Am_0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICAITON NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicble)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICIATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a)By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPIRATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc. ) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION ( Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

Amendment No. 0002 17-JUN-2016

U.S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, OMAHA DISTRICT

CONTRACTING OFFICE

1616 CAPITOL AVE.

OMAHA, NE 68102-4901

See Item 6

W9128F-16-R-0067

23-MAY-2016

4th ID CAB, ATTK BN MAINTENANCE HANGAR

PN 77305, FORT CARSON, COLORADO

See attached documentation for content of the amendment revisions

Date for receipt of Proposals is 21 JUL 2016 at 1400 hours

Government Point of Contact: Denise Cramer (402) 995-2057

17-JUN-2016

Am #0002 - 2 (Continuation SF 30)

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

Omaha District, Corps of Engineers 1616 Capitol Avenue Omaha, Nebraska 68102-4901

:NOTICE: Failure to acknowledge : Solicitation No. W9128F 16 R 0067 :all amendments may cause rejec- :

:tion of the offer. See FAR : Date of Issue: 23 MAY 2016 :52.215-1 of Section 00 21 00 : Date of Receiving Proposals:

21 JUL 2016

Amendment No. 0002

17 JUN 2016

SUBJECT: Amendment No. 0002 to Request for Proposal Solicitation Package for Construction of 4th ID CAB, ATTK BN MAINTENANCE HANGAR, PN 77305, FORT CARSON, COLORADO

Solicitation No. W9128F 16 R 0067

TO: Prospective Offerors and Others Concerned

1. The specifications and drawings for subject project are hereby modified as follows (revise all specification indices, attachment lists, and drawing indices accordingly).

a. Specifications (New and/or Revised and Reissued). Delete and substitute or add specification pages or sections as noted below. The substituted pages or sections are revised and reissued with this amendment.

For convenience, on the revised specification pages (excepting the general wage decision ones), changes have been identified by highlighting. (All portions of reissued specification pages shall apply whether or not changes thereon have been indicated by highlighting.)

Pages or Sections Deleted Pages or Sections Substituted or Added 00 10 00 00 10 00 00 22 00 00 22 00 01 30 00.24 01 30 00.24

CO160012 CO160012

01 30 00.24AT2 01 30 00.24AT2

01 33 29AT1 01 33 29AT1

01 33 29AT2 ** ** **

** ** ** 02 82 14.00 10AT2

** ** ** 02 82 33.13 20AT

08 34 59 08 34 59 08 62 00 08 62 00 09 06 90 09 06 90 41 22 13.14 41 22 13.14 41 22 13.15 41 22 13.15

b. Drawings (Reissued). The following drawings are revised with latest revision date of 1 JUN 2016, and reissued with this amendment.

(1) Sheet FCX7A-461, CASEWORK ELEVATIONS

(2) Sheet FCX7A-600, FINISH SCHEDULE FIRST FLOOR

(3) Sheet FCX7A-610, DOOR SCHEDULE AND TYPES

Am #0002 - 3

(4) Sheet FCX7A-611, DOOR SCHEDULE AND TYPES

(5) Sheet FCX7A-732, MISC. DETAILS

(6) Sheet FCX7AE200, PRECAST WALL ELEVATIONS

(7) Sheet FCX7AE208, PRECAST WALL ELEVATIONS

(8) Sheet FCX7CS502, HANGAR SITE FE6 CHAIN-LINK SECURITY FENCE

DETAILS

(9) Sheet FCX7EL112, LIGHTING PLAN FIRST FLOOR AREA B

(10) Sheet FCX7EL601, LIGHTING SCHEDULE

(11) Sheet FCX7EL602, EMERGENCY LIGHTING SCHEDULE

(12) Sheet FCX7EP601, ELECTRICAL ONE-LINE DIAGRAM

(13) Sheet FCX7ES113B, ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN AREA 113B

(14) Sheet FCX7ES114A, ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN AREA 114A

(15) Sheet FCX7S-101, FOUNDATION PLAN A

(16) Sheet FCX7S-102, FOUNDATION PLAN B

(17) Sheet FCX7S-103, FOUNDATION PLAN C

2. This amendment is a part of the proposing papers and its receipt shall be acknowledged on the Standard Form 1442. All other conditions and requirements of the request for proposal remain unchanged. If the proposals have been mailed prior to receiving this amendment, you will notify the office where proposals are received, in the specified manner, immediately of its receipt and of any changes in your proposal occasioned thereby.

a. Hand-Carried Proposals shall be delivered to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District, Contracting Division, 1616 Capitol Avenue, Omaha, Nebraska 68102-4901.

b. Mailed Proposals shall be addressed as noted in Item 8 on Page 00 10 00-1 of Standard Form 1442.

c. Electronic Mail (Email). It is acceptable to provide pricing proposals by Email to the following address:

Denise.M.Cramer@usace.army.mil

Any Email message may be followed by a hard copy of the cost proposal sent to arrive in the following office no later than the next business day (Monday through Friday).]

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District CENWO-CT-M (Cramer) 1616 Capitol Avenue Omaha, NE 68102-4901

Telephone: (402) 995-2057

3. Offers will be received until 2:00 p.m., local time at place of receiving proposals, 21 JUL 2016.

Attachments:

Spec Pages listed in 1.a. above Dwgs. listed in 1.b. above (under separate cover)

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District 1616 Capitol Avenue Omaha, Nebraska 68102-4901

Am #0002 - 4

17 JUN 2016

jlb/2099

00 10 00 - 1

SOLICITATION, OFFER

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

W9128F-16-R-0067

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

3. DATE ISSUED

23 MAY 2016

PAGES OF PAGES

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO. 5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO.

6. PROJECT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE CT 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

U.S.ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, OMAHA

Contracting Division (CENWO-CT) 1616 Capitol Ave

U.S.ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, OMAHA

Attn: CONTRACTING DIVISION (CENWO-CT) 1616 Capitol Ave

9. FOR INFORMATION

CALL:

A. NAME

Denise Cramer

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

(402) 995-2057

SOLICITATION

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS (Title, identifying no., date):

The offeror hereby agrees to do all work described in the documents entitled:

4th ID CAB, ATTK BN MAINTENANCE HANGAR

PN 77305

FORT CARSON, COLORADO

RETURN WITH OFFER: INFORMATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 00 10 00 (SF1442 AND CLIN BIDDING SCHEDULE), SECTION 00 22 00, AND SECTION 00 45 00.

*BLOCK 13A. – REFER TO SECTION 00 22 00 FOR THE NUMBER OF COPIES TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THE ORIGINAL OFFER.

THIS SOLICITATION IS UNRESTRICTED AND OPEN TO PARTICIPATION BY SMALL AND OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESS INTERESTS. SOURCE SELECTION PREFERENCE WILL BE GIVEN TO THE PROPOSAL REPRESENTING THE OVERALL BEST VALUE TO THE GOVERNMENT.

11. The Contractor shall begin performance within 10 calendar days and complete it within 540 calendar days after receiving award, notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory, negotiable.

12A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

YES NO

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and * copies to perform the work required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by 1400 (hour) local time 21 JUL 2016. If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time. Sealed envelopes containing offers shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee is is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) work requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than 60 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected.

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101

STANDARD FORM 1442(REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA FAR(48 CFR) 53.236-1(d)

Am_0002

00 10 00 - 2

14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR (Include ZIP Code) 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

DUNS Number:

16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS (Include only if different than Item 14)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the work required at the prices specified below in strict accordance with the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in writing within 60 calendar days after the date offers are due.

AMOUNTS

SEE ATTACHED CLIN BIDDING SCHEDULE

Contractor’s Fax No.____________ CAGE CODE ________________ Contractor’s E-Mail address_______________

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation - give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER

(Type or print)

20B. SIGNATURE 20C. OFFER DATE

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT

23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

ITEM

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) ( ) 41 U.S.C. 253(c) ( )

26. ADMINISTERED BY CODE 27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY

U.S. Army Engineer District, Omaha 1616 Capitol Ave.

Omaha, Nebraska 68102-4901

USAED Omaha c/o USACE Finance Center 5722 Integrity Drive Millington, TN 38054-5005

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT (contractor is required to sign this document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees to furnish and deliver all items or perform all work, requisitions identified on this form and any continuation sheets for the consideration stated in this contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be governed by (a) this contract award,

(b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certifications, and specifications incorporated by reference in or attached to this contract.

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.) Your offer on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award consummates the contract, which consists of (a) the Government solicitation and your offer, and (b) this contract award. No further contractual document is necessary.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED

TO SIGN (Type or print)

31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30B. SIGNATURE

30C. DATE 31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

31C. AWARD DATE

STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK (REV. 4-85)

Section 00 10 00 W9128F-16-R-0067

CLIN SCHEDULE 00 10 00 - 3

OFFEROR'S NAME:____________________________

CONTRACT LINE ITEM (CLIN) BIDDING SCHEDULE

ITEM

NO.

DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT

PRICE

LINE ITEM AMOUNT

BASIC ITEMS

0001 All work complete to Construct the ATTK BN Maintenance Hangar, up to 5 feet outside of the building.

1 Job XXX $_______________________

0002 All work complete to Construct Sitework, Utilities, and Pavements, complete from the five-foot line to the limits of construction of the ATTK BN Maintenance Hangar, and any required demolition.

1 Job XXX $_______________________

TOTAL BASIC AMOUNT $_______________________

OPTION ITEMS

[Option 1]

All work complete to Provide Foam Pumps, Controllers, Atmospheric Tank, Relief Valves, Fire Alarm equipment, In-line Balance Proportioners, and any additional equipment, labor, programming, or design effort to meet the requirements of Engineering and Construction Bulletin No. 2015-17.

1 Job XXX $_______________________

[Option 2]

All work complete to Construct Pedestrian Bridge in accordance with the plans and specifications.

1 Job XXX $_______________________

[Option 3]

All work complete to Construct PT Pits in accordance with the plans and specifications.

1 Job XXX $_______________________

[Option 4]

All work complete to Construct Airfield Paving in accordance with the plans and specifications.

1 Job XXX $_______________________

Section 00 10 00 W9128F-16-R-0067

CLIN SCHEDULE 00 10 00 - 4

[Option 5]

All work complete to Demolish the 9600/9601/9602 Building Complex including abatement and disposal of lead-based paint (LBP) and asbestos containing materials (ACM).

1 Job XXX $_______________________

[Option 6]

All work complete to Demolish Building 9610 including abatement and disposal of lead-based paint (LBP) and asbestos containing materials (ACM).

1 Job XXX $_______________________

[Option 7]

All work complete to Demolish Building 9611 including abatement and disposal of lead-based paint (LBP) and asbestos containing materials (ACM).

1 Job XXX $_______________________

[Option 8]

All work complete to Demolish Building 9634A including abatement and disposal of lead-based paint (LBP) and asbestos containing materials (ACM).

1 Job XXX $_______________________

[Option 9]

All work complete to Demolish Building 9635A including abatement and disposal of lead-based paint (LBP) and asbestos containing materials (ACM).

1 Job XXX $_______________________

[Option 10]

All work complete to Demolish Underground Utility Lines shown on Optional Additional Demolition plan sheets.

1 Job XXX $_______________________

TOTAL AMOUNT (BASIC PLUS OPTIONS) $_______________________

NOTES:

1. The government intends to issue a limited notice to proceed at time of award to begin work as described in Section 01 30 00.24, paragraph 1.7.

2. See 00 21 00, INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS, for evaluation of options. The Government reserves the right to exercise options within 180 calendar days after issuance of Notice to Proceed.

3. Prices must be entered for all items of the schedule. Total amounts submitted without prices being entered on individual items will be rejected. In case of variation between the lump-sum prices and the total amount, the lump-sum prices will be considered the price submitted.

4. A modification to a bid which provides for a single adjustment to the total amounts, should state the application of the adjustment to each respective lump-sum price affected. If the modification is not so apportioned, the single adjustment will be applied to Item No. 0001.

0012 All work complete to Demolish 1 Job XXX $_______________________ p Underground Utility Lines shown on[Option g y Optional Additional Demolition plan [ p

10] p sheets.

The government intends to issue a limited notice to proceed at time of award to begin work as described in g Section 01 30 00.24, paragraph 1.7.

2.

3.

4.

Section 00 22 00-1

SECTION 00 22 00

PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS,

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND EVALUATION

INDEX

1. WHO MAY SUBMIT

2. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

3. SIZE OF PRINTED MATTER SUBMISSIONS

4. WHERE TO SUBMIT

5. SUBMISSION DEADLINE

6. EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS

7. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

8. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND SUBMISSION FORMAT

9. COVER LETTER (BINDER NO. 1)

10. CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE (BINDER NO. 1)

10.1.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

OFFEROR’S CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE (TAB 1-A)

10.1.2 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

MINIMUM DOLLAR AMOUNT OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS (TAB 1-B)

10.1.3 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

CONSTRUCTION PERSONNEL REQUIRMENTS (TAB 1-C):

10.2 PAST PERFORMANCE, CONSTRUCTION FIRM (BINDER NO. 1)

10.2.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

OFFEROR’S PAST PERFORMANCE, CONSTRUCTION FIRM (TAB 1-D)

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

10.3 SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN (BINDER NO. 1)

10.3.1 UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS

10.3.2 PAST PERFORMANCE IN UTILIZING SMALL BUSINESS

Section 00 22 00-2

11. PRICING (BINDER 2)

11.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS (TAB 2)

11.1.1 EVALUATION OF PRICE

12. COMPETITIVE RANGE

13. CLAIRIFICATIONS AND DISCUSSIONS

14. FINAL PROPOSAL REVISIONS

15. SMALL BUSINESS SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

16. EVALUATION FOR AWARD

17. AWARD OF CONTRACT

18. DEBRIEFING

Section 00 22 00-3

SECTION 00 22 00

PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS,

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND EVALUATION

1. WHO MAY SUBMIT

This solicitation is unrestricted and open to both large and small business participation.

All proposers, including joint ventures, must be registered in the System for Award Management at www.sam.gov

There will be no public opening. All proposals submitted will become, upon receipt, the property of the U.S. Government and will not be returned. After evaluation of proposals, the original will be retained for the official contract file. Extra copies of the awardee’s proposal will be submitted to the Field and Area Offices in support of their contract administration functions.

Any extra copies of the proposals deemed unnecessary by the government will be destroyed.

This is a “Best Value” solicitation for the construction of the Attack Hangar (PN 77305) located at Fort Carson, Colorado. The Government will evaluate the proposals in accordance with the criteria described herein, and award a firm-fixed-price contract to the responsible offeror whose proposal conforms with all the terms and conditions of the solicitation and whose proposal is determined to represent the overall best value to the Government.

2. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

In order to effectively and equitably evaluate all proposals, the Contracting Officer must receive information sufficiently detailed to clearly indicate compliance with the proposal submission requirements.

3. SIZE OF PRINTED MATTER SUBMISSIONS

All written portions (other than an organization chart (if provided)) shall be in 8-1/2" x 11" format.

4. WHERE TO SUBMIT

Offerors shall submit their proposal packages to the USACE Contracting Activity at the address shown in Block 8 of Standard Form 1442.

5. SUBMISSION DEADLINE

Proposals shall be received by the USACE Contracting Activity no later than the time and date specified in Block 13 of Standard Form 1442.

Section 00 22 00-4

Due to heightened security at Government installations, those offerors who have their proposals hand-delivered shall contact Denise Cramer, Contract Specialist at (402) 995-2057 prior to delivering to:

Department of the Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District 1616 Capitol Avenue Omaha, NE 68102-4901

On the date specified and for the thirty minutes prior to the time specified on the Standard Form SF 1442, Section 00 10 00, Page 1, Item 13A, a Contracting Representative will be in the lobby to accept proposals. At the time specified in Item 13A, it will be announced that receipt of proposals is closed. Official time will be established by the clock located in the area where proposals are received.

6. EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS

a. All proposals and documentation which have been properly submitted will be evaluated. Proposals will be evaluated on the basis of the factors stated in the solicitation to select the responsible offeror whose proposal is most advantageous to the Government. Because of the number of proposals anticipated, uniformity of all proposals is essential to assure fair and accurate evaluation. All proposals must comply with the instructions in the solicitation. Proposals that do not generally conform to the RFP requirements may be considered to have a “deficiency”, i.e. a defect that cannot be remedied by exchanges and/or permitted proposal revisions. If a proposal is suspected of having a deficiency, it will be brought to the immediate attention of the appropriate authority who will determine if there is a deficiency. If the determination is made that a deficiency exists, the proposal will not be evaluated further and will be eliminated from further consideration. The affected offeror shall be promptly notified of the decision. Properly conforming proposals will be forwarded to the Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) for evaluation. If, after award, the contractor wishes to replace key personnel or sub-contractors identified in the proposal, a formal request for substitution shall be presented to the Contracting Officer for approval. The Contracting Officer’s written consent shall be obtained before making any substitutions for these designated personnel or sub-contractors. The request shall clearly show the qualifications of the replacement personnel or sub-contractors and shall illustrate that the replacements have skills, experience, and capacity to accomplish the work equal to or better than those personnel or sub-contractors identified in the proposal

b. Information obtained from owners, contract administrators, or other points of contact provided by the offeror may affect the evaluation rating given for the factors being evaluated by those discussions.

c. Evaluations will be conducted in accordance with the Tradeoff Process, FAR 15.101-1.

This process allows for a tradeoff between non-cost factors and cost/price and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest priced proposal or other than the highest technically-rated proposal to achieve a best–value contract award. Binder No. 1, Tabs 1A through 1F will be rated using an adjectival methodology with a narrative assessment and Binder No. 2 (Price) will be evaluated after consensus scoring Tabs 1A-1F in Binder No. 1. Proposal evaluation is an

Section 00 22 00-5 assessment of the proposal and the offeror's ability to perform the resultant contract successfully.

Proposals will be evaluated to determine ratings supported by narratives, and to identify strengths, weaknesses, and deficiencies of the proposed approach in each proposal.

d. Evaluation Definitions.

(1) Strength. Any aspect of a proposal that, when judged against a stated evaluation criterion, enhances the merit of the proposal or increases the probability of successful performance of the contract.

(2) Weakness. A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. A significant weakness in the proposal is a flaw that appreciably increases the risk.

(3) Deficiency. A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

(4) Clarification. Clarifications are limited exchanges between the Government and offerors that may occur when award without discussions is contemplated. If award without discussions is anticipated, offerors may be given the opportunity to clarify certain aspects of their proposals or to resolve minor or clerical errors.

(5) Communications. Communications are exchanges between the Government and offerors after receipt of proposals, leading to establishment of the competitive range.

(6) Discussions. Discussions are negotiations conducted in a competitive acquisition and take place after establishment of the competitive range. Discussions are tailored to each offeror's proposal, and shall be conducted by the Contracting Officer with each offeror within the competitive range.

(7) Rating. The application of a scale of colors or words used in conjunction with a narrative to denote the degree to which the proposal has met the standard for a non-cost factor.

For purposes of this solicitation, ratings will utilize an adjectival methodology in conjunction with narratives. Ratings will be applied at the factor (tab) and subfactor level. If at any level of indentation an Offeror’s proposal is evaluated as not meeting a minimum requirement (that is, below the level of yellow (marginal)), this fact must be included in the rating and narrative assessment at that level and each higher level of indentation. Therefore, an unacceptable rating at any level must be carried to the factor (tab) level. The following ratings will be used to evaluate Tabs 1A through 1F:

Blue - Outstanding. Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.

Purple - Good. Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Section 00 22 00-6

Green - Acceptable. Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Yellow - Marginal. Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Red - Unacceptable. Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. Proposal is un-awardable.

Neutral. (Used in the evaluation of Past Performance only) In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the offeror may not be evaluated either favorably or unfavorably on past performance. *

(8) Past Performance Rating: The past performance evaluation results is in an assessment of the offeror’s probability of meeting the solicitation requirements. The past performance evaluation considers each offeror’s demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance in supplying products and services that meet the contract’s requirements. One performance confidence assessment rating is assigned for each offeror after evaluating the offeror’s recent past performance, focusing on performance that is relevant to the contract requirements. There are two aspects to the past performance evaluation. The following Past Performance Relevancy Rating and Performance Confidence Assessment Rating will be used to evaluate Tab 1D – Past Performance:

a. Relevancy Rating. The first aspect of the past performance evaluation is the determination of how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the offeror is to the effort to be acquired through the source selection. Relevancy shall be determined utilizing the similarity definition found in Paragraph 10.1.1.1, based on size, relevance, and complexity of the projects and the similarity of those projects to the project in this solicitation. With respect to Relevancy, more relevant past performance will typically be a stronger predictor of future success and have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment than past performance of lesser relevance. The four levels of relevancy are shown below.

Very Relevant. Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant. Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant. Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Section 00 22 00-7

Not Relevant. Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

The Relevancy Rating is not a separate proposal rating, but is used only to develop an overall Performance Confidence Assessment Rating for the Past Performance Evaluation Factors.

b. Performance Confidence Assessment Rating. The second aspect of the past performance evaluation is to determine how well the contractor performed on the contracts. The past performance evaluation performed in support of a current source selection does not establish, create, or change the existing record and history of the offeror’s past performance on past contracts; rather, the past performance evaluation process gathers information from customers on how well the offeror performed those past contracts. The SSEB Voting Members will review this past performance information and determine the quality and usefulness as it applies to performance confidence assessment. Each offeror shall be assigned one of the following ratings for Tab 1D – Past Performance:

Substantial Confidence. Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence. Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Limited Confidence. Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence. Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Unknown Confidence (Neutral). No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.*

*For Tab 1D, Past Performance, an unknown confidence (neutral) rating will be awarded when no past performance records are provided or are otherwise unavailable. Per Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.305(a) (2) (iv), “In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the offeror may not be evaluated either favorably or unfavorably on past performance."

7. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The Evaluation Factors for award will be evaluated based on the adjectival methodology. The requirements specified in the solicitation are considered to be minimum requirements. A more favorable evaluation rating may be given for exceeding the minimum requirements. Note:

Binder No. 1, Tabs 1A-1F are shown below in descending order of importance, excluding Binder No. 2 (Price), which is approximately equal to all of the combined tab elements contained in Binder No. 1. *Note: A low evaluation rating for any tab, or combination of different tabs, may

Section 00 22 00-8 cause the proposal to be evaluated as “Red – Unacceptable”. Binder No. 2 – Price will be evaluated in accordance with the requirements listed in paragraph 11.1.1 Evaluation of Price.

BINDER NO. 1

Cover Letter Para. 6.1 - Construction Experience (TAB 1A-1C) Tab 1-A Offeror’s Construction Experience Tab 1-B Minimum Dollar Amount of Construction Projects Tab 1-C Construction Personnel Requirements Para. 6.2 - Past Performance, Construction Firm (TAB 1D) Tab 1-D Offeror’s Past Performance, Construction Firm Para. 6.3 – Small Business Participation Plan (TAB 1E-1F) Tab 1-E Utilization of Small Business Concerns Tab 1-F Past Performance in Utilizing Small Business

BINDER NO. 2

Para. 7.1 – Pricing (TAB 2) Tab 2-A Section 00 10 00, SF1442 Solicitation/Contract Form and Pricing Schedule Tab 2-B Section 00 45 00, Representations, Certifications and Other Statements of Offerors Tab 2-C Pre-Award Survey Information (Local Provision) (Sep 93)

8. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS AND SUBMISSION FORMAT

All proposals shall contain the information stated herein. Proposal clarity, organization (as defined in this solicitation) and cross-referencing is mandatory. No material (information not part of proposal) shall be incorporated by reference. Material not specifically identified below will not be evaluated. If proposers do not want the data contained in the proposal disclosed by the Government, the proposer shall follow the procedure specified in Section 00 21 00 INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS, paragraph: RESTRICTION ON DISCLOSURE AND USE OF DATA. However, portions of the winning proposal will be incorporated into the contract and are subject to disclosure notwithstanding restrictive markings.

a. Binder No. 1 - Offerors shall submit the original and five (5) copies as well as two CD’s or DVD’s of their Binder No. 1 (containing Tabs 1A-1F). Binder 1 shall consist of a 3-ring binder with dividers separating Tabs. This binder shall be divided as follows:

Tab 1A – Offeror’s Construction Experience

Tab 1B – Minimum Dollar Amount of Construction Projects

Tab 1C – Construction Personnel Requirements

Tab 1D – Offeror’s Past Performance, Construction Firm

Tab 1E – Utilization of Small Business Concerns

Tab 1F – Past Performance in Utilizing Small Business

Section 00 22 00-9

b. Binder No. 2 - Binder No. 2 shall be a separate binder containing the information shown below. Only the original of Binder No. 2 - Price shall be submitted (copies of this binder are not required). This binder shall include the following information, in the order identified herein. Additional information on the contents of this binder is shown in Section 11.1 below.

SF 1442 (Reference Section 00 11 00)

Pricing Schedule (Reference Section 00 11 00)

Representations, Certifications and Other Statements of Offerors (Reference Section 00 45 00)

Pre-Award Survey Information, as defined in Section 9.1

c. Teaming Arrangements - For purposes of this RFP, an “Offeror” may include a group of two (2) or more entities that have formed a “contractor team arrangement,” as defined in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Section 9.601. In the case of entities that have formed a contractor team arrangement, the experience and performance history of any member of the team, whether or not gained while working with the other member(s) of the currently-proposed contractor team arrangement, will be considered as a part of the evaluation of the Offeror’s proposal. In the case of contractor team arrangements involving a prime contractor and subcontractor(s), where the prime contractor submits the proposal in response to this RFP, the prime contractor must have completed at least 50 percent (50%) of the total number of projects submitted for Tab 1A for consideration in response to the experience requirements of this RFP. In the case of subcontractor submissions, the subcontractor must submit the final cost of their portion of the project. An Offeror that relies upon the experience and performance history of a member or members of a proposed contractor team arrangement will be expected to maintain that arrangement during performance of any contract awarded to that Offeror under this RFP. As a part of their proposal, the Offeror must provide a contractor team agreement signed by all parties, identifying the legal name(s) of all entities and describing the nature of each entity’s relationship (teaming/partnering, joint venture, mentor/protégé, etc.) and their role on this project. This documentation shall be provided at the beginning of the Offeror's technical proposal, prior to any Tabs.

9. COVER LETTER (BINDER NO. 1)

The Preface to Binder No. 1 should consist of a brief explanation of the proposer, the organization of the proposed construction team, and key sub-contractors that will be utilized on this project. If a teaming arrangement or Joint Venture (JV) of prime contractors will be utilized, the JV will be identified in this preface and the management of the JV will be provided. Any additional information that will be useful to the selection board may also be included. This preface shall not exceed four (4) pages. The information included will not be evaluated, but will be utilized by the Selection Board to aid in the evaluation process.

Section 00 22 00-10

10. CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE (BINDER NO. 1)

10.1.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

OFFEROR’S CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE (TAB 1-A)

Offeror shall submit two (2) construction projects that demonstrate past experience as the prime contractor. At least one of the two submitted projects shall be an Aviation Hangar that included placement airfield pavements. At least one of the two submitted projects shall be a Department of Defense construction project. No more than two (2) projects are to be submitted.

Project information shall consist of vertical facility construction (e.g., containing architectural, structural, mechanical, fire protection, and electrical construction features), airfield paving, and all other site development features applicable to the submitted project (e.g. utilities, landscaping, site drainage, roads, playgrounds, parks, trails, etc.). Project example information shall include:

summaries for each project submitted; picture/photo of the each project example; a description of the project; quantity of airfield paving; construction contract award amount; final construction cost;

location; date when the project was started; original contract finish date and actual finish date. All summaries shall contain the name, address, telephone and fax number of a representative of the owner (as well as one alternate individual not affiliated with your firm) familiar with your firm’s experience on the project that can verify the experience cited.

NOTE: "Offeror" and "prime contractor" as used in the paragraph directly above (as well as the rest of this solicitation) shall both be taken to mean ONLY the named entity entered on SF1442 of Section 00 10 00 of the proposal submission. In the event the offeror is a Joint Venture (reference solicitation Section 00 21 01, paragraph 1.19 for Joint Venture information and requirements), projects submitted for this evaluation factor shall be those completed by the Joint Venture offeror or any party to the Joint Venture. In the event the prime contractor intends to have contractor team arrangement(s) whereby a potential prime contractor agrees with one or more other companies to have them act as its subcontractor(s) under this Government contract, projects submitted for this evaluation factor shall be limited to projects completed by the offeror/prime contractor entity ONLY. The Government will not accept for evaluation projects completed by a potential prime contractor's prospective subcontractor(s).

10.1.1.1 EVALUATION: OFFEROR’S CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE

The Government will evaluate the extent of recent, relevant experience of the construction and design entities in design, construction or design-build, as relevant to their role on this project.

Experience on similar projects will be rated more favorably. Federal Government project experience will be rated inherently more important than non-Federal Government project experience. (Note: After award, the Section 00 73 00 Special Contract Requirement Key Personnel, Subcontractors and Outside Consultants will apply to the selection, which establishes the minimum quality standard. No substitution will be allowed without adequate justification and approval by the Contracting Officer.)

Offeror shall submit two (2) construction projects that demonstrate rr past experience as the prime( ) p j p p p contractor. At least one of the two submitted projects shall be an Aviation Hangar that included p j g placement airfield pavements. At least one of the two submitted projects shall be a Department p p p j of Defense construction project. No more than two (2) projects are to be submitted.

Section 00 22 00-11

Projects that are not complete at time of proposal will be considered less relevant and may be rated less favorably. Projects completed and turned over more than ten (10) years before the proposal issue date will be considered less relevant and may be rated less favorably. Joint Venture partners should each demonstrate experience commensurate with their role on this project or explain in the supplemental narrative how their experience qualifies them for their role on this project.

Completed projects that demonstrate local area construction may be rated more favorable over projects that were completed outside the state of Colorado.

The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of cited projects or other recent projects by reviewing the Contactor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) or other DOD and Government appraisal systems, or through interviewing owners or references.

The Government may check any or all cited references to verify supplied information.

The Offeror should demonstrate qualifications and experience in sustainable construction, based on project experience on projects that have achieved US Green Building Council’s LEED certification or project experience on completed Corps of Engineers projects that were validated as having achieving LEED silver rating or were certifiable at LEED silver or better for an acceptable rating. A more favorable rating may be given if offeror demonstrate qualifications and experience with LEED.

10.1.2 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

MINIMUM DOLLAR AMOUNT OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS (TAB 1-B)

Construction projects cited in Tab 1A shall have a minimum construction dollar value of $10,000,000 (final construction cost). Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contracts or similar, where numerous smaller Task/Delivery Orders or related projects are summed to meet the minimum construction dollar value identified herein, are not acceptable.

10.1.2.1 EVALUATION: MINIMUM DOLLAR AMOUNT OF CONSTRUCTION

PROJECTS

The Government will evaluate the required information to determine the offeror’s ability to accomplish projects at the minimum dollar amount. Completed projects with a dollar amount above $10,000,000 will be evaluated more favorably. List the projects from Tab 1-A and include the dollar amount, as well as a reference to include the owner’s name and contact information, for each construction project.

10.1.3 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

CONSTRUCTION PERSONNEL REQUIRMENTS (TAB 1-C):

Provide resumes for the personnel that are proposed to be used on this contract for the following key positions: Project Manager, Site Superintendent, and Contractor Quality Control System

Projects that are not complete at time of proposal will be considered less relevant and may be j p p p y rated less favorably. Projects completed and turned over more than ten (10) years before they j p ( ) y proposal issue date will be considered less relevant and may be rated less favorably. Joint p p y y Venture partners should each demonstrate experience commensurate with their role on this p p project or explain in the supplemental narrative how their experience qualifies them for their rolep j p on this project.

10.1.2.1 EVALUATION: MINIMUM DOLLAR AMOUNT OF CONSTRUCTION

PROJECTS

The Government will evaluate the required information to determine the offeror’s ability toq y accomplish projects at the minimum dollar amount. Completed projects with a dollar amount p p j p p j above $10,000,000 will be evaluated more favorably. List the projects from Tab 1-A and include , , y p j the dollar amount, as well as a reference to include the owner’s name and contact information, , for each construction project.

Section 00 22 00-12

Manager. Proposed personnel shall not perform in more than one key position. The proposed personnel shall meet the following minimum requirements.

Minimum Experience Requirements:

• The Project Manager shall have at least two years construction and construction management experience in the past five years as a project manager that includes at least one completed Department of Defense construction project with minimum construction dollar value of $10,000,000 (final construction cost).

• The Construction Superintendent shall have a minimum of two years experience in the past five years as Superintendent, managing multiple trades and subcontractors that includes at least one completed Department of Defense construction project with minimum construction dollar value of $10,000,000 (final construction cost).

Resumes shall be limited to one page per individual. Resumes shall have project dates (beginning and ending of project by month/year). Resumes shall clearly demonstrate meeting the minimum experience requirements in the position proposed for this project, not total years with a company or in the construction field.

If the successful Offeror needs to replace a named design individual, replacement personnel having education and experience meeting or exceeding those identified in the proposal shall be presented for acceptance and approval by the Contracting Officer.

10.1.3.1 EVALUATION: CONSTUCTION PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS

The Government will evaluate the required information to determine how well the offeror identifies and demonstrates that its key personnel meet or exceed minimum qualifications necessary, which includes previous satisfactory experience in similar type work, to manage, control and perform construction. The Government will evaluate how well the Offeror demonstrates that it has the necessary structure and experienced, qualified personnel within its organization to effectively manage, control, administer and execute the construction operations, quality control program and subcontracts. This shall be achievable with other projected on-going work. Previous experience with projects greater than $10,000,000 will be evaluated more favorably. If alternates are proposed for key positions, the evaluation rating will consider the lesser qualified or experienced person, if there is a difference.

10.2 PAST PERFORMANCE, CONSTRUCTION FIRM (BINDER NO. 1)

10.2.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

OFFEROR’S PAST PERFORMANCE, CONSTRUCTION FIRM (TAB 1-D)

The Offeror shall submit past construction performance evaluations on the two (2) projects submitted under Tab 1A. The Government reserves the right to contact the evaluator of those projects to verify the firm’s construction performance and performance rating.

Section 00 22 00-13

CPARS/CCASS Evaluations

Copies of records contained in the CPARS/CCASS database may be requested by offerors by:

(1) Accessing past performance information directly from Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) available at: http://www.cpars.gov or the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) at http://www.ppirs.gov for CCASS completed before 27 June 2014 and for merged CPARS /CCASS completed after 27 June 2014. PPIRS is an electronic repository of performance information collected by all the major federal performance reporting systems. Logging onto PPIRS will require the following:

All firms must have purchased and installed a Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) certificate. If you do not have this certificate, you cannot access your information. Additional information about the PKI certificate is at http://www.ppirs.gov web page.

You will also need your DUNS number and Marketing Partner Identification Number (MPIN) to log onto PPIRS. The MPIN number was selected by whoever registered your firm in the System for Award Management (SAM) Registry at https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/. If you do not know your MPIN number, you will need to contact the SAM help desk by emailing them from the email link on the https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/ web page. Please be aware that they will only release the MPIN number to the person who originally registered your firm.

(2) Contact your government point of contact for the project you mentioned, and ask them if they can send you a copy, or

(3) Apply for “Contractor/ Senior Contractor Representative” access on PPIRS web page http://www.ppirs.gov and CPARS web page: http://www.cpars.gov. This type of access is issued to only one person within the firm, typically a member of senior management. In addition to access to your completed CCASS /CPARS performance evaluations, you will also be able to view status of evaluations which have not yet been completed. Following receipt of your faxed application request, you will be emailed a logon and access instructions. This type of access will only let you see merged CPARS/CCASS information for all government projects evaluated after 27 June 2014 or CCASS information for projects evaluated before 27 June 2014, so it is not as complete as PPIRS access which allows access to evaluations prepared by non-DOD federal agencies, as well as the DOD agencies which use CCASS. Be aware that you will also need to have a PKI certificate to access the PPIRS system. This is a DOD requirement.

Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

The Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment at end of section) is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client.