QA_W912CH26R0055.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 12 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Ground Hop Kit
- Solicitation number
- W912CH-26-R-0055
- Issued by
-
Department of the Army
About this file
This is a Questions and Answers document for Solicitation W912CH-26-R-0055 addressing contractor inquiries regarding Factory Acceptance Testing (FAT) requirements and Technical Data Package (TDP) file issues for the Ground Hop Kit procurement. The document clarifies that the FAT quantity of 23 units does not refer to complete kits but rather to individual wiring harness components within the kit. Three samples are required for FAT testing of part numbers 12298170, 12298168, 12484297, 12298171, 12298169, 12358987, and 12381627, while two samples are required for part number 12488241. The government provides a cost reduction opportunity: if a contractor uses a single manufacturer for all wiring harness configurations and completes successful FAT testing on parts 12298170 and 12488241, the manufacturer may waive the six remaining FATs for other harness configurations.
Regarding the TDP file concerns raised in Question 2, the government confirmed that all files in the Technical Data Package have been verified as correct and up-to-date, despite contractor reports of mismatched file names, unopenable PDFs, and a missing top-level assembly drawing for part 12298101. The government's response provides no additional remediation or clarification beyond the verification statement, leaving contractors to proceed with the provided documentation.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| QA_W912CH26R0055.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| W912CH26R0055-0003 Amendment.pdf | ||
| QA_W912CH26R0055.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| W912CH26R0055-0002 Amendment.pdf | ||
| QA_W912CH26R0055.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| W912CH26R0055 Solicitation.pdf | ||
| W912CH25R0055_0001 Amendment.pdf | ||
| First-Article-Waiver-Worksheet (1).pdf | ||
| OPSEC_PLAN_2025.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Number | QUESTION | ANSWER |
| 1 | The FAT quantities state 23 in total of each configuration that will be consumed. Is that as follows? |
12298168 – Qty 23 12298169 – Qty 23 12298170 – Qty 23 12298171 – Qty 23 12358987 – Qty 23 1238127 – Qty 23 12484297-1 – Qty 23 12484297-2 – Qty 23
| 12488241 – Qty 23 | The quantity of 23 units for FAT is correct; however, this number does not refer to 23 whole kits but rather to the individual wiring harness parts contained within the kit. This kit contains multiple wiring harness part numbers, each requiring FAT testing. Specifically, three samples are required for each of the following part numbers: 12298170, 12298168, 12484297, 12298171, 12298169, 12358987, and 12381627. Additionally, two samples are required for part number 12488241. To reduce the total number of FATs, the contractor may utilize a single actual manufacturer for all wiring harness configurations. Please see the attached additional Section E language for Kit 12298101 for further details. This Kit contains 8 wiring harnesses / cables that all have FAT Requirements. If the contractor uses a single actual manufacturer to produce all of the wiring harnesses and completes a successful (approved) FAT against parts 12298170 and 12488241, using the required three (3) and two (2) test samples respectively, the actual manufacturer is approved to waive the six (6) FATs for the remaining harness configurations. See SEction E for Kit in the TDP. | |
| 2 | My engineering team has review TDP and provided the following feedback below: |
1. The file names on the PDF drawings do not match the contents of the drawings. Example: the file titled “12298101_G” contains the 12308310 drawing.
2. Multiple PDFs would not open and gave the following error: file could not be open because it is either not a supported file type, or the file has been damaged.
3. The top level assembly drawing 12298101 was not included in the TDP. We checked all the drawings we could open and none of them had the details of the 12298101.
| Can you please advise? Thank you! | A review has been made of the TDP file and files were verified to be correct and up-to-date. |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .