W9127820R0060 AM06.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W9127820R0060
About this file
This solicitation seeks proposals for an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) for Environmental Remediation Services in the Mobile District Area of Responsibility (AOR). Firms will provide a range of environmental remediation services including project management, engineering, and construction at sites requiring investigation, cleanup, and closure of hazardous and radioactive waste. Services will support installations managed by the Mobile District of the Army Corps of Engineers. The solicitation includes detailed requirements for project management plans, health and safety plans, quality control, and reporting. Pricing is to be proposed for labor categories on multi-year ordering period schedules. Proposals are due by the specified date, and awards will be made to multiple vendors for ordering periods up to ten years.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| W9127820R0060 AM05.pdf | ||
| W9127820R0060 AM04.pdf | ||
| W9127820R0060 AM03 SF30 .pdf | ||
| W9127820R0060 AM0002 .pdf | ||
| W9127820R0060 AM0002.pdf | ||
| W9127820R0060 AM0001.pdf | ||
| W9127820R0060 ERS RFP 8OCT2020.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE
RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
1. CONTRACT ID CODE
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)
7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE
STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)
Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
FACILITY CODE
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER
9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER
NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15C. DATE SIGNED
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
PAGE OF PAGES
6. ISSUED BY CODE
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)
CODE
15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of person authorized to sign)
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(Signature of Contracting Officer)
Previous edition unusable
AM0006
W91278
SEE SUMMARY OF CHANGES SHEET - AMENDMENT 0006
ENDIST MOBILE CONTRACTING DIVISION
109 ST JOSEPH STREET
MOBILE, AL 36602
W9127820R0060
10/08/2020
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
05/12/2021
IDC MATOCs for Environmental Remediation Services W9127820R0060 (ERS) to support the Environmental Remediation Program
PART I – REVISIONS MADE BY ADDED AND/OR REPLACEMENT PARAGRAPHS/PAGES/SECTIONS
The items listed below are to be replaced by the corresponding added and/or revised paragraphs/pages or sections. Added and/or revised paragraphs/pages or sections are indicated by a note in bottom right hand corner of each paragraph or page. Added sections are hereby made a part of the contract and are to be inserted in the specifications in the proper numerical/alphabetical sequence.
Within the specifications, deletions from the specifications are indicated by strikethrough, e.g.: deletions are marked with strikethrough and additions to the specifications including revisions/substitutions are indicated in bold, italic and underlined, e.g.: additions are indicated thus.
SECTION Corresponding Added or Revised Paragraph Page, and/or Section
CESAM ERS MATOC 10 Year Ordering
Period Labor Rate Schedule
(fillable) Excel file in attachments
– Revised herein.
SAM_ERS_MATOC_8aSample_Project_Sub-
CLIN Structure
(fillable) Excel file in attachments
– Revised herein.
Section - I Revised as indicated herein.
Section - J Revised as indicated herein.
Section - K Revised as indicated herein.
Encl as stated Revised Pages of the solicitation as indicated in Part I.
IDC MATOCs for Environmental Remediation Services W9127820R0060 (ERS) to support the Environmental Remediation Program
Revised by Amendment No. W9127820R0060-0006
Section I - Contract Clauses
52.219-28
(e) The small business size standard for a Contractor providing a product which it does not manufacture itself, for a contract other than a construction or service contract, is 500 750 employees.
Section J - List of Documents, Exhibits, and Other Attachments
1. -REVISED- SAM_ERS_MATOC_8aSample_Project_Sub-CLIN_Structure (AM0006).xlsx
2. Acronyms and Definitions.pdf
3. -REVISED- CESAM ERS MATOC 10 Year Ordering Period Labor Rate Schedule.xlsx
4. SF LLL Disclosure of Lobbying Acitivites.pdf
5. CESAM Form 1151 Prompt Payment Cert.pdf
Section K - Representations, Certifications and Other Statements of Offerors
52.204-8
(2) The small business size standard is $22,000,000 750 employees.
| 1a AM06 page 1- |
| 2a SF33 Solicitation W9127820R0060 |
| 2b. Statement of Revisions |
| 3. AM0006 Requests for Information Page 3 |
Sheet1
| CLIN/Sub-CLIN Number | Task/ Installation | Site | CLIN/Sub-CLIN Description | Estimated Timing of Award | |
| (Pending availability of funding and bona fide need) | CLIN/SubCLIN Pricing |
(In Whole Dollars)
0001 N/A N/A Complete Project Management Plan (PMP)
0001AA N/A N/A Complete PMP Yr. 1
0001AB N/A N/A Update PMP Est. Yr. 3
0001AC N/A N/A Project Closeout Summary Yr. 5
0001AD N/A N/A Final PMP Yr. 5
0002 N/A N/A Complete Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) Deleted by ammendment
0002AA N/A N/A Complete QASP Yr. 1 Deleted by ammendment
0002AB N/A N/A Update QASP Est. Yr. 3 Deleted by ammendment
0003 N/A N/A Develop Integrated Master Schedule (IMS)/Milestone Payment Schedule (MPS) and Update Monthly
0003CA N/A N/A Develop IMS/MPS and Update Monthly Yr. 1
0003CB N/A N/A Update IMS/MPS Monthly - Year 2 Yr. 2
0003CC N/A N/A Update IMS/MPS Monthly - Year 3 Yr. 3
0003CD N/A N/A Update IMS/MPS Monthly - Year 4 Yr. 4
0003CE N/A N/A Update IMS/MPS Monthly - Year 5 Yr. 5
0004 Fort Mystery AFB OU007 Achieve Site Closeout
0004AA Fort Mystery AFB OU007 Achieve Final CMS Report/IM Workplan Yr. 1
0004AB Fort Mystery AFB OU007 Achieve Final IM Report Yr. 3
0004AC Fort Mystery AFB OU007 Achieve Memorandum of Decision for NFA Yr. 4
0004AD Fort Mystery AFB OU007 Achieve SRCO and government and regulatory approval of Final Well Abandonment Report Yr. 5
Acronyms and Definitions
ACRONYMS
AF ................................ Air Force
AFCEC ........................ Air Force Civil Engineer Center
AFI ............................... Air Force Instruction
AFSOC ........................ Air Force Special Operations Command
AGC ............................. Advanced Geophysical Classification
API ............................... American Petroleum Institute
APP .............................. Accident Prevention Plan
ASTM .......................... American Society for Testing and Materials
BCA ............................. Business Case Analysis
BCE ............................. Base Civil Engineer
BRAC .......................... Base Realignment and Closure
CA ............................... Cost Analysis
CAC ............................. Common Access Card
CADD .......................... Computer-Aided Design and Drafting
CD ............................... Compact Disk
CERCLA ..................... Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
CFR ............................. Code of Federal Regulations
CIP ............................... Common Installation Picture
CLIN ............................ Contract Line Item Number
CMRA ......................... Contractor Manpower Reporting Application
COC ............................. Contaminant of Concern
COPC ........................... Chemical of Potential Concern
CONUS ........................ Continental United States
COR ............................. Contracting Officer’s Representative
CPSMR ........................ Contractor’s Progress, Status, and Management Report
CQP ............................. Construction Quality Plan
CSDGM ....................... Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata
CSM ............................. Conceptual Site Model
CWM ........................... Chemical Warfare Materiel
DAGCAP ..................... DoD Advanced Geophysical Classification Accreditation Program
DD ............................... Decision Document
DERP ........................... Defense Environmental Remediation Program
DLH ............................. Data Loading Handbook
DoD ............................. Department of Defense
DOT ............................. Department of Transportation
DQO ............................ Data Quality Objectives
EE ................................ Engineering Evaluation
EESOH-MIS ................ Enterprise Environmental, Safety, and Occupational Health Management Information System
ELAP ........................... Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program
EMS ............................. Environmental Management System
EO ................................ Executive Order
EOD ............................. Explosive Ordnance Disposal
EPCRA ........................ Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act
ERP .............................. Environmental Restoration Program
ERPIMS ....................... Environmental Resources Program Information Management System
ERPTools ..................... Environmental Resources Program Tools
ESD ............................. Explanation of Significant Differences
ESRI ............................ Environmental Systems Research Institute
ESTCP ......................... Environmental Security Technology Certification Program
FAR ............................. Federal Acquisition Regulation
FDEP ........................... Florida Department of Environmental Protection
FFA .............................. Federal Facility Agreement
FGDC .......................... Federal Geographic Data Committee
FS ................................. Feasibility Study
FUSRAP ...................... Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
FY ................................ Fiscal Year
GCO ............................. Geophysical Classification Organization
Enclosure 1: Acronyms and Definitions
GFI ............................... Government Furnished Information
GFP .............................. Government Furnished Property
GIO .............................. Geospatial Integration Office
GIS ............................... Geographic Information System
GPS .............................. Global Positioning Systems
GSR ............................. Green and Sustainable Remediation
HAZMO ...................... Hazardous Materials Management Office
HAZWOPER ............... Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response
HSP .............................. Health and Safety Plan
HSWA ......................... Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments
HTRW ......................... Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
IBC .............................. International Building Code
IDW ............................. Investigation-Derived Waste
IMS .............................. Integrated Master Schedule
IRP ............................... Installation Restoration Program
ITRC ............................ Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council
KO ............................... Contracting Officer
LCC ............................. Life-Cycle Cost
LTM ............................. Long-Term Management
LUC ............................. Land Use Control
MAP ............................ Management Action Plan
MC ............................... Munitions Constituents
MCL ............................ Maximum Concentration Level
MDL ............................ Master Document List
MDS ............................ Mission Data Set
MEC ............................ Munitions and Explosives of Concern
MMRP ......................... Military Munitions Response Program
MOD ............................ Memorandum of Decision
MOU ............................ Memorandum of Understanding
MPS ............................. Milestone Payment Schedule
MXD ............................ Map Exchange File
NACE .......................... National Association of Corrosions Engineers
NAD83 ........................ North American Datum 1983
NCP ............................. National Contingency Plan
NEC ............................. National Electrical Code
NFA ............................. No Further Action
NFPA ........................... National Fire Protection Act
NOV ............................ Notice of Violation
NPL ............................. National Priorities List
OES ............................. Optimized Exit Strategy
OGC ............................. Office of the General Counsel
O&M ........................... Operations and Maintenance
ORC ............................. Optimized Remediation Contract
OSHA .......................... Occupational Safety and Health Administration
PA ................................ Preliminary Assessment
PAO ............................. Public Affairs Officer
PARM .......................... Post-Active Remediation Monitoring
PBR ............................. Performance-Based Remediation
PFBS ............................ Perfluorobutane Sulfonate
PFOA ........................... Perfluorooctanoic Acid
PFOS ........................... Perfluorooctane Sulfonate
PM ................................ Project Manager
PMP ............................. Project Management Plan
PMR ............................. Project Management Review
PO ................................ Performance Objective
POC ............................. Point of Contact
POL ............................. Petroleum, Oil, and Lubricant
POP .............................. Period of Performance
PP ................................. Performance Period
PWS ............................. Performance Work Statement
QA ............................... Quality Assurance
QASP ........................... Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan
QAPP ........................... Quality Assurance Project Plans
QC ............................... Quality Control
QPP .............................. Quality Program Plan
QSM ............................ Quality Systems Manual
RA ............................... Remedial Action
RAB ............................. Restoration Advisory Board
RACR .......................... Remedial Action Completion Report
RAP ............................. Remedial Action Plan
RA-O ........................... Remedial Action – Operation
RC ................................ Response Complete
RCRA .......................... Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
RDW ............................ Remediation-Derived Waste
RECAP ........................ Risk Evaluation Corrective Action Program
REMG ......................... Resident Engineer Management Guide
RFI ............................... RCRA Facility Investigation
RI ................................. Remedial Investigation
RIP ............................... Remedy in Place
RISD ............................ Remedial Investigation Scoping Document
ROCC .......................... Range Operations Control Center
ROD ............................. Record of Decision
SARA .......................... Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
SC ................................ Site Closeout
SDG ............................. Sample Delivery Group
SDS .............................. Safety Data Sheet
SDSFIE ........................ Spatial Data Standards for Facilities, Infrastructure, and Environment
SERDP ......................... Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program
SI ................................. Site Inspection
SRCO ........................... Site Rehabilitation Completion Order
SSHP ........................... Site Safety and Health Plan
SSI ............................... Supplemental Site Investigation
SSPC ............................ Steel Structures and Painting Counsel
SSR .............................. Site Status Report
TCE ............................. Trichloroethylene
TDSR ........................... Technical Data Summary Report
UFC ............................. Uniform Fire Code
UFP .............................. Uniform Federal Policy
USACE ........................ United States Army Corps of Engineers
USEPA ........................ United States Environmental Protection Agency
UTM ............................ Universal Transverse Mercator
UXO ............................ Unexploded Ordnance
WBS ............................ Work Breakdown Structure
WP ............................... Work Plan
DEFINITIONS
The definitions included in this Enclosure were adapted from the following sources:
1. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Site Remediation Program Technical Guidance for
Preparation and Submission of a Conceptual Site Model dated 16 December 2011.
2. Air Force Instruction 32-7020 dated 7 November 2014.
3. Council on Environmental Quality Aligning National Environmental Policy Act Processes with
Environmental Management Systems, A Guide for NEPA and EMS Practitioners dated April 2007.
4. Interstate Technical Regulatory Council Green and Sustainable Remediation: A Practical Framework dated November 2011.
5. Air Force Civil Engineer Center Optimized Exit Strategy Compendium for Performance-Based
Remediation dated October 2014.
6. 42 U.S. Code § 9601 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
Definitions.
7. United States Environmental Protection Agency Guide to Preparing Superfund Proposed Plans, Records of Decision, and Other Remedy Selection Decision Documents dated July 1999.
8. National Academies Press Contaminants in the Subsurface: Source Zone Assessment and Remediation dated 2005.
9. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Management Business Process, ER 5-1-11
10. EPA. 2006a. Guidance on Systematic Planning Using the Data Quality Objectives Process. EPA QA/G-
4, EPA/240/B-06/001, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Information, Washington DC.
In the case where the definition provided below does not align with the source reference, the source reference shall prevail.
Definitions
Alternate Objective See PWS
Conceptual Site
Model1
A written and/or illustrative representation of the physical, chemical and biological processes that control the transport, migration and actual/potential impacts of contamination (in soil, air, ground water, surface water and/or sediments) to human and/or ecological receptors. It can range from a simple illustration to a more sophisticated comprehensive document and applied to all phases of the remedial process to understand the relationship between sources, migration pathways, and receptors associated with the site or area of concern and identified COCs. It serves to identify currently complete or potentially complete pathways to receptors and the potential for future risks. It should be continually revised to reflect the current understanding of the site during all phases of the investigation, remediation and support the remedial decision.
Contracting Officer
(KO)
The USACE employee with sole authority to enter into and or terminate contracts, obligate government funds, and make related determinations and findings on behalf of the government. This is the only individual who can legally bind the government.
Contracting
Officers
Representative
(COR)
The USACE employee designated by the KO to monitor contractor performance and ensure execution of contractual requirements. Such appointment shall be in writing and shall state the scope of authority and limitations. This individual has authority to provide technical direction to the Contractor as long as that direction is within the scope of the contract, does not constitute a change, and has no funding implications.
This individual does NOT have authority to change the terms and conditions of the contract.
Contractor (KTR) The supplier or vendor awarded a contract to provide specific supplies or service to the government. The term used in this contract refers to the Prime Contractor.
Decision
Document2
A generic name for the document that selects a response action under all legal authorities. All DDs, including PPs and RODs, must go through legal and technical review. The remedial action objectives defined in the DD will be used later in the environmental restoration process to confirm and demonstrate that DOD has met the obligations established in the DD.
DQO10 The DQO Process is a seven-step planning approach to develop sampling designs for data collection activities that support decision making. The DQO Process is iterative and allows the planning team to incorporate new information and modify outputs from previous steps as inputs for a subsequent step. Although the principles of systematic planning and the DQO Process are applicable to all scientific studies, the DQO
Process is particularly designed to address problems that require making a decision between two clear alternatives. The final outcome of the DQO Process is a design for collecting data (e.g., the number of samples to collect, and when, where, and how to collect the samples), together with limits on the probabilities of making decision errors.
Draft Document Document submitted for AF and USACE review and approval. In all respects, Draft
Documents shall be complete; substantively correct and consistent with applicable laws, regulations, and DoD/AF policies; in proper format; and free of grammatical and typographical errors. In general, Draft Documents are the initial version reviewed by AF and USACE. Draft Documents shall not be submitted to regulatory agencies for review.
Draft Final
Document
Document incorporating AF and USACE comments and submitted for regulatory agency review and/or approval. Draft Final Documents may also be required prior to
Final Document preparation. Note some documents may initially be submitted to the regulatory agencies as Final with any comments being incorporated into subsequent documents as appropriate (e.g., system status reports, monitoring reports, “data dumps”).
Emerging
Contaminant2
Contaminants that either (1) do not have regulatory standards based on peer-reviewed science, or (2) contaminants that have the regulatory standards which may change due to new science, detection capabilities, or pathways.
Environmental
Management
System3
A structure of procedures and policies used to systematically identify, evaluate, and manage environmental impacts of ongoing activities, products, and services. Designed to provide order and consistency for organizations to address environmental concerns in a comprehensive manner, an EMS for a Federal agency is intended to ensure that all necessary actions are taken to integrate environmental accountability into day-to-day decision-making and long-term planning processes. An EMS employs a continuous, rigorous, self-monitoring cycle for continual improvement of environmental performance.
Final Document Document that has received AF and USACE approval, and regulatory agency concurrence and/or approval. For documents requiring AF and/or regulatory agency signature, the document will not be considered Final until it is signed by the appropriate signatory(ies). Final documents are required to achieve performance objectives, unless specifically indicated in the contract or by the PM/COR.
Green and
Sustainable
Remediation4
The site-specific employment of products, processes, technologies, and procedures that mitigate contaminant risk to receptors while making decisions that are cognizant of balancing community goals, economic impacts, and net environmental effects.
Land Use Control2 Any type of physical, legal, proprietary or administrative mechanism that restricts the use of, or limits access to, real property to prevent or reduce risks to human health and the environment. Physical mechanisms (i.e., engineering controls) encompass a variety of engineered remedies to contain or reduce contamination and physical barriers to limit access to property, such as landfill caps, fences, or signs. The legal, proprietary, or administrative mechanisms used for LUCs are generally the same as those used for Institutional Controls (ICs), as discussed in the National Contingency
Plan. Examples of ICs include deed notices; IC registries, property easements and covenants; installation administrative controls, such as construction and work request review and approval processes; and administrative orders and cleanup agreements.
Life-Cycle Cost
(LCC)
An estimate of POP and post-POP costs based on proposed activities, activity duration, and assumptions from contract award through Contractor’s projected Site
Closeout date (or 30 years for sites with indefinite closeout dates).
Long-Term
Management2
Environmental monitoring, review of site conditions, and maintenance of a remedial action to ensure continued protection as designed once a site achieves Response
Complete. LTM includes operation and maintenance which are the measures required to maintain the effectiveness of response actions. LTM should not be used until no further environmental restoration response actions are appropriate or anticipated.
LTM should not be used to refer to monitoring after RIP (this includes sites for which the selected response action is natural attenuation). Examples of LTM include landfill cap maintenance, leachate disposal, fence monitoring and repair, management of five-year review execution, and LUC maintenance.
Note: the requirements for Five-Year Reviews are in accordance with the PWS and may not be included in LTM required under ORCs.
Optimized Exit
Strategy
See PWS Section 1.2.1.
Optimized
Remediation
Contract
A contract that will effectively and efficiently manage the Air Force ERP in a performance-based, results-oriented, and cost-conscious framework. One significant component will be the incorporation of lessons learned during PBRs in the development of ORC performance objectives. ORCs will be firm fixed price contracts and generally cover all known sites at an installation. Contractors will be incentivized to achieve performance objectives in keeping with the end state of choice as determined by a business case analysis of total life cycle cost with the objective of minimizing future Air Force liability and cost to the greatest degree feasible. While that end state of choice is generally RC, ORCs will utilize existing site data to inform realistic performance objective selection.
Performance Goal5 A standard being used to define when an effort has achieved satisfactory performance for a site for which the Performance Objective is OES. In a Performance Model, it is the value for a specific Performance Indicator that distinguishes success from failure of the implemented approach. As such, the Performance Goal is the pass/fail criterion for a given Performance Indicator.
Performance
Indicator5
A measurable or calculable feature of an approach, system, or process that provides direct interpretive value with respect to (1) remedial mechanisms or (2) achievement of a remedial objective.
Metric5
A unit of measure for a Performance Indicator.
Model5
A predictive graphic model that describes the expected course of the remediation process (i.e., how conditions are expected to change over time as measured using appropriate Performance Indicators from the current state until the Performance Goal is achieved).
Objective
The contractually required endpoint, status, condition, or requirement for a site as defined in the PWS. The Performance Objectives defined by the Government and documented in the PWS are unconditional requirements and the Contractor shall not include caveats, limitations, or other statements that place conditions on the achievement of a performance objective. In such, the contractors technical approach included in proposals and PMP (after award) shall not include caveats, unidentified assumptions, limiting narratives, clarifications, qualifications, or exceptions that may impact the achievement of a Performance Objective.
Performance Period The contractually required duration to achieve the Performance Objective. The
Performance Period does not necessarily equate to the contract Period of Performance.
Standard
The condition that must be satisfied to demonstrate a Performance Objective has been achieved.
Project Manager9 The USACE point of contact assigned to manage scope, schedule, budget, quality, and serve as leader of the project delivery team (PDT). The Project Manager is the primary point of contact for the Contractor and monitors contractor progress and performance to ensure Performance Objectives are achieved within the Performance
Periods, and work is completed in accordance with the contract requirements.
Quality The totality of features and characteristics of a product or service that bear on its ability to meet the stated or implied needs and expectations for the project/contract.
Quality Assurance
(QA)
An integrated system of management activities involving planning, implementation, documentation, procedures, assessment, reporting, and quality improvement to verify and ensure that processes, items, or services meet acceptable standards and requirements.
Quality Assurance
Surveillance Plan
(QASP)
The formal document specifying the surveillance methodology, criteria, frequency, etc. to be used for surveillance of Contractor performance and adherence to contract requirements. The Government assesses contract compliance and quality by conducting surveillances based on the QASP.
Quality Control
(QC)
All necessary measures taken by the Contractor to assure that the quality of an end product or service shall meet contract requirements, including the overall system of technical activities that measures the attributes and performance of a process, item, or service against defined standards to verify that they meet the stated requirements established by the customer; operational techniques and activities that are used to fulfill requirements for quality.
Record of Decision2 The document required by CERCLA containing the final decision and statutory determinations of the lead agency concerning selection of the remedial action at a site(s). This includes any preliminary phase of a remedial action, such as an interim remedial action, which would require an interim ROD.
Reduce Life-Cycle
Cost
See PWS Section 1.2.3
Remedial Action6 Those actions consistent with permanent remedy taken instead of or in addition to removal actions in the event of a release or threatened release of a hazardous substance into the environment, to prevent or minimize the release of hazardous substances so that they do not migrate to cause substantial danger to present or future public health or welfare or the environment. The term includes, but is not limited to, such actions at the location of the release as storage, confinement, perimeter protection using dikes, trenches, or ditches, clay cover, neutralization, cleanup of released hazardous substances and associated contaminated materials, recycling or reuse, diversion, destruction, segregation of reactive wastes, dredging or excavations, repair or replacement of leaking containers, collection of leachate and runoff, onsite treatment or incineration, provision of alternative water supplies, and any monitoring reasonably required to assure that such actions protect the public health and welfare and the environment. The term includes the costs of permanent relocation of residents and businesses and community facilities where the President determines that, alone or in combination with other measures, such relocation is more cost-effective than and environmentally preferable to the transportation, storage, treatment, destruction, or secure disposition offsite of hazardous substances, or may otherwise be necessary to protect the public health or welfare; the term includes offsite transport and offsite storage, treatment, destruction, or secure disposition of hazardous substances and associated contaminated materials.
Remedial Action –
Construction2
The period of time in which a response action is being implemented, but is not yet operating as designed. At the end of this phase of work, a remedy is in place.
Remedial Action
Objectives7
Describe what the proposed site cleanup is expected to accomplish.
Note: these are generally defined in the DD.
Remedial Action -
Operation2
The period of time that a selected remedy must operate before achieving remedial action objectives. At the end of this phase of work, the response is complete.
Remedial Design7 An engineering phase during which additional technical information and data identified are incorporated into technical drawings and specifications developed for the subsequent remedial action. These specifications are based upon the detailed description of the selected remedy and the cleanup criteria provided in the ROD.
Remedy in Place2 Designation that a final remedial action has been constructed, is functional, and is operating as planned in the RD and would be expected to meet the remedial action objectives detailed in the DD. Examples of RIP are a soil vapor extraction system or an in situ chemical treatment system that is installed and operating as designed and for which performance data indicate the system will achieve remedial action objectives, thus demonstrating proper operation of the system. Because remedial action objectives have not been met, the site cannot be considered RC.
Response
Complete2
A milestone signifying that the DoD Component has met the remedial action objectives for a site, documented the determination, and sought regulatory agreement.
RC signifies that DoD has determined at the end of the PA/SI or RI that no additional response action is required; achieved RIP and the required RA-O has achieved the remedial action objectives; or where there is no RA-O phase, then the remedial action-construction has achieved the remedial action objectives. LTM may occur after RC is achieved and precedes Site Closeout.
Site Closeout2 The stage at which the DoD has completed active management and monitoring at an environmental restoration site, and no additional environmental restoration funds will be expended at the site. SC occurs when environmental restoration goals have been achieved that allow unlimited use and unrestricted (UU/UE) exposure of the property
(e.g., no further LTM, including LUCs, is required). Regulatory approval of final documents supporting Site Closeout shall not include restrictive wording indicating the remedy is not fully protective of human health and the environment at the residential exposure level.
Note: achieving Site Closeout may include, but not be limited to, the dismantling, removal, recycling, reclamation and/or disposal of all remedial activity systems and ancillary equipment above and underground to return the site to its natural state, well abandonment, and site restoration in accordance with Installation and regulatory requirements.
Source Strength8 The mass of contaminant present in the source zone and its flux from the source zone to the larger groundwater plume. The source strength is intended to convey information not only about the longevity of the source, but also about the size of the plume that would be created due to the flux from the source. Source-strength evaluations shall quantitatively determine the magnitude of each source relative to observed transport and attenuation rates and shall include all applicable COCs. Data gap evaluations to delineate the extent of source-zone contamination shall be performed consistent with state-of-the-science methodologies (e.g., application of high-resolution aquifer profiling, DNAPL partitioning tracer tests, vapor-phase tomography, downhole geophysics) and guidance.
Source Zone
Delineation8
The location of a primary contaminant source in the subsurface (both horizontally and vertically) to include all applicable phase partitioning (e.g., NAPL, sorbed, dissolved, and vapor) and distribution into low permeability materials.
Subcontractor Business entity entering into a contract with a Prime contractor to complete specific task. The Government does not have “privity of contract” nor a contractual relationship with the subcontractor.
Sheet1
CESAM ERS MATOC 10 Year Ordering Period Labor Rates Schedule
| Draft CESAM ERS MATOC | |
| Labor Categories | Ordering |
| Year 1 & 2 | Ordering |
| Year 3 & 4 | Ordering |
| Year 5 & 6 | Ordering |
| Year 7 & 8 | Ordering |
| Year 9 & 10 | FAR 52.217-8 |
Option to Extend Services (Max of 6 months)
Program Manager
Project Manager
Safety & Health Manager
Site & Safety Health Officer
Industrial Hygenist
Certified Health Physicist (CHP)
Sr. Contract Manager
Quality Control Manager
Sr. Engineer
Mid. Engineer
Jr. Engineer
Sr. Environmental Specialist
Mid. Environmental Specialist
Jr. Environmental Specialist
Sr. Geologist/Hydrogeologist
Mid. Geologist/Hydrogeologist
Jr. Geologist/Hydrogeologist
Sr. Environmental Technician
Mid. Environmental Technician
Jr. Environmental Technician
Sr. Chemist
Mid. Chemist
Jr. Chemist
Sr. Biologist
Mid. Biologist
Jr. Biologist
Sr. Archeologist
Mid. Archeologist
Jr. Archeologist
Risk Assessor
Geophysicist
Historian/Researcher
Regulatory Specialist
Field Technician
Sr. Project Controls/Scheduler
Mid. Project Controls/Scheduler
Jr. Project Controls/Scheduler
Estimator
Construction Foreman
Site Superintendent/Supervisor
Laborer
GIS Specialist
CADD Specialist
Administrative Assistant/Clerical
NOTES:
1. Hourly Labor Rates shall include overhead(s), general and administrative (G&A) expenses, labor burden fringes and any other applicable costs.
2. Profit will be negotiated with each task order- DO NOT include profit in the hourly labor rate.
3. The Hourly Labor Rates listed above shall be the maximum rates that can be proposed in response to Requests for Proposal (RFPs) issued during the Base Period of the contract; the Hourly Labor Rates listed above shall be the maximum rates that can be incorporated into task orders awarded during the Option Period of this contract. Lower rates may be proposed during the RFP process and incorporated into awarded task orders.
4. Modifications to task orders will reflect the applicable Hourly Labor Rate at the time the task order was awarded.
| Rate | Ordering | |
| Year 1 & 2 | Ordering | |
| Year 3 & 4 | Ordering | |
| Year 5 & 6 | Ordering | |
| Year 7 & 8 | Ordering | |
| Year 9 & 10 | FAR 52.217-8 |
Option to Extend Services (Max of 6 months)
Overhead
G&A
NOTES:
1. The rates in the table above will be applied to Other Direct Costs (ODCs) as negotiated per task order. ODCs may include but are not limited to reproduction, travel, subcontracting effort and specialized equipment.
2. Profit on ODCs will be negotiated per task order.
3. Modification to task orders will reflect the applicable Overhead and G&A Rates at the time the task order was awarded.
DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES
CONTINUATION SHEET
Approved by OMB 0348-0046
Reporting Entity: Page of
Authorized for Local Reproduction Standard Form - LLL-A
STANDARD FORM LLL (REV. 71997)
INSTRUCTIONS
Standard Form - LLL-A
Sheet of
PROMPT PAYMENT CERTIFICATION AND SUPPORTING DATA FOR CONTRACTOR PROGRESS PAYMENT INVOICE
Contractor Name and Address Contract No. Est. No. Date Discount Terms
Description and Location of Work
Designated Contractor Offical and Address for Payment
Defective Invoice Notification (Name, Title, Telephone)
Subcontractor Name Total Amount
Subcontracted
Subcontractor Amount Included
This Payment Est
Previous Subcontractor
Payments
Subcontractor Earnings Deducted by Contractor
(Total to Date)
(NAME)
(TITLE)
(DATE)
CESAM Form 1151
AUG 90
Information required by PPA Amend 1988.
SF24 - Bid Bond
SF28 - Affidavit of Individual Surety
SF LLL - Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
CESAM Form 1151 - Prompt Payment Certification and Supporting Data for Contractor Progress Payment Invoice
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .