Combined-Synopsis-Solicitation-22R6029.pdf

SECTION A- SOLICITATION

This section provides the solicitation information for potential offerors for a contract to provide Municipal Services (MS) for the U.S. Army Reserve, 63d Readiness Division (RD) Region 2.

REQUEST FOR

Solicitation Number W9127S 029 is issued as a Request for (RF ). The solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-47.

This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice.

This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; Quotes are being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued.

Title: Municipal Services (MS), 63d U.S Army Reserve Readiness Division (RD)

Due Date for Quotes: 05 JUL 2022 12:00 PM CDT

This solicitation is small business set-aside. NAICS Code 561210 applies and the small business size standard is $41. million.

This is a requirement to provide Janitorial Services and Grounds Maintenance Services. The period of performance is 3-year base and 2 one year option years: Base: Bl - 09/02/2022 TO 09/01/2023, B2 - 09/02/2023 TO 09/01/2024, B3 - 09/02/2024 TO 09/01/2025, OYl-

09/02/2025 TO 09/01/2026, OY2 - 09/02/2026 TO 09/01/2027.

INSTRUCTIONS

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

Please see the electronic attachment titled: Performance Work Statement, found on FBO.GOV under the corresponding solicitation number. (63RD_REGION2MS_PWS_FINAL_REV3_ 24MAY2022)

EXHIBIT LINE ITEMS SPREADSHEET

Please see the electronic attachment titled: Exhibit Line Items (ELINs), found on FBO.GOV under the corresponding solicitation number.

- REG --2 MS PWS- ATCH+J-0200000-07- ELINS- GroundsMaint- Rev2- 20220524- BidSheet

- EG2 M - S PWS- ATCH+J-0200000-07 ELINS Janitorial- Rev2- 20220524- BidSheet

Exhibit Line Items (ELINs): ELINs spreadsheets are in MS Excel Format and posted with the solicitation shall be completed by the Offeror & submitted in MS Excel Format. The completed ELINs will constitute Off e r o r’s proposed prices for the services corresponding to the PWS. Upon contract award, a price schedule in contract section B will be created using the completed ELINs from the successful Offeror.

Failure to bid on all the items in the ELIN spreadsheets may cause the bid to be considered nonresponsive and therefore ineligible for contract award.

COVER PAGE

US Army Corps of Engineer, Little Rock District Contracting Division

700 W. Capitol Avenue Room # 7315 Little Rock, AR 72201

, IDIQ

Municipal Services-Region 2

Submitted by

Offeror Name:

Offeror Address:

Offeror Address Cont'd:

Cage Code:

UEI Code (SAM):

TIN:

Telephone Number:

Authorized Negotiators:

SECTION L

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS/

OFFEROR SUBMITTAL INFORMATION FOR OFFERORS (RF )

This requirement defines the criteria, organization, and policies to be used in selecting a contractor to provide The 63d U.S. Army Reserve RD mission involves critical work in the areas of MS to include, but not limited to Janitorial Services and Grounds Maintenance Services.

A. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Little Rock District (SWL) and the 63d RD have a requirement to provide MS on a regional basis.

B. ACQUISITION STRATEGY

This is a competitive acquisition for the award of a f m-f ed-price (FFP) Services contract. In accordance with (IAW) the Acquisition Plan (AP). TI1is solicitation is restricted as set-aside for eligible and responsible small business (SB) fim1s. This is a competitive 100% small business set-aside. Award will be based on a Best Value Decision, Trade off process, IAW FAR 15.101-1 to the best overall proposal that is determined to be the most beneficial to the Government. The anticipated ordering period is 3-year base plus 2 IAW the Acquisition Plan.

The combination of all technical (non-price) evaluation factors are significantly more important than the price. As technical ratings and relative advantages and disadvantages become less distinct, differences in price between Quotes are of increased importance in determining the most advantageous . Conversely, as differences in price become less distinct, differences in rating and relative advantages and disadvantages between Quotes are of increased importance to the determination.

Evaluation methodology for the instant procurement consists of a Best-value Trade-off.

1. INQUIRIES

Bidder Inquiry: Technical inquiries and questions relating to procedures or bonds are to be submitted via: Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at http://www.projnet.org/projnet

To submit and review bid inquiry items, bidders will need to be a current registered user or self- register into system. To self-register go to web page identified above, click Bid tab and select Bidder Inquiry, select agency USACE, enter Key for this solicitation listed below, and your e-mail address, click login.

Fill in all required information and click create user. Verify that the information on next screen is correct, click and continue.

Bidders will receive an aclt1owledgement of their question via email, followed by an answer to their question after it has been processed by our technical team.

The Solicitation Number is:

The Bidder Inquiry Key is:

SXZE9V-HID25Z

The Review is open from June 1, 2022 to June 14, 2022-12:00 PM CDT. _ The Bidder Inquiry System will be unavailable after June 14th for new inquires in order to ensure adequate time is allotted to form an appropriate response and amend the solicitation, if necessary.

Offerors are requested to review the specification in it's entirely, review the Bidder Inquiry System for answers to questions prior to submission of a new inquiry.

Oral explanations or instruction are not binding. Any information given to an offeror which impacts the solicitation and/or offer will be given in the form of a written amendment to the solicitation.

As this is a competitive negotiation acquisition, there is no public bid opening and no information will be given out as to the number of offerors or the results of the competition until all awards are made.

2. SITE VISIT

WHEN: Friday, 10 June 2022 at 9:00 am CST WHERE: TXl14 - Grand Prairie Reserve Complex: 397 Armed Forces Drive, Bldg. 301 Grand Prairie, Texas 75051

Please provide the Contract Specialist (Thomas Cooper) via email at thomas.n.cooper@usace.army.mil, the following information if your company will be attending the site visit:

Participants must provide information listed below & the day of the site visit are required to have valid identification card for entry.

a. Names and Titles of those attending

b. Driver's License State and Number

c. Contact Information (Emails and phone numbers)

****Items a-c above are due to the Contract Specialist NLT: 08 June 2022@ 09:00 am CST via email above.

IMPORTANT NOTES: (1) There will be NO remarks, questions or explanations addressed during the site visit. Please submit all inquiries through the Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet. This ensures all participants have access to all questions and answers equally and fairly. (2) The terms and conditions of the solicitation remain unchanged unless the solicitation is formally amended in writing.

A guaranteed minimum will be given to the awardee in the event that no task orders are issued (Bl - Base Year). The guaranteed minimum shall be $10,000.00.

A. SUBMISSION-INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFEROR'S (Section L)

1. Introduction: The Offeror's shall be submitted in digital copies, as set forth below.

The shall provide the Government address and receipt date for submittal.

The Offeror's shall consist of two (2) volumes. These Volumes are I-Technical, and II- Price.

A. Volume I - Technical Volume

a) Factor 1: Understanding of the Work

b) Factor 2: Past Performance

B . Volume II - Price Volume Cover Sheet Acknowledgment of Amendments (if any) Copy of ELINS Spreadsheet Copy of Data Sheet Joint Venture Agreement (if applicable)

Offerors are cautioned that "parroting" of the Technical requirements or the PWS with a statement of intent to perform does not reflect an understanding of the requirement or capability to perform. Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each . Proprietary information shall be clearly marked.

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

Each volume shall be submitted in its own file. Any pages that are changed (as a result of negotiations or revisions) should be of a different color and have changed information clearly marked by a vertical line in the right margin of the page. The revised pages shall be dated.

Each file shall be clearly labeled with its Title and a copy number (e.g., copy 1 of 5).

Pages should be single spaced. Each paragraph shall be separated by at least one blank line. A standard, 12-point minimum font size applies. Arial or New Times Roman fonts are required.

Tables and illustrations may use a reduced font size no less than 8- point and may be landscape.

The following volumes of material shall be submitted:

Volumes: I-Technical (non-price): 1 - Digital Copy II - Cost/Price: 1 - Digital Copy

d. NOTE: Pages that exceed the required page limitations will not be evaluated.

Additional pages over the maximum allowed will be removed or not read and will not be evaluated by the Government.

*Manpower charts and the small business subcontracting plan are excluded from the page count.

e. The following page limitations are established for each factor described above:

Factor 1, Understanding of the Work- 25 Page Limit Factor 2, Offeror Past Performance - No Page Limitations

Tables of content, cover letters, and tabs between information do not count toward any page limitations in the

FILES

Format. The submission shall be clearly indexed and logically assembled. Each volume shall be clearly identified and shall begin at the top of a page. All pages of each volume shall be appropriately numbered and identified by the complete company name, date and number in the header and/or footer. A Table of Contents should be created using the Table of Contents feature in MS Word. MS Word (doc) files shall use the following page setup parameters:

Margins - Top, Bottom, Left, Right - 1" Gutter - O" From Edge - Header, Footer 0.5'' Page Size, Width - 8.5" Page Size, Height- 11"

NOTE: ll X l7pages are acceptable for tables/graphic representations; however, each ll X l7page counts as two pages.

The following additional restrictions apply:

File Packaging. Files shall be in read-only format, using PDF files. All price breakdown information to aide in the cost/price evaluation shall be submitted in Microsoft Office Excel Read/Write format and viewable in Microsoft Excel 2007.

Content Requirement. All information shall be confined to the appropriate file. The offeror shall confine submissions to essential matters, sufficient to define the in a concise manner, to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each .

Each file of the shall consist of a Table of Contents, Summary Section, and the Narrative discussion. The Summary Section shall contain a brief abstract of the file. Proprietary information shall be clearly marked. The following shall be included in the Narrative discussion:

(i) VOLUME I - Technical (non-price). The volume shall be organized into the following sections:

Tab A - Factor 1 - Understanding of the Work. Include a brief narrative (See requirements in Section D Evaluation Approach, Factor 2, Understanding of Work), in addition to your information.

Tab B - Factor 2 - Offeror Past Performance. Include completed Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire Forms in addition to your information. A sample Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire Form is provided in this Section (See Attachment 1).

VOLUME II- Price. This volume shall consist of all information, required to support proposed prices. Certified cost and pricing data are not currently required; however, the Government reserves the right to request such data prior to award. The information submitted in this volume shall comply with FAR 15.408, Table 15-2, and the requirements set forth below. There are no page limitations for this volume.

Cover Sheet Acknowledgment of Amendments (if any) Completed ELINS spreadsheet Completed copy of the Data sheet (Appendix B) Joint Venture Agreement (if applicable)

Exhibit Line Items (ELINs): ELINs spreadsheet posted with the solicitation shall be completed by the Offeror & submitted in MS Excel Format The completed ELINs will constitute Offeror's proposed prices for the services corresponding to the PWS. Upon contract award, a price schedule in contract section B will be created using the completed ELINs from the successful Offeror.

**See Submission Requirements (2) Volume II - Price Volume

METHOD OF SUBMISSION. Offerors shall submit one (1) electronic copy of their proposal via the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) Solicitation Module before the time and date specified in the solicitation (Standard Form 1442).

1. Register in PIEE:

a. Navigate to https://wawf.eb.mil/

b. Select Register [top right]

c. Select Vendor

d. Create a User ID and Password and follow the prompts [next]

e. Create Security Questions [next]

f. Complete your User Profile Information [next]

g. Complete your Supervisor or Approving Official Information [next]

h. Complete Roles

i. Step 1. Select SOL-Solicitation

ii. Step 2. Select Proposal Manager

iii. Step 3. Click Add Roles

iv. Step 4. Fill in your Location Code (CAGE Code) [next]

i. Provide a justification for your registration [next]

j. Follow the remaining prompts to submit your registration

2. Log into PIEE and select the Solicitation Icon.

3. Enter search criteria to find the solicitation. (Search Criteria can be the complete solicitation number, Solicitation Open Date, Response Due Date, Product or Service Code, NAICS, Set Aside code, Place of Performance Zip Code, Contracting Office DODAAC, or Status)

4. The search results display. Select the Solicitation Number link to open the solicitation.

5. The solicitation displays. The information is view only.

6. Scroll down to see the Contract Information and Attachments. The Attachments can be viewed by selecting the File link. Scroll back up to the top of the screen and click the Offer tab.

7. Click the Offer tab to Add and review current offers on the Solicitation. Click the Add button to add an offer to the Solicitation.

8. Select the applicable CAGE Code for which they are submitting the offer. The list is prefiltered based on the CAGEs in the Proposal Manager's profile.

9. Upload the attachments that comprise their offer by selecting the Choose Files link.

10. After entering all necessary information enter a Signature Date and Click the Signature button.

11. The Sign Document pop-up will be displayed requiring the user to enter a Digital Pin and One Time Password (OTP). Click the Sign and Submit button to continue.

12. After successfully adding the Offer a success message of the submission will be displayed and the offer displayed collapsed. Users may expand and view all offers on a Solicitation.

EVALUATION FACTORS

Section M-Evaluation Factors for Award

B. BASIS OF AWARD

The award will be made based on the best overall (i.e., best overall value) that is determined to be the most beneficial to the Government, with appropriate consideration given to each offer that will consist of both a ''price

", as price to the Government must always be considered, and a "technical ", which responds to the technical (e.g., "non-price") evaluation factors in the solicitation. The two (2) non-price evaluation factors are: (1) Understanding of the Work, (2) Past Performance. The Understanding of the Work factor is considered to be the most heavily weighted factor. Past Performance will be weighted less than factor one. To receive consideration for award, a rating of no less than "Acceptable" must be achieved for the Technical factors (non-price evaluation factors).

Offerors cautioned that the award may not necessarily be made to the lowest price offered.

NOTE: ALL NON-PRICE FACTORS COMBINED ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN COST/PRICE.

The Government intends to award ONE (1) contract to a small business to the responsible offeror whose (s) is determined to be most advantageous to the Government in accordance with the following relationship between price and technical merit:

The technical evaluation factors, when combined, are approximately greater than the cost or price.

The Government is concerned with striking the most advantageous balance between technical, quality and/or past performance features and cost to the Government.

C. FACTORS AND SUB-FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED

The Government will select the that represents the best value to the Government by using the tradeoff process. This process permits trade offs among cost or price and non-price factors and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest priced .

Concurrent with or upon completing the evaluation of all non-price Quotes, the Contracting Officer will, in accordance with the provisions of this and applicable acquisition regulations, evaluate price. In the event that discussions are determined necessary, the Contracting Officer will conduct discussions with Offeror's determined to be within the competitive range. In determining the competitive range, the Government will include analysis of the non- price and price Quotes of Offeror's. Upon conclusion of discussions, the Contracting Officer will request final revisions and may, upon receipt of final revisions, proceed to award a contract without further discussions or notice.

The following evaluation factors will be used to evaluate each :

NON-PRICE FACTORS: The purpose of the non-price factors is to assess whether th e Offeror's will satisfy the Government's minimum requirem in an overall unacceptable

Factor 1: Understanding of the Work

Factor 2: Past Performance

RELATIVE WEIGHTING OF THE TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS

The following Technical Evaluation Factors are listed in descending order of importance:

Factor 1 - Understanding of Work is weighted more heavily than factor 2.

Factor 2 - Past Performance is weighted less heavily than factor 1.

D. EVALUATION APPROACH

All Quotes shall be subject to evaluation by the Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) unless the Package is incomplete and therefore would be rejected based on that factor.

NON PRICE FACTORS: Data provided in response to the non-price factors described below shall be included in Volume I, "Non-Price ." If the Offeror is a joint venture, the Offeror must provide evidence of a binding teaming agreement or other contractual agreement, which creates legal responsibility on the part of all contractors in the joint venture and submit evidence or confirm that the contractor submitted its paperwork to its local small business administration office for this specific requirement. If the Offeror proposes to utilize a "key subcontractor'' as described in FAR 9.6, it is Government policy to recognize the integrity and validity of contractor team arrangements. For a teaming arrangement to be recognized for purposes of source selection evaluation and the application of non- price factors, there must be full disclosure of the teaming arrangement and company relationships in the team's .

The must include a narrative that explains the major or critical aspects of the work to be performed by each team member. The must also include an agreement that has been or will be executed prior to award between/among all team members. The and agreement must be consistent; substantive inconsistencies between the and agreement may be construed against the offeror. In the case of prime-sub teams, the prime contractor remains fully responsible for contract performance, regardless of any tean1 arrangement between the prime contractor and its subcontractors. However, consistent with FAR 9.l04, the Government may consider the responsibility of subcontractor team members when it may adversely affect the prospective prime contractor's responsibility or when it is in the Government's interest to do so.

The team agreement submitted with the will govern the performance of the work by the team.

The agreement must address the following items: identification of team members, a full delineation of roles and responsibilities of team members, and the duration of the agreement. In the case of Joint Ventures or other partnerships seeking award to the team as a prime contractor, the agreement must indicate the percentages of the participants, in particular the percent of the controlling party. In the case of a prime-sub team, the agreement must reflect that the prin1e contractor is vested with control and responsibility for the daily management of the work, and that it remains responsible for contract performance, including those items allocated to a subcontractor on the team.

Contractor teams should not submit an agreement in their that is subject to substantive revision because the agreement will be part of the evaluation process. The timely submission of the executed teaming agreement prior to award shall be a precondition to a finding of responsibility. In the case of prime-sub teams, any resulting subcontract(s) may not deviate from the substantive provisions of the teaming agreement.

Regardless of any provision to the contrary in a team or subcontract agreement, all members of a recognized team arrangement are bound to perform any resulting contract and options by means of the same team. There can be no substitution of subcontractor team members except that, in the case of a prime-sub team arrangement, the Government may (in its sole discretion and without any obligation whatsoever), at the request of the prime, permit the substitution of a subcontractor with equivalent or greater capability for a subcontractor on the identified team.

The failure of the Offeror to perform with one or more subcontractors on a recognized team may be grounds for termination for default. Note: Only a Contracting Officer can approve such a change after contract award.

For evaluation purposes, the definition of a relevant contract is as follows: A recent contract awarded to the Offeror (or in the case of an Offeror which is a Joint Venture (JV), a contract awarded to either member of the N) as the prime contractor. The contract should be substantially complete or completed projects within the last five years that are similar in terms of cost, complexity, design or features that have been perform by the Offeror to be used for reference and evaluation purposes.

Factor 1, Understanding of Work: Evaluators will determine whether the Offeror demonstrates an understanding of the complexity and magnitude of service requirements set forth in the performance objectives and standards of the Performance Work Statement.

The submission for this factor shall include a narrative (conceptual work plan) that clearly demonstrates an understanding of requirements of the solicitation. The narrative shall address how the Offeror will perform, develop and implement a Municipal Services Progran1 (Grounds Maintenance and Janitorial Services). This information can be in charts, tables, sketches and maps as necessary to make the work approach understandable. The Narrative shall not exceed 25 pages. The narrative should contain a description of the following:

Ability to perform Municipal Services (Janitorial and Grounds Maintenance) as required by the .

A thorough understanding of the current commercial standards, policies, procedures, and processes utilized in each of the service areas identified in the PWS.

A thorough understanding of the difficulties, uncertainties and risks associated with each of the service areas identified in the PWS, as well as administering the contract as a whole.

A logical performance approach for each of the service areas identified in the PWS, as well as administering the contract as a whole.

Management & administration capabilities commensurate with the magnitude of the resulting contract.

Appropriate types of resources required to perform the work and of their appropriate allocation to the work activities in multiple locations during weekdays, weekends, and holidays when applicable;

Personnel and subcontractors necessary to perform the work required by the .

Organizational Chart: The Offeror shall provide an organizational chart that identifies key personnel and individuals on the project team that show clear lines of authority, responsibility, and communication between corporate staff, key on-site staff, and subcontractor interface. The Offeror should propose a logical flow of authority and demonstrate how assigned responsibilities and experience of proposed on-site personnel for the multiple geographic sites will enhance operation of the project.

For the Understanding of the Work evaluation, Offeror will be rated utilizing the chart provided below:

Outstanding

Good

Acceptable

Marginal

Unacceptable meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.

meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Quotation contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no i pact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The quotation has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. Quotation is un-awardable.

Factor 2, Past Performance: The Government's past performance evaluation will include an assessment of past performance on relevant contracts (as defined above). The evaluators will assess whether the Offeror has obtained an overall satisfactory past performance rating on relevant contracts, to demonstrate the ability of the Offeror to accomplish the work specified under the . Key focus areas will include the following (see PPQ):

• Quality

• Schedule/Timeliness of Performance

• Customer Satisfaction

• Management/Personnel/Labor

• Cost/Financial Management

• Safety/Security

This assessment will be based on consideration of all relevant facts and circumstances, including any trends in past performance. Offerors shall complete and provide a Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire Forms from Attachment.

The offeror shall complete Blocks 1-4 of the provided Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire (Attachment 1) and have the Contracting Activity and the Technical Representative responsible for the past/current contract complete the remainder of the questionnaire. Offeror shall ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed Past Performance Questionnaires shall be submitted with the . If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the the fust page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s).

Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact via email no later than the closing date of this . Include Contractor Performance Assessment Rating System (CPARS) performance evaluation ratings, if available.

For projects which were performed for other government entities, submit the performance appraisal sheets used by that government entity if available. Also include performance recognition documents received for the Factor 1 projects such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition. The Government may call and confirm information provided by the offeror on the Past Performance Information Sheet with the points of contact. The Government reserves the right to interview other individuals if the point of contact is not available. If an offeror has no relevant past performance history, the offeror must affirmatively state that it possesses no relevant directly related or similar past performance.

The Government may use data provided by the Offeror in its and data obtained from other sources. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), including Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the Offeror's , inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror. In rating past performance, the Government may consider available past performance information on predecessor companies, or employment histories of key personnel, or majors u b con tractors performing key elements of the project. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

There are two aspects to the past performance evaluation. The first is to evaluate the Offeror's past performance to determine how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the offeror is to the effort to be acquired through the source selection. Common aspects of relevancy include similarity of service/support, complexity, dollar value, contract type and degree of subcontract/teaming. The second aspect of the past performance evaluation is to determine how well the contractor performed on the contracts.

l. Past Performance Relevancy Ratings (Adjectival) -- Past performance analysis provides insight into an Offeror' s probability of successfully completing the solicitation requirements based on the Offeror's performance record on similar contract efforts.

Rating Definition

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant

Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

2. Past Performance Confidence Assessment - Performance confidence is the confidence associated with an Offeror's likelihood of success in performing the solicitation's requirements as indicated by that Offeror's record of current or past performance. Performance Confidence Assessment: In conducting a performance confidence assessment, each offeror shall be assigned one of the ratings in accordance with the table below

(Reference FAR 15.305(2) for information on assigning an unknown/neutral confidence rating.)

Rating Description

Substantial Confidence

Based on the Offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence

Based on the Offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Limited Confidence

Based on the Offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the Offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Unknown Confidence (Neutral)

No recent/relevant performance record is available, or the Offeror's performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

PRICE: Offerors will be required to price all line items for each contract period (base and option years). Price will not be scored, but will be a factor in establishing the competitive range prior to discussions (if held) and in making the final determination for award. The Government will perform a price analysis on all Quotes received. Price analysis will be performed in accordance with FAR 15.404-1, to determine completeness, balanced pricing, reasonableness, and understanding of the work. The evaluation will determine the adequacy of the offer in fulfilling the requirements of the . Completeness addresses the extent to which the elements of the price are consistent with the requirements of the . Contract Line Items (CLINS) will be analyzed to determine if the prices are unbalanced. If the price analysis indicates that an offer is unbalanced, the contracting officer shall consider the risks to the Government associated with the unbalanced pricing in determining the reasonableness of the offer. An offer will be rejected if the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.

DISCUSSION SCHEDULING: If discussions are conducted, the Contracting Officer will schedule the discussion sessions, and each offeror will be notified of the time and place at least two (2) business day prior to their discussion session. The Contracting Officer will provide additional instructions with the notification.

APPENDIX A- CORPORA TE RELEVANT SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE DATA SHEET

APPENDIX B- DATA SHEET

ATTACHMENT 1 - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE FORM

Appendix A

CORPORA TE RELEVANT SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE DATA SHEET

FACTOR 2: CORPORATE RELEVANT SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE.

On an attached sheet, provide information for substantially complete or completed projects within the last five years that are similar in terms of cost, complexity, design or features that have been performed by the Offeror to be used for reference and evaluation purposes. For each project provide the following information:

Project Title:

Location:

Contract number:

Nature of involvement in this project, i.e. General Contractor, subcontractor, designer:

Procuring activity:

Procurement point of contact and telephone number:

Performance period (month/year start to month/year end or percent complete if performance is underway):

Address of project:

Address and telephone number of owner:

Indicate type of project (private sector, Government, planned unit development, etc.):

General description of project:

How this project to relevant to the requirements of this solicitation:

Total cost:

TERMINATED PROJECTS:

Attach a list of any projects within the last three years that have been terminated. Provide an explanation, as well as a Point of Contact (Name, organization, email, phone number) for each terminated project.

APPENDIX B

DATA SHEET

NOTE TO OFFERORS

This OFFEROR PERFORMANCE CAPABILITY DATA SHEET must be completed and attached as the first page of the body of your . The information required by this data sheet may be completed directly on this form or attached to the form as supplemental data sheets.

I.NAME OF OFFEROR.

Name of Offeror(s):

If a joint venture or contractor-subcontractor association of firms, list the individual firms and briefly describe the nature of the association.

Firm 1:

Firm 2:

Nature of Association:

2. DUNS NUMBER FOR OFFEROR (If more than one DUNS number is to be considered, explain affiliation to Offeror)

3. CCASS INDENTIFICA TION FOR OFFEROR

4. AUTHORIZEDNEGOTIATORS. FAR 52.215-11

5. CAGE CODE:

6. Tax ID#

The offeror represents that the following persons are authorized to negotiate on its behalf with the Government in connection with this Request for ( ). List names, titles, and telephone number of the authorized negotiator.

Name of Person(s) Authorized to Negotiate:

Negotiator's Address:

Negotiator's Telephone:

I ATTACHMENT 1: NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0) CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: D Prime Contractor D Sub Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

Contractor D Joint Venture D Other (Explain)

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: D Firm Fixed Price D Cost Reimbursement Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

D Other (Please specify):

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work D High D Med D Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

) CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client's Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR.

THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH THEIR QUOTE, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAJRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

6. Describe the client's role in the project:

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's/Owner's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG s M u N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG s M u N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E VG s M u N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG s M u N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG s M u N

b) Rate the contractor's use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

E VG s M u N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG s M u N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E VG s M u N

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG s M u N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG s M u N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

E VG s M u N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG s M u N

c) Government Property Control E VG s M u N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG s M u N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG s M u N

t) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG s M u N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

E VG s M u N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

E VG s M u N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

E VG s M u N

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

E VG s M u N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor's timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance

E VG s M u N with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

d) Is the Contractor's accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes No

t) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

Yes No

6. SAFETY /SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E VG s M u N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements. E VG s M u N

7.GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

E VG s M u N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG s M u N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

E VG s M u N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk.

W9127S22Q0030

Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 Months Janitorial Services

FFP

Janitorial Services, such as space cleaning, floor care, and restroom services - for full description see PWS & location PWS/ELINS.

FOB: Destination

PSC CD: S216

NET AMT

0002 Job Janitorial Services - IDIQ

FFP

IDIQ Janitorial Services, such as space cleaning, floor care, restroom services - for full description see PWS & location PWS/ELINS. IDIQ work is identified in each applicable annex or sub-annex and shall be performed by the Contractor as ordered by the KO per the requirements of the contract. IDIQ work may consist of Unit Priced Tasks (UPT) (non-negotiated) and Unit Priced Labor (UPL) (negotiated).

Unit Priced Tasks and Unit Priced Labor may be ordered as separate items or in combinations of items from the Schedule of Indefinite Quantity Work (Bid Schedule) in Section B on an as needed basis.

0003 Months Grounds Maintenance

FFP

This may include but not limited to: mowing, landscaping care, trees-shrubs, and plants - for full description see PWS & location PWS/ELINS.

0004 Job Grounds Maintenance - IDIQ

FFP

This may include but not limited to: mowing, landscaping care, trees-shrubs, and plants - for full description see PWS & location PWS/ELINS. IDIQ work is identified in each applicable annex or sub-annex and shall be performed by the Contractor as ordered by the KO per the requirements of the contract. IDIQ work may consist of Unit Priced Tasks (UPT) (non-negotiated) and Unit Priced Labor (UPL) (negotiated). Unit Priced Tasks and Unit Priced Labor may be ordered as separate items or in combinations of items from the Schedule of Indefinite Quantity Work (Bid Schedule) in Section B on an as needed basis.

0005 Job Contract Manpower Reporting

FFP

The contractor shall report ALL contractor labor hours (including subcontractor labor hours) required for performance of services provided under this contract via a secure data collection site. (Base Year One)

0006 Job Contractor Submittals

FFP

This CLIN is for the Start-up Submittal Period (first month only). This is to include but not limited to: successfully submit all permits, licenses, accident prevention plans, quality management plans, etc., required by the Government in Section F (Deliveries or Performance) of the PWS to successfully start in alllocations designated in the region at the end of the start-up submittal period.

1001 Months Janitorial Services - B2

FFP

Janitorial Services, such as space cleaning, floor care, and restroom services - for full description see PWS & location PWS/ELINS.

1002 Job Janitorial Services - IDIQ - B2

FFP

IDIQ Janitorial Services, such as space cleaning, floor care, restroom services - for full description see PWS & location PWS/ELINS. IDIQ work is identified in each applicable annex or sub-annex and shall be performed by the Contractor as ordered by the KO per the requirements of the contract. IDIQ work may consist of Unit Priced Tasks (UPT) (non-negotiated) and Unit Priced Labor (UPL) (negotiated).

Unit Priced Tasks and Unit Priced Labor may be ordered as separate items or in combinations of items from the Schedule of Indefinite Quantity Work (Bid Schedule) in Section B on an as needed basis.

1003 Months Grounds Maintenance - B2

FFP

This may include but not limited to: mowing, landscaping care, trees-shrubs, and plants - for full description see PWS & location PWS/ELINS.

1004 Job Grounds Maintenance - IDIQ - B2

FFP

This may include but not limited to: mowing, landscaping care, trees-shrubs, and plants - for full description see PWS & location PWS/ELINS. IDIQ work is identified in each applicable annex or sub-annex and shall be performed by the Contractor as ordered by the KO per the requirements of the contract. IDIQ work may consist of Unit Priced Tasks (UPT) (non-negotiated) and Unit Priced Labor (UPL) (negotiated). Unit Priced Tasks and Unit Priced Labor may be ordered as separate items or in combinations of items from the Schedule of Indefinite Quantity Work (Bid Schedule) in Section B on an as needed basis.

1005 Job Contractor Manpower Reporting - B2

FFP

The contractor shall report ALL contractor labor hours (including ubcontractor labor hours) required for performance of services provided under this contract via a secure data collection site.

1006 Job Contractor Submittals - B2

FFP

This is to include…