W9127S17R6002_Amendment_0001.pdf

PDF 234 KB Posted

Attached to
Naval Hospital Oak Harbor (NHOH) Initial Outfitting Project Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W9127S17R6002
Issued by
Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering District Little Rock

About this file

AMENDMENT 0001

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Naval Hospital Oak Harbor (NHOH) Initial Outfitting Project, newest first.
File Type Posted
W9127S-17-R-6002_ProjNet_inquiry_report.pdf PDF
W9127S-17-R-6002_Amendment_0002.pdf PDF
W9127S17R6002_Amendment_0001.pdf PDF
SOLICITATION_-_W9127S17R6002_OAK_HARBOR.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to correct the Bidder Inquity Key to SETSYW-RU2DN7 and Change the number of copies required for the Non Price Proposal. Please see the summery of Changes.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 10

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 13-Jul-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W9127S-17-R-6032

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

11-Jul-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

13-Jul-2017

CODE

CONTRACTING DIVISION

USACE, LITTLE ROCK (W9127S)

700 W. CAPITOL AVE, RM 7315

LITTLE ROCK AR 72201-3225

W9127S 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W9127S-17-R-6032

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

The following have been modified:

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1

A. Addendum to FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Items

1. Submission of Offers. Submit signed and dated offer at or before the exact time specified in this solicitation. Failure to provide all required documents or information may exclude the offeror(s) from further consideration. Both the electronic copy and paper/hard copy offer will be accepted at the address identified below. Only signed offers submitted on the SF 1449 will be accepted. Emailed and faxed proposals will not be considered.

Submit proposals to:

CONTRACTING DIVISION

USACE, LITTLE ROCK (W9127S)

ATTN: TIMOTHY PIGHEE

700 W. CAPITOL AVENUE, RM 7315

LITTLE ROCK AR 72201-3225

The Packaging:

The Proposals shall be marked:

“Proposals for Solicitation Number: W9127S-17-R-6032, Chesapeake Tricare Prine Clinic Initial Outfitting “DO NOT OPEN”

a. Electronic submissions via email or fax will not be accepted. Offers should be mailed through a commercial/Government carrier or hand carried.

b. This is an electronic solicitation release. No hard copies will be mailed.

Amendments to the solicitation will be posted through the Federal Business Opportunities www.fbo.gov website. It is the responsibility of each Offeror to review the webpage for notice of amendments, updates, or changes to current information.

c. Questions and/or comments relative to these documents should be submitted via e-mail to the Contract Specialist who is the primary point of contact Mr. Timothy Pighee at Timothy.A.Pighee@usace.army.mil.

d. Technical inquiries and questions relating to proposal procedures are to be submitted via ProjNet at http://www.projnet.org/projnet . To submit and review bid inquiry items, bidders will need to be a current registered user or self-register into system. To self-register go to web page identified above please use the following directions:

Click BID tab select Bidder Inquiry, select agency USACE; enter Key for this solicitation listed below, and your e-mail address, click login.

Fill in all required information and click create user. Verify that information on next screen is correct and click continue.

From this page you may view all proposal inquiries or add inquiry

Offerors will receive an acknowledgement of their question via email, followed by an answer to their question after it has been processed by our technical team.

The Solicitation Number is: W9127S-17-R 6032 The Bidder Inquiry Key is: SETSYW –RU2DN7 The Review will be open from July 10, 2017 through July 31, 2017 at 2:00 PM CDT

Offerors are requested to review the solicitation in its entirety, review the Bidder Inquiry System for answers to questions prior to submission of a new inquiry.

Offers will NOT be publicly opened. Information concerning the status of the evaluation and/or award will NOT be available after receipt of proposals

Oral explanations or instructions are not binding. Any information given to an offeror which impacts the solicitation and/or offer will be given in the form of a written amendment to the solicitation.

As this is a competitive negotiation acquisition, there is no public bid opening and no information will be given out as to the number of Offerors or the results of the competition until an award is made.

2. General Instructions. These instructions are designed to provide general guidance for preparing proposals as well as providing specific instructions on proposal organization, format, and content. Offerors shall include all documents and information requested and should be submitted in accordance with the instructions. The Offeror is cautioned to follow the instructions carefully, as the Government reserves the right to make an award based on initial proposals received without discussion. However, the Government reserves the right to request clarifications if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary.

a. If an offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, an ambiguity, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the PCO in writing with supporting rationale prior to the close of the Solicitation.

b. The proposal must be presented in a manner that clearly addresses the requirements, as set forth in the Statement of Work. Proposals that are overly verbose or include marketing material may distract from the evaluators’ ability to ascertain compliance with the solicitation.

3. Team/Team Member(s)/Teaming Partner(s). The Government will consider the offeror and all subcontractors a “team” when evidence of a signed Teaming Arrangement or Letter of Intent is provided. This RFP will refer to the offeror and all identified teaming subcontractors as a “team.” This RFP will refer to all identified teaming subcontractors as “team members” or “teaming partners.” The offeror shall identify any Team/Team Members in their Executive Summary and briefly describe how the Teaming Arrangement will support this requirement.

4. Proposal Preparation Instructions. Offeror’s proposal will consist of two (2) separate volumes: Price and Non Price Proposal

Proposal Format. All pages of each offer must be appropriately numbered and identified with the solicitation number W9127S-17-R-6032 in the header and/or footer of each page. If the RFP page limits are exceeded, the pages in excess of the limit will be removed and not evaluated.

Hard Copy format and electronic copies on CDs are both required in this submission, please see table below for specific numbers. Volume I and Volume II shall be submitted on two (2) separate CD-ROMs. Page limitations are also annotated.

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2

SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL

(1) Number of Sets of the Price Proposal. Submit the ORIGINAL and ONE additional hard copy sets of the Price Proposal. Submit 2 CD ROMs of the Price Proposal.

(2) Size Restrictions and Page Limits. Use only 8 ½” x 11” pages. There are no page limits set for the price proposal. However, limit your response to information required by this solicitation. Excess information will not be considered in the Government’s evaluation.

(3) Format and Contents of the Price Proposal and List of Tabs. The Price Proposal shall be appropriately labeled as such and shall be organized as indicated in the following chart. Note: If the Offeror is not required to submit any information under a listed Tab in accordance with the instructions below, that tab can be omitted. However, do not renumber the subsequent tabs.

TAB

CONTENTS OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL

#1

The Proposal Cover Sheet

#2

The SF1449 and Acknowledgement of Amendments

#3

Section 001100, Pricing Schedule

#4

Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors (if the offeror does not have electronic certifications in ORCA)

#5

JV Agreement, if applicable.

PROPOSAL COVER SHEET

1. Solicitation Number:

2. The name, address, and telephone and facsimile numbers of the Offeror (and electronic address if available):

3. A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item. Statement to include any exceptions in technical or cost/price proposal or exceptions inherent in Offeror’s standard terms and conditions.

4. Names, titles, and telephone and facsimile numbers (and electronic addresses if available) of persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation:

5. Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE NON-PRICE FACTOR PROPOSAL

(1) Number of Sets of the Non-Price Factor Proposal. Submit ONE (1) Hard Copies and ONE (1) CD-ROM Copies of the written Technical Proposal, with each set separately packaged.

(2) Format and Contents of the Technical Proposal and List of Tabs. The original and all copies of the technical proposal will be appropriately labeled as such. Each set shall be organized using the tabs specified in the following chart.

FACTOR

CONTENTS OF THE NON-PRICE FACTOR

PROPOSAL

Factor 1

TECHNICAL

Sub Factor 1.1 EXPERIENCE

Sub Factor 1.2 PERSONNEL

Factor 2

PAST PERFORMANCE

M4CT9MDM

Highlight

Sub Factor 2.1

PAST PERFORMANCE

(3) Page Limitations. The following page limitations are established for each factor described above:

Sub Factor 1.1, Experience – Limited to 5 pages (a maximum of 5 forms) Sub Factor 1.2, Personnel – Limited to 1 page for each resume provided, 1 page for the

Authority Diagram Sub Factor 2.1, Past Performance – No page limitation

Tables of content, proposal cover letters, and tabs between proposal information do not count toward any page limitations in the proposal.

(4) Detailed Submission Requirements for the Technical Proposal. The following is a detailed description of the information to be submitted under each TAB.

(i) FACTOR 1: SUB FACTOR 1.1 - EXPERIENCE: Demonstrate the experience of the Offeror on projects with a scope that is same/similar to that required by this Solicitation.

1. The Offeror shall complete a minimum of three (3), but no more than five (5), “Experience

Information” forms, attached at the end of this section, in response to this factor. All blocks must be filled in and all data should be accurate, current, and complete.

2. All projects submitted must have been completed or initiated within 5 years of this Soliciation.

3. At least two (2) of the projects provided must be valued over $2,500,000.00.

Experience considered same/similar would include scope such as: Intial Outfitting & Transition Services

The Offeror may be considered non-responsive and evaluated as unacceptable if any of the information required is not included on the form.

(SEE EXPERIENCE INFORMATION FORM NEXT PAGE)

EXPERIENCE INFORMATION

(To be completed by Contractor)

1. Contractor:

Name:

Address:

2. Contract /Task Order(TO) /Purchase Order (PO) Number:

3. Contract/TO/PO Dollar Value:

4. Contract/TO /PO Status: Active Complete

Completion Date (w/ extensions):

5. Project Title:

Location:

6. Project Description-- to include the role of the contractor on the project and specific responsibilities of the contractor in performance of the effort:

7. Project Owner or Project Manager for the Client -- provide:

Name:

Address:

Telephone Number and E-mail:

(ii) FACTOR 1: SUB FACTOR 1.2 - PERSONNEL: The Offeror must provide resumes for the following key personnel: Project Manager, Medical Space/Equipment Planner, & Interior Designer, & equipment installers.

Resumes shall be limited to one (1) page per person and include the following information as a minimum:

Name and title Project assignment Years experience with this firm and with other firms Education degree(s), year, specialization, if applicable Other experience and qualifications relevant to same/similar work required under their field.

Experience considered same/similar would include scope such as: initial outfitting & transition services, planning, or interior design of a medical facility

(iii) TAB 2: SUB FACTOR 2.1, PAST PERFORMANCE: The Past Performance evaluation will assess the Offeror’s probability of meeting the solicitation’s requirements as indicated by that Offeror’s record of past performance. Past Performance is assessed at the factor level after evaluating aspects of the Offeror’s recent past performance and focusing on performance that is relevant to the services being procured under this solicitation. Offerors are cautioned that in conducting the performance risk assessment, the Government may use data provided in the Offeror’s proposal and data obtained from other sources, such as the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), or similar systems and State Department Watch Lists. Past performance areas of evaluation include:

- Business Relations

- Quality of Service

- Schedule

- Customer Satisfaction

(a) Recency Assessment. An assessment of the past performance information will be made to determine if it is recent. To be recent, the effort must be ongoing (at least 50% complete) or must have been performed during the past 3 years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. Past performance information that fails to meet these requirements will not be evaluated.

(b) Relevancy Assessment. The Government will conduct an in-depth evaluation of all recent performance information obtained to determine if it is the same or similar in nature of work, size, and complexity to the services/products being procured under this solicitation.

A relevancy determination of the Offeror’s (including joint venture partner(s) and major and critical subcontractor(s)) past performance will be made. In determining relevancy for individual contracts, consideration will be given to the effort, or portion of the effort, being proposed by the offeror, teaming partner, or subcontractor whose contract is being reviewed and evaluated. In establishing what is relevant for the acquisition, consideration should be given to what aspects of an Offeror’s contract history would give the most confidence that the offeror will satisfy the current procurement. The past performance information provided in the proposal and obtained from other sources will be used to establish the relevancy of past performance.

SOURCE SELECTION USING THE LOW-PRICED, TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE PROCESS. An evaluation for acceptability will be performance on each proposal in accordance with FAR 15.101-2(b)(3).

The proposal that provides the lowest price and is otherwise technically acceptable in all factors will be selected for award. To be considered technically acceptable, no technical factor in the proposal may be determined to be unacceptable. The failure of a proposal to meet any of the factors will result in a technically unacceptable rating and preclude award.

BASIS OF AWARD. Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. Tradeoffs are not permitted. Proposals are evaluated for acceptability but not ranked using non-cost/price factors.

EVALUATION OF THE PRICE PROPOSALS

a. Price will be evaluated and considered but will not be scored or combined with other aspects of the proposal evaluation. The proposed prices will be analyzed for reasonableness. They may also be analyzed to determine whether they are realistic for the work to be performed, reflect a clear understanding of the requirements, and are consistent with the information provided by the Offeror.

Additionally, all offers will be analyzed for unbalanced pricing.

The otherwise technically-acceptable, lowest-priced offeror may be required to confirm its price on either a CLIN, element, or total price basis, and/or provide additional information in support of their price, prior to contract award at the Government’s request and discretion.

EVALUATION OF THE NON-PRICE FACTOR PROPOSAL. The Non-Price Factor Proposal will be evaluated based on the criteria below. The Source Selection Evaluation Board will evaluate each Offeror’s proposal against the requirements to determine whether the proposal is acceptable or unacceptable, using the ratings and descriptions in the following table:

Table A-1. Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating Rating Description Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

FACTOR 1: TECHNICAL

a. SUB FACTOR 1.1 - EXPERIENCE: The Government will review the project experience of the Offeror, including subcontractors, on projects provided in response to Factor 1. Offerors must meet all of the following minimum acceptability standards to receive an “ACCEPTABLE” on this sub factor:

Offeror must have at least three (3) projects that are same/similar to that of the work found in this solicitation; AND

Those projects must have been initiated or completed within 5 years of this Solicitation.

At least two (2) of the projects submitted must be valued at over $2,500,000.00.

Failure to demonstrate the minimally acceptability standards under this sub factor will result in an “UNACCEPTABLE” rating and possible elimination from further consideration for contract award.

b. SUB FACTOR 1.2 - PERSONNEL: The Government will review the resumes provided in response to Factor 1. Offerors must demonstrate all of the following minimum acceptability standards to receive an “ACCEPTABLE” on this sub factor.

The proposal’s resumes shall meet the following minimum requirements:

The project manager, medical space/equipment planner, equipment/product installers & interior designer resumes shall indicate experience relevant to the scope of this Solicitation. The project manager shall have a 4 year college degree.

The project manager, medical space/equipment planner, & interior designer shall possess a minimum of five (5) years experience in their fields.

Failure to demonstrate the minimally acceptability standards under this sub factor will result in an “UNACCEPTABLE” rating and possible elimination from further consideration for contract award.

c.

FACTOR 2: PAST PERFORMANCE

c. SUB FACTOR 2.1: PAST PERFORMANCE: The Past Performance Factor will be assigned one of the ratings defined below.

Table A-2. Past Performance Evaluation Ratings Rating Description Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the

Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.

Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

If the Contracting Officer determines that a small business’s past performance is not acceptable, this matter shall be referred to the Small Business Administration for a Certificate of Competency determination (see FAR 15.101-2 (b) (1)), in accordance with the procedures contained in Subpart 19.6 and 15 U.S.C. 637(b)(7).

(End of Summary of Changes)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .