration basin. The proposed basin is intended to compensate for the additional impervious runoff to be generated by the construction of a proposed building and appurtenant parking facilities/drive aisles.

PROJECT LOCATION

The subject site is located Fort Dix, Burlington County, New Jersey north of 8th Street and approximately 0.06 miles east of the Maryland Avenue and 8th Street intersection (see Exhibit A2), east of building 5202 and west of the baseball field behind building 5226 which area has been identified as the desired location for a stormwater infiltration basin.

PROPOSED SITE DEVELOPMENT

This proposed site improvement anticipates a water quality infiltration basin in the rear of a proposed Youth Center building receiving overland runoff from three sides of the Youth Center building as well as runoff from the proposed Youth Center building and a portion of East Infantry Road via storm pipe. The proposed stormwater management system and proposed infiltration feature design was prepared by Tetra Tech.

EXISTING SITE DEVELOPMENT

The existing site is 250 feet of open, grassed field north of 8th Street and then wooded north of the open grassland. Runoff is conveyed overland from 8th Street to the north where it eventually makes its way to a ditch beyond the wooded area. Underground cable and electric were marked out along the 8th Street frontage. Water service was marked out from 8th Street and running perpendicular to 8th Street to the north along a dirt road on the east side of the proposed site improvements.

SOIL EVALUATION

The classification of the existing soils in the study area as reported in the “Web Soil Survey”, prepared by the Natural Resources Conservation Service U.S. Department of Agriculture (see Exhibit A3) are mapped from this reference as:

Soil Name Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) Sassafras sandy loam (SacA) B

Inspection of the soils encountered in the study area during the testing resulted in the determination that the onsite soils are a sandy soil.

The approximate locations of the test pits performed on June 20, 2014, have been depicted on the Test Pit Location Plan (Exhibit A1). Soil logs of the excavated profile

Soil Investigation Report SWM Facility Design at the Proposed Youth Center Fort Dix, NJ pits are also provided in Exhibit B. No groundwater or mottling (indicative of Seasonal High Water Table (SHWT)) in the soil was observed in any of the soil logs (Exhibit B).

Test pits were excavated in the proposed stormwater management area to conduct testing to determine the in-situ permeability rate of the soil. Two (2) percolation tests (Exhibit C) were performed in the proposed infiltration basin area at depths of 50 and 58 inches below the existing grade elevation to support the bottom of the infiltration basin’s proposed design elevation.

Results for percolation tests conducted adjacent to soil logs SL-A and SL-C produced K5 permeability class results corresponding to permeability rates greater than 20 inches per hour (Exhibit D). The actual values were 85 and 240 inches per hour, SL-A and SL-C respectively.

The New Jersey Best Management Practices Manual requires a minimum design permeability rate of 0.5 in/hr for infiltration. The design permeability rate is the tested permeability rate divided by a safety factor of 2. Conservatively, it is found that the permeability at this location is at least 20 inches per hour (actual values are 42.5 and 120 inches per hour).

CONCLUSION

The soils are exceptionally well drained, and the K5 (>20 inches per hour) permeability rate results support the proposed infiltration basin as a feasible stormwater management method.

Enclosures:

Exhibit A1 – Test Pit Location Plan

Exhibit A2 – Site Location Plan

Exhibit A3 – NRCS Web Soil Survey

Exhibit B – Soil Log and Interpretation

Exhibit C – Percolation Test Results

Exhibit D – Copy of Soil Permeability/Textural Triangle

Exhibit A2 - Site Location Plan

SITE

BLDG

BLDG

dilkece Typewritten Text dilkece Typewritten Text dilkece Typewritten Text dilkece Typewritten Text dilkece Typewritten Text dilkece Typewritten Text dilkece Typewritten Text dilkece Typewritten Text dilkece Typewritten Text

BLDG

dilkece Typewritten Text

531890 531920 531950 531980 532010 532040 532070 532100 532130 532160 532190 532220

531890 531920 531950 531980 532010 532040 532070 532100 532130 532160 532190 532220

40° 0' 44'' N

7'

5' ' W

40° 0' 44'' N

7'

0' ' W

40° 0' 37'' N

7'

5' ' W

40° 0' 37'' N

7'

0' ' W

N

Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 18N WGS84 0 50 100 200 300

Feet 0 20 40 80 120

Meters Map Scale: 1:1,610 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.

dilkece Typewritten Text dilkece Typewritten Text Exhibit A3 - NRCS Web Soil Survey dilkece Typewritten Text dilkece Typewritten Text dilkece Typewritten Text dilkece Typewritten Text Map Unit Legend Burlington County, New Jersey (NJ005) SacA Sassafras sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes.

SacC Sassafras sandy loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes.

Percolation Test Data

Perc Test – P1 (Adjacent to SL C)

1. Test Number _____1____ Replicate (Letter) ______ Date Tested 6/20/14

2. Elevation 50” below existing

3. Pre-soak: ____X____ ___X___ Sandy Textured Soil Only, Shortened Pre-soak – Indicate Time Required for 12 Inches of Water to Drain After Second Filling, Minutes – 3.0 min.

____ Four Hour Pre-soak Completed – Indicate Result:

____ Test Hold Drained Within 16 to 24 Hours After Pre-soak

____ Test Hole Did Not Drain Within 24 Hours After Pre-soak

4. Rate of Fall Data:

a. Time Interval Selected, Minutes ___0.5___

b. Record the Drop in Water Level During Each Time Interval to the Nearest 1/10th-Inch On the Lines Below:

Depth of Water, Start of Interval (inches)

Depth of Water, End of Interval (inches)

Drop in Water Level (inches)

1.00’ (12.0”) 0.83’ (10.0”) 0.17’ (2.0”) 1.00’ (12.0”) 0.83’ (10.0”) 0.17’ (2.0”) 1.00’ (12.0”) 0.83’ (10.0”) 0.17’ (2.0”)

5. Percolation Rate:

a. Time, minutes, Required for a Six-inch Drop in Water Level ___1.5___

b. Percolation Rate = a/6 = 1.5/6 = 0.25 min/in = 240 in/hr

EXHIBIT C – PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS

Percolation Test Data

Perc Test – P2 (Adjacent to SL A)

1. Test Number _____1____ Replicate (Letter) ______ Date Tested 6/20/14

2. Elevation 58” below existing

3. Pre-soak: ____X____ ___X___ Sandy Textured Soil Only, Shortened Pre-soak – Indicate Time Required for 12 Inches of Water to Drain After Second Filling, Minutes – 8.5 min.

____ Four Hour Pre-soak Completed – Indicate Result:

____ Test Hold Drained Within 16 to 24 Hours After Pre-soak

____ Test Hole Did Not Drain Within 24 Hours After Pre-soak

4. Rate of Fall Data:

a. Time Interval Selected, Minutes ___1.0___

b. Record the Drop in Water Level During Each Time Interval to the Nearest 1/10th-Inch On the Lines Below:

Depth of Water, Start of Interval (inches)

Depth of Water, End of Interval (inches)

Drop in Water Level (inches)

1.00’ (12.0”) 0.89’ (10.6”) 0.11’ (1.4”) 1.00’ (12.0”) 0.89’ (10.6”) 0.11’ (1.4”) 1.00’ (12.0”) 0.89’ (10.6”) 0.11’ (1.4”)

5. Percolation Rate:

a. Time, minutes, Required for a Six-inch Drop in Water Level ___4.25___

b. Percolation Rate = a/6 = 4.25/6 = 0.71 min/in = 85 in/hr

EXHIBIT C – PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS

EXHIBIT D - SOIL PERMEABILITY / TEXTURAL TRIANGLE

100% DESIGN SEPTEMBER 14, 2016

Contract No.:F41999-11-D-011 Section 01 23 00 Project No.: PTFL 015000, AFBCIF 150015 Page 1

SECTION 01 23 00

ALTERNATES

PART 1 GENERAL

1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS

Drawings and general provisions of the Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and other Division 01 Specification Sections, apply to this Section.

1.2 SUMMARY

Section includes administrative and procedural requirements for alternates.

1.3 DEFINITIONS

1.3.1 Alternate:

An amount proposed by bidders and stated on the Bid Form for certain work defined in the bidding requirements that may be added to or deducted from the base bid amount if the Contracting Officer decides to accept a corresponding change either in the amount of construction to be completed or in the products, materials, equipment, systems, or installation methods described in the Contract Documents.

Alternates described in this Section are part of the Work only if enumerated in the Agreement.

THE COST OR CREDIT FOR EACH ALTERNATE IS THE NET ADDITION TO OR DEDUCTION

FROM THE CONTRACT SUM TO INCORPORATE ALTERNATES INTO THE WORK. NO OTHER

ADJUSTMENTS ARE MADE TO THE CONTRACT SUM.1.4 PROCEDURES

1.4.1 Coordination

Include as part of each alternate, miscellaneous devices, accessory objects, and similar items incidental to or required for a complete installation whether or not indicated as part of alternate.

1.4.2 Execute

Execute accepted alternates under the same conditions as other work of the Contract.

1.4.3 Schedule

Schedule of alternates is included at the end of this Section. Specification Sections referenced in schedule contain requirements for materials necessary to achieve the work described under each alternate.

PART 2 PRODUCTS (NOT USED)

Contract No.:F41999-11-D-011 Section 01 23 00 Project No.: PTFL 015000, AFBCIF 150015 Page 2

PART 3 EXECUTION

3.1 SCHEDULE OF ALTERNATES

3.1.1 Alternate No. 1 - ADD SURFACE PARKING

Base Bid: Parking as indicated on Drawing A1.01 - SITE PLAN, BUILDING SIGN, TRASH DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE.

Alternate: Add Surface Parking which includes bituminous concrete, curbs, and parking stripping with five additional EX6 light fixtures as indicated on Drawing A1.01 - SITE PLAN, BUILDING SIGN, TRASH DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. See Civil Drawings C1.10, C1.20, C1.30, and Electrical Drawing E1.00. Associated specification sections as referenced or required.

3.1.2 Alternate No. 2 - ADD HARD SURFACE AT OUTDOOR PLAY AREA

Base Bid: Hard Surface at Outdoor Play Area as indicated on Drawing A1.01 -

SITE PLAN, BUILDING SIGN, TRASH DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE.

Alternate: Add hard surface at the outdoor play area which includes bituminous concrete, painting/markings on the bituminous concrete, and fence as indicated on Drawing A1.01 - SITE PLAN, BUILDING SIGN,TRASH DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. Remove lawn area where added bituminous concrete is shown. The perimeter fence shall remain in the base contract. See Landscape Drawings L1.01, L2.01. Associated specification sections as referenced or required.

3.1.3 Alternate No. 3 - ADD PLAYGROUND

Base Bid: Outdoor Play Area as indicated on Drawing A1.01 - SITE PLAN, BUILDING SIGN, TRASH DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE.

Alternate: Add Playground which includes the play structure, shade structure and rubber play surface (including the gravel sub base as indicated on Drawing A1.01 - SITE PLAN, BUILDING SIGN, TRASH DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. The tree clearing, grubbing and grading in the area for the play structure will remain in Contract. The two musical instruments and two benches shall remain in the base contract. See Landscape Drawings L1.01, L2.01, L2.02, L4.04.

Associated specification sections as referenced or required.

3.1.4 Alternate No. 4 - REVISE HVAC SYSTEM TO INCLUDE HYPER HEAT TECHNOLOGY

Base Bid: HVAC System is designed as a variable refrigerant flow (VRF) system for heating and cooling, with multiple evaporators sized for the individual rooms and matched up to outdoor units. Drawings M1.01, M2.00, E3.00, E5.01.

Alternate: VRF System shall include Hyper Heat Technology serving the whole building. The alternate system shall be provided as required on mechanical and electrical Drawings sheet M1.01A and E3.00A.

-- End of Section --

Joint Base McGuire-Dix Lakehurst Youth Center Annex

Contract No.:F41999-11-D-011 Section 01 30 00

Project No.: PTFL 015000, AFBCIF 150015 Page 1 Administrative Requirements

SECTION 01 30 00

ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS

1.1 REFERENCES

The publications listed below form a part of this specification to the extent referenced. The publications are referred to within the text by the basic designation only.

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (USACE)

EM 385-1-1 (2014) Safety and Health Requirements Manual

1.2 SUBMITTALS

Government approval is required for submittals with a "G" designation;

submittals not having a "G" designation are for Contractor Quality Control approval. Submittals with an "S" are for inclusion in the Sustainability

Notebook, in conformance with Section 01 33 29 SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING.

Submit the following in accordance with Section 01 33 00 SUBMITTAL

PROCEDURES:

SD-01 Preconstruction Submittals

View Location Map; G

Progress and Completion Pictures; G

SD-04 Samples

Color Boards; G

1.3 COLOR BOARDS FOR AIR FORCE PROJECTS

Submit five sets of color boards within 90 calendar days after Contract

Award. Each set of boards must include samples of colors and finishes of interior surfaces, such as walls, floors, and ceilings. Present the samples on 8 by 10-1/2 inches boards (modules) with a maximum spread of 24 by 31-1/2 inches for foldouts. Design modules to fit in a standard loose-leaf, three-ring binder. Where special finishes such as architectural concrete, carpet, or prefinished textured metal panels are required, submit samples not less than 12 inches square with the board. If more space is needed, more than one board per set may be submitted. Certify that the color samples have been reviewed in detail, and that the color samples are in strict accordance with contract drawings and specifications, except as may be otherwise explicitly stated. Submittal of color samples does not relieve the

Contractor of the responsibility to submit samples required elsewhere herein.

1.4 VIEW LOCATION MAP

file:///C:/USERS/WENDEL/DOCUMENTS/SPECSINTACT/JOBS/ARROWSTREET/prntdata/word/01%2033%2029.DOC file:///C:/USERS/WENDEL/DOCUMENTS/SPECSINTACT/JOBS/ARROWSTREET/prntdata/word/01%2033%2000.DOC

Contract No.:F41999-11-D-011 Section 01 30 00

Project No.: PTFL 015000, AFBCIF 150015 Page 2 Administrative Requirements

Submit, prior to or with the first digital photograph submittals, a sketch or drawing indicating the required photographic locations. Update as required if the locations are moved.

1.5 PROGRESS AND COMPLETION PICTURES

Photographically document site conditions prior to start of construction operations. Provide monthly, and within one month of the completion of work, digital photographs, 1600x1200x24 bit true color minimum resolution in JPEG file format showing the sequence and progress of work. Take a minimum of 20 digital photographs each week throughout the entire project from a minimum of ten views from points located by the Contracting Officer.

Submit with the monthly invoice two sets of digital photographs, each set on a separate compact disc (CD) or data versatile disc (DVD), cumulative of all photos to date. Indicate photographs demonstrating environmental procedures. Provide photographs for each month in a separate monthly directory and name each file to indicate its location on the view location sketch. Also provide the view location sketch on the CD or DVD as a digital file. Include a date designator in file names. Cross reference submittals in the appropriate daily report. Photographs provided are for unrestricted use by the Government.

1.6 MINIMUM INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

Provide the minimum insurance coverage required by FAR 28.307-2 LIABILITY, during the entire period of performance under this contract. Provide other insurance coverage as required by State law.

1.7 FIRST TIER CONTRACTOR REQUIREMENTS FOR ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS

Accomplish all contract requirements of Section assigned to the directly with a first tier subcontractor.

1.8 SUPERVISION

1.8.1 Minimum Communication Requirements

Have at least one qualified superintendent, or competent alternate, capable of reading, writing, and conversing fluently in the English language, on the job-site at all times during the performance of contract work. In addition, if a Quality Control (QC) representative is required on the contract, then that individual must also have fluent English communication skills.

1.8.2 Superintendent Qualifications

The project superintendent must have a minimum of 10 years experience in construction with at least 5 of those years as a superintendent on projects similar in size and complexity. The individual must be familiar with the requirements of EM 385-1-1 and have experience in the areas of hazard identification and safety compliance. The individual must be capable of interpreting a critical path schedule and construction drawings. The qualification requirements for the alternate superintendent are the same as for the project superintendent. The Contracting Officer may request proof of the superintendent's qualifications at any point in the project if the performance of the superintendent is in question.

Contract No.:F41999-11-D-011 Section 01 30 00

Project No.: PTFL 015000, AFBCIF 150015 Page 3 Administrative Requirements

1.8.2.1 Duties

The project superintendent is primarily responsible for managing and coordinating day-to-day production and schedule adherence on the project.

The superintendent is required to attend partnering meetings, and quality control meetings. The superintendent or qualified alternative must be on-site at all times during the performance of this contract until the work is completed and accepted.

1.8.3 Non-Compliance Actions

The Project Superintendent is subject to removal by the Contracting Officer for non-compliance with requirements specified in the contract and for failure to manage the project to insure timely completion. Furthermore, the

Contracting Officer may issue an order stopping all or part of the work until satisfactory corrective action has been taken. No part of the time lost due to such stop orders is acceptable as the subject of claim for extension of time for excess costs or damages by the Contractor.

1.9 PRECONSTRUCTION

After award of the contract but prior to commencement of any work at the site, meet with the Contracting Officer to discuss and develop a mutual understanding relative to the administration of the value engineering and safety program, preparation of the schedule of prices or earned value report, shop drawings, and other submittals, scheduling programming, prosecution of the work, and clear expectations of the "Interim DD Form

1354" Submittal. Major subcontractors who will engage in the work must also attend.

1.10 PARTNERING

To most effectively accomplish this contract, the Government requires the formation of a cohesive partnership within the Project Team whose members are from the Government, the Contractor and their Subcontractors. Key personnel from the Supported Command, the End User (who will occupy the facility), the Government Design and Construction team and Subject Matter

Experts, the Installation, the Contractor and Subcontractors, and the

Designer of Record will be invited to participate in the Partnering process.

The Partnership will draw on the strength of each organization in an effort to achieve a project that is without any safety mishaps, conforms to the

Contract, and stays within budget and on schedule.

The Contracting Officer will provide Information on the Partnering Process and a list of key and optional personnel who should attend the Partnering meeting.

1.10.1 Formal Partnering

Provide and host the Partnering sessions with key personnel of the Project

Team, including Contractor personnel and Government personnel. Pay all costs associated with the Partnering effort including the Facilitator, the meeting room, and other incidental items. In exception, each participant bears their own costs for meals, lodging, and transportation associated with the Partnering sessions.

Contract No.:F41999-11-D-011 Section 01 30 00

Project No.: PTFL 015000, AFBCIF 150015 Page 4 Administrative Requirements

Before a Partnering session, coordinate with the Facilitator all requirements for incidental items (such as audio-visual equipment, easels, flipchart paper, colored markers, note paper, pens/pencils, colored flash cards), and have these items available at the Partnering session. Provide copies of documents for distribution to all attendees. Provide a

Facilitator experienced in conducting Partnering Workshops, and who is acceptable to both the Government and the Contractor. The Facilitator is responsible for leading the team in a timely manner and making sure that issues are identified and resolved. A list of Partnering Facilitators is available from the Contracting Officer.

a. Schedule the Initial Partnering Session for a duration of one day minimum. Locate this session at a place off the construction site, as agreed to by the Contracting Officer and the Contractor. It may take place concurrently with the Pre-Construction Meeting.

b. Schedule follow-on Partnering Session(s) for a maximum of 4 hours.

Schedule them at no more than 3 to six month intervals. Participants are encouraged to utilize electronic means to expedite meetings.

Meetings may be held at a location off-Base, at the project site, or in a Government Facility on Base. Follow-on meetings may be held concurrently with other scheduled meetings. Attendees need only be those required to resolve current issues. Recommend using the same

Facilitator from the Initial Partnering session to achieve best results and for continuity.

1.11 ELECTRONIC MAIL (E-MAIL) ADDRESS

Establish and maintain electronic mail (e-mail) capability along with the capability to open various electronic attachments as text files, pdf files, and other similar formats. Within 10 days after contract award, provide the

Contracting Officer a single (only one) e-mail address for electronic communications from the Contracting Officer related to this contract including, but not limited to contract documents, invoice information, request for proposals, and other correspondence. The Contracting Officer may also use email to notify the Contractor of base access conditions when emergency conditions warrant, such as hurricanes or terrorist threats.

Multiple email addresses are not allowed.

It is the Contractor's responsibility to make timely distribution of all

Contracting Officer initiated e-mail with its own organization including field office(s). Promptly notify the Contracting Officer, in writing, of any changes to this email address.

PART 2 PRODUCTS

PART 3 EXECUTION

Contract No.:F41999-11-D-011 Section 01 33 00

Project No.: PTFL 015000, AFBCIF 150015 Page 1 Submittal Procedures

SECTION 01 33 00

SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES

1.1 DEFINITIONS

1.1.1 Submittal Descriptions (SD)

Submittals requirements are specified in the technical sections. Submittals are identified by Submittal Description (SD) numbers and titles as follows:

Submittals which are required prior to

Certificates of insurance

Surety bonds

List of proposed Subcontractors

List of proposed products

Construction progress schedule

Network Analysis Schedule (NAS)

Submittal register

Schedule of prices or Earned Value Report

Health and safety plan

Work plan

Quality Control(QC) plan

Environmental protection plan

SD-02 Shop Drawings

Drawings, diagrams and schedules specifically prepared to illustrate some portion of the work.

Diagrams and instructions from a manufacturer or fabricator for use in producing the product and as aids to the Contractor for integrating the product or system into the project.

Drawings prepared by or for the Contractor to show how multiple systems and interdisciplinary work will be coordinated.

SD-03 Product Data

Contract No.:F41999-11-D-011 Section 01 33 00

Project No.: PTFL 015000, AFBCIF 150015 Page 2 Submittal Procedures

Catalog cuts, illustrations, schedules, diagrams, performance charts, instructions and brochures illustrating size, physical appearance and other characteristics of materials, systems or equipment for some portion of the work.

Samples of warranty language when the contract requires extended product warranties.

SD-04 Samples

Fabricated or unfabricated physical examples of materials, equipment or workmanship that illustrate functional and aesthetic characteristics of a material or product and establish standards by which the work can be judged.

Color samples from the manufacturer's standard line (or custom color samples if specified) to be used in selecting or approving colors for the project.

Field samples and mock-ups constructed on the project site establish standards by which the ensuring work can be judged. Includes assemblies or portions of assemblies which are to be incorporated into the project and those which will be removed at conclusion of the work.

SD-05 Design Data

Design calculations, mix designs, analyses or other data pertaining to a part of work.

SD-06 Test Reports

Report signed by authorized official of testing laboratory that a material, product or system identical to the material, product or system to be provided has been tested in accord with specified requirements. Unless specified in another section, testing must have been within three years of date of contract award for the project.

Report which includes findings of a test required to be performed by the

Contractor on an actual portion of the work or prototype prepared for the project before shipment to job site.

Report which includes finding of a test made at the job site or on sample taken from the job site, on portion of work during or after installation.

Investigation reports.

Daily logs and checklists.

Final acceptance test and operational test procedure.

SD-07 Certificates

Statements printed on the manufacturer's letterhead and signed by responsible officials of manufacturer of product, system or material attesting that the product, system, or material meets specification requirements. Must be dated after award of project contract and clearly name the project.

Document…