Draft_Solicitation_RFI_Questions_Responses_final_17OCT19.pdf

UNCLASSIFIED\\FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Bid Inquiry Contractor Report All Inquiries

Project: Joint Base Andrews Optimized Remediation Contract Draft Solicitation Comments Review:

W912DR19R0025-01 (00001)

(sorted by CommentID ) Displaying 100 inquiries.

Id Discipline Sheet Detail Spec

8203771 General Questions and Answers

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Does the Government intend to answer the 91 Pre-RFP questions previously posted to ProjNet- AK48U7-A72IU7 and if so when?

On: Sep 26 2019.

Government Response. . Yes. They will be posted to the combined solicitation/synopsis posting on FBO by 4 October 2019. On: Sep 30 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8203962 General Section M, D. EVALUATION APPROACH, Item 2.

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section M, D. EVALUATION APPROACH, Item 2. Technical Management/Risk Approach (Factor 1) on pdf page 233 of 256 of the solicitation.

Second to the last sentence reads: "The factor is met when the offeror's proposal effectively addresses and includes those elements described in Section II A."

Respectfully, we cannot find a Section II A reference in the solicitation provided. Please provide Section II A in its entirety.

On: Sep 26 2019.

Government Response. . This should state that the factor is met when the offeror's proposal effectively addresses and includes those elements described in 2.b.1. On: Sep 30 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8204767 Specifications Section L, Volume I – Factor 1

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section L, Volume I – Factor 1 Technical/Risk Approach, 3rd bullet states (in part) – 'For all sites in PWS Table 1:

Performance Table with a PO of Optimized Exit Strategies (OES), the offeror shall demonstrate the following...".

However, Table 1 of the PWS does not include any references to an OES requirement, nor is it defined elsewhere in the documents provided by the Army. Can the Army please clarify this apparent discrepancy?

On: Sep 27 2019.

Government Response. . There is no OES requirement at JB Andrews so it was removed from the AFCEC PWS used as the basis for the JB Andrews specific ORC. The solicitation will be revised accordingly. On: Sep 30 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8204855 General Reports

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Is a wetland delineation report available for the LF 581 area and Piscataway Creek tributary areas?

On: Sep 27 2019.

Government Response. . Wetland survey maps for the installation including those for landfills 6 and 7 and other southern portions of the installation can be provided with the GFI. Please request the GFI from the Contract Specialist. On: Oct 16 2019

Page 1 of 22ProjNet: Logged In User

10/21/2019https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicPublicReport...

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8204860 Specifications Characterization

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Was the JBA property outside the perimeter fence and the eastern LF 581 SWMU boundary characterized for the presence of fill material?

On: Sep 27 2019.

Government Response. . No. That is a former farm that was acquired by the US Air Force in early 19990. It is not anticipated that there is any fill material there from US AF Operations. It is NOT considered part of LF-581. On: Sep 30 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8204868 General Reports

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Can the Government please provide the boring/well construction log for well BW-MW14.

On: Sep 27 2019.

Government Response. . This will be provided with the GFI upon request. On: Sep 30 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8204890 General FS Status

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

What is the current status of the FS Statement for SWMU 66? If not finalized, is regulatory review of the document underway? If so, have the regulators provided any comments yet? Do EPA and MDE agree with the USAF recommendation stated in the FS Statement's Section 4.0 (Conclusions and Recommendation)?

On: Sep 27 2019.

Government Response. . As of 30 SEP 2019 the FS statement is under legal review with USAF and the document has not been submitted to the regulators for review. On: Sep 30 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8207384 Environmental na

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 8.1.1 (g) of the PWS indicates that analytical costs for 1,4-Dioxane for all of the identified sites will be included within a separate sub-CLIN. The CLIN for these activities is identified as CLIN 0011 on the CLIN schedule in Section L, but is not identified on Table 1 provided in Section B. Will the Government please revise Table 1 in the PWS to include 1,4-dioxane sampling and provide a revised sub-CLIN structure?

On: Sep 30 2019.

Government Response. . The final solicitation with an updated PWS will address this. On: Oct 09 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8207387 Environmental na

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please confirm if analytical costs associated with 1,4-Dioxane sampling should also include data validation costs in accordance with Section 5.1 of the PWS.

On: Sep 30 2019.

Government Response. . Confirmed. On: Oct 09 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

Page 2 of 22ProjNet: Logged In User

8207388 Environmental na

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please clarify as to what level the Government would like to see the WBS Dictionary and provide an example for reference.

On: Sep 30 2019.

Government Response. . Based on the WBS guidance provided, offerors are provided levels 1-7, with the SubCLIN defined as level seven (7). Per the WBS guidance, it is up to the Contractor to develop lower levels but the WBS should demonstrate a comprehensive understanding and decomposition of the work to be accomplished to meet the PO. On: Oct 09 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8207391 Environmental na

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

What is the required submittal format for the WBS Dictionary (i.e. MS Excel) in addition to the IMS?

On: Sep 30 2019.

Government Response. . The WBS is typically a word document. However, MS Excel is acceptable. Per the submittal requirements of the PWS, submit in native format. On: Oct 09 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8207396 Environmental na

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please describe which fields in the WBS Dictionary will be required for the proposal? Will it be:

a. WBS Element Title

b. WBS element Code

c. Site and CLIN/Sub-CLIN associated with the WBS Element

d. Performance Objective

On: Sep 30 2019.

Government Response. . Per the guidance document (Guidance for the Development of Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) Structures, Work Breakdown Structures (WBSs), Integrated Master Schedules (IMSs), and Milestone Payment Schedules) the above fields are those that the Government has provided. The contractor needs to provide sufficient detail to illustrate the decomposition of the work for each work package. Guidance regarding the information that should be included in the WBS and WBS dictionary are provided in detail in the guidance document. On: Oct 09 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8207399 Environmental na

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Considering this is Performance Based Contract, please clarify if the Earned Value Management System (EVMS) requirements (Section H) are necessary for this solicitation.

On: Sep 30 2019.

Government Response. . The EVMS are NOT necessary for this solicitation. The solicitation will be revised accordingly. On: Oct 09 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8207400 Environmental na

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

For the ranges (FI346, RR004, RR348, SR347, TS345, ZZ349), please indicate if grouping of sites into combined reports (i.e, one ROD for sites RR004, RR348, and FI346) is acceptable, or if the Government prefers separate reports for each site. For sites with "A" designations (SR347A, TS345A, and ZZ349A), please indicate if the individual

Page 3 of 22ProjNet: Logged In User site can be combined with the counterpart (i.e., one report to include both SR347 and SR347A) or if the reports should be separate.

On: Sep 30 2019.

Government Response. . Sites with "A" designations are to be combined in with their counterpart in their respective documents. Separate reports are required for each site listed in the Federal Facility Agreement (FI346, RR004, RR348,SR347, TS345, ZZ349) but both the EPA and USAF consider TS345A part of TS345, SR347A part of SR347, and ZZ349A part of ZZ349. On: Oct 09 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8208639 General Section L page 199 of 256 and Section M page 234 of 256

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please clarify the age requirements for projects - the RFP has conflicting information on 5 vs. 10 years (Section L page 199 of 256 and Section M page 234 of 256). We request revision to 10 years, or something greater than 5 years). Also we request that projects be no more than 50% complete vs. 80%.

On: Oct 01 2019.

Government Response. . Project completion requirement removed. Language updated in final solicitation to read, "Offerors shall submit a maximum of five (5) example projects demonstrating the Offeror's recent, relevant experience as it relates to ORC within the past five (5) years. The Government will not consider performance on a project that concluded more than five (5) years prior to the date of solicitation issuance.

Three (3) of the five (5) projects shall be from the Prime Contractor." On: Oct 17 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8208642 General Section L, Factor 3

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please clarify the key personnel position listed in Section L, Factor 3, for "Alternate Object Site Lead". What is the role of this person?

On: Oct 01 2019.

Government Response. . Alternate Objective Sites have complex attributes that have, to date, inhibited progress towards the achievement of RC. The AF desires to have a single point of contact (POC) with sufficient technical experience to be responsible for implementing, tracking and achieving the requirements and goals for all the Alternate Objective sites in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) for the duration of the contract. On: Oct 17 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8208643 General Section L under Factor 3

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section L under Factor 3 references an attachment B - can this be provided in advance of the RFP?

On: Oct 01 2019.

Government Response. . Section B was listed as attachment A. This has been fixed in the solicitation document. On: Oct 09 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8208644 General Page Count

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please clarify if exhibits/figures included within the page counts?

On: Oct 01 2019.

Government Response. . Exhibits/figures are included in the page counts. Language in solicitation has been revised accordingly. On: Oct 09 2019

Page 4 of 22ProjNet: Logged In User

Government Response. . This new text supercedes ALL previous replies.

Exhibits/figures have been excluded from the page count in the final solicitation. On: Oct 18 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8208646 General Page Count

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Recommend providing a total page count limit for Volumes I, II, and III and allow the contractor flexibility to use pages as warranted across the 3 factors. The 40 page limit for technical Vol 1 seems low (especially given that the evaluation criteria check list itself is over 20 pages), and the 40 page limit for management and past experience seems high. Alternatively - recommend increasing the technical to 60, and the past experience and managment sections to 15 each .

On: Oct 01 2019.

Government Response. . The page count for Volume I has been increased to 60 pages and will be reflected in final solicitation. On: Oct 09 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8208647 General Section L

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

An organizational chart is requested in section L under both Factors 2 and 3. Please clarify where the org chart should be? Also the evaluation criteria seem to only focus on projects for Factor 2. Suggest that Factor 2 be only Corporate experience / projects, and management/org chart is all Factor 3.

On: Oct 01 2019.

Government Response. . Please see information on final solicitation. Factor 2 in section L has been revised. On: Oct 09 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8208649 General Section 1.2.1 and Section L

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 1.2.1 and Section L: Is the government looking for conceptual performance models to be submitted with the proposal? Or will all performance models be developed after contract award and not required in the proposal?

On: Oct 01 2019.

Government Response. . The performance models are part of the PWS as a deliverable once the contract is awarded. On: Oct 09 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8208650 General Section 1.2.5

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 1.2.5: Could the government clarify if this PO (RA-O and LTM) requires or expects activities to optimize the systems and reduce LCC within the POP? The Reduce LCC summary report required in bullet 4 specifies that a summary of what was done to date to reduce LCC should be included. Reduce LCC in not part of the PO title "RA-O and LTM").

On: Oct 01 2019.

Government Response. . See changes in the Final PWS included in the final solicitation. On: Oct 17

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8208652 General Section 8.1.3

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Page 5 of 22ProjNet: Logged In User

Section 8.1.3: Site specific CSMs are required for each PWS site. Can the recent environmental sequence stratigraphy work done by Tehama for HGL be provided in the GFI to assist contractors develop technical proposals?

It is important all bidders have the same information.

On: Oct 01 2019.

Government Response. . Please request the GFI from the Contract Specialist. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8208653 General SS001

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

SS001: Can the government provide examples of the Environmental Baseline Surveys required for offsite access at this site?

On: Oct 01 2019.

Government Response. . Please request the GFI from the Contract Specialist as this is included in that information. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8208655 General CPAR and PPQs

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Are CPAR and PPQs excluded from the page count? If not we request they are.

On: Oct 01 2019.

Government Response. . CPARS and PPQs will not be included in the page count but are limited to those projects submitted as required by factor 2. Final solicitation revised accordingly. On: Oct 09 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8208658 General Key Personnel

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Are there any specific requirements for the Key Personnel in terms of qualifications?

On: Oct 01 2019.

Government Response. . See attachment to section L in final solicitation. On: Oct 17 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8208662 General Section A. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION (Section L)

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

In Section A. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION (Section L) of the RFP under 2) VOLUME II – FACTOR 2 Corporate Experience/Past Performance, the RFP instructions state the following: "If the Joint Venture/Mentor Protégé is a Small and Large Business, the Small Business will be evaluated as the Prime Offeror."

We're confused by this statement as JVs are normally recognized and treated as a single entity prime contractor during the proposal evaluation stage and during performance of the contract. Also, this statement seems to conflict with the FAR and SBA regulations concerning joint ventures. For example, FAR 9.603 states that the Government will recognize teaming arrangements, and Section 9.601 specifically defines a joint venture as a teaming arrangement where 'two or more companies form a partnership or joint venture to act as a potential prime contractor". And the SBA regulations regarding Small Business Joint Ventures in 13 CFR § 124.513 (f) and 13 CFR § 125.8 (e) state that procuring activities "must consider work done individually by each partner to the joint venture". Therefore, we respectfully request that the Government revise or remove this language from the RFP.

On: Oct 01 2019.

Government Response. . This information has been removed. The final solicitation will be revised accordingly. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Page 6 of 22ProjNet: Logged In User

8208771 General Attachment B

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Draft Solicitation Page 201 of 256, 3) Vol III Factor 3 A. states "Provide a matrix to include all key disciplines (and alternates) submitted using the attached template in Attachment B of the RFP" Can the government please provide Attachment B.

On: Oct 01 2019.

Government Response. . Attachment B has been included in the final solicitation. On: Oct 09 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8208773 General Qualifications

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Draft Solicitation Page 201 of 256, 3) Vol III Factor 3 A. provides a list of 8 key personnel, can the government please provide the qualifications for these positions.

On: Oct 01 2019.

Government Response. . See attachment in section L of the final solicitation. On: Oct 17 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8208891 General Clarification

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Draft Solicitation Page 199 of 256 2) Volume II-Factor 2 Corporate Experience/Past Performance states "Provide a narrative description of the roles and responsibilities of the key personnel (name/title/firm) identified in Section II, Paragraph A.1.c and include an organizational chart depicting the hierarchical structure of the team members responsible for project execution." Does the government want Management and Key Personnel information within the Experience/Past Performance Section? This appears to be in the wrong section and it references Section II, Paragraph A.1.c which doesn't exist in the document. Can the government please clarify or correct this paragraph?

On: Oct 01 2019.

Government Response. . Volume II-Factor 2 has been revised to: Provide an organizational chart depicting the hierarchical structure of the team members responsible for project execution. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8209180 General Resumes

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Draft Solicitation Page 201 of 256, 3) Volume III – Factor 3 Management Experience. Key Personnel: Offerors shall provide resumes ... The key personnel are: Program Manager, Project Manager(s), Program Chemist, Program Quality Assurance (QA)/Quality Control (QC), Program Health and Safety Manager, Alternate Object Site Lead, Geophysicist for UXO projects, and Public Affairs Officer.

Question: Is up to the discretion of the Offeror to propose additional PM's and/or other key positions?

On: Oct 01 2019.

Government Response. . The final solicitation has been revised for the key personnel resumes be no more than 2. On: Oct 09 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8210058 Environmental na

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Sec L, Factor 2, Corp Experience - These instructions seem to request a narrative similar to that requested in Factor 3 Management. Please confirm that Factors 2 is only requesting 5 projects and either CPARS or PPQs.

On: Oct 02 2019.

Page 7 of 22ProjNet: Logged In User

Government Response. . This requirement has been removed in Factor 2. Factor 2 is requesting corporate experience along with past performance for 5 example projects. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8210059 Environmental NA

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Under which Factor should we include our JV and Teaming Agreements?

On: Oct 02 2019.

Government Response. . The contractor team agreement/commitment shall be provided at the beginning of the Offeror's technical proposal, prior to Factor 1, and will not be included in the overall page count. On:

Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8210307 Environmental na

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Sec L.2.b. Content Requirement. "Each file of the proposal shall consist of a Table of Contents, Summary and the Narrative discussion. The Summary Section shall contain a brief abstract of the file." Please clarify where the Summary Abstract should be included and if it counts toward the page limit.

On: Oct 02 2019.

Government Response. . Section revised to: The first page of the Summary Section shall contain a brief abstract of the file. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8210538 Environmental na

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Proposal Adequacy Checklist - As this is not requested in Sec L factor instructions, we assume this is not required as part of our proposal. Please confirm.

On: Oct 02 2019.

Government Response. . Removed from solicitation. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8210596 Environmental NA

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Sec L, Factor 1 requests "A summary table for all sites that reflects the offeror's proposed approach." Please provide guidance of what the summary table should include.

On: Oct 02 2019.

Government Response. . The Offeror shall provide a summary table including the following information for each site listed in the PWS: Site ID, Site Name, Performance Objective, and Summary of proposed Technical Approach. Language added in final solicitation. On: Oct 17 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8210948 General Small Arms Range (ZZ349)

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Could the Air Force please provide the status of the RI with DFS statement for the Small Arms Range (ZZ349)? If possible a copy of the current draft document would be helpful.

On: Oct 03 2019.

Government Response. . The Small Arms Range is included in a May 2019 version of the RI Report for MMRP Sites TS345, SR347, and ZZ349 As of 8 OCT 2019 no revised version of that report exists. Draft

Page 8 of 22ProjNet: Logged In User responses to EPA and MDE comments on the report and other discussions regarding the status of this site and the other MMRP sites can be found in the SEP 2019 Tier I Meeting minutes. In addition, an updated Key Points document for MMRP Sites SR347, TS345, ZZ349 dated 24 Sep 2019 can be provided as GFI if requested(use this version instead of the Key Points document for these sites provided in 26 Jun 19 GFI).

On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8211571 Environmental na

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The adequacy table seems to indicate that cost buildup information and basis (e.g. OH, G&A)is required, however this is not included in Section L instructions. Please indicated what type of cost backup should be included.

On: Oct 03 2019.

Government Response. . This has been removed. However, for the price, all backup to support the price should be provided (i.e. subcontractor quotes, equipment costs, etc.) On: Oct 16 2019

Government Response. . This new text supercedes ALL previous replies.

This has been removed. See final solicitation for changes in the evaluation criteria. On: Oct 18 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8211591 Environmental na

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

If cost buildup information is required (per FAR 15.408, Table 15-2), we request that JV's be allowed to provide each member's information confidentially in separate envelopes.

On: Oct 03 2019.

Government Response. . This has been removed. However, pricing backup should be provided to support the prices proposed. On: Oct 16 2019

Government Response. . This new text supercedes ALL previous replies.

This has been removed. Please see final solicitation for evaluation criteria changes. On: Oct 18 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8211748 Environmental Section L Proposal Submission Requirements

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Given the level of detail requested in the Technical Approach, would the government consider expanding the page count for Volume I/Factor 1 to 50 pages and/or consider reducing the font size to 10 point with 0.25" gutter?

On: Oct 03 2019.

Government Response. . The page limit for Volume I has been increased to 60 pages. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8211751 Environmental PMP Guidance Document

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Attachment 2-1 of the ORC PMP Guidance document indicates that the first step in developing the performance model baseline includes querying ERPIMS to determine wells exceeding the RLs within the last five years. Will the government provide the ERPIMS dataset for review as part of the solicitation?

On: Oct 03 2019.

Government Response. . Please request the GFI from the Contract specialist. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8211756 Environmental Section C - PWS Table 1

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Page 9 of 22ProjNet: Logged In User

For Site SS028, Table 1 of the Performance Work Statement lists a Period of Performance (POP) of five (5) years for achievement of performance objectives (RIP, then RA-O through the duration of the POP). Given that the Price Schedule (Section B) includes 5 years of RA-O, does the Government intend to extend the POP to allow time for preceding tasks to be completed (remedial design, remedy implementation, and demonstration of RIP) prior to the five years of RA-O?

On: Oct 03 2019.

Government Response. . The government does not intend to extend the POP. The intent is to achieve RIP within five years of award of CLIN0030AA. Five years of RA-O are provided as options that will be exercised as needed, depending on when RIP is achieved. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8211926 General Price Schedule

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The Price schedule starting on Page 2 of the Draft solicitation does not match CLIN table provided in Volume IV Price. Please confirm that the contractors should follow Volume IV Price.

On: Oct 03 2019.

Government Response. . The price schedule has been corrected and will be reflected in the final solicitation. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8211927 General Period of Performance

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

For Site SS028: Please confirm that the 5 year Period of performance to Achieve RIP begins once CLIN 0030AB is exercised (I.e, after "Achieve Remedial Design and Remedial Action" is complete)

On: Oct 03 2019.

Government Response. . That is incorrect. The 5 year period of performance for achieving RIP at SS028 begins when CLIN 0030AA is exercised. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8211928 General Dates

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

For Site TU167: Table 1 indicates that the work is to start upon award of the base contract. Table 2 indicates that the current site characterization work will be complete on 9/29/2022. Please confirm that start date for this Site.

On: Oct 03 2019.

Government Response. . The site characterization work at site TU167 under the current contract is complete. The final report is in the Administrative Record under AR# 1971. The ORC contractor is expected to start work at TU-167 upon award. The current contractor has other sites at which they are conducting work that are not included in the ORC, so the POP for that contract is 9/29/2022. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8211929 General Pricing

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

What specific information is required to support proposed costs and prices in Volume IV?

On: Oct 03 2019.

Government Response. . Information has been updated in the final solicitation. This requirement has been removed. On: Oct 17 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8211943 General Page Limit Exclusions

Page 10 of 22ProjNet: Logged In User

Can government confirm WBS, integrated master schedule (IMS) and milestone payment (without cost) are all to be included in volume I, Factor 1 are excluded from the 40 page count.

On: Oct 03 2019.

Government Response. . WBS, IMS, and milestone payment are included in the page count and can utilize 11x17 page sizes. However, the page limit has been increased. On: Oct 17 2019

Government Response. . This new text supercedes ALL previous replies.

WBS, IMS, and milestone payment are NOT included in the page count and can utilize 11x17 page sizes.

On: Oct 18 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8211946 Environmental PFAS

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please clarify whether PFAS sampling and analysis is part of the ORC scope.

On: Oct 03 2019.

Government Response. . PFAS sampling and analysis are not part of the JB Andrews ORC scope.

PFOS/PFOA will be addressed in a future separate effort. If there is a change in regulatory status or DOD policy that forces PFOS/PFOA to be addressed in the ORC, then a course of action will be determined at that time. JB Andrews' current approach regarding Investigation Derived Waste (IDW) is to sample IDW for PFOS/PFOA only if the IDW was generated during the collection of samples for PFOS/PFOA analysis. As PFOS/PFOA is not included in the ORC scope, then testing for PFOS/PFOA in ORC-derived IDW should not be needed. If there is a change in regulations, policy, or the requirements of disposal centers that requires testing for PFAS, then the ORC may be modified accordingly. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8211949 Specifications FT-02

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Per the recommendations in the FT002 Five-Year Report, have the additional monitoring wells been installed along the eastern plume boundary? If so, can the well construction details and well locations be provided?

On: Oct 03 2019.

Government Response. . The 2nd FYR specifically recommends "A monitoring well should be installed to establish the southwestern edge of the northern plume." This was in response to the USEPA request to delineate the southwestern edge of the FT002 groundwater plume in 2013. Monitoring well FT02-MW13 was installed in March 2018 following three direct-push "step out" groundwater samples being collected and analyzed before choosing that monitoring well location It also preceded the 3rd round of injections, so it was considered in the design of those injections. Sampling results from FT02-MW13 have enabled JBA to refine the LUC boundary for FT002 and minimize the area of the FT002 LUC requirements without any new data from additional new monitoring wells. Well construction details for FT02-MW13 can be found in Appendix E of the 2018 FT02 Injection Tech Memo in the Administrative Record (AR # 1895). While the 2nd FYR also recommended "The need for installation of one or more monitoring wells to the east of the northern plume should be evaluated," additional monitoring wells were not necessary to delineate the eastern edge of the northern plume at this time. It is important to note that FT002 is located in what is probably the most active portion of the JBA airfield, and limiting monitoring wells on the ramp at this location has always been an extremely high priority. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8211951 Specifications FT-02

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Per the recommendations in the FT002 Five-Year Report, has the sampling program been expanded? If so, can the details of the sampling expansion be provided?

On: Oct 03 2019.

Page 11 of 22ProjNet: Logged In User

Government Response. . The sampling program for FT002 meets the requirements of the FT002 ROD. It has remained the same since the second injection at that site. The program involves very detailed analysis of the monitoring wells within the center of the plume. All other accessible monitoring wells at FT-02 have been sampled at a minimum, for evaluation of the FT-02 COCs. Please see the FT-02 Annual RA-O Monitoring Report for 2019, Performance-Based Restoration, Joint Base Andrews Naval Air Facility Washington, Camp Springs, Maryland for the historical details on specific samples analyses for individual FT002 monitoring wells. This report is part of the GFI. Please request the GFI from the contract specialist.

On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8211952 Specifications SS-028

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please clarify when RIP is expected to be achieved at SS-028.

On: Oct 03 2019.

Government Response. . RIP at SS028 is expected within 5 years of when CLIN 0030AA is exercised.

On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8211953 Specifications SS-028

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please clarify if the performance model will be required after RIP.

On: Oct 03 2019.

Government Response. . PWS Section 1.2.1 states "The Contractor shall develop performance models for all sites listed in Table 1 of this PWS that do not have a PO of Long Term Management (LTM) and have a remedy planned and/or in place." Since SS028 has a remedy planned as part of the ORC, a performance model will be required. On: Oct 17 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8211955 Specifications TU-167

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Can the Government please provide a copy of the report Accord MACTEC Joint Venture 2014, Subsurface Investigation to Ascertain the Nature and Preliminarily Delineate the Extent of Liquid-Phase Hydrocarbons in the Building 3166/3167 UST Area, Joint Base Andrews, Maryland that is referenced in the March 2019 Final Site Characterization Report for TU167.

On: Oct 03 2019.

Government Response. . Please request the full GFI for all supporting documents. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8211956 Specifications TU-167

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Confirm that the May 2019 Final Site Characterization Report is the final deliverable expected of the current contractor, as indicated in Table 2 of the PWS.

On: Oct 03 2019.

Government Response. . Yes that is the final deliverable for TU-167. However the contractor is working on other sites not included in the ORC. The final report is in the Administrative Record under AR# 1971.

On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8211958 Specifications SS022

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Page 12 of 22ProjNet: Logged In User

Has MDE responded (in meetings or comment letters or other means) to the current contractor's intent to stop monitoring in Q2 2019 and request closure under MDE MEAT guidelines? If so, please provide.

On: Oct 03 2019.

Government Response. . The MDE letter can be provided as GFI if requested. Please contact the contract specialist for the GFI. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8211959 General SS022

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please provide the results of the June 2019 gauging/sampling event.

On: Oct 03 2019.

Government Response. . The last gauging/sampling event at SS022 was in March 2019. Results of that event are in SS-22 Final O&M Q15 (Jan-Mar 2019) which was finalized July 2019. Please request the GFI from the contract specialist. The next gauging/sampling event at SS022 is scheduled for the week of 21 Oct 2019. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8211961 General SS022

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please provide the most up-to-date draft (working copy) of the Downward Trend Status Report that the contractor is preparing or has prepared.

On: Oct 03 2019.

Government Response. . As of 9 Oct 2019, the contractor for SS022 has not submitted a working copy of this report. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8211963 General SS022

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please provide additional information of the MPE system condition.

On: Oct 03 2019.

Government Response. . The system is currently deactivated, and has been so for over a year. The Air Force intends to direct the current contractor to place the system in a "mothball" state of being out of operation but can be reactivated with minimal effort. The internal lines, tanks, and associated systems are to be drained. All parts of the system were functioning prior to shut down. The telemetry for the system has been knocked out by a lawn mower and will take several months to bring back on line through the base telecom network. The process to reestablish telemetry has not been started and will not be started unless the system needs to be reactivated. Power to the system is currently active but the transformer feeding power to system has been prone to fail during previous storm events. The system as a whole is now approaching ten years of constant use, and should be considered nearing the end of its life. On: Oct 16

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8211964 General SS022

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please provide AECOM, 2010. Interim Draft SS-22 Corrective Action Report (CAR); April.

On: Oct 03 2019.

Government Response. . Please request GFI from contract specialist On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

Page 13 of 22ProjNet: Logged In User

8211965 General ST014

Please provide the most recent comment (even if Working Copy) of the ST-14 OES Report

On: Oct 03 2019.

Government Response. . Please request the GFI from the Contract Specialist. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8211967 General ST014

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please provide JBA Comments on December 2014 ST-14 RAO Work Plan

On: Oct 03 2019.

Government Response. . Please request the GFI from the Contract Specialist. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8211971 General ST014

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please provide Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. (Amec Foster Wheeler), 2015a. Technical Memorandum 2015 Remedial Action Optimization, EOS Injection, Former East Side Gas Station: Site ST-14 Performance-Based Remediation, Joint Base Andrews Naval Air Facility Washington Camp Springs, Maryland, March.

On: Oct 03 2019.

Government Response. . Please request the GFI from the Contract Specialist. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8211972 General ST014

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please provide Amec Foster Wheeler, 2015c. Technical Memorandum 2015 Remedial Action Optimization, EOS Injection and Biosparge System Installation, Former East Side Gas Station: Site ST-14 Performance-Based Remediation, Joint Base Andrews Naval Air Facility Washington. June.

On: Oct 03 2019.

Government Response. . Please request the GFI from the Contract Specialist. Note, it is labeled working copy but it is actually the final version. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8211973 General ERPIMS

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please provide data for the sites from ERPIMS, or provide access to database.

On: Oct 03 2019.

Government Response. . Please request the GFI from the Contract Specialist. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8211974 General Wells

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please provide a complete list of wells for the site (JBA Well List).

On: Oct 03 2019.

Page 14 of 22ProjNet: Logged In User

Government Response. . A complete list of wells is included in the ERPIMS data. In addition a complete list of wells with notes on condition is located in the excel file titled BASWGEAugust2018ResultsFinalTehama. Please request the GFI from the Contract Specialist. On: Oct 16

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8211975 General Meeting Minutes

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please provide meeting minutes and presentations from Tier 1 Partnering Meetings

On: Oct 03 2019.

Government Response. . Please request the GFI from the Contract Specialist. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8212024 General SS011

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Does the current contractor have a second round of injections in their scope at the SS011 site (Davidsonville Radar Facility)

On: Oct 03 2019.

Government Response. . No. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8212145 Environmental N/A N/A N/A

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section L, VOLUME II – FACTOR 2 Corporate Experience/Past Performance states, "Provide a narrative description of the roles and responsibilities of the key personnel (name/title/firm) identified in Section II, Paragraph A.1.c and..."

Please provide Section II, Paragraph A.1.c.

On: Oct 04 2019.

Government Response. . This has been revised to state: Provide an organizational chart depicting the hierarchical structure of the team members responsible for project execution. On: Oct 16 2019

Government Response. . This has been revised to state: Provide an organizational chart depicting the hierarchical structure of the team members responsible for project execution. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8212147 Environmental N/A N/A N/A

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section L, VOLUME II – FACTOR 2 Corporate Experience/Past Performance states, "Provide a narrative description of the roles and responsibilities of the key personnel (name/title/firm) identified in Section II, Paragraph A.1.c and..."

Is the requested information to be provided separately or within each project description?

On: Oct 04 2019.

Government Response. . This has been revised to state, "Provide an organizational chart depicting the hierarchical structure of the team members responsible for project execution." On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8212148 Environmental N/A N/A N/A

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section L, VOLUME III – FACTOR 3 Management Experience requires, "identification of roles, responsibilities, ...for key personnel..." Please explain if this information request is different than that described Section L, VOLUME II – FACTOR 2 Corporate Experience/Past Performance.

Page 15 of 22ProjNet: Logged In User

On: Oct 04 2019.

Government Response. . Yes, the information as described in Factor 2 is for corporate experience / past performance whereas the Factor 3 is for the management experience. Language has been revised to distinguish between the two. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8212149 Environmental N/A N/A N/A

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section K states that the NAICS code for this acquisition is 562910 and that the small business size standard is $20,500,000. Please confirm that the NAICS code for this procurement should be 562910 Environmental Remediation Services for firms of 750 employees or fewer.

On: Oct 04 2019.

Government Response. . Final solicitation is has been revised accordingly to 750 Employees as the size standard under NAICS code 562910. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8212150 Environmental N/A N/A N/A

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section M, Price Factor (FACTOR 4), states that the Government will, as part of the Overall Price Proposal Evaluation, "verify the adequacy of the Offeror's business systems". Section L does not have a requirement for including information regarding business systems. Please clarify submission instructions and evaluation factors for the Price Proposal.

On: Oct 04 2019.

Government Response. . This has been removed. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8212155 Environmental N/A N/A N/A

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Draft Solicitation Page 201 of 256, 3) Vol III Factor 3. Please provide the specific Key Personnel requirements/qualifications including educational requirements, minimum years of experience, and licensing requirements (e.g., P.G., P.E.). If these requirements are provided in Attachment B (not included in the Draft RFP), can the government provide a draft of Attachment B?

On: Oct 04 2019.

Government Response. . The final solicitation will be revised accordingly. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8212156 Environmental N/A N/A N/A

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please provide the most recent EBS template that has been used successfully at JBA.

On: Oct 04 2019.

Government Response. . Please request the GFI from the Contract Specialist. On: Oct 16 2019

Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8212157 Environmental N/A N/A N/A

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

For LF-581, while not documented in GFI provided to…