00 22 00 Edwards Amend 0002.pdf

PDF 135 KB Posted

Attached to
Pre-Solicitation Notice Competitive 8(a) - SP-POL-SRM-Edwards AFB - MSS-Transfer line-Hydrant 3
Solicitation number
W9128F24R0053
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the MSS - Transfer Line - Hydrant 3 project at Edwards AFB, CA. The solicitation is open to all 8(a) participants. The key requirements include installation of a positive displacement meter, piping, security fencing and gates, replacement of asphalt cement concrete, and installation or replacement of above ground storage tanks and fueling truck offload. Proposals are due by Tuesday, May 9, 2024 at 2:00 PM CST. The government will evaluate proposals based on Specialized Experience, Proposed Contract Duration and Summary Schedule, and Price, using a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) approach. Award will be made to the offeror with the lowest aggregated proposed price. A site visit is scheduled for March 5, 2024. The contract performance period is 365-540 calendar days from contract award, anticipated to be made on May 23, 2024.

View the file

Other files

Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

MSS - Transfer Line - Hydrant 3 - Edwards AFB, CA CA64

DIVISION 00 - PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS

SECTION 00 22 00

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)

W9128F-24-R-0053

INSTRUCTIONS, SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND EVALUATION

1. WHO MAY SUBMIT

This solicitation is available to all 8(a) participants.

2. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

In order to effectively and equitably evaluate the submitted proposal, the Contracting Officer must receive information sufficiently detailed to clearly indicate compliance with the proposal submission requirements. The price proposal submitted in response to this request will be evaluated using one or more of the proposal analysis techniques identified in FAR 15.404-1(b).

Contract award will be made to the proposal found to be the lowest aggregated proposed price in accordance with FAR 52.217-5 Evaluation of Options.

The government will hold an organized site visit on Tuesday, March 5, 2024, at 1000 local time. Participants will meet at the following location:

Edwards AFB Visitor Center (west gate), 1004 Rosamond Blvd

RSVP to the POC listed below no later than ten (10) calendar days before the scheduled site visit:

gary.krivokapich1@us.af.mil (Cc: Seth.A.Kiely@usace.army.mil) – Subject: MSS, Transfer Line, Hydrant 3 Contractor Site Visit.

3. SUBMISSION DEADLINE

Proposals shall be received by the USACE Contracting Activity no later TuesdayWednesday, April May 91, 2024, 1400 CST. Proposals shall be submitted electronically to the contract Specialist per the instructions in Section 00 21 00.

Contract Specialist: timothy.b.boyte@usace.army.mil Contracting Officer: Jae.H.Chang@usace.army.mil

4. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

8.5”x 11” page size; font no smaller than font 10 size. The requirements specified in the solicitation are considered minimum requirements. A proposal that fails to comply with the minimum technical and submittal requirements may not be eligible for award. Submit no more than three (3) pages (single sided) for Volume 1, Factor 1, and submit a Gantt Chart for Factor 2.

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

Volume 1: Technical Proposal

Factor 1: Specialized Experience Factor 2: Proposed Contract Duration and Summary Schedule Volume 2 Pricing Factor 3: Price

IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT NONE OF THE PRICING OR VOLUME 2 INFORMATION SHOW UP IN

VOLUME 1.

4.1 VOLUME 1: TECHNICAL (VOLUME 1) SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

4.1.1 Factor 1: SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

a. Offeror shall submit a maximum three (3) projects, completed within the last 7 years from the date of this RFP that collectively show the following work activities, unless otherwise noted. The Government will accept performance by the prime contractor or its key subcontractor/teaming partner. One project shall be from the prime contractor.

1. All projects submitted must show demonstrated experience IAW UFC 3-460-

01, & AW 78-24-28, & STD 123-335-03.

2. Installation of positive displacement meter, and piping IAW UFGS 33 52 43.13.

3. Installation of security fencing and gates for DoD.

4.3. Replacement of asphalt cement concrete IAW DoD specification UFGS

32 12 16.

5.4. Installation or replacement of UL 2085 10,000 – 20,0006,000 gal and greater above ground storage tank.

6.5. Installation or replacement of DoD fueling truck offload.

b. Project total cost, at completion, shall total $1,0500,000 or greater for each project.

c. The submitted project experience shall include:

1. description of the project and location

2. final construction cost

3. date when the construction of the project was completed.

4.1.2 Factor 2: PROPOSED CONTRACT DURATION AND SUMMARY SCHEDULE

Based on your understanding of the RFP requirements, provide a schedule Gantt chart showing Phase 1 (Preconstruction Phase), Phase 2 (On-site Construction) and Phase 3 (Post Construction) in accordance with mandatory scheduled performance of 365 540 calendar days.

The schedule should present the requirements to complete the required design and field work. It must include all milestones and durations, to include:

1. All necessary permits, licenses, and certificates

2. Site specific contractor management plans

3. Key Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) activities

4. Long lead procurements (i.e., Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) Mix

Design, etc.)

5. Critical path, starting with award and ending at project closeout.

6. Simultaneous and concurrent activities

7. Construction sequence (phasing is required, temporary fueling required at time of NTP)

If there are no long lead procurements, state this on the project schedule.

For scheduling purposes assume the contract award is Thursday, May 23, 2024, with NTP approximately 2 weeks later.

4.2 TECHNICAL EVALUATION

Pricing data will not be part of the technical evaluation. Criteria for the technical evaluation set forth in the solicitation will be sole basis for determining the technical merit of proposals. Factor(s) listed above will be assigned a technical evaluation of “Acceptable” or “Unacceptance”

Adjectival Rating Description Acceptable Proposal meets the requirement of the solicitation Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirement of the solicitation

Factor 1: Specialized Experience Experience that does not show the collective work activities on the submitted projects will be deemed unacceptable.

Submissions which do not demonstrate a complete representation of the criteria listed above will be evaluated as Unacceptable.

Factor 2: Proposed Contract Duration and Summary Schedule The Government will evaluate the contractor’s understanding of the requirements of the design and construction as portrayed in your schedule Gantt chart. Requirements to be evaluated include but are not limited to demonstrated complete and logical scheduling of milestones and durations for Phase 1 (Preconstruction Phase), Phase 2 (On-Site Construction) and Phase 3 (Post Construction). Submissions which demonstrate a complete and logical schedule will be evaluated as Acceptable. Submissions that are incomplete, illogical or lack thought out phasing will be evaluated as Unacceptable.

Omission of requested information will be evaluated as Unacceptable.

4.3 VOLUME 2: PRICING SUBMISSION REQUIRMENTS

4.3.1 Factor 3: Price

The pricing proposal shall contain the following information:

a. Section 00 10 00, Solicitation/Contract Form and Pricing Schedule

4.4 PRICE EVALUATION

The price proposal submitted in response to this request will be evaluated using one or more of the proposal analysis techniques identified in FAR 15.404-1(b). Contract award will be made to the proposal found to be the lowest aggregated proposed price in accordance with FAR 52.217-5 Evaluation of Options.

5. EVALUATION FOR AWARD

Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) will be the proposal evaluation used for award. Uniformity of the proposal is essential to assure accurate evaluation. Proposal must comply with the instructions in the solicitation.

The lowest priced proposal will be evaluated to determine technically acceptable contractor(s). If the lowest proposed offer is determined to be technically acceptable, the Government reserves the right to not evaluate the technical proposal(s) submitted by the other offeror(s). A proposal that fails to comply with any minimum technical requirements will not be eligible for award regardless that it may offer the lowest price.

Any Factor evaluated as “Unacceptable” in any TAB will render the complete technical portion of the offer as “Unacceptable”. No further evaluation will be made on the Offeror’s proposal, including price.

6. SELECTION AND AWARD WITHOUT EXCHANGES

It is the intent of the Government to make award based upon initial offers.

Proposals are intended to be evaluated, and award made, without exchanges with the offerors, unless exchanges are determined to be necessary.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .