A.07.23_RFP_W9127S18R0011_Amendment_2.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to further clarify this solicitation has been evaluated based upon the solicitation notice.

A.the follow ing has been added to the proposal evaluation factors, w hich w as included in the solicitation notice - "The CLIN structure of the RFP is broken into three distinct specialties: CLINs 0001 thru 0032, 1001 thru 1032, and 2001 thru 2032 are for Park Maintenance --- CLINs 0033 thru 0049, 1033 thru 1049, and 2033 thru 2049 are for Electrical Maintenance --- CLINs 0050 thru 0066, 1050 thru 1066, and 2050 thru 2066 are for Plumbing Maintenance

Vendors quoting on this RFP w hom are not capable of performing all different specialties required may quote only the CLINs for one or more specialties to be considered for aw ard. The government reserves the right to aw ard one to three orders as a result of this RFP based upon the identif ied CLINs above."

B. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 4

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 31-Jan-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W9127S18R0011

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

20-Dec-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

26-Jan-2018

CODE

CONTRACTING DIVISION

USACE, LITTLE ROCK (W9127S)

700 W. CAPITOL AVE, RM 7315

LITTLE ROCK AR 72201-3225

W9127S 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W9127S18R0011

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

The following have been modified:

PROPOSAL EVALUATION SUMMARY

PROPOSAL EVALUATION SUMMARY

A. Weight of Evaluations. This RFP is being evaluated under Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) evaluation criteria. Due to the commercial nature of this requirement no technical proposals are required in this RFP. Instead, past performance shall be evaluated based upon the criteria below. In order for a proposal to be considered 'Technically Acceptable' the past performance rating below must be a minimum of 'Satisfactory' or higher.

B. Volume 1 Past Performance Information. The Past Performance of the Prime Contractor (Offeror) consists of (a) Relevant Company Effort and (b) Quality of Past Performance. The Government will review recent, relevant company efforts and quality i n f o r ma t i o n provided by the owners of those efforts to assess the Offeror’s past experience and probability of successfully performing the work described in this solicitation. A recent, relevant project is construction or repair type project:

(a) Performed under a contract or task order, as those terms are defined in FAR 2.101, for Federal projects, or similar contractual agreements for State or Local Governments, or the commercial or private sector. (Multiple projects under a single contract or task order are considered one project.

However, do not combine multiple projects under separate contracts or task orders to create a single project.);

(b) That is “recent”; one that has been completed within five (5) years of the solicitation issue date, or one where the construction is at least 50% complete (measured by end user approved progress report) as of the solicitation issue date. (Offerors are responsible for providing start and completion dates for each completed project, or the start and scheduled completion dates for projects currently under construction.);

(c) That is “relevant”; one that is similar in scope (type, size, complexity and dollar value) to the project types described in Section 01 00 02, in particular paragraph 2.0 OBJECTIVE. (In terms of dollar value, a relevant project is one ranging from $100k to $1M. For a project to be assessed any degree of “relevancy” it must reflect performance of construction, repair, or renovation type work of a CPF facility (Any law enforcement, fire station, municipal office, or medical facilities).

Every recent and relevant PPQ reference shall contribute toward an overall Volume 1 Past Performance evaluation rating based upon the following rating scale. Any rating of 'Satisfactory' or higher shall demonstrate the proposal is considered 'Technically Acceptable'.

RATING

DEFINITION

NOTE

(E) Exceptional

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG)

Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government /Owner’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory

Performance meets minimum contractual requirements.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

(M) Marginal

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner.

A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

C. Volume 2 Price Schedule. The price schedule will be evaluated based upon the lowest priced offeror being considered most advantageous to the government. The price schedule shall be submitted in Firm Fixed Price values.

The CLIN structure of the RFP is broken into three distinct specialties:

CLINs 0001 thru 0032, 1001 thru 1032, and 2001 thru 2032 are for Park Maintenance

CLINs 0033 thru 0049, 1033 thru 1049, and 2033 thru 2049 are for Electrical Maintenance

CLINs 0050 thru 0066, 1050 thru 1066, and 2050 thru 2066 are for Plumbing Maintenance

Vendors quoting on this RFP whom are not capable of performing all different specialties required may quote only the CLINs for one or more specialties to be considered for award. The government reserves the right to award one to three orders as a result of this RFP based upon the identified CLINs above.

D. Award Recommendation. Award recommendation should it be accomplished shall be issued to the LPTA offeror.

There is no preference given for vendors with higher past performance evaluation ratings.

END OF PROPOSAL EVALUATION SUMMARY

(End of Summary of Changes)